1
|
Kell G, Roberts A, Umansky S, Qian L, Ferrari D, Soboczenski F, Wallace BC, Patel N, Marshall IJ. Question answering systems for health professionals at the point of care-a systematic review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2024; 31:1009-1024. [PMID: 38366879 PMCID: PMC10990539 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocae015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Question answering (QA) systems have the potential to improve the quality of clinical care by providing health professionals with the latest and most relevant evidence. However, QA systems have not been widely adopted. This systematic review aims to characterize current medical QA systems, assess their suitability for healthcare, and identify areas of improvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS We searched PubMed, IEEE Xplore, ACM Digital Library, ACL Anthology, and forward and backward citations on February 7, 2023. We included peer-reviewed journal and conference papers describing the design and evaluation of biomedical QA systems. Two reviewers screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles. We conducted a narrative synthesis and risk of bias assessment for each study. We assessed the utility of biomedical QA systems. RESULTS We included 79 studies and identified themes, including question realism, answer reliability, answer utility, clinical specialism, systems, usability, and evaluation methods. Clinicians' questions used to train and evaluate QA systems were restricted to certain sources, types and complexity levels. No system communicated confidence levels in the answers or sources. Many studies suffered from high risks of bias and applicability concerns. Only 8 studies completely satisfied any criterion for clinical utility, and only 7 reported user evaluations. Most systems were built with limited input from clinicians. DISCUSSION While machine learning methods have led to increased accuracy, most studies imperfectly reflected real-world healthcare information needs. Key research priorities include developing more realistic healthcare QA datasets and considering the reliability of answer sources, rather than merely focusing on accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Kell
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, Greater London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
| | - Angus Roberts
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King’s College London, London, Greater London, SE5 8AB, United Kingdom
| | - Serge Umansky
- Metadvice Ltd, London, Greater London, SW1Y 5JG, United Kingdom
| | - Linglong Qian
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, King’s College London, London, Greater London, SE5 8AB, United Kingdom
| | - Davide Ferrari
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, Greater London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
| | - Frank Soboczenski
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, Greater London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
| | - Byron C Wallace
- Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, United States
| | - Nikhil Patel
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, Greater London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
| | - Iain J Marshall
- Department of Population Health Sciences, King’s College London, London, Greater London, SE1 1UL, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mahmoud A, Goodwin VA, Morley N, Whitney J, Lamb SE, Lyndon H, Creanor S, Frost J. How can we improve Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for older people living with frailty in primary care and community settings? A qualitative study. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e081304. [PMID: 38548360 PMCID: PMC10982782 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE With advancing age comes the increasing prevalence of frailty and increased risk of adverse outcomes (eg, hospitalisation). Evidence for comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA), a multidimensional holistic model of care, is mixed in community settings. Uncertainties remain, such as the key components of CGA, who delivers it, and the use of technology. This study aimed to understand the perspectives, beliefs and experiences, of both older people and health professionals, to improve the current CGA and explore factors that may impact on CGA delivery in community settings. DESIGN A qualitative interview study was conducted with older people and healthcare professionals (HCPs) identified using a maximum variation strategy. Data were analysed using an abductive analysis approach. The non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread and sustainability framework and the theoretical framework of acceptability guided the categorisation of the codes and identified categories were mapped to the two frameworks. SETTING England, UK. RESULTS 27 people were interviewed, constituting 14 older people and 13 HCPs. We identified limitations in the current CGA: a lack of information sharing between different HCPs who deliver CGA; poor communication between older people and their HCPs and a lack of follow-up as part of CGA. When we discussed the potential for CGA to use technology, HCPs and older people varied in their readiness to engage with it. CONCLUSIONS Viable solutions to address gaps in the current delivery of CGA include the provision of training and support to use digital technology and a designated comprehensive care coordinator. The next stage of this research will use these findings, existing evidence and stakeholder engagement, to develop and refine a model of community-based CGA that can be assessed for feasibility and acceptability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aseel Mahmoud
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | | - Naomi Morley
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Julie Whitney
- Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah E Lamb
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Helen Lyndon
- Adult Community Services Specialist Services Directorate, Cornwall Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Bodmin, UK
- Southwest Clinical School, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Siobhan Creanor
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | - Julia Frost
- Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Branney P, Marques MM, Norris E. Applying the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework to evaluate automated evidence synthesis in health behaviour change. J Health Psychol 2024:13591053241229870. [PMID: 38456322 DOI: 10.1177/13591053241229870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Automated tools to speed up the process of evidence synthesis are increasingly apparent within health behaviour research. This brief review explores the potential of the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability framework for supporting automated evidence synthesis in health behaviour change by applying it to the ongoing Human Behaviour-Change Project, which aims to revolutionize evidence synthesis within behaviour change intervention research. To increase the relevance of NASSS for health behaviour change, we recommend i) terminology changes ('condition' to 'behaviour' and 'patient' to 'end user') and ii) that it is used prospectively address complexities iteratively. We draw conclusions about i) the need to specify the organizations that will use the technology, ii) identifying what to do if interdependencies fail and iii) even though we have focused on automated evidence synthesis, NASSS would arguably be beneficial for technology developments in health behaviour change more generally, particularly for invention development.
