Physiological effects of roflumilast at rest and during exercise in COPD

Fixed-intensity exercise tests to measure exertional dyspnoea in chronic heart and lung populations: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Exertional dyspnoea is the primary diagnostic symptom for chronic cardiopulmonary disease populations. Whilst a number of exercise tests are used, there remains no gold standard clinical measure of exertional dyspnoea. The aim of this review was to comprehensively describe and evaluate all types of fixed-intensity exercise tests used to assess exertional dyspnoea in chronic cardiopulmonary populations and, where possible, report the reliability and responsiveness of the tests.

METHODS

A systematic search of five electronic databases identified papers that examined 1) fixed-intensity exercise tests and measured exertional dyspnoea, 2) chronic cardiopulmonary populations, 3) exertional dyspnoea reported at isotime or upon completion of fixed-duration exercise tests, and 4) published in English.

RESULTS

Searches identified 8785 papers. 123 papers were included, covering exercise tests using a variety of fixed-intensity protocols. Three modes were identified, as follows: 1) cycling (n=87), 2) walking (n=31) and 3) other (step test (n=8) and arm exercise (n=2)). Most studies (98%) were performed on chronic respiratory disease patients. Nearly all studies (88%) used an incremental exercise test. 34% of studies used a fixed duration for the exercise test, with the remaining 66% using an exhaustion protocol recording exertional dyspnoea at isotime. Exertional dyspnoea was measured using the Borg scale (89%). 7% of studies reported reliability. Most studies (72%) examined the change in exertional dyspnoea in response to different interventions.

CONCLUSION

Considerable methodological variety of fixed-intensity exercise tests exists to assess exertional dyspnoea and most test protocols require incremental exercise tests. There does not appear to be a simple, universal test for measuring exertional dyspnoea in the clinical setting.

Comparative measurement properties of constant work rate cycling and the endurance shuttle walking test in COPD: the TORRACTO® clinical trial

Background:

Exercise tolerance is an important endpoint in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) clinical trials. Little is known about the comparative measurement properties of constant work rate cycle ergometry (CWRCE) and the endurance shuttle walking test (ESWT). The objective of this sub-analysis of the TORRACTO^® study was to directly compare the endurance measurement properties of CWRCE and ESWT in patients with COPD in a multicentre, multinational setting. We predicted that both tests would be similarly reliable, but that the ESWT would be more responsive to bronchodilation than CWRCE.

Methods:

This analysis included 151 patients who performed CWRCE and ESWT at baseline and week 6 after receiving once-daily placebo, tiotropium/olodaterol (T/O) 2.5/5 μg or T/O 5/5 μg. Reproducibility was assessed by comparing their respective performance at baseline and week 6 in the placebo group. Responsiveness to bronchodilation was assessed by comparing endurance time at week 6 with T/O with baseline values and placebo. The locus of symptom limitation and end-exercise Borg scales for breathing and leg discomfort for both tests were also analysed.

Results:

The intraclass correlation coefficients for CWRCE and ESWT were 0.56 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.71] and 0.75 (95% CI 0.63–0.84). More patients were limited by breathing discomfort during the ESWT than during CWRCE, whereas more patients were limited by leg discomfort or breathing/leg discomfort during CWRCE than the ESWT (p <0.0001). Both tests were responsive to bronchodilator treatment: there was a 19% increase in endurance time from baseline at week 6 (p = 0.0006) assessed with CWRCE, and a 20% increase in endurance time assessed with ESWT (p = 0.0013).

Conclusions:

Both exercise tests performed well in a multicentre clinical trial. Although the locus of symptom limitation differed between the two tests, both were reliable and responsive to bronchodilation. For future clinical trials, the choice of test should depend on the study requirements.

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:

NCT01525615.

The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Current insights on clinical efficacy of roflumilast for treatment of COPD, asthma and ACOS

Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors (PDE4) are of great interest for the treatment of airway inflammatory diseases due to its broad anti-inflammatory effects. Roflumilast is a selective PDE4 inhibitor that inhibits pulmonary and systemic inflammation and rallies symptoms in airway diseases. Asthma and COPD are common chronic airway inflammatory diseases having incompletely illustrious pathophysiology and clinical manifestations. Recently, the condition called Asthma- COPD Overlap (ACO) has been evolved having the overlapping symptoms of both diseases. The newly discovered PDE4 inhibitor, roflumilast has exposed its potential in the treatment of Asthma, COPD and ACOS. Its mechanism of action in airway inflammatory diseases are said to be exerts by elevating intracellular cAMP and shows its anti-inflammatory action. Roflumilast, a promising therapeutic approach in inflammatory airway diseases, has many significant outcomes. In this review, we have provided various promising clinical evidences of roflumilast in COPD and asthma. However, there is no published clinical evidence to date for the role of roflumilast in ACOS. Nevertheless, there are therapeutic mechanisms that provide a reference for clinical application for ACOS.

