1
|
Xia TC, Rainone GJ, Woodhouse CJ, Kramer DE, Whiting AC. Post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery patients with thoracolumbar drains: A meta analysis. World Neurosurg X 2024; 23:100373. [PMID: 38645512 PMCID: PMC11031792 DOI: 10.1016/j.wnsx.2024.100373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective Closed-suction drains are commonly placed after thoracolumbar surgery to reduce the risk of post-operative hematoma and neurologic deterioration, and may stay in place for a longer period of time if output remains high. Prolonged maintenance of surgical site drains, however, is associated with an increased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). The present study aims to examine the literature regarding extended duration (≥24 h) prophylactic antibiotic use in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar surgery with closed-suction drainage. Methods This systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Relevant studies reporting the use of 24-h post-operative antibiotics compared with extended duration post-operative antibiotics in patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar surgery with closed-suction drainage were identified from a PubMed database query. Results Six studies were included for statistical analysis, encompassing 1003 patients that received 24 h of post-operative antibiotics and 984 patients that received ≥24 h of post-operative antibiotics. The SSI rate was 5.16 % for the shorter duration group (24 h) and 4.44 % (p = 0.7865) for the longer duration group (≥24 h). Conclusions There is no significant difference in rates of SSI in patients receiving 24 h of post-operative antibiotics compared with patients receiving ≥24 h of post-operative antibiotics. Shorter durations of post-operative antibiotics in patients with thoracolumbar drains have similar outcomes compared to patients receiving longer courses of antibiotics. Shorter durations of antibiotics could potentially help lead to lower overall cost and length of stay for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry C. Xia
- Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Cody J. Woodhouse
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Dallas E. Kramer
- Department of Neurosurgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stoehr JR, Le NK, Urban D, Koussayer B, Kuykendall L, Hayman E, Troy JS. Reducing drain use with paraspinal muscle flaps for spinal closures: A retrospective cohort study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2023; 87:83-90. [PMID: 37826967 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2023.09.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Paraspinal muscle (PSM) flaps can be mobilized with superficial undermining and lateral release from the thoracolumbar fascia and/or deep undermining and medial release from the transverse processes and ribs. The objective of the study was to compare the effect of the PSM flap technique on drain use, retention, and complication rates. METHODS A retrospective chart review was performed for patients who underwent spinal coverage with PSM flaps at a single institution from April 2020 to June 2021. Patient demographics, preoperative comorbidities, surgical technique, drain usage, and postoperative complications were analyzed to compare the effects of different PSM flap surgical techniques on postoperative drain use and complications. RESULTS Sixty patients were included. Both superficial and deep releases were performed in half (47%) of the cases, while the remainder was split between superficial (25%) and deep (28%) releases. Drains were used less frequently for the deep release (35%) than the superficial (93%) or both releases (96%, p < 0.01). The deep release had shorter mean drain retention time (5.8 days) than the superficial (30.3 days) or both releases (24.8 days, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the techniques in terms of complications. For the deep release, the use of drains was not associated with a reduction in complications (odds ratio 0.91 [0.84 - 0.98], p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS In a selected patient population, a "deep release only" PSM flap technique may allow for drainless spinal closure without an increased risk of seroma or other complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenna R Stoehr
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Nicole K Le
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - DaKota Urban
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Bilal Koussayer
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Lauren Kuykendall
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Erik Hayman
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Jared S Troy
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dastagirzada Y, Benjamin C, Bevilacqua J, Gurewitz J, Sen C, Golfinos JG, Placantonakis D, Jafar JJ, Lieberman S, Lebowitz R, Lewis A, Pacione D. Discontinuation of Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Endoscopic Endonasal Skull Base Surgery. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84:157-163. [PMID: 36895810 PMCID: PMC9991524 DOI: 10.1055/a-1771-0372] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative prophylactic antibiotic usage for endoscopic skull base surgery varies based on the institution as evidence-based guidelines are lacking. The purpose of this study is to determine whether discontinuing postoperative prophylactic antibiotics in endoscopic endonasal cases led to a difference in central nervous system (CNS) infections, multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) infections, or other postoperative infections. Methods This quality improvement study compared outcomes between a retrospective cohort (from September 2013 to March 2019) and a prospective cohort (April 2019 to June 2019) after adopting a protocol to discontinue prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEAs). Our primary end points of the study included the presence of postoperative CNS infection, Clostridium difficile ( C. diff ), and MDRO infections. Results A total of 388 patients were analyzed, 313 in the pre-protocol group and 75 in the post-protocol group. There were similar rates of intraoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak (56.9 vs. 61.3%, p = 0.946). There was a statistically significant decrease in the proportion of patients receiving IV antibiotics during their postoperative course ( p = 0.001) and those discharged on antibiotics ( p = 0.001). There was no significant increase in the rate of CNS infections in the post-protocol group despite the discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics (3.5 vs. 2.7%, p = 0.714). There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative C. diff (0 vs. 0%, p = 0.488) or development of MDRO infections (0.3 vs 0%, p = 0.624). Conclusion Discontinuation of postoperative antibiotics after EEA at our institution did not change the frequency of CNS infections. It appears that discontinuation of antibiotics after EEA is safe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosef Dastagirzada
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Carolina Benjamin
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, United States
| | - Julia Bevilacqua
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Jason Gurewitz
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Chandra Sen
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - John G Golfinos
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | | | - Jafar J Jafar
