Resting-state Functional Connectivity After Occipital Stroke

Graph Analysis of TMS-EEG Connectivity Reveals Hemispheric Differences following Occipital Stimulation

(1) Background: Transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) provides a unique opportunity to investigate brain connectivity. However, possible hemispheric asymmetries in signal propagation dynamics following occipital TMS have not been investigated. (2) Methods: Eighteen healthy participants underwent occipital single-pulse TMS at two different EEG sites, corresponding to early visual areas. We used a state-of-the-art Bayesian estimation approach to accurately estimate TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs) from EEG data, which has not been previously used in this context. To capture the rapid dynamics of information flow patterns, we implemented a self-tuning optimized Kalman (STOK) filter in conjunction with the information partial directed coherence (iPDC) measure, enabling us to derive time-varying connectivity matrices. Subsequently, graph analysis was conducted to assess key network properties, providing insight into the overall network organization of the brain network. (3) Results: Our findings revealed distinct lateralized effects on effective brain connectivity and graph networks after TMS stimulation, with left stimulation facilitating enhanced communication between contralateral frontal regions and right stimulation promoting increased intra-hemispheric ipsilateral connectivity, as evidenced by statistical test (p < 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The identified hemispheric differences in terms of connectivity provide novel insights into brain networks involved in visual information processing, revealing the hemispheric specificity of neural responses to occipital stimulation.

Visual stimulation rehabilitation for cortical blindness after vertebral artery interventional surgery: A case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Cortical blindness (CB) after vertebral artery interventional surgery is not a frequently reported complication. In this study, the efficacy of visual stimulation rehabilitation consisting of visual recovery training and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for cortical blindness was investigated by clinical evaluation, ophthalmologic examination, and electroencephalography (EEG).

CASE PRESENTATION

This study reports on a 55-year-old male who showed partial bilateral posterior cerebral artery cortical branch occlusion after timely embolectomy due to thrombus dislodgement during right vertebral artery opening, stenting resulting in basilar artery tip occlusion. The lesions were mainly located in the right cerebellar hemisphere and bilateral occipital lobes, and the patient suffered from bilateral loss of vision, with only light perception preserved. The patient began to receive visual recovery training and 15 sessions of right occipital high-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation 5 days after the onset.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

After treatment, the patient's capacity to identify things improved, allowing him to watch television, as did the precision and fluency of random hand movements, walking, and self-care.

CONCLUSION

Visual stimulation rehabilitation composed of visual recovery training and rTMS is a promising therapy option for cortical blindness, and our case report provides clinical experience with vision recovery for patients with cortical blindness.

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Chronic Stroke: Is Neuroimaging the Answer to the Next Leap Forward?

During rehabilitation, a large proportion of stroke patients either plateau or begin to lose motor skills. By priming the motor system, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising clinical adjunct that could augment the gains acquired during therapy sessions. However, the extent to which patients show improvements following tDCS is highly variable. This variability may be due to heterogeneity in regions of cortical infarct, descending motor tract injury, and/or connectivity changes, all factors that require neuroimaging for precise quantification and that affect the actual amount and location of current delivery. If the relationship between these factors and tDCS efficacy were clarified, recovery from stroke using tDCS might be become more predictable. This review provides a comprehensive summary and timeline of the development of tDCS for stroke from the viewpoint of neuroimaging. Both animal and human studies that have explored detailed aspects of anatomy, connectivity, and brain activation dynamics relevant to tDCS are discussed. Selected computational works are also included to demonstrate how sophisticated strategies for reducing variable effects of tDCS, including electric field modeling, are moving the field ever closer towards the goal of personalizing tDCS for each individual. Finally, larger and more comprehensive randomized controlled trials involving tDCS for chronic stroke recovery are underway that likely will shed light on how specific tDCS parameters, such as dose, affect stroke outcomes. The success of these collective efforts will determine whether tDCS for chronic stroke gains regulatory approval and becomes clinical practice in the future.

Resting-state functional connectivity for determining outcomes in upper extremity function after stroke: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy study

OBJECTIVE

Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is a non-invasive and promising tool to map the brain functional networks in stroke recovery. Our study mainly aimed to use fNIRS to detect the different patterns of resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC) in subacute stroke patients with different degrees of upper extremity motor impairment defined by Fugl-Meyer motor assessment of upper extremity (FMA-UE). The second aim was to investigate the association between FMA-UE scores and fNIRS-RSFC among different regions of interest (ROIs) in stroke patients.

METHODS

Forty-nine subacute (2 weeks-6 months) stroke patients with subcortical lesions were enrolled and were classified into three groups based on FMA-UE scores: mild impairment (n = 17), moderate impairment (n = 13), and severe impairment (n = 19). All patients received FMA-UE assessment and 10-min resting-state fNIRS monitoring. The fNIRS signals were recorded over seven ROIs: bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), middle prefrontal cortex (MPFC), bilateral primary motor cortex (M1), and bilateral primary somatosensory cortex (S1). Functional connectivity (FC) was calculated by correlation coefficients between each channel and each ROI pair. To reveal the comprehensive differences in FC among three groups, we compared FC on the group level and ROI level. In addition, to determine the associations between FMA-UE scores and RSFC among different ROIs, Spearman's correlation analyses were performed with a significance threshold of p < 0.05. For easy comparison, we defined the left hemisphere as the ipsilesional hemisphere and flipped the lesional right hemisphere in MATLAB R2013b.

RESULTS

For the group-level comparison, the one-way ANOVA and post-hoc t-tests (mild vs. moderate; mild vs. severe; moderate vs. severe) showed that there was a significant difference among three groups (F = 3.42, p = 0.04) and the group-averaged FC in the mild group (0.64 ± 0.14) was significantly higher than that in the severe group (0.53 ± 0.14, p = 0.013). However, there were no significant differences between the mild and moderate group (MD ± SE = 0.05 ± 0.05, p = 0.35) and between the moderate and severe group (MD ± SE = 0.07 ± 0.05, p = 0.16). For the ROI-level comparison, the severe group had significantly lower FC of ipsilesional DLPFC-ipsilesional M1 [p = 0.015, false discovery rate (FDR)-corrected] and ipsilesional DLPFC-contralesional M1 (p = 0.035, FDR-corrected) than those in the mild group. Moreover, the result of Spearman's correlation analyses showed that there were significant correlations between FMA-UE scores and FC of the ipsilesional DLPFC-ipsilesional M1 (r = 0.430, p = 0.002), ipsilesional DLPFC-contralesional M1 (r = 0.388, p = 0.006), ipsilesional DLPFC-MPFC (r = 0.365, p = 0.01), and ipsilesional DLPFC-contralesional DLPFC (r = 0.330, p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that different degrees of post-stroke upper extremity impairment reflect different RSFC patterns, mainly in the connection between DLPFC and bilateral M1. The association between FMA-UE scores and the FC of ipsilesional DLPFC-associated ROIs suggests that the ipsilesional DLPFC may play an important role in motor-related plasticity. These findings can help us better understand the neurophysiological mechanisms of upper extremity motor impairment and recovery in subacute stroke patients from different perspectives. Furthermore, it sheds light on the ipsilesional DLPFC-bilateral M1 as a possible neuromodulation target.