Effects of roflumilast on arterial stiffness in COPD (ELASTIC): A randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Cardiovascular risk is substantially increased in patients with COPD and can be quantified via arterial stiffness. The PDE-IV inhibitor roflumilast revealed a potential reduction of COPD-related cardiovascular risk. We aimed to investigate the effects of roflumilast on arterial stiffness by quantification of pulse wave velocity (PWV) in stable COPD.

METHODS

In this randomized placebo-controlled trial, 80 COPD patients received roflumilast or placebo for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in cf-PWV. Secondary outcomes comprised markers of vascular function (e.g. Aix and RHI), systemic inflammation (e.g. IL-6 and TNF-α) and clinical characteristics of COPD (e.g. CAT and 6MWT).

RESULTS

A total of 33 and 34 patients completed the roflumilast and placebo arm, respectively (age, median (IQR): 64.5 (61-69.5) vs 64.5 (56-72) years; FEV₁ , median (IQR): 34.5 (25.5-48.6) vs 35.3 (27-46.8) % predicted; 6MWT, median (IQR): 428 (340-558) vs 456 (364-570) m). Change from baseline PWV did not show a significant difference between roflumilast and placebo (+5.0 (95% CI: -2.0 to +13.0) vs 0.0 (95% CI: -7.0 to +7.0)%, P = 0.268). Roflumilast did not improve markers of vascular function or systemic inflammation. We observed a significant improvement in change from baseline 6MWT with roflumilast versus placebo (+53.0 (95% CI: +19.1 to +86.9) vs -0.92 (95% CI: -35.1 to +33.3) m, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Our study revealed no beneficial effects of roflumilast on arterial stiffness. Further studies are needed to test a potential improvement of exercise capacity with roflumilast in COPD.

Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with cough, sputum production or dyspnoea, and a reduction in lung function, quality of life, and life expectancy. Apart from smoking cessation, no other treatments that slow lung function decline are available. Roflumilast and cilomilast are oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE₄) inhibitors proposed to reduce the airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction seen in COPD. This Cochrane Review was first published in 2011, and was updated in 2017 and 2020.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral PDE₄ inhibitors for management of stable COPD.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register (date of last search 9 March 2020). We found other trials at web-based clinical trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs if they compared oral PDE₄ inhibitors with placebo in people with COPD. We allowed co-administration of standard COPD therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Two independent review authors selected trials for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We resolved discrepancies by involving a third review author. We assessed our confidence in the evidence by using GRADE recommendations. Primary outcomes were change in lung function (minimally important difference (MID) = 100 mL) and quality of life (scale 0 to 100; higher score indicates more limitations).

MAIN RESULTS

We found 42 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analyses for roflumilast (28 trials with 18,046 participants) or cilomilast (14 trials with 6457 participants) or tetomilast (1 trial with 84 participants), with a duration between six weeks and one year or longer. These trials included people across international study centres with moderate to very severe COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades II to IV), with mean age of 64 years. We judged risks of selection bias, performance bias, and attrition bias as low overall amongst the 39 published and unpublished trials. Lung function Treatment with a PDE₄ inhibitor was associated with a small, clinically insignificant improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) over a mean of 40 weeks compared with placebo (mean difference (MD) 49.33 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) 44.17 to 54.49; participants = 20,815; studies = 29; moderate-certainty evidence). Forced vital capacity (FVC) and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were also improved over 40 weeks (FVC: MD 86.98 mL, 95% CI 74.65 to 99.31; participants = 22,108; studies = 17; high-certainty evidence; PEF: MD 6.54 L/min, 95% CI 3.95 to 9.13; participants = 4245; studies = 6; low-certainty evidence). Quality of life Trials reported improvements in quality of life over a mean of 33 weeks (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) MD -1.06 units, 95% CI -1.68 to -0.43; participants = 7645 ; moderate-certainty evidence). Incidence of exacerbations Treatment with a PDE₄ inhibitor was associated with a reduced likelihood of COPD exacerbation over a mean of 40 weeks (odds ratio (OR) 0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.84; participants = 20,382; studies = 27; high-certainty evidence), that is, for every 100 people treated with PDE₄ inhibitors, five more remained exacerbation-free during the study period compared with those given placebo (number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 20, 95% CI 16 to 27). No change in COPD-related symptoms nor in exercise tolerance was found. Adverse events More participants in the treatment groups experienced an adverse effect compared with control participants over a mean of 39 weeks (OR 1.30, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.38; participants = 21,310; studies = 30; low-certainty evidence). Participants experienced a range of gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting, or dyspepsia. Diarrhoea was more commonly reported with PDE₄ inhibitor treatment (OR 3.20, 95% CI 2.74 to 3.50; participants = 20,623; studies = 29; high-certainty evidence), that is, for every 100 people treated with PDE₄ inhibitors, seven more suffered from diarrhoea during the study period compared with those given placebo (number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 15, 95% CI 13 to 17). The likelihood of psychiatric adverse events was higher with roflumilast 500 µg than with placebo (OR 2.13, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.54; participants = 11,168; studies = 15 (COPD pool data); moderate-certainty evidence). Roflumilast in particular was associated with weight loss during the trial period and with an increase in insomnia and depressive mood symptoms. Participants treated with PDE₄ inhibitors were more likely to withdraw from trial participation; on average, 14% in the treatment groups withdrew compared with 8% in the control groups. Mortality No effect on mortality was found (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.24; participants = 19,786; studies = 27; moderate-certainty evidence), although mortality was a rare event during these trials.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

