Oral Bacterial Acid-Base Metabolism in Caries Screening: A Proof-Of-Concept Study

Efficacy of an adenosine triphosphate meter for evaluating caries risk in clinical dental practice

BACKGROUND

Adenosine triphosphate bioluminescence (ATP-B) readings have been proposed as markers of caries risk. ATP readings may indicate bacteria or oral streptococci activity in microbial plaque. The authors of this study aimed to evaluate whether readings using a commercial ATP meter (CariScreen Testing Meter, Oral BioTech) are significantly different for patients with low, moderate, and high caries risk in the Caries Management by Risk Assessment Practice-Based Research Network study.

METHODS

Twenty practice-based research network dentists enrolled 460 patients; 271 returned for 2 or more semiannual follow-up visits over 2 years. Dentists were trained and calibrated to perform ATP-B testing and caries risk assessment (CRA) using established protocols. ATP-B readings were compared via CRA category (low, moderate, high). Generalized estimating equations were used to compare the risk of experiencing incident clinical outcomes (newly recorded decayed, missing, or restored tooth surfaces and CRA disease indicators) according to ATP-B reading at prior patient visits (≥ 1,500 versus < 1,500 relative light units).

RESULTS

Median ATP-B readings did not differ statistically significantly by clinician-assessed caries risk level (low, 2,323; moderate, 2,940; high, 3,217; P = .65). Adjusted for patient demographics and trial intervention assignment, higher readings were not associated with newly developed decayed, missing, or restored tooth surface (relative risk, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 0.55 to 4.45) or disease indicators (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.85 to 1.37) at the following visit, whereas clinician-assessed caries risk level was strongly associated.

CONCLUSIONS

ATP-B readings poorly predicted caries risk and future clinical outcomes. CRA incorporating multiple risk, protective, and disease indicators has superior predictive performance.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The findings of this study do not provide evidence supporting the use of ATP-B to predict caries risk.

Critical Appraisal of Oral Pre- and Probiotics for Caries Prevention and Care

In recent years, the concept of preventing caries-related microbial dysbiosis by enhancing the growth and survival of health-associated oral microbiota has emerged. In this article, the current evidence for the role of oral pre- and probiotics in caries prevention and caries management is discussed. Prebiotics are defined as "substrates that are selectively utilized by host microorganisms conferring a health benefit." With regard to caries, this would include alkali-generating substances such as urea and arginine, which are metabolized by some oral bacteria, resulting in ammonia production and increase in pH. While there is no evidence that urea added to chewing gums or mouth rinses significantly contributes to caries inhibition, multiple studies have shown that arginine in consumer products can exert an inhibitory effect on the caries process. Probiotics are "live microorganisms which when administrated in adequate amounts confer a health benefit on the host." Clinical trials have suggested that school-based programs with milk supplemented with probiotics and probiotic lozenges can reduce caries development in preschool children and in schoolchildren with high caries risk. Due to issues with research ethics (prebiotics) and risk of bias (prebiotics, probiotics), the confidence in the effect estimate is however limited. Further long-term clinical studies are needed with orally derived probiotic candidates, including the health-economic perspectives. In particular, the development and evaluation of oral synbiotic products, containing both prebiotics and a probiotic, would be of interest in the future management of dental caries.

Caries reporting in studies that used the International Caries Detection and Assessment System: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

To explore how caries was reported in studies that employed the International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS).

METHODS

A systematic database search up to August 2017 was carried out using PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane library and ISI Web of Science electronic databases. Only studies that used the ICDAS for dental caries examinations were included. Studies were excluded if the examination was done only for the validation or the calibration of the ICDAS and/or if the examination was not done for the whole dentition. Measures used to report caries were considered.

RESULTS

A total of 126 papers met the inclusion criteria. Forty-four different synthesis measures were used to report caries. Most of the studies used a combination of multiple measures to report patient's caries level. These reporting measures cluster into four main groups: the number of individual ICDAS scores (ie, total counts of every score); the number of decayed surfaces/teeth (ie, total counts of combined caries scores for surfaces or teeth); measures of caries experience (ie, total counts of combined caries scores, filled and/or missing surfaces or teeth); and measures of central tendency and dispersion. The number of decayed surfaces and individual ICDAS scores were the most commonly used measures. Three studies used mean ICDAS score (ie, total ICDAS scores divided by the number of teeth), two used mean ICDAS score of carious teeth (ie, total ICDAS scores divided by the number of carious teeth) and two used the maximum ICDAS score (ie, highest ICDAS score recorded). The total ICDAS score was used only once. Many studies synthesized from the ICDAS the number of decayed, missing and filled teeth/surfaces (dmft/DMFT, dmfs/DMFS) as a measure of caries experience.

CONCLUSIONS

There are variations among studies in the utilization of the system to summarize caries. Most studies presented caries data using the categorical characteristics of the ICDAS.