Clinical benefits of FilmArray meningitis-encephalitis PCR assay in partially-treated bacterial meningitis in Israel

The Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel for the Detection of Bacteria and Yeast in Cerebrospinal Fluid Specimens

Background and objective Infectious meningitis and encephalitis are serious diseases that can have fatal consequences, especially in the case of bacterial meningitis. Molecular biology has made it possible to quickly introduce appropriate treatment. Our study aims to evaluate the FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, Utah) implemented in our department compared to traditional methods. Material and methods This was a retrospective single-center study conducted in the Department of Bacteriology of Mohammed V Military Training Hospital, Rabat, for a period of four years. All cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples from patients with symptoms of meningitis or meningoencephalitis submitted to the laboratory for cytobacteriological analysis were included in the study. Conventional analysis has been compared with molecular biology.  Results The overall agreement rate with FilmArray in our study was 86%. The sensitivity to Escherichia coli K1, Haemophilus influenzae, Neisseria meningitidis, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae was 100%. And for Cryptococcus neoformans it was 83% in our study. Conclusion In summary, this technique can be used to diagnose bacterial meningitis more sensitively than with conventional techniques, while at the same time allowing a rapid and efficacious patient's treatment.

Rational Use of Microbiological Tests in the Diagnosis of Central Nervous System Infections Using Restrictive Criteria: a Retrospective Study

Microbiological testing in general and in the setting of central nervous system (CNS) infection in particular are often excessive, leading to superfluous laboratory work and costs. In this regard, restrictive criteria, named Reller criteria, have been developed to reduce unnecessary CSF herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) PCR testing when suspecting encephalitis.

Clinical application and drug-use-guidance value of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in central nervous system infection

OBJECTIVE

Timely and precise etiology diagnosis is crucial for optimized medication regimens and better prognosis in central nervous system infections (CNS infections). We aimed to analyze the impact of mNGS tests on the management of patients with CNS infections.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study to analyze the value of mNGS in clinical applications. Three hundred sixty-nine patients with a CNS infection diagnosis were enrolled, and their clinical data were collected. CDI and DDI were defined in our study to describe the intensity of drug use in different groups. We used LOH and mRS to evaluate if the application of mNGS can benefit CNS infected patients.

RESULTS

mNGS reported a 91.67% sensitivity in culture-positive patients and an 88.24% specificity compared with the final diagnoses. Patients who participated with the mNGS test had less drug use, both total (58.77 vs. 81.18) and daily (22.6 vs. 28.12, P < 0.1, McNemar) intensity of drug use, and length of hospitalization (23.14 vs. 24.29). Patients with a consciousness grading 1 and 3 had a decrease in CDI (Grade 1, 86.49 vs. 173.37; Grade 3, 48.18 vs. 68.21), DDI (Grade 1, 1.52 vs. 2.72; Grade 3, 2.3 vs. 2.45), and LOH (Grade 1, 32 vs. 40; Grade 3, 21 vs. 23) with the application of mNGS. Patients infected with bacteria in the CNS had a reduced CDI, DDI, and LOH in the mNGS group. This was compared with the TraE group that had 49% of patients altered medication plans, and 24.7% of patients reduced drug intensity four days after mNGS reports. This was because of the reduction of drug types.

CONCLUSION

mNGS showed its high sensitivity and specificity characteristics. mNGS may assist clinicians with more rational medication regimens and reduce the drug intensity for patients. The primary way of achieving this is to reduce the variety of drugs, especially for severe patients and bacterial infections. mNGS has the ability of improving the prognosis of CNS infected patients.

Assessment of the Impact of a Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel on Hospital Length of Stay: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Meningitis and encephalitis are central nervous system infections with considerable morbidity and mortality. The BioFire^® FilmArray^® Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (multiplex ME panel) can identify pathogens rapidly potentially aiding in targeted therapy and curtail antimicrobial exposure. This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized the literature on the association between the multiplex ME panel and length of hospital stay (LOS), length of acyclovir therapy, and days with antibiotics. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched. Only studies presenting novel data were retained. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the impact of the multiplex ME panel on outcomes. Of 169 retrieved publications, 13 met the criteria for inclusion. Patients tested with the multiplex ME panel had a reduction in the average LOS (mean difference [MD] [95% CI]: −1.20 days [−1.96, −0.44], n = 11 studies). Use of the multiplex ME panel was also associated with a reduction in the length of acyclovir therapy (MD [95% CI]: −1.14 days [−1.78, −0.50], n = 7 studies) and a nonsignificant reduction in the average number of days with antibiotics (MD [95% CI]: −1.01 days [−2.39, 0.37], n = 6 studies). The rapidity of pathogen identification contributes to an overall reduced LOS, reductions in the duration of empiric antiviral utilization, and a nonsignificant reduction in antibiotic therapy.