For this current update, five new studies from the 2020 search contributed to existing findings but made little impact on outcomes described in earlier versions of this review. PDE₄ inhibitors offered a small benefit over placebo in improving lung function and reducing the likelihood of exacerbations in people with COPD; however, they had little impact on quality of life or on symptoms. Gastrointestinal adverse effects and weight loss were common, and the likelihood of psychiatric symptoms was higher, with roflumilast 500 µg. The findings of this review provide cautious support for the use of PDE₄ inhibitors in COPD. In accordance with GOLD 2020 guidelines, they may have a place as add-on therapy for a subgroup of people with persistent symptoms or exacerbations despite optimal COPD management (e.g. people whose condition is not controlled by fixed-dose long-acting beta₂-agonist (LABA) and inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) combinations). More longer-term trials are needed to determine whether or not PDE₄ inhibitors modify FEV₁ decline, hospitalisation, or mortality in COPD.

An evaluation of roflumilast and PDE4 inhibitors with a focus on the treatment of asthma

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common chronic airway inflammatory disease characterized by diverse inflammatory events leading to airway hyperresponsiveness and reversible airflow obstruction. Corticosteroids have been the mainstay for asthma treatment due to their broad anti-inflammatory actions; however, other medications such as phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors also demonstrate anti-inflammatory activity in the airways.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes tissue expression of phosphodiesterase 4 in the airways, the different phosphodiesterase 4 isoenzymes identified, and the anti-inflammatory activities of phosphodiesterase 4 inhibition in asthma and related findings in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The authors further review clinical trials demonstrating that drugs such as roflumilast have an excellent safety profile and efficacy in patients with asthma and COPD.

EXPERT OPINION

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors suppress the activity of immune cells, an effect similar to corticosteroids although by acting through different anti-inflammatory pathways and uniquely blocking neutrophilic inflammation. Roflumilast and other phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors have been shown to provide additive protection in asthma when added to corticosteroid and anti-leukotriene treatment. Developmental drugs with dual phosphodiesterase 3 and 4 inhibition are thought to be able to provide bronchodilation and anti-inflammatory activities and will consequently be pushed forward in their clinical development for the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Effects of Roflumilast on Rehospitalization and Mortality in Patients

Introduction: Hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation portends the greatest risk of rehospitalization and mortality. Treatments that prevent hospitalizations could significantly lessen COPD morbidity and mortality. Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of roflumilast 500 ug daily versus placebo in patients hospitalized for acute COPD exacerbation. Primary outcome was time to all-cause mortality or non-elective rehospitalization at 180 days post-randomization. Secondary outcomes were death or hospitalization from a respiratory cause, quality of life, change in health status, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and roflumilast tolerance. Results: A total of 64 patients with moderate to severe COPD (FEV1, 37.6 ± 16.4% predicted; 61% female, 61.6 ± 7.9 years old) were assigned to roflumilast or placebo. No deaths occurred in the follow-up period. There was no difference in the time to first readmission between the roflumilast and placebo groups (46.1 days versus 47.3 days respectively, p=0.93). There were 29 and 30 readmissions in the roflumilast and placebo groups, respectively (p=0.47). The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) decreased 10.8 points and 7.8 points in the roflumilast and placebo groups, respectively and were not different. EuroQuality of Life Five Dimension scale (EQ5D) scores improved, but not significantly in either group. Weight loss and nausea were more common with roflumilast but not different from placebo. Change in glycosylated hemoglobin percentage (HgbA1C%) was not different between groups. Sub-analysis for the impact of chronic bronchitis did not affect outcomes. Conclusion: In this pilot study conducted in patients hospitalized with an exacerbation of COPD, roflumilast did not affect time to all-cause rehospitalization, quality of life, FEV1 or any other measured parameter.

Incidence of Adverse Effects and Discontinuation Rate between Patients Receiving 250 Micrograms and 500 Micrograms of Roflumilast: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Roflumilast is the only approved oral phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor for the treatment of severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in patients with chronic bronchitis and a history of frequent exacerbations. The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of adverse effects associated with roflumilast treatment in a real-world setting. Further, we compared the incidence of adverse effects and the discontinuation rate among patients receiving different doses.

