Cancer Care in the Elderly: Cost and Quality-of-Life Considerations

Evidence-Based Use of Colony-Stimulating Factors in Elderly Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

Neutropenia and its complications represent the major dose-limiting toxicity of cancer chemotherapy, especially in the elderly. Hematopoietic growth factors have been shown to reduce the severity and duration of febrile neutropenia (FN) and to sustain chemotherapy dose intensity.

METHODS

A systematic review was undertaken of studies of the relationship between age and the risk of neutropenia and its complications. Recent studies of the "Awareness of Neutropenia in Chemotherapy Study Group" related to the impact of age on neutropenic complications are also summarized.

RESULTS

The risk of FN associated with standard regimens increases with age and appears to be greatest during the first cycle of chemotherapy. FN continues to have a considerable clinical, economic, and quality-of-life impact on affected individuals. The risk of mortality associated with hospitalization with FN also increases with age but is largely associated with the higher rate of comorbidities observed in the elderly population. Despite increasing evidence that elderly patients experience similar benefit from cancer chemotherapy, reductions in dose intensity often compromise response rates and long-term survival. The hematopoietic growth factors reduce the risk of neutropenic events and the need for reduced dose intensity in elderly cancer patients. Primary prophylaxis with colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) reduces the risk of FN and its complications in elderly patients receiving moderately intensive systemic chemotherapy for responsive malignancies. CSFs also appear to reduce cost and improve quality of life in selected elderly patients receiving chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary prophylaxis with CSFs should be considered in elderly patients with responsive and potentially curable malignancies who receive moderately intensive chemotherapy.

Prevention of neutropenia-related events in elderly patients with hematological cancer

The aging of the population makes it necessary to define more precisely the needs of elderly patients in terms of anticancer therapy as the number of older cancer patients is expected to increase. There is evidence that many elderly cancer patients can benefit from relatively aggressive treatments, provided major side effects can be prevented or treated. In patients with hematological malignancies, infection is the most common and threatening complication resulting from chemotherapy administration. Discussion of the prevention of infection in the setting described above is the aim of this paper.

Chemotherapy in the elderly: supportive measures for chemotherapy-induced myelotoxicity

Not only is the U.S. populace aging, but the incidence of cancer in the elderly also is increasing. Many elderly patients with cancer can obtain the same benefits from standard chemotherapy as younger patients can, but the elderly are more susceptible to the myelotoxicity of chemotherapy, which can limit the dose intensity of their treatments. Nurses can help identify patients at risk before they are treated with chemotherapy and discuss the need for hematopoietic support with other members of the treatment team. They also can provide ongoing patient and family education and teach patients to recognize and report early symptoms of potential problems. Appropriate supportive measures, such as granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor, reduce the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and related infections and make the use of full-dose chemotherapy possible in elderly patients despite their greater risk of myelosuppression.

Filgrastim in patients with neutropenia: potential effects on quality of life

Treatment- and disease-related neutropenia are associated with a number of negative clinical effects such as febrile neutropenia, documented infection, hospitalisation for infection-related morbidity, infection-related mortality, and decreased ability to administer the planned chemotherapy dose on schedule. Reductions or delays in dosage have the ability to jeopardise the effectiveness of treatment by lowering response rates. Not only are clinical outcomes adversely affected, but these complications can have a negative influence on patient quality of life. Filgrastim is a haematopoietic growth factor that primarily acts to stimulate the proliferation and differentiation of neutrophil progenitor cells. Filgrastim is capable of reducing the incidence and severity of neutropenia and the complications that accompany it in patients with cancer or HIV infection. Although there are few data evaluating the effect of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on quality of life, it is assumed that the benefits would be seen through both the reduction of treatment-related complications and the enhanced potential for long-term disease control. A new, longer-acting form of filgrastim is now available that has the potential to simplify the management of neutropenia and further improve patient quality of life by decreasing the number of necessary injections. Additional prospective controlled trials that contain quality-of-life issues as endpoints are needed.

