Severe maternal hardships are associated with food insecurity among low-income/lower-income women during pregnancy: results from the 2012–2014 California maternal infant health assessment

The Link Between Intimate Partner Violence and Food Insecurity: A Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Studies

Intimate partner violence (IPV) and food insecurity are global health issues that affect millions of people worldwide. Numerous studies show that IPV and food insecurity are linked; however, there is a lack of synthesis of this research. Using a systematic search and review, we examined the international quantitative and qualitative research published on the link between IPV and food insecurity. We searched for peer-reviewed, English-language articles with participants above the age of 16 in 4 large online databases. Fifty-six studies were included from around the world that discussed the link between food insecurity and IPV perpetration and/or victimization. We found evidence in both qualitative and quantitative studies for a meaningful connection between these two global health isues. We also reviewed the literature on moderators and mediators (e.g., mental health). Our findings indicate the importance of implementing IPV prevention strategies which also address household food insecurity, and the potential for food insecurity resources to provide IPV resources. Future research should focus more frequently on IPV perpetration as opposed to victimization, and further examine the moderating and mediating mechanisms that inform the link between IPV and food insecurity.

Understanding Food Insecurity as a Determinant of Health in Pregnancy Within the United States: An Integrative Review

Background

Food insecurity is a major public health concern in the United States, particularly for pregnant and postpartum individuals. In 2020, ∼13.8 million (10.5%) U.S. households experienced food insecurity. However, the association between food security and pregnancy outcomes in the United States is poorly understood.

Purpose

The purpose of this review was to critically appraise the state of the evidence related to food insecurity as a determinant of health within the context of pregnancy in the United States. We also explored the relationship between food insecurity and pregnancy outcomes.

Methods

PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Food and Nutrition Science databases were used. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies about food (in)security, position articles from professional organizations, and policy articles about pregnancy outcomes and breastfeeding practices. Studies conducted outside of the United States and those without an adequate definition of food (in)security were excluded. Neonatal health outcomes were also excluded. Included articles were critically appraised with the STROBE and Critical Appraisal Skills Program checklists.

Results

Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Inconsistencies exist in defining and measuring household food (in)security. Pregnant and postpartum people experienced several adverse physiological and psychological outcomes that impact pregnancy compared with those who do not. Intersections between neighborhood conditions and other economic hardships were identified. Findings regarding the impact of food insecurity on breastfeeding behaviors were mixed, but generally food insecurity was not associated with poor breastfeeding outcomes in adjusted models.

Conclusion

Inconsistencies in definitions and measures of food security limit definitive conclusions. There is a need for standardizing definitions and measures of food insecurity, as well as a heightened awareness and policy change to alleviate experiences of food insecurity.

Integrating Lawyers Into Perinatal Care Teams to Address Unmet, Health-Harming Legal Needs

Across the United States, historically imposed structural, social, and environmental variables are intimately connected to poor obstetric outcomes and high maternal and infant mortality rates among Black pregnancy-capable people. Efforts to diminish the effect of these variables include integrating screening for social determinants of health during the perinatal period and treating them with social services, mental health support, and other referrals, including connections to community-based resources. Although helpful, some of these social determinants cannot be overcome without legal advocacy. Medical-legal partnerships, which integrate lawyers into health care, fill this gap. This commentary by an interprofessional team of authors relies on the experience of an established MLP. We posit that unmet legal needs of perinatal patients merit ongoing monitoring and intervention. We explain the rationale for perinatal practice medical-legal partnerships and share implementation suggestions from a high-intensity safety-net urban hospital.

Food insecurity and delayed or forgone health care among pregnant and postpartum women in the United States, 2019-2021

OBJECTIVE

Despite the growing food insecurity crisis in the United States, limited evidence exists about the effects of food insecurity on the unmet health care needs of peripartum (pregnant and postpartum) women. The aim of this study was to examine the association between food insecurity and delayed or forgone health care among peripartum women in the United States from 2019 to 2021.

METHODS

We conducted a pooled cross-sectional analysis using data from the 2019, 2020, and 2021 National Health Interview Surveys. Food security status was defined by type (high/marginal, low, and very low). Descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression, adjusted for sociodemographic and health-related characteristics, were conducted to estimate the overall and specific delayed or forgone health care (yes or no) between the different categories of food security.

RESULTS

Of the 1525 peripartum women (weighted, N = 5,580,186), 11% of peripartum women in the United States experienced suboptimal food security in the 12 mo between 2019 and 2021, with 5% experiencing low and 5% experiencing very low food security. This included 6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5-8%) who reported delaying filling a medical prescription, 6% (95% CI, 5-8%) who required counseling or therapy from a mental health professional but did not receive it, 6% (5-8%) who delayed counseling or therapy from a mental health professional, 8% (95% CI, 6-10%) who needed medical care but did not receive it, and 9% (95% CI, 7-10%) who delayed medical care. Peripartum women with low and very food security were more likely to delay or forego health care due to cost concerns than food-secure peripartum women. In the multivariable analyses adjusted for predisposing, enabling, and need-based factors, women with low and very low food security had higher risk for delayed or forgone health care than those with marginal or high food security.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated a positive association between food insecurity and cost-related unmet health care needs among peripartum women. Future empirical studies are needed to assess the effects of peripartum health care interventions targeting food insecurity on reducing health care access disparities associated with costs and improving peripartum health outcomes.