METHODS

We identified all outpatients diagnosed with COPD at Seoul St. Mary's Hospital between May 2011 and September 2016 and retrospectively reviewed their medical records. Roflumilast was prescribed to patients in doses of 500 μg and 250 μg.

RESULTS

A total of 269 COPD patients were prescribed roflumilast in our hospital during the study period. Among them, 178 patients were treated with 500 μg and 91 patients were treated with 250 μg. The incidence of adverse effects was 38.2% in the 500 μg group and 25.3% in the 250 μg group (p=0.034). The discontinuation rate of roflumilast was 41.6% (n=74) in the 500 μg group and 23.1% (n=21) in the 250 μg group (p=0.003). When adjusted by age, sex, smoking status, and lung function, 500 μg dose was significantly associated with the discontinuation of roflumilast (odds ratio, 2.87; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

There was a lower incidence of adverse effects and discontinuation among patients treated with 250 μg compared with 500 μg dose. Further studies regarding the optimal dose of roflumilast are required.

Effect of roflumilast on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of roflumilast effect on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have been reported in the last decade. The current meta-analysis was designed to systematically review and perform meta-analysis of the RCTs of roflumilast treatment in COPD.

METHODS

Electronic databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane clinical trials database were searched to identify RCTs of roflumilast treatment on COPD. The primary outcomes were effect of roflumilast on pre-bronchodilator FEV1, post-bronchodilator FEV1, and exacerbation rate. Secondary outcomes were effect of roflumilast on airway inflammation and adverse effect.

RESULTS

A total of 11 RCTs were enrolled into the current analysis. Roflumilast significantly improved both pre-bronchodilator FEV1 (standardized difference in mean ± SD was 0.621 ± 0.161; 95% CI 0.306~0.936, p < 0.001) and post-bronchodilator FEV1 (standardized difference in mean ± SD was 0.563 ± 0.149, 95% CI 0.270~0.855, p < 0.001) compared with placebo. Roflumilast also significantly reduced exacerbation of COPD (standardized difference in mean ± SD 0.099 ± 0.020, 95% CI 0.061~0.138; p < 0.001) and suppressed airway inflammation (standardized difference in mean ± SD 1.354 ± 0.260, 95% CI 0.845~1.862, p < 0.001) compared with placebo. However, roflumilast significantly increased adverse effect such as diarrhea (rate ratio 2.945, 95% CI 2.453~3.536, p < 0.001) and weight loss (rate ratio 3.814, 95% CI 3.091~4.707, p < 0.001) compared with placebo.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicated that roflumilast treatment could improve COPD patients' lung function and reduce exacerbation, and that inhibition of airway inflammation by roflumilast might contribute to the beneficial effect of PDE-4 inhibitors on COPD.

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with cough, sputum production or dyspnoea and a reduction in lung function, quality of life and life expectancy. Apart from smoking cessation, there are no other treatments that slow lung function decline. Roflumilast and cilomilast are oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE₄) inhibitors proposed to reduce the airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction seen in COPD. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2011 and updated in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral PDE₄ inhibitors in the management of stable COPD.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Trials Register (date of last search October 2016). We found other trials from web-based clinical trials registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs if they compared oral PDE₄ inhibitors with placebo in people with COPD. We allowed co-administration of standard COPD therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted data and a second review author checked the data. We reported pooled data in Review Manager as mean differences (MD), standardised mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR). We converted the odds ratios into absolute treatment effects in a 'Summary of findings' table.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-four separate RCTs studying roflumilast (20 trials with 17,627 participants) or cilomilast (14 trials with 6457 participants) met the inclusion criteria, with a duration of between six weeks and one year. These included people across international study centres with moderate to very severe COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) grades II-IV), with a mean age of 64 years.We considered that the methodological quality of the 34 published and unpublished trials was acceptable overall. Treatment with a PDE₄ inhibitor was associated with a significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁) over the trial period compared with placebo (MD 51.53 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) 43.17 to 59.90, 27 trials with 20,585 participants, moderate-quality evidence due to moderate levels of heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias). There were small improvements in quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), MD -1.06 units, 95% CI -1.68 to -0.43, 11 trials with 7645 participants, moderate-quality evidence due to moderate levels of heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias) and COPD-related symptoms, but no significant change in exercise tolerance. Treatment with a PDE₄ inhibitor was associated with a reduced likelihood of COPD exacerbation (OR 0.78, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.83; 23 trials with 19,948 participants, high-quality evidence). For every 100 people treated with PDE₄ inhibitors, five more remained exacerbation-free during the study period compared with placebo (number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 20, 95% CI 16 to 26). More participants in the treatment groups experienced non-serious adverse events compared with controls, particularly a range of gastrointestinal symptoms such as diarrhoea, nausea, vomiting or dyspepsia. For every 100 people treated with PDE₄ inhibitors, seven more suffered from diarrhoea during the study period compared with placebo (number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 15, 95% CI 13 to 17). Roflumilast in particular was associated with weight loss during the trial period and an increase in insomnia and depressive mood symptoms. There was no significant effect of treatment on non-fatal serious adverse events (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.07) or mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.23), although mortality was a rare event during the trials. Participants treated with PDE₄ inhibitors were more likely to withdraw from the trials because of adverse effects; on average 14% in the treatment groups withdrew compared with 8% in the control groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people with COPD, PDE₄ inhibitors offered benefit over placebo in improving lung function and reducing the likelihood of exacerbations; however, they had little impact on quality of life or symptoms. Gastrointestinal adverse effects and weight loss were common, and safety data submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have raised concerns over psychiatric adverse events with roflumilast. The findings of this review give cautious support to the use of PDE₄ inhibitors in COPD. They may be best used as add-on therapy in a subgroup of people with persistent symptoms or exacerbations despite optimal COPD management. This is in accordance with the GOLD 2017 guidelines. Longer-term trials are needed to determine whether or not PDE₄ inhibitors modify FEV₁ decline, hospitalisation or mortality in COPD.

