Optimal duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy: how to apply the newest data

A Nomogram for Predicting Liver Metastasis of Lymph-Node Positive Luminal B HER2 Negative Subtype Breast Cancer by Analyzing the Clinicopathological Characteristics of Patients with Breast Cancer

Background: Luminal B-like human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (Luminal B [HER2-]) is the most common molecular subtype of breast cancer (BC). Since the relationship between Luminal B (HER2-) BC and liver metastasis (LM) is poorly defined, this retrospective study aimed to develop an LM risk nomogram for patients with lymph node-related (N + Luminal B [HER2-]) BC. Methods: Data were obtained for patients initially diagnosed with BC from the Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. There were 30,975 Chinese female patients with stage I-III BC and follow-up confirming 1217 subsequent patients with LM, and 427 patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-). The LM risk was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, histogram, Venn diagram, and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, with further analysis for patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-) BC. A nomogram was established based on the N + Luminal B (HER2-) BC data, which was validated using calibration plots. Results: The median age of 427 patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-) liver metastasis of breast cancer (BCLM) was 49 years. The largest number of patients with BCLM was diagnosed between the second to the 6th year, the longest interval from initial BC diagnosis to subsequent LM was 145 months. The patients with LM as the first site of distant metastasis which is associated with better survival were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier. The nomogram was constructed for the risk of LM that included age, menstrual status, unilateral oophorectomy, pregnancy, hepatitis B antigen, region of residence, tumor size, lymph node, clavicular lymph nodes, progesterone receptor, and lymph vessel invasion. Conclusion: We described the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with stage I-III BC, and constructed a nomogram for calculating personalized LM probabilities for patients with N + Luminal B (HER2-), which could guide future prolonged or early extensive treatment decisions.

Duration of Adjuvant Aromatase-Inhibitor Therapy in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

For postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer, the most effective duration for adjuvant therapy with an aromatase inhibitor remains unclear.

METHODS

In this prospective, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer who had received 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy to receive the aromatase inhibitor anastrozole for an additional 2 years (2-year group, receiving a total of 7 years) or an additional 5 years (5-year group, receiving a total of 10 years). The primary end point was disease-free survival. The primary analysis included all the patients who were still participating in the trial and who had no recurrence 2 years after randomization (i.e., when treatment in the 2-year group had ended). Secondary end points were overall survival, contralateral breast cancer, second primary cancer, and clinical bone fracture.

RESULTS

Among the 3484 women who were enrolled in the trial, 3208 remained in the trial without disease progression after the first 2 years of extended anastrozole treatment following randomization. Among these women, disease progression or death occurred in 335 women in each treatment group in the primary-analysis set at 8 years (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85 to 1.15; P = 0.90). No between-group differences occurred in most secondary end points, and subgroup analyses did not indicate differences in any particular subgroup. The risk of clinical bone fracture was higher in the 5-year group than in the 2-year group (hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.84).

CONCLUSIONS

In postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer who had received 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, extending hormone therapy by 5 years provided no benefit over a 2-year extension but was associated with a greater risk of bone fracture. (Funded by AstraZeneca and the Austrian Breast and Colorectal Cancer Study Group; ABCSG-16/SALSA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00295620.).

Toronto Workshop on Late Recurrence in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Part 1: Late Recurrence: Current Understanding, Clinical Considerations

Disease recurrence (locoregional, distant) exerts a significant clinical impact on the survival of estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients. Many of these recurrences occur late, more than 5 years after original diagnosis, and represent a major obstacle to the effective treatment of this disease. Indeed, methods to identify patients at risk of late recurrence and therapeutic strategies designed to avert or treat these recurrences are lacking. Therefore, an international workshop was convened in Toronto, Canada, in February 2018 to review the current understanding of late recurrence and to identify critical issues that require future study. In this article, the major issues surrounding late recurrence are defined and current approaches that may be applicable to this challenge are discussed. Specifically, diagnostic tests with potential utility in late-recurrence prediction are described as well as a variety of patient-related factors that may influence recurrence risk. Clinical and therapeutic approaches are also reviewed, with a focus on patient surveillance and the implementation of extended endocrine therapy in the context of late-recurrence prevention. Understanding and treating late recurrence in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer is a major unmet clinical need. A concerted effort of basic and clinical research is required to confront late recurrence and improve disease management and patient survival.

Reirradiation of recurrent breast cancer with proton beam therapy: A case report and literature review

BACKGROUND

Locoregional recurrence of breast cancer is challenging for clinicians, due to the various former treatments patients have undergone. However, treatment of the recurrence with systemic therapy and subsequent reirradiation of chest wall is accompanied by increased toxicities, particularly radiation-induced cardiovascular disease. Reirradiation by proton beam therapy (PBT) enables superior preservation of adjacent organs at risk as well as concurrent dose escalation for delivery to the gross tumor. This technology is expected to improve the overall outcome of recurrent breast cancer.

CASE SUMMARY

A 47-year-old female presented with an extensive locoregional recurrence at 10 yr after primary treatment of a luminal A breast cancer. Because of tumor progression despite having undergone bilateral ovarectomy and systemic therapy, the patient was treated with PBT BE total dose of 64.40 Gy to each gross tumor and 56.00 Gy to the upper mediastinal and retrosternal lymphatics including the entire sternum in 28 fractions. Follow-up computed tomography showed a partial remission, without evidence of newly emerging metastasis. At 19 mo after the PBT, the patient developed a radiation-induced pericardial disease and pleural effusions with clinical burden of dyspnea, which were successfully treated by drainage and corticosteroid. Cytological analysis of the puncture fluid showed no malignancy, and the subsequent computed tomography scan indicated stable disease as well as significantly decreased pericardial and pleural effusions. The patient remains free of progression to date.

CONCLUSION

PBT was a safe and effective method of reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent breast cancer in our patient.

Optimizing adjuvant endocrine therapy for early ER+ breast cancer: An update for surgeons

INTRODUCTION

The optimal duration of adjuvant endocrine therapy in early ER + breast cancer has been controversial. This article aims to provide an overview of the evidence.

METHODS

A search of the literature was conducted via MEDLINE using appropriate keywords. Eligible studies were screened and relevant articles were selected for this report.

RESULTS

Studies investigating the role of extended adjuvant tamoxifen beyond 5 years have revealed mixed results depending on the proportion of node positivity. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) for 5 years are superior to tamoxifen. Extending the use of AIs beyond 5 years seem to reduce the risk of relapse in postmenopausal women with node positive disease. The addition of bisphosphonates to counteract AI-related osteopenia may further improve overall and disease-free survival. Women younger than 40 years seem to benefit from ovarian suppression combined with tamoxifen or exemestane.

CONCLUSIONS

An individualised approach is required for every patient. The adverse effects of endocrine therapy should be weighed against the potential benefits of extended therapy to better inform decision-making.