What qualitative research can tell us about food and nutrition security in the UK and why we should pay attention to what it is telling us

Poor dietary patterns leading to poorer health and increased health care use have affected people living in disadvantaged economic circumstances in the UK for decades, which many fear will be exacerbated due to the UK's current so-called 'cost of living crisis'. The voices of experts by experience of those health and social inequalities are not routinely included in health improvement intervention development in relation to obesity prevention policy and programmes. Obesity is highly correlated with food insecurity experience in high-income country contexts (where food insecurity data are routinely collected) and is similarly socially patterned. Using a health equity lens, this review paper highlights qualitative research findings that have revealed the perspectives and direct experiences of people living with food insecurity, or those others supporting food-insecure households, that shed light on the role and influence of the socio-economic contextual factors food-insecure people live with day-to-day. Insights from qualitative research that have focused on the granular detail of day-to-day household resource management can help us understand not only how food insecurity differentially impacts individual household members, but also how behavioural responses/food coping strategies are playing into pathways that lead to avoidable ill health such as obesity, diabetes and other chronic health conditions, including mental health problems. This review paper concludes by discussing research and policy implications in relation to food-insecure households containing people with chronic health conditions, and for pregnant women and families with infants and very young children living in the UK today.

Trends, Prevalence, and Risk Factors of Food Insecurity Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the United States: Findings from the 2019-2021 National Health Interview Survey

Background: Despite the widespread food insecurity in the United States, there is limited research investigating its prevalence among pregnant women and the potential impact it has on maternal and child health outcomes. This study examined trends in the prevalence of, and investigated risk factors for, food insecurity among peripartum women, using a nationally representative sample in the United States. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included pregnant and postpartum women aged 18-49 years who reported being currently pregnant or pregnant in the past 12 months and who participated in the National Health Interview Survey from 2019 to 2021. Weighted multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to estimate associations with food insecurity. Results: A total of 1,527 pregnant women, weighted to represent 5,588,192 women in the United States, were included in the analysis. Overall, from 2019 to 2021, 10.8% of peripartum women were food insecure. The prevalence of food insecurity changed substantially between 2019 and 2021 (2019: 10.6% confidence interval [95% CI: 8.7-13.5], 2020: 16.0% [95% CI: 10.9-22.8], 2021: 6.2% [95% CI: 4.2-9.1]). The adjusted odds of food insecurity were significantly higher among pregnant and postpartum women in 2020 (aOR 2.15), who had a health insurance coverage (aOR 2.98) and who had an unmet health care need in the preceding 12 months (aOR 6.52). Conclusion: We found that food insecurity was common among peripartum women between 2019 and 2021 and was exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying the factors that predispose peripartum women to the risk of food insecurity can guide the development and implementation of targeted interventions aimed at reducing the adverse impact of food insecurity on perinatal and infant health.

Food Insecurity and Food Access Among Women in Northern New England During the Perinatal Period

OBJECTIVE

To describe the experience of food insecurity and food access among women in northern New England during the perinatal period.

DESIGN

Qualitative descriptive.

SETTING

Hospital system in northern New England.

PARTICIPANTS

Twelve pregnant women and two women who gave birth.

METHODS

We interviewed participants during pregnancy and the postpartum period about their experiences of food insecurity, including screening, their willingness and ability to access food programs, and the extent to which their food needs were met through referrals. We analyzed interview transcripts to identify themes related to participants' experiences of food insecurity; food support, including screening and referral; and opportunities for improvement in current food support interventions.

RESULTS

Most participants accepted being screened for food insecurity and were satisfied with the food distributed in their perinatal care settings. Food insecurity consistently occurred alongside general financial strain, housing insecurity, and transportation needs, which affirmed the interconnectedness of social determinants of health. Other co-occurring risks included intimate partner violence, substance use, and mental health challenges. Food receipt was facilitated by care team members who were knowledgeable about food distribution programs. Barriers to food receipt included challenges with enrolling in public assistance programs, poor awareness among participants of available resources, the persistence and unpredictability of food insecurity, and stigma. We identified three distinct themes that described participants' experiences with food insecurity during pregnancy and the postpartum period: Experience of Being Screened for Food Insecurity, Intersecting Social Needs, and Experience of Accessing Resources.

CONCLUSION

These findings can be used to inform comprehensive food support programs that reflect the needs and values of women during the perinatal period. Interventions to screen and intervene for food insecurity during and after pregnancy align with the quality standards of The Joint Commission and should be integrated into nursing practice.

Impact of fruit and vegetable benefits on pregnancy outcomes among WIC participants: a natural experiment

Proper nutrition is critical for maternal and neonatal health. In January 2017, the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) in San Francisco, California, began providing an additional $40 per month in fruit and vegetable (F&V) benefits to pregnant clients with the goal of improving food security and nutrition-related outcomes. We evaluated whether pregnant women on WIC who received this additional F&V benefit exhibited better perinatal and birth outcomes compared with those who received standard WIC benefits. We used 2010-2019 birth certificate data from the National Center for Health Statistics. The intervention group consisted of WIC participants living in San Francisco (SF) County (intervention county) and whose first trimester started after January 2017. We used a quasi-experimental synthetic control method to compare trends between the intervention and control groups (a weighted sample of other California counties that did not distribute additional F&V benefits). Outcomes included low birth weight, preterm birth, small-for-gestational-age, gestational diabetes, and gestational weight gain. No significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes among WIC recipients in SF and synthetic control group were observed after the F&V benefits were distributed. Prior studies have shown that additional F&V benefits have positive effects on maternal and infant outcomes, indicating that F&V vouchers are a promising strategy for supporting equitable health outcomes. Our null results suggest that more rigorous research is needed to determine their optimal dose and duration, especially in high-cost-of-living areas, and to examine more upstream and structural interventions.