Roles of roflumilast, a selective phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, in airway diseases

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are common chronic respiratory diseases. Both diseases have incompletely distinct pathophysiology, clinical manifestation, and treatment responsiveness. Pulmonary and systemic inflammations are the hallmarks of COPD. Most asthma responds to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment. In contrast, COPD is a corticosteroid-resistant disease. Bronchodilators are a preferred treatment method of COPD, with the aim of improving symptoms and preventing exacerbation. In addition, corticosteroid insensitivity is an underlying mechanism in severe asthma. An overlap of features between asthma and COPD, which was described as asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) is not uncommon in practice. Novel nonsteroidal therapies focusing on inflammation in asthma and COPD have been developed. Selective phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor is a promising class of drugs that has been studied for the treatment of COPD. Selective PDE4 inhibitor is different from xanthine in terms of mechanisms and pharmacokinetic profiles. This review focuses on clinical data on PDE4 inhibitors and its future roles in asthma, COPD, bronchiectasis, ACOS and other chronic non-pulmonary diseases.

Effects of yoga in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A meta-analysis

Aims/Introduction

A meta‐analysis was carried out to evaluate the efficacy of yoga in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Materials and Methods

The PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched to obtain eligible randomized controlled trials. The primary outcome was fasting blood glucose, and the secondary outcomes included glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride and postprandial blood glucose. Weighted mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. The I² statistic represented heterogeneity.

Results

A total of 12 randomized controlled trials with a total of 864 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled weighted mean differences were −23.72 mg/dL (95% CI −37.78 to −9.65; P = 0.001; I² = 82%) for fasting blood glucose and −0.47% (95% CI −0.87 to −0.07; P = 0.02; I² = 82%) for hemoglobin A1c. The weighted mean differences were −17.38 mg/dL (95% CI −27.88 to −6.89; P = 0.001; I² = 0%) for postprandial blood glucose, −18.50 mg/dL (95% CI −29.88 to −7.11; P = 0.001; I² = 75%) for total cholesterol, 4.30 mg/dL (95% CI 3.25 to 5.36; P < 0.00001; I² = 10%) for high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol, −12.95 mg/dL (95% CI −18.84 to −7.06; P < 0.0001; I² = 37%) for low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol and −12.57 mg/dL (95% CI −29.91 to 4.76; P = 0.16; I² = 48%) for triglycerides.

Conclusions

The available evidence suggests that yoga benefits adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, considering the limited methodology and the potential heterogeneity, further studies are necessary to support our findings and investigate the long‐term effects of yoga in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.

Potential treatment benefits and safety of roflumilast in COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Current evidence suggests that roflumilast is efficacious in treating COPD, especially in preventing the acute exacerbation of COPD.

OBJECTIVES

This study was designed to evaluate the clinical effects and safety of roflumilast in the treatment of stable COPD using randomized clinical trial (RCT) data.

METHODS

A MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register search was carried out. RCTs reporting the treatment effects of roflumilast in COPD were identified. Relevant data were extracted and a meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

A total of nine articles and 13 RCT studies were identified. Overall, 29.1% of the subjects in the roflumilast group showed evidence of exacerbation. The corresponding figure was 32.2% in the placebo group. According to pooled analysis, the use of roflumilast reduced COPD exacerbations in comparison to placebo (odds ratio [OR] =0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] =0.75-0.9). The quality of life and spirometry were improved. For patients receiving baseline pre-bronchodilators, their average forced expiratory volume in the first second showed evidence of change when they took roflumilast (64.88 mL; 95% CI =54.09-75.66). Those who took placebo showed no evidence of change. Similar result was observed in patients receiving baseline (54.49 mL; 95% CI =44.04-64.94). As for the safety of roflumilast treatment, the overall cumulative incidence of adverse drug reaction was 54.2% in the roflumilast group and 48.2% in the placebo group (OR =1.36, 95% CI =1.13-1.65). The adverse effects included diarrhea, headache, nausea, weight loss, and insomnia.