The role of myelopoietic growth factors in managing cancer in the elderly

More than 50% of all malignancies are diagnosed in patients aged > 65 years and most cancer-related deaths occur in this population. Misconceptions about prognosis and treatment contribute to the undertreatment of elderly cancer patients and consequent poor outcomes. Although older patients have been excluded from cancer treatment trials in the past, response rates to chemotherapy in a variety of common cancers in otherwise healthy elderly patients are comparable to those attained in younger patients. Lower functional reserve in many organ systems alters the pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic drugs as well as the patient's response to treatment-induced toxicity. Except for myelosuppression and mucositis, otherwise fit elderly cancer patients are not at significantly enhanced risk of toxicity to chemotherapy. Severe neutropenia and related infection are encountered much more frequently during the treatment of elderly as compared with younger cancer patients. These lead to treatment delays, dose reductions and higher hospitalisation rates. Myelopoietic growth factor support reduces myelosuppression and the associated risk of severe infection, thereby allowing delivery of chemotherapy at full dose intensity. Beneficial responses to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in elderly patients have been found in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (CHOP) therapy and acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) during induction and consolidation chemotherapy. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF; sargramostim) has been found to reduce myelosuppression in elderly AML patients receiving induction but not consolidation chemotherapy. These prophylactic treatments produce significant cost benefits because of the reduced hospitalisation and antibiotic use associated with neutropenia. To maximise positive outcomes, elderly patients should be included in clinical trials of new cancer agents. Since myelosuppression is the main risk factor for elderly patients undergoing chemotherapy, optimisation of growth factor support and the development of more effective and safer myelopoietic agents may improve success rates and reduce adverse events. Such information will lead to better management of cancer in older patients.

Updates in surgical oncology for elderly patients

Elderly patients affected by solid tumours are frequently encountered on the surgical ward. Prejudice regarding operative risks and long term outcomes may alter their surgical management. Large series of elderly cancer subjects have been analysed and conclusive data are now available, to better tailor their management. Specific epidemiological data are presented in this review, screening programs critically considered, treatment procedures discussed, and the effectiveness of follow-up protocols is analysed together with cost effectiveness issues. Quality of life issues should not be neglected, and a continuous educational endeavour targeted at specialists and general practitioners is desirable.

Cost-benefit analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the management of elderly cancer patients

Health care costs continue to rise, and hospitalization represents the single largest component of direct medical costs associated with cancer care. Neutropenia and its complications including febrile neutropenia (FN) remain the major dose-limiting toxicity of systemic cancer chemotherapy. The risk of FN varies considerably across treatment regimens but appears to be significantly higher among elderly patients. The colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) have been used effectively in a variety of clinical settings to prevent or treat FN and to assist patients receiving dose-intensive chemotherapy with or without stem cell support. Several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the clinical efficacy of the prophylactic use of CSFs. A recently presented meta-analysis of the available RCTs has confirmed the efficacy of prophylactic CSFs. The cost of these agents, along with their large-scale clinical use, has prompted a number of economic investigations. Economic models based on measures of resource utilization derived from RCTs have provided FN risk threshold estimates for the cost-saving use of prophylactic CSF. A number of important studies concerning the clinical and economic impact of these agents in elderly cancer patients have been reported during the past year. Continuing clinical and economic evaluation along with an updating of clinical practice guidelines especially related to elderly patients is recommended because of rapid technologic and clinical advances.

Geriatric oncology: challenges for the new century

The management of cancer in the older aged person represents one of the major immediate challenges of medicine. The response to this challenge involves answers to the following questions: I. Who is old? Currently. 70 years of age may he considered the lower limit of senescence because the majority of age-related changes occur after this age. Individual estimates of life expectancy and functional reserve may be obtained by a comprehensive and time-consuming multidimensional geriatric assessment. The current instrument may be fine-tuned and new instruments, including laboratory tests of ageing. may be developed. 2. Why do older persons develop more cancer? It is clear that ageing tissues are more susceptible to late-stage carcinogen. Older persons may represent a natural monitor system for new environmental carcinogens, and may also represent a fruitful ground to study the late stages of carcinogenesis. 3. Is cancer different in younger and older persons? Clearly. the behaviour of some tumors. including acute myeloid leukaemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and breast cancer change with the age of the patient. The mechanisms of these changes that may involve both the tumour cell and the tumour host are poorly understood. 4. Can cancer he prevented in older individuals? Chemoprevention offers a new horizon of possibilities for cancer prevention: older persons may benefit most from chemoprevention due to increased susceptibility to environmental carcinogens. Screening tests may become more accurate in older individuals due to increased prevalence of cancer. hut may he less beneficial due to more limited patient life expectancy. 5. Do older persons benefit from cytotoxic treatment? The answer to this question partly stands on proper patient selection. partly on the development of safer forms of cancer treatment and prudent use of antidotes to chemotherapy toxicity. 6. What is the cost of treating older cancer patients? The treatment of older patients is generally more costly. This cost should be assessed against the cost of not treating cancer and promoting functional dependence. which by itself is extremely costly. 7. What are the endpoints of clinical trials in older cancer patients? With more limited life expectancy. the effect of treatment on quality of life is paramount. Reliable assessment of quality of life is essential for interpreting clinical trials in older individuals. 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.