FilmArray® Meningoencephalitis panel in the diagnosis of central nervous system infections: stewardship and cost analysis in a paediatric hospital in Chile

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system (CNS) infection has been an ongoing concern in paediatrics. The FilmArray® Meningoencephalitis (FAME) panel has greater sensitivity in identifying the aetiology of CNS infections. This study's objective was to compare the aetiological identification and hospitalization costs among patients with suspected CNS infection before and after the use of FAME.

METHODS

An analytical observational study was carried out using a retrospective cohort for the pre-intervention (pre-FAME use) period and a prospective cohort for the post-intervention (post-FAME use) period in children with suspected CNS infection.

RESULTS

A total of 409 CSF samples were analysed, 297 pre-intervention and 112 post-intervention. In the pre-intervention period, a total of 85.5% of patients required hospitalization, and in the post-intervention period 92.7% required hospitalization (p < 0.05). Median of ICU days was significantly lower in the post-intervention period than it was in the pre-intervention period. The overall positivity was 9.4 and 26.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). At ages 6 months and below, we found an increase in overall positivity from 2.6 to 28.1%, along with an increased detection of viral agents, S. agalactiae, S. pneumoniae, and N. meningitidis. The use of this diagnostic technology saved between $2916 and $12,240 USD in the cost of ICU bed-days. FAME use provided the opportunity for more accurate aetiological diagnosis of the infections and thus the provision of adequate appropriate treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The cost/benefit ratio between FAME cost and ICU bed-day cost savings is favourable. Implementation of FAME in Chilean public hospitals saves public resources and improves the accuracy of aetiological diagnosis.

Evaluation of the Utilization of FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis in Children With Suspected Central Nervous System Infection: A Retrospective Case Series

BACKGROUND

The etiology of central nervous system infections is often difficult to establish. FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis (ME) panel is a multiplex polymerase chain reaction for rapid identification of 14 pathogens. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential real-life contributions of the use of this method in the pediatric population.

METHODS

We herein report the results obtained with FilmArray ME in a retrospective case series of 367 children with suspected central nervous system infection. We identified viral and bacterial agents by FilmArray, and we evaluated the potential diagnostic contributions of the use of the panel taking into account the cytological, biochemical, and microbiological results of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis.

RESULTS

The FilmArray ME panel detected a viral infection in 186 cases (50.7%) and a bacterial infection in 12 cases (3.3%). Fifty-three cases (28.4%) of viral infection had at least 1 CSF finding that could be mistaken for bacterial meningitis. Enterovirus was identified in 2 cases with normal CSF findings. Among 12 bacterial infection cases, only 6 (50%) had a positive result with conventional microbiology analysis (Gram stain and culture). The CSF findings suggestive of bacterial meningitis were found in all 6 cases in which FilmArray was the only method to identify bacterial etiological agent.

CONCLUSIONS

FilmArray ME panel identified an etiological agent in cases in which conventional CSF analysis failed, providing potential clinical contributions to the management of such cases.

Biofire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis panel for the aetiological diagnosis of central nervous system infections: A systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis(FA/ME) panel brings benefits in clinical practice, but its diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the DTA of FA/ME for the aetiological diagnostic in patients with suspected central nervous system(CNS) infection.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review with DTA meta-analysis (PROSPERO: CRD42020139285). We searched Embase, Medline (Ovid), and Web of Science from inception until September 1st, 2021. We assessed the study-level risk of bias with the QUADAS-2 tool and applied the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the synthesised evidence. We included studies that simultaneously measured the reference test (CSF/blood culture for bacteria, and specific polymerase chain reaction for viruses) and the FA/ME in patients with suspected CNS infection. We performed random-effects bivariate meta-analysis models of combined sensitivity and specificity using CSF/blood cultures(reference test 1) and a final diagnosis adjudication based on clinical/laboratory criteria (reference test 2).

FINDINGS

We included 19 studies (11,351 participants). For all bacteria with reference test 1 (16 studies/6183 patients) sensitivity was estimated at 89·5% (95%CI 81·1-94·4), and specificity at 97·4% (95%CI 94-98·9). With reference test 2 (15 studies/5,524 patients), sensitivity was estimated at 92·1%(95%CI 86·8-95·3) and specificity at 99.2(95%CI 98·3-99·6) For herpes simplex virus-2(HSV-2), enteroviruses, and Varicella-Zoster virus (VZV), we obtained sensitivities between 75·5 and 93·8%, and specificities above 99% (reference test 1). Certainty of the evidence was low.

INTERPRETATION

FA/ME may have acceptable-to-high sensitivities and high specificities for identifying bacteria, especially for S.pneumoniae, and viruses, especially for HSV-2, and enteroviruses. Sensitivities for L.monocytogenes, H.influenzae, E.coli, and HSV-1 were suboptimal.

FUNDING

None.