CONCLUSION

The efficacy of roflumilast in the prevention of acute exacerbation of COPD is obvious. Roflumilast is proved to be able to improve spirometry of COPD patients. The adverse drug reaction did not increase significantly in the roflumilast group compared with the control group. COPD patients can benefit from roflumilast therapy. However, our results are limited by the cohort design of the selected studies and the degree of heterogeneity among them; hence, more randomized trials are needed to further support this conclusion.

Pharmacological management of breathlessness in COPD: recent advances and hopes for the future

INTRODUCTION

Activity-related breathlessness is often the dominant symptom in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and usually persists despite optimal medical therapy. Currently, our inability to meaningfully alter the pathophysiology of the underlying disease means that we must focus our attention on relieving this distressing symptom so as to improve exercise tolerance and quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

The current review examines the neurobiology of breathlessness and constructs a solid physiological rationale for amelioration of this distressing symptom. We will examine the efficacy of interventions which: 1) reduce the increased central drive to breathe (opioids); 2) improve the respiratory system's ability to appropriately respond to this increased demand (bronchodilators); and 3) address the important affective dimension of breathlessness (anxiolytics). Expert commentary: Advances in our understanding of the mechanisms of activity-related breathlessness in COPD, and its measurement in the clinical domain, now set the stage for the development of effective management strategies on an individual patient basis.

Can roflumilast, a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, improve clinical outcomes in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A meta-analysis

Background

Effects of roflumilast on lung function, symptoms, acute exacerbation and adverse events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are controversial. We aimed to further clarify the efficacy and safety of roflumilast in treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD.

Methods

From 1946 to November 2015, we searched the Pubmed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ISI Web of Science and American College of Physician using “roflumilast” and “chronic obstructive pulmonary disease” or “COPD”. Randomized controlled trials that reported forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV₁), forced vital capacity (FVC), transition dyspnea index (TDI), St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and incidence of COPD exacerbations and adverse events were eligible. We conducted the heterogeneities test and sensitivity analysis, and random-effects or fixed-effects model was applied to calculate risk ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD) for dichotomous and continuous data respectively. Cochrane systematic review software, Review Manager (RevMan), was used to test the hypothesis by Mann-Whitney U-test.

Results

Thirteen trials with a total of 14,563 patients were pooled in our final studies. Except for SGRQ (I² = 63 %, χ² = 1.71, P = 0.07) and adverse events (I² = 94 %, χ² = 0.03, P < 0.001), we did not find statistical heterogeneity in outcome measures. The pooled MD of pre- and post-bronchodilator FEV₁ was 54.60 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 46.02 ~ 63.18) and 57.86 (95 % CI 49.80 ~ 65.91), and both showed significant improvement in patients with roflumilast (z = 12.47, P <0.001; z = 14.07, P < 0.001), so did in FVC (MD 90.37, 95 % CI 73.95 ~ 106.78, z = 10.79, P < 0.001). Significant alleviation of TDI (MD 0.30, 95 % CI 0.14 ~ 0.46, z = 3.67, P < 0.001) and decrease of acute exacerbation (RR 0.86, 95 % CI 0.81 ~ 0.91, z = 5.54, P < 0.001) were also identified in treatment of roflumilast, but without significant difference in SGRQ (MD −1.30, 95 % CI −3.16 ~ 0.56, z = 1.37, P = 0.17). Moreover, roflumilast significantly increased the incidence of adverse events compared with placebo (RR 1.31, 95 % CI 1.16 ~ 1.47, z = 4.32, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Roflumilast can be considered as an alternative therapy in selective patients with moderate-to-severe COPD.

Effect of roflumilast on exacerbations in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease uncontrolled by combination therapy (REACT): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Roflumilast reduces exacerbations in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Its effect in patients using fixed combinations of inhaled corticosteroids and longacting β2 agonists is unknown. We postulated that roflumilast would reduce exacerbations in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease at risk for exacerbations, even in combination with inhaled corticosteroid and longacting β2 agonist treatment.

METHODS

For this 1-year double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multicentre, phase 3-4 trial, the Roflumilast and Exacerbations in patients receiving Appropriate Combination Therapy (REACT) study, we enrolled patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease from 203 centres (outpatient clinics, hospitals, specialised pulmonologists, and family doctors) in 21 countries. Eligible patients were 40 years of age or older with a smoking history of at least 20 pack-years and a diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with severe airflow limitation, symptoms of chronic bronchitis, and at least two exacerbations in the previous year. We used a computerised central randomisation system to randomly assign patients in a 1:1 ratio to the two treatment groups: roflumilast 500 μg or placebo given orally once daily together with a fixed inhaled corticosteroid and longacting β2 agonist combination. Background tiotropium treatment was allowed. All patients and investigators were masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was the rate of moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations per patient per year, analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01329029.