Collapse
|
4
|
Daniels K, Bonnechère B. Harnessing digital health interventions to bridge the gap in prevention for older adults. Front Public Health 2024; 11:1281923. [PMID: 38259780 PMCID: PMC10800474 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Daniels
- Department of PXL – Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | - Bruno Bonnechère
- Department of PXL – Healthcare, PXL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hasselt, Belgium
- REVAL Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Center, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Technology-Supported and Data-Driven Rehabilitation, Data Science Institute, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hamann P, Knitza J, Kuhn S, Knevel R. Recommendation to implementation of remote patient monitoring in rheumatology: lessons learned and barriers to take. RMD Open 2023; 9:e003363. [PMID: 38056918 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-003363] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote patient monitoring (RPM) leverages advanced technology to monitor and manage patients' health remotely and continuously. In 2022 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) points-to-consider for remote care were published to foster adoption of RPM, providing guidelines on where to position RPM in our practices. Sample papers and studies describe the value of RPM. But for many rheumatologists, the unanswered question remains the 'how to?' implement RPM.Using the successful, though not frictionless example of the Southmead rheumatology department, we address three types of barriers for the implementation of RPM: service, clinician and patients, with subsequent learning points that could be helpful for new teams planning to implement RPM. These address, but are not limited to, data governance, selecting high quality cost-effective solutions and ensuring compliance with data protection regulations. In addition, we describe five lacunas that could further improve RPM when addressed: establishing quality standards, creating a comprehensive database of available RPM tools, integrating data with electronic patient records, addressing reimbursement uncertainties and improving digital literacy among patients and healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip Hamann
- Faculty of Health Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Johannes Knitza
- Institute of Digital Medicine, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Kuhn
- Institute of Digital Medicine, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Knevel
- Rheumatology, Leiden Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Thompson CA, Daffu-O'Reilly A, Willis T, Gordon A, Noakes C, Khaliq K, Farrin A, Kemp A, Hall T, Bojke C, Spilsbury K. 'Smart' BLE wearables for digital contact tracing in care homes during the COVID-19 pandemic-a process evaluation of the CONTACT feasibility study. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:155. [PMID: 38049924 PMCID: PMC10694939 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00533-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rapid and mass transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus amongst vulnerable people led to devastating effects from COVID-19 in care homes. The CONTACT intervention introduced Bluetooth Low Energy 'smart' wearable devices (BLE wearables) as a basis for automated contact tracing in, and feedback on infection risks and patterns to, care homes to try and improve infection prevention and control (IPC). We planned a cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) of CONTACT. To be feasible, homes had to adopt CONTACT's technology and new ways of working. This paper reports on the process evaluation conducted alongside CONTACT's feasibility study and explains why it lacked the feasibility and acceptability for a definitive RCT. METHODS This mixed method process evaluation used Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) qualitative (interviews, field notes, study case report forms and documents, and observation) and quantitative (survey instruments, counts of activity) data to plan, implement, and analyse the mechanisms, effects, and contextual factors that shaped the feasibility and acceptability of the CONTACT intervention. RESULTS Thirteen themes within four core NPT constructs explained CONTACT's lack of feasibility. Coherence: the home's varied in the scale and extent of commitment and understanding of the technology and study procedures. Leadership credibility was important but compromised by competing priorities. Management and direct care staff saw CONTACT differently. Work to promote (cognitive participation) and enact (collective action) CONTACT was burdensome and failed to be prioritised over competing COVID-19-related demands on time and scarce human and cognitive resources. Ultimately, staff appraisal of the value of CONTACT-generated information and study procedures (reflexivity) was that any utility for IPC was insufficient to outweigh the perceived burden and complexity involved. CONCLUSIONS Despite implementation failure, dismissing BLE wearables' potential for contact tracing is premature. In non-pandemic conditions, with more time, better co-design and integration of theory-driven implementation strategies tailored to care homes' unique contexts, researchers could enhance normalisation in readiness for future pandemic challenges. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN registration: 11,204,126 registered 17/02/2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carl A Thompson
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK.