New methods in meningitis diagnosis

Meningitis remains a worldwide problem and Central nervous system (CNS) infections are associated with devastating sequelae, including cognitive deficits, vision and hearing impairment, motor and sensory deficits and epilepsy in over one-half of survivors. Rapid diagnosis of meningitis is essential to improve chances at survival and minimize unnecessary healthcare costs related to isolation procedures and empiric treatment. Multiplex molecular assays are an attractive option for the simultaneous detection of several microbial targets. Currently, several assays are marketed. The aim of our review is to comprehensively evaluate the molecular available systems of using a new multiplex PCR panel in determining the microbiologic etiologies of meningitis.

Impact of the FilmArray meningitis/encephalitis panel on antimicrobial duration among patients with suspected central nervous system infection

Ten controlled studies evaluated antimicrobial use following implementation of the FilmArray meningitis and encephalitis panel versus usual care. Only one-half of studies identified significant reductions in antibiotic duration, with 8/10 reporting modest reductions for acyclovir. Coupling the FilmArray meningitis and encephalitis panel with interventions by antimicrobial stewardship programs may help enhance its clinical impact.

Syndromic Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (mPCR) Testing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: Current Practice and Future Directions

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Syndromic multiplex polymerase chain reaction (mPCR) panels offer the antimicrobial steward a rapid tool for optimizing and de-escalating antimicrobials. In this review, we analyze the role of syndromic mPCR in respiratory, gastrointestinal, and central nervous system infections within the context of antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

RECENT FINDINGS

For all mPCR syndromic panels, multiple studies analyzed the pre-and-post implementation impact of mPCR on antimicrobial utilization. Prospective studies and trials of respiratory mPCR stewardship interventions, including diagnostic algorithms, educational efforts, co-testing with procalcitonin, and targeted provider feedback currently exist. For gastrointestinal and cerebrospinal fluid mPCR, fewer peer-reviewed reports exist for the use of mPCR in antimicrobial stewardship. These studies demonstrated an inconsistent trend towards decreasing antibiotic use with mPCR. This is further limited by a lack of statistical significance, the absence of controlled, prospective trials, and issues with data generalizability.

SUMMARY

Antibiotic overuse may improve when mPCR is coupled with electronic medical record algorithm-based approaches and direct provider feedback by an antimicrobial stewardship professional. mPCR may prove a useful tool for antimicrobial stewardship but future studies are needed to define the best practice for its utilization.

Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Meningitis and Encephalitis-BioFire

Meningitis and encephalitis (ME) are important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Patients suspected of having ME are often hospitalized and started on empiric antimicrobial treatment, because of the potential adverse consequences of delaying the diagnosis or treatment. Multiplexed polymerase chain reaction panels are one of several rapid diagnostic technologies that have the potential to overcome some of the limitations of conventional diagnostic methods for ME. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel was the first Food and Drug Administration-cleared multiplex polymerase chain reaction for the evaluation of cerebrospinal fluid samples, able to identify 14 organisms in a single test reaction. This newer rapid diagnostic tool has an overall high sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of ME with a fast turnaround time and has the potential to improve resource utilization for patients presenting with suspicion of ME. However, further research is needed to determine its optimal use in the evaluation of patients with suspected ME.

Diagnostic challenges of central nervous system infection: extensive multiplex panels versus stepwise guided approach

BACKGROUND

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing is a key component for the diagnosis of central nervous system (CNS) infections. Current meningitis and encephalitis management guidelines agree on the need for CSF molecular testing in combination with other direct and indirect biological testing, both in CSF and blood. Multiplex molecular tests have been developed to reduce turnaround times and facilitate the diagnostic approach.

OBJECTIVES

We aim to discuss the role of multiplex molecular panels in the management of CNS infections.

SOURCES

The MEDLINE database and the grey literature have been searched for relevant articles.

CONTENT

New molecular multiplex panels are being developed to simultaneously detect a large array of neuropathogens in CSF. Although one of these assays has been US Food and Drug Administration-approved, extensive analytical and clinical validation is still missing, and suboptimal performance related issues have been raised. Its use has been associated with decreased costs, reduced length of hospital stay and reduced antiviral therapy administration in retrospective, industry-sponsored studies. The pros and cons of this multiplex syndromic approach are discussed in this narrative review.

IMPLICATIONS

Molecular multiplex CNS infection diagnosis panels have been developed and present several attractive features, including ease of use and low turnaround time. However, suboptimal analytical performances render these tests difficult to use without additional confirmatory tests. Such panels are not comprehensive nor adapted to all situations, depending on the epidemiological or clinical context. Overall, available data in the literature currently do not support the use of a multiplex PCR panel in clinical routine as a 'stand-alone' molecular assay. Except in restricted laboratory capacity settings where such easy-to-use multiplex panels offer the diagnostic means that would otherwise not be available, the stepwise testing approach remains a more rational option. Serological testing both in blood and CSF should not be neglected, but it represents essential complementary tools regarding some neuropathogens.