Comparison of the resonance sonorheometry based Quantra® system with rotational thromboelastometry ROTEM® sigma in cardiac surgery - a prospective observational study

The role of viscoelastic hemostatic assays for postpartum hemorrhage management and bedside intrapartum care

Viscoelastic hemostatic assays are point-of-care devices that assess coagulation and fibrinolysis in whole blood samples. These technologies provide numeric and visual information of clot initiation, clot strength, and clot lysis under low-shear conditions, and have been used in a variety of clinical settings and subpopulations, including trauma, cardiac surgery, and obstetrics. Emerging data indicate that these devices are useful for detecting important coagulation defects during major postpartum hemorrhage (especially low plasma fibrinogen concentration [hypofibrinogenemia]) and informing clinical decision-making for blood product use. Data from observational studies suggest that, compared with traditional formulaic approaches to transfusion management, targeted or goal-directed transfusion approaches using data from viscoelastic hemostatic assays are associated with reduced hemorrhage-related morbidity and lower blood product requirement. Viscoelastic hemostatic assays can also be used to identify and treat coagulation defects in patients with inherited or acquired coagulation disorders, such as factor XI deficiency or immune-mediated thrombocytopenia, and to assess hemostatic profiles of patients prescribed anticoagulant medications to mitigate the risk of epidural hematoma after neuraxial anesthesia and postpartum hemorrhage after delivery.

Multichannel resonant acoustic rheometry system for quantification of coagulation of multiple human plasma samples

Resonant Acoustic Rheometry (RAR), a newly developed ultrasound-based technique for non-contact characterization of soft viscoelastic materials, has shown promise for quantitative viscoelastic assessment of temporally changing soft biomaterials in real time, and may be used to monitor blood coagulation process. Here, we report the development of a novel, multichannel RAR (mRAR) system for simultaneous measurements of multiple temporally evolving samples and demonstration of its use for monitoring the coagulation of multiple small-volume plasma samples. The mRAR system was constructed using an array of 4 custom-designed ultrasound transducers at 5.0 MHz and a novel electronic driving system that controlled the generation of synchronized ultrasound pulses for real time assessment of multiple samples simultaneously. As a proof-of-concept of the operation of the mRAR system, we performed tests using pooled normal human plasma samples and anti-coagulated plasma samples from patients treated with warfarin with a range of International Normalized Ratio (INR) values as well-characterized samples with different coagulation kinetics. Our results show that simultaneous tracking of dynamic changes in 4 plasma samples triggered by either kaolin or tissue factor was achieved for the entire duration of coagulation. The mRAR system captured distinct changes in the samples and identified parameters including the clotting start time and parameters associated with the stiffness of the final clots that were consistent with INR levels. Data from this study demonstrate the feasibility of the mRAR system for efficient characterization of the kinetic coagulation processes of multiple plasma samples.

Viscoelastic testing: Critical appraisal of new methodologies and current literature

United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved viscoelastic testing (VET) methodologies have significantly changed in the last 10 years, with the availability of cartridge-based VET. Some of these cartridge-based methodologies use harmonic resonance-based clot detection. While VET has always allowed for the evaluation of real-time clot formation, cartridge-based VET provides increased ease of use as well as greater portability and robustness of results in out-of-laboratory environments. Here we review the use of VET in a variety of clinical contexts, including cardiac surgery, trauma, liver transplant, obstetrics, and hypercoagulable states such as COVID-19. As of now, high quality randomized trial evidence for new generation VET (TEG 6s, HemoSonics Quantra, ROTEM sigma) is limited. Nevertheless, the use of VET-guided transfusion algorithms appears to result in reduced blood usage without worsening of patient outcomes. Future work comparing the new generation VET instruments and continuing to validate clinically important cut-offs will help move the field of point-of-care coagulation monitoring forward and increase the quality of transfusion management in bleeding patients.

Multichannel Resonant Acoustic Rheometry System for Rapid and Efficient Quantification of Human Plasma Coagulation

Resonant Acoustic Rheometry (RAR), a newly developed ultrasound-based technique for non-contact characterization of soft viscoelastic materials, has shown promise for quantitative assessment of plasma coagulation by monitoring the entire dynamic process in real time. Here, we report the development of a multichannel RAR (mRAR) system for simultaneous monitoring of the coagulation of multiple small-volume plasma samples, a capability that is critical to efficiently provide improved assessment of coagulation. The mRAR system was constructed using an array of 4 custom-designed ultrasound transducers at 5.0 MHz and an electronic driving system that controlled the generation of synchronized ultrasound pulses for real time monitoring of multiple samples simultaneously. The mRAR system was tested using Coumadin-treated plasma samples with a range of International Normalized Ratio (INR) values, as well as normal pooled plasma samples. Tracking of dynamic changes in clotting of plasma samples triggered by either kaolin or tissue factor was performed for the entire duration of coagulation. The mRAR system captured distinct changes in the samples and identified parameters including clotting time, clotting speed, and the mechanical properties of the clots that were consistent with Coumadin dose and INR levels Data from this study demonstrate the feasibility of the mRAR system for the rapid, efficient, and accurate characterization of plasma coagulation.

Point-of-Care Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays in Cardiac Surgery Patients: Comparison of Thromboelastography 6S, Thromboelastometry Sigma, and Quantra

OBJECTIVES

Viscoelastic tests allow a reduction in blood product transfusion. Three modern devices are currently available (rotational thromboelastometry [ROTEM] sigma, thromboelastography [TEG] 6S, and Quantra). No study has compared the performances of these 3 devices simultaneously.

DESIGN

An observational, nonrandomized cohort study.