| | | | - Thomas Willis
- Trials Research, Leeds Institute of Clinical, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Adam Gordon
- Division of Medical Sciences and Graduate Entry Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, DE22 3NE, UK
| | - Catherine Noakes
- School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Kishwer Khaliq
- School of Civil Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Amanda Farrin
- Trials Research, Leeds Institute of Clinical, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Andrew Kemp
- School of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Tom Hall
- South Tyneside Council, South Shields, NE33 2RL, UK
| | - Chris Bojke
- Academic Unit of Health Economics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Karen Spilsbury
- School of Healthcare, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bamgboje-Ayodele A, McPhail SM, Brain D, Taggart R, Burger M, Bruce L, Holtby C, Pradhan M, Simpson M, Shaw TJ, Baysari MT. How digital health translational research is prioritised: a qualitative stakeholder-driven approach to decision support evaluation. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075009. [PMID: 37931965 PMCID: PMC10632864 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Digital health is now routinely being applied in clinical care, and with a variety of clinician-facing systems available, healthcare organisations are increasingly required to make decisions about technology implementation and evaluation. However, few studies have examined how digital health research is prioritised, particularly research focused on clinician-facing decision support systems. This study aimed to identify criteria for prioritising digital health research, examine how these differ from criteria for prioritising traditional health research and determine priority decision support use cases for a collaborative implementation research programme. METHODS Drawing on an interpretive listening model for priority setting and a stakeholder-driven approach, our prioritisation process involved stakeholder identification, eliciting decision support use case priorities from stakeholders, generating initial use case priorities and finalising preferred use cases based on consultations. In this qualitative study, online focus group session(s) were held with stakeholders, audiorecorded, transcribed and analysed thematically. RESULTS Fifteen participants attended the online priority setting sessions. Criteria for prioritising digital health research fell into three themes, namely: public health benefit, health system-level factors and research process and feasibility. We identified criteria unique to digital health research as the availability of suitable governance frameworks, candidate technology's alignment with other technologies in use,and the possibility of data-driven insights from health technology data. The final selected use cases were remote monitoring of patients with pulmonary conditions, sepsis detection and automated breast screening. CONCLUSION The criteria for determining digital health research priority areas are more nuanced than that of traditional health condition focused research and can neither be viewed solely through a clinical lens nor technological lens. As digital health research relies heavily on health technology implementation, digital health prioritisation criteria comprised enablers of successful technology implementation. Our prioritisation process could be applied to other settings and collaborative projects where research institutions partner with healthcare delivery organisations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adeola Bamgboje-Ayodele
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven M McPhail
- Australian Centre for Health Service Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Brain
- Australian Centre for Health Service Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard Taggart
- Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Mitchell Burger
- Sydney Local Health District, NSW Health, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lenert Bruce
- Murrumbidgee Local Health District, NSW Health, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Caroline Holtby
- Murrumbidgee Local Health District, NSW Health, Wagga Wagga, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Mark Simpson
- eHealth NSW, Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tim J Shaw
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Melissa T Baysari
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abell B, Naicker S, Rodwell D, Donovan T, Tariq A, Baysari M, Blythe R, Parsons R, McPhail SM. Identifying barriers and facilitators to successful implementation of computerized clinical decision support systems in hospitals: a NASSS framework-informed scoping review. Implement Sci 2023; 18:32. [PMID: 37495997 PMCID: PMC10373265 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-023-01287-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Successful implementation and utilization of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems (CDSS) in hospitals is complex and challenging. Implementation science, and in particular the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, may offer a systematic approach for identifying and addressing these challenges. This review aimed to identify, categorize, and describe barriers and facilitators to CDSS implementation in hospital settings and map them to the NASSS framework. Exploring the applicability of the NASSS framework to CDSS implementation was a secondary aim. METHODS Electronic database searches were conducted (21 July 2020; updated 5 April 2022) in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PyscInfo, and CINAHL. Original research studies reporting on measured or perceived barriers and/or facilitators to implementation and adoption of CDSS in hospital settings, or attitudes of healthcare professionals towards CDSS were included. Articles with a primary focus on CDSS development were excluded. No language or date restrictions were applied. We used qualitative content analysis to identify determinants and organize them into higher-order themes, which were then reflexively mapped to the NASSS framework. RESULTS Forty-four publications were included. These comprised a range of study designs, geographic locations, participants, technology types, CDSS functions, and clinical contexts of implementation. A total of 227 individual barriers and 130 individual facilitators were identified across the included studies. The most commonly reported influences on implementation were fit of CDSS with workflows (19 studies), the usefulness of the CDSS output in practice (17 studies), CDSS technical dependencies and design (16 studies), trust of users in the CDSS input data and evidence base (15 studies), and the contextual fit of the CDSS with the user's role or clinical setting (14 studies). Most determinants could be appropriately categorized into domains of the NASSS framework with barriers and facilitators in the "Technology," "Organization," and "Adopters" domains most frequently reported. No determinants were assigned to the "Embedding and Adaptation Over Time" domain. CONCLUSIONS This review identified the most common determinants which could be targeted for modification to either remove barriers or facilitate the adoption and use of CDSS within hospitals. Greater adoption of implementation theory should be encouraged to support CDSS implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bridget Abell
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Sundresan Naicker
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - David Rodwell
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Thomasina Donovan
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