FINDINGS

Between April 3, 2011, and May 27, 2014, we enrolled 1945 eligible participants and randomly assigned 973 to the roflumilast group and 972 to the placebo group. The rate of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations was 13·2% lower in the roflumilast group than in the placebo group according to a Poisson regression analysis (roflumilast 0·805 vs placebo 0·927; rate ratio [RR] 0·868 [95% CI 0·753-1·002], p=0·0529), and 14·2% lower according to a predefined sensitivity analysis using negative binomial regression (0·823 vs 0·959; 0·858 [0·740-0·995], p=0·0424). Adverse events were reported by 648 (67%) of 968 patients receiving roflumilast and by 572 (59%) of 967 patients in the placebo group; adverse event-associated patient withdrawal from the study was also more common in the roflumilast group (104/968 [11%]) than in the placebo group (52/967 [5%]). The most frequently reported serious adverse events were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations and pneumonia, and 17 (1·8%) deaths occurred in the roflumilast group compared with 18 (1·9%) in the placebo group.

INTERPRETATION

Our findings suggest that roflumilast reduces exacerbations and hospital admissions in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic bronchitis who are at risk of frequent and severe exacerbations despite inhaled corticosteroid and longacting β2 agonist therapy, even in combination with tiotropium.

FUNDING

Takeda.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: clinical integrative physiology

Peripheral airway dysfunction, inhomogeneous ventilation distribution, gas trapping, and impaired pulmonary gas exchange are variably present in all stages of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This article provides a cogent physiologic explanation for the relentless progression of activity-related dyspnea and exercise intolerance that all too commonly characterizes COPD. The spectrum of physiologic derangements that exist in smokers with mild airway obstruction and a history compatible with COPD is examined. Also explored are the perceptual and physiologic consequences of progressive erosion of the resting inspiratory capacity. Finally, emerging information on the role of cardiocirculatory impairment in contributing to exercise intolerance in patients with varying degrees of airway obstruction is reviewed.

Efficacy and safety of the p38 MAPK inhibitor losmapimod for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The p38 MAPK pathway seems to be involved in pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Losmapimod is a potent and selective inhibitor of p38 MAPK. We assessed the effect of losmapimod on exercise tolerance in patients with COPD.

METHODS

We did this randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled trial at 46 secondary care centres in Argentina, Czech Republic, Estonia, Germany, Norway, South Korea, Ukraine, and USA between Nov 4, 2010, and Dec 22, 2011. We enrolled patients aged 40 years or older with moderate-to-severe COPD (6 min walking distance <350 m) who were current or previous smokers. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) by a computer generated sequence to one of losmapimod 2·5 mg, 7·5 mg, or 15 mg, or placebo, twice daily for 24 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by country and exacerbation history (block size eight). Patients and investigators were masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change in 6 min walking distance between baseline and week 24, assessed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrial.gov, number NCT01218126.

FINDINGS

We screened 886 patients, of whom 602 were enrolled and received treatment. The difference between the placebo group and the losmapimod groups for mean change of 6 min walk distance was not significant: -6·7 m (95% CI -18·2 to 4·9) for losmapimod 2·5 mg, -4·7 m (-16·1 to 6·8) for losmapimod 7·5 mg, and -3·4 m (-15·1 to 8·2) for losmapimod 15 mg. The safety profile was much the same in each group, although drug-related adverse events were more common with losmapimod 7·5 mg (n=19, 13%) and losmapimod 15 mg (n=20, 13%) than with placebo (n=11, 7%) and losmapimod 2·5 mg (n=13, 9%). The most common serious adverse events were COPD exacerbation resulting in admission to hospital (eight patients [5%] taking placebo, six [4%] taking losmapimod 2·5 mg, two [1%] taking losmapimod 7·5 mg, and three [2%] taking losmapimod 15 mg) and pneumonia (four [3%] vs 0 [0%] vs 1 [1%] vs 4 [3%]).

INTERPRETATION

Losmapimod did not cause an improvement in exercise tolerance or lung function, despite being well-tolerated in this COPD population.

FUNDING

GlaxoSmithKline.

Phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is associated with cough, sputum production or dyspnoea and a reduction in lung function, quality of life and life expectancy. Apart from smoking cessation, there are no other treatments that slow lung function decline. Roflumilast and cilomilast are oral phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors proposed to reduce the airway inflammation and bronchoconstriction seen in COPD.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral PDE4 inhibitors in the management of stable COPD.