SETTING

A single-center of cardiac surgery in a university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 30 consecutive measurements from at least 10 adult patients presenting significant bleeding in the intensive care unit after cardiac surgery INTERVENTION: Viscoelastic tests using ROTEM sigma, TEG 6S, and Quantra were performed concomitantly with conventional coagulation measurements MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The authors included 16 patients with 31 blood samples. After the exclusion of missing values, 27 samples were analyzed. Correlation with platelet count was as follows: ROTEM, r = 0.84 [0.66-0.93], p < 0.0001; Quantra, r = 0.83 [0.64-0.92], p < 0.0001; TEG 6S, r = 0.64 [0.29-0.83], p = 0.001. Correlation with fibrinogen (Clauss assay) was as follows: ROTEM, r = 0.85 [0.68-0.93], p < 0.0001; Quantra, r = 0.88 [0.74-0.95], p < 0.0001; TEG 6S, r = 0.79 [0.55-0.91], p < 0.0001. No difference was observed for the detection of residual circulating heparin (anti-Xa activity >0.1), with 87% of correct identification for Quantra and 80% for both ROTEM and TEG 6S (p = 0.3). Time to first results after the beginning of the test was shorter for Quantra than ROTEM and TEG 6S (136 [126-152] seconds v 205 [176-221] seconds, p = 0.003 and v 450 [372-516] seconds, p < 0.0001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

ROTEM sigma, TEG 6S, and Quantra performed similarly for exploring platelet count or residual circulating heparin. Thromboelastography 6S presented a weaker correlation with fibrinogen Clauss.

Are Viscoelastometric Assays of Old Generation Ready for Disposal? Comment on Volod et al. Viscoelastic Hemostatic Assays: A Primer on Legacy and New Generation Devices. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 860

With the advent of new viscoelastometric hemostatic assay (VHA) devices, with ready-to-use cartridge reagents allowing for their use by people without special laboratory skills, the appreciation of the actual clinical value of VHAs in settings such as severe trauma, post-partum hemorrhage, cardiac surgery and liver transplantation still needs to be fully validated. While two of the newest versions remain based on a 'cup and pin' system (ROTEM^® sigma, ClotPro^®), two other new devices (TEG^® 6s, Quantra^®) rely on very different technologies: clotting blood is no longer in contact with the probe and challenged by oscillation of one of the components but explored with ultrasound exposure. A systematic literature search (including Sonoclot^®) retrieved 20 observational studies (19 prospective). Most studies pointed to imperfect agreements, highlighting the non-interchangeability of devices. Only a few studies, often with a limited number of patients enrolled, used a clinical outcome. No study compared VHA results with conventional laboratory assays obtained through a rapid tests panel. Clinical evidence of the utility of the new VHAs largely remains to be proven through randomized clinical trials, with clinically relevant outcomes, and compared to rapid panel hemostasis testing. The availability of new, improved VHA devices provides an impetus and an opportunity to do so.

Are Viscoelastic Tests Clinically Useful to Identify Platelet-Dependent Bleeding in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients?

BACKGROUND

Postoperative use of platelet function testing to rule out microvascular bleeding due to platelet dysfunction after cardiac surgery still lacks strong reference data and reliable cutoff values, yielding a clinically adequate sensitivity and specificity. The present study aims to investigate the performance of two different point-of-care viscoelastic devices and platelet aggregometry in expressing surgery-dependent platelet dysfunction and anticipating postoperative major bleeding in a cohort of high-risk patients.

METHODS

Prospective cohort study of 50 adult patients who were on antiplatelet drugs discontinued for no more than 7 days (clopidogrel and prasugrel) or 5 days (ticagrelor) undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Coagulation and platelet function testing, including QUANTRA, ROTEM, and Multiplate, were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Chest drain blood loss was measured in the first 12 postoperative hours. Perioperative bleeding was assessed using a modified version of the Universal Definition of Perioperative Bleeding (UDPB) in cardiac surgery, modified to not consider anemia-correcting packed red cells transfusions in the absence of bleeding >600 mL/12 h. Major bleeding was identified as UDPB class II or higher.

RESULTS

Multiplate adenosine diphosphate (ADPtest) was significantly ( P = .001) reduced after CPB, whereas TRAPtest was not. The platelet component (PC) as extrapolated by ROTEM data (EXTEM MCF-FIBTEM MCF) was unchanged after CPB, while the A10 PC (PC at 10 minutes) was significantly ( P = .001) reduced. The QUANTRA platelet contribution to clot stiffness (PCS) was significantly ( P = .001) reduced, as well. At the ROC analysis for the predictive ability of the post-CPB platelet function testing, the best discrimination was obtained by the QUANTRA PCS, with an area under the curve (AUC) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.80 (0.66-0.91), P = .001, followed by the ROTEM A10 PC with AUC (95% CI) of 0.75 (0.51-0.99), P = .004, and PC with AUC (95% CI) of 0.74 (0.50-0.99), P = .009. The Multiplate ADPtest had an AUC (95% CI) of 0.67 (0.42-0.91), and the TRAPtest had an AUC (95% CI) of 0.62 (0.37-0.86). The cutoff values identified were 13 hPa for the QUANTRA PCS, 40 mm for the ROTEM A10, and 48.5 mm for the ROTEM PC, with negative predictive values of 84%, 81%, and 86%, respectively, and positive predictive values of 55%, 53%, and 69%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

QUANTRA PCS, ROTEM A10 PC, and Multiplate ADPtest showed a significant decrease after CPB, whereas ROTEM PC and Multiplate TRAPtest did not. Major bleeding was predicted with a moderate to good discrimination by the post-CPB viscoelastic tests (PCS, PC, and A10 PC).