An open-label expanded access program of afatinib in EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

Real-world outcomes associated with afatinib use in patients with solid tumors harboring NRG1 gene fusions

OBJECTIVES

Neuregulin-1 (NRG1) fusions may drive oncogenesis via constitutive activation of ErbB signaling. Hence, NRG1 fusion-driven tumors may be susceptible to ErbB-targeted therapy. Afatinib (irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor) has demonstrated activity in individual patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors. This study collected real-world data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes in this patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter, non-comparative cohort study, physicians in the US-based Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network collected data from medical records of patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors who received afatinib (afatinib cohort) or other systemic therapies (non-afatinib cohort) in any therapy line. Objectives included demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes (overall response rate [ORR], progression-free survival [PFS], and overall survival [OS]).

RESULTS

Patients (N = 110) with a variety of solid tumor types were included; 72 received afatinib, 38 other therapies. In the afatinib cohort, 70.8 % of patients received afatinib as second-line treatment and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was 2-4 in 69.4 % at baseline. In the non-afatinib cohort, 94.7 % of patients received systemic therapy as first-line treatment and ECOG PS was 2-4 in 31.6 % at baseline. In the afatinib cohort, ORR was 37.5 % overall (43.8 % when received as first-line therapy); median PFS and OS were 5.5 and 7.2 months, respectively. In the non-afatinib cohort, ORR was 76.3 %; median PFS and OS were 12.9 and 22.6 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study provides real-world data on the characteristics of patients with NRG1 fusion-positive solid tumors treated with afatinib or other therapies; durable responses were observed in both groups. However, there were imbalances between the cohorts, and the study was not designed to compare outcomes. Further prospective/retrospective trials are required.

Afatinib and Dacomitinib Efficacy, Safety, Progression Patterns, and Resistance Mechanisms in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Carrying Uncommon EGFR Mutations: A Comparative Cohort Study in China (AFANDA Study)

(1) Background: Afatinib has been approved for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) carrying major uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) mutations. Dacomitinib, another second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has also shown promising potential for uncommon EGFR mutations. However, no comparative study has been conducted. (2) Methods: Two cohorts were employed: the AFANDA cohort, an ambispective cohort including 121 patients with uncommon EGFR mutations admitted to two tertiary hospitals in China, and an external validation afatinib cohort (ex-AC), extracted from the Afatinib Uncommon EGFR Mutations Database (N = 1140). The AFANDA cohort was divided into an afatinib cohort (AC) and a dacomitinib cohort (DC) for internal exploration. Objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs) were assessed for comparison. Progression patterns and resistance mechanisms were explored. (3) Results: In total, 286 patients with advanced NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations treated with afatinib or dacomitinib were enrolled, including 79 in the AFANDA cohort (44 in the DC, 35 in the AC) and 207 in the ex-AC. In internal exploration, the ORR of the DC was significantly higher than that of the AC (60.5 vs. 26.7%, p = 0.008), but there was no significant difference in median PFS between the DC and the AC (12.0 months vs. 10.0 months, p = 0.305). Multivariate analysis confirmed an independent favorable effect of dacomitinib on PFS (hazard ratio (HR), 1.909; p = 0.047). In external validation, multivariate analysis confirmed the independent prognostic role of dacomitinib in PFS (HR, 1.953; p = 0.029). Propensity score matching analysis confirmed the superiority of dacomitinib over afatinib in terms of PFS in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Toxicity profiling analysis suggested more G1 (p = 0.006), but fewer G3 (p = 0.036) AEs in the DC than in the AC. Progression patterns revealed that the incidence of intracranial progression in the AC was significantly higher than that in the DC (50 vs. 21.1%, p = 0.002). Drug resistance analysis indicated no significant difference in the occurrence of T790M between the AC and the DC (11.8 vs. 15.4%, p = 0.772). (4) Conclusions: Compared with afatinib, dacomitinib demonstrated a more favorable activity with manageable toxicity and different progression patterns in patients with NSCLC carrying uncommon EGFR mutations.

A pharmacological exploration of targeted drug therapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the prime cause of cancer-related deaths globally, with a contribution of 85% from non-small cell lung cancer. Before a few decades back, conventional chemotherapy was the most chosen treatment option for NSCLC but with side effects. Now, the treatment approaches have shifted to a new trend, targeted therapy, and a better treatment strategy with minimal side effects compared to chemotherapy. Advances in technologies and understanding the pathways lead to the discovery of new targets and through which it is possible to improve treatment outcomes and patient compliance. Unlike chemotherapy, targeted therapy focuses on the tumor cells and does not produce toxicity to healthy cells. The last two decades were very crucial in the development of many small molecules with the capability to target-specific proteins or genes in the disease progression pathway. Although the targeted therapy approach was a gemstone with many successful drugs for the treatment of NSCLC, various resistance mechanisms and activation of bypass signaling pathways put many of these drugs in the trash. In this review, we will discuss the major targeted proteins involved in NSCLC as well as the inhibitor drugs developed to target them for now and along with the future directions.

Afatinib 30 mg in the treatment of common and uncommon EGFR-mutated advanced lung adenocarcinomas: a retrospective, single-center, longitudinal study

Background

Afatinib 30 mg has been proved to be with comparable efficacy but more tolerable than the dose of 40 mg for Asian patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical outcomes of afatinib at 30 mg/d in the treatment of advanced lung adenocarcinomas (LAD) with common and uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations.

Methods

EGFR-mutated advanced LAD patients receiving afatinib (30 mg/d) from January 2017 to November 2021 were retrospectively included. EGFR status was classified into three subtypes, namely common mutations including exon 19 deletions (19del) and exon 21 L858R (21L858R), uncommon mutations including G719X, L861Q, S768I, and complex mutations, and separately exon 20 insertions (20ins). Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed during regular follow-up.

Results

The overall median PFS of totally 58 included patients was 9.83 [95% confidence index (CI): 5.76–13.91] months. The number of patients with common, uncommon, and 20ins mutations was 32 (55.2%), 19 (32.8%) and 7 (12.1%), respectively. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly among the three subtypes. The corresponding median PFS was 13.97 (12.06–15.89), 8.48 (0.32–16.64), and 3.78 (1.93–5.64) months, respectively (P=0.002). In the first-line setting, patients with common and uncommon mutations had a significantly longer PFS compared to those with 20ins [14.53 (13.53–15.53) vs. 10.39 (4.87–15.91) vs. 2.37 (0.00–5.11) months, P<0.001]. The first-line ORR showed significant differences among the three subtypes (60% vs. 80% vs. 0.0%, P=0.023). All-grade AEs occurred in 22 patients (37.9%). AEs ≥ grade 3 mainly included diarrhea (8.6%), and none of the patients discontinued treatment due to severe AEs.

Conclusions

Afatinib at 30 mg/d is associated with a favorable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of advanced LAD with common and major uncommon EGFR mutations except 20ins. Further large-scale prospective studies are warranted to confirm our findings.