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Seth Lieberman
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Rich Lebowitz
- Department of Otolaryngology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Ariane Lewis
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States.,Department of Neurology, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| | - Donato Pacione
- Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, New York, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sastry RA, Wang EJ, Mermel LA. Antibiotic prophylaxis practices in neurosurgery: A Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) survey. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022; 43:662-4. [PMID: 34915964 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
|
5
|
Rohrer F, Maurer A, Noetzli H, Gahl B, Limacher A, Hermann T, Bruegger J. Prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis use in elective orthopaedic surgery - a cross-sectional analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021; 22:420. [PMID: 33957917 PMCID: PMC8101240 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-021-04290-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) prevents surgical site infections (SSI). In orthopaedic surgery, the use of prolonged SAP (PSAP) has been reported in daily routine, despite guidelines advising against it. Therefore, we asked: What is the proportion of PSAP use, defined as administration of SAP ≥24 h after elective orthopaedic surgery? Are there patient- and surgery-related predictors of PSAP use? Methods This cross-sectional analysis investigated 1292 patients who underwent elective orthopaedic surgery including total joint arthroplasties at one Swiss centre between 2015 and 2017. Patient comorbidities, surgical characteristics and occurrence of SSI at 90 days in PSAP group were compared to the SAP group (< 24 h post-operative). Results PSAP use was 12% (155 of 1292). Patient-related factors associated with PSAP compared to the SAP group included older age (63 vs. 58y; p < 0.001), higher BMI (29 vs. 27 kg/m2; p < 0.001), ASA classification ≥3 (31% vs. 17%; p < 0.001) and lung disease (17% vs. 9%; p = 0.002). Surgery-related factors associated with PSAP were use of prosthetics (62% vs. 45%; p < 0.001), surgery of the knee (65% vs. 25%; p < 0.001), longer surgery duration (87 vs. 68 min; p < 0.001) and presence of drains (90% vs. 65%; p < 0.001). All four SSI occurred in the SAP group (0 vs. 4; p = 1.0). Surgeons administered PSAP with varying frequencies; proportions ranged from 0 to 33%. Conclusion PSAP use and SSI proportions were lower than reported in the literature. Several patient- and surgery-related factors associated with PSAP use were identified and some were potentially modifiable. Also, experienced surgeons seemed to implement differing approaches regarding the duration of SAP administration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Rohrer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland. .,Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV, 1011, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Anita Maurer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Hubert Noetzli
- University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland.,Orthopaedie Sonnenhof, 3006, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Brigitta Gahl
- Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) Bern, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Andreas Limacher
- Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) Bern, University of Bern, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Tanja Hermann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.,Stiftung Lindenhof, Campus SLB, Swiss Institute for Translational and Entrepreneurial Medicine, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jan Bruegger
- Department of Internal Medicine, Sonnenhofspital, 3006, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Urquhart JC, Collings D, Nutt L, Kuska L, Gurr KR, Siddiqi F, Rasoulinejad P, Fleming A, Collie J, Bailey CS. The Effect of Prolonged Postoperative Antibiotic Administration on the Rate of Infection in Patients Undergoing Posterior Spinal Surgery Requiring a Closed-Suction Drain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2019; 101:1732-1740. [PMID: 31577678 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Closed-suction drains are frequently used following posterior spinal surgery. The optimal timing of antibiotic discontinuation in this population may influence infection risk, but there is a paucity of evidence. The aim of this study was to determine whether postoperative antibiotic administration for 72 hours (24 hours after drain removal as drains were removed on the second postoperative day) decreases the incidence of surgical site infection compared with postoperative antibiotic administration for 24 hours. METHODS Patients undergoing posterior thoracolumbar spinal surgery managed with a closed-suction drain were prospectively randomized into 1 of 2 groups of postoperative antibiotic durations: (1) 24 hours, or (2) 24 hours after drain removal (72 hours). Drains were discontinued on the second postoperative day. The duration of antibiotic administration was not blinded. All subjects received a single dose of preoperative antibiotics, as well as intraoperative antibiotics if the surgical procedure lasted >4 hours. The primary outcome was the rate of complicated surgical site infection (deep or organ or space) within 1 year of the surgical procedure. RESULTS The trial was terminated at an interim analysis, when 552 patients were enrolled, for futility with respect to the primary outcome. In this study, 282 patients were randomized to postoperative antibiotics for 24 hours and 270 patients were randomized to postoperative antibiotics for 72 hours. A complicated infection developed in 17 patients (6.0%) in the 24-hour group and in 14 patients (5.2%) in the 72-hour group (p = 0.714). The superficial infection rate did not differ between the groups (p = 0.654): 9.6% in the 24-hour group compared with 8.1% in the 72-hour group. Patients in the 72-hour group had a median hospital stay that was 1 day longer (p < 0.001). At 1 year, patient-rated outcomes including leg and back pain and physical and mental functioning were not different between the groups. CONCLUSIONS The extension of postoperative antibiotics for 72 hours, when a closed-suction drain is required, was not associated with a reduction in the rate of complicated surgical site infection after posterior thoracolumbar spinal surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of Levels of Evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Urquhart
- Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Darryl Collings
- Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lori Nutt
- Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Linda Kuska
- Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin R Gurr
- Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fawaz Siddiqi
- Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Parham Rasoulinejad
- Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alyssa Fleming
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joanne Collie
- Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christopher S Bailey
- Combined Orthopaedic and Neurosurgical Spine Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.,Lawson Health Research Institute, London, Ontario, Canada.,Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|