Ishihara M, Onoguchi M, Shibutani T. Accuracy of washout rate analysis for thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging using cadmium zinc telluride detectors: A phantom study.
JRSM Cardiovasc Dis 2020;
9:2048004019900600. [PMID:
31976070 PMCID:
PMC6958653 DOI:
10.1177/2048004019900600]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective
The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of washout rate (WOR) analysis for thallium-201 chloride (201Tl) single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging data acquired using cadmium zinc telluride detectors and a myocardial phantom.
Methods
A myocardial phantom was injected with 10.5 MBq 201Tl, and 10-min acquisitions were performed at 0, 24, 46, and 62 h to accommodate natural radioactive decay over time. Global myocardial WOR (global-WOR) and regional WOR (regional-WOR, left anterior descending artery [LAD], right coronary artery [RCA], and left circumflex artery [LCX]) were analyzed between 0 and 24 h (infarction model), 0 and 46 h (ischemia model), and 0 and 62 h (normal model), respectively. We compared the calculated radioactive decay-rate as a reference standard and phantom imaging WOR (phantom-WOR).
Results
Decay-rate versus phantom-WOR were 20.4% vs. 20.8% (global-WOR), 21.3% (LAD), 21.2% (RCA), and 19.7% (LCX) for the infarction model; 35.4% vs. 35.6% (global-WOR), 35.5% (LAD), 36.2% (RCA), and 35.2% (LCX) for the ischemia model; and 44.5% vs. 45.1% (global-WOR), 45.4% (LAD), 44.7% (RCA), and 43.5% (LCX) for the normal model.
Conclusion
WOR analysis for 201Tl single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging using cadmium zinc telluride detectors is a reliable analysis method.
Collapse