SEARCH METHODS

We identified randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of trials (date of last search June 2013). We found other trials from web-based clinical trial registers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs if they compared oral PDE4 inhibitors with placebo in people with COPD. We allowed co-administration of standard COPD therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

One review author extracted data and a second review author checked the data, before entry into The Cochrane Collaboration software program (RevMan version 5.2). We reported pooled data as mean differences (MD), standardised mean differences (SMD) or odds ratios (OR).

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-nine separate RCTs studying roflumilast (15 trials, 12,654 patients) or cilomilast (14 trials, 6457 patients) met the inclusion criteria, with a duration between six weeks and one year. These included people across international study centres with moderate to very severe COPD (GOLD grades II-IV), with a mean age of 64 years.Treatment with a PDE4 inhibitor was associated with a significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) over the trial period compared with placebo (MD 45.60 mL; 95% confidence interval (CI) 39.45 to 51.75, 22 trials with 15,670 participants, moderate quality evidence due to moderate levels of heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias). There were small improvements in quality of life (St George's Respiratory Questionnaire MD -1.04; 95% CI -1.66 to -0.41, 10 trials with 7618 participants, moderate quality evidence due to moderate levels of heterogeneity and risk of reporting bias) and COPD-related symptoms, but no change in exercise tolerance. Treatment with a PDE4 inhibitor was associated with a reduced likelihood of COPD exacerbation (OR 0.77; 95% CI 0.71 to 0.83, high quality evidence). For every 100 people treated with PDE4 inhibitors, six more remained exacerbation-free during the study period compared with placebo (number needed to treat for an additional beneficial effect (NNTB) 20; 95% CI 16 to 27). More participants in the treatment groups experienced non-serious adverse events compared with controls, particularly gastrointestinal symptoms and headache. Roflumilast in particular was associated with weight loss during the trial period and an increase in insomnia and depressive mood symptoms. Participants treated with PDE4 inhibitors were also more likely to withdraw from the trials because of adverse effects; on average 24% in the treatment groups withdrew compared with 19% in the control groups.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people with COPD, PDE4 inhibitors offered benefit over placebo in improving lung function and reducing the likelihood of exacerbations; however, they had little impact on quality of life or symptoms. Gastrointestinal adverse effects and weight loss were common, and safety data submitted to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have raised concerns over psychiatric adverse events with roflumilast. The optimum place of PDE4 inhibitors in COPD management therefore remains to be defined. Longer-term trials are needed to determine whether or not PDE4 inhibitors modify FEV1 decline, hospitalisation or mortality in COPD.

No room to breathe: the importance of lung hyperinflation in COPD

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are progressively limited in their ability to undertake normal everyday activities by a combination of exertional dyspnoea and peripheral muscle weakness. COPD is characterised by expiratory flow limitation, resulting in air trapping and lung hyperinflation. Hyperinflation increases acutely under conditions such as exercise or exacerbations, with an accompanying sharp increase in the intensity of dyspnoea to distressing and intolerable levels. Air trapping, causing increased lung hyperinflation, can be present even in milder COPD during everyday activities. The resulting activity-related dyspnoea leads to a vicious spiral of activity avoidance, physical deconditioning, and reduced quality of life, and has implications for the early development of comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease. Various strategies exist to reduce hyperinflation, notably long-acting bronchodilator treatment (via reduction in flow limitation and improved lung emptying) and an exercise programme (via decreased respiratory rate, reducing ventilatory demand), or their combination. Optimal bronchodilation can reduce exertional dyspnoea and increase a patient's ability to exercise, and improves the chance of successful outcome of a pulmonary rehabilitation programme. There should be a lower threshold for initiating treatments appropriate to the stage of the disease, such as long-acting bronchodilators and an exercise programme for patients with mild-to-moderate disease who experience persistent dyspnoea.

Does roflumilast improve dyspnea in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease? A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Although several large studies showed roflumilast (Rof) has demonstrated efficacy in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the efficacy of Rof in dyspnea remains unclear. We therefore undertook a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy of Rof in dyspnea for COPD patients.

METHODS

A computerized search through electronic databases was performed to obtain randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Dyspnea was assessed by the transition dyspnea index (TDI) and the UCSD Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (SOBQ). The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Jadad score. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and heterogeneity was assessed with the I(2) test. The effect sizes were compared with the minimum clinically important difference (MCID).

RESULTS

Four RCTs involving 4,767 patients with forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) <80% predicted met the inclusion criteria. The Jadad score of each study was 5 scores. Rof statistically improved the TDI focal score (WMD =0.30 units; 95% CI: 0.14-0.46), but failed to decrease the SOBQ (WMD =-1.10 units; 95% CI: -4.24 to 2.04). The overall effect sizes were lower than the MCID of the TDI and the SOBQ, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Sufficient evidence to support Rof relieving dyspnea in COPD patients is currently lacking. Further studies are needed to investigate the effects of Rof in dyspnea, especially for COPD patients with a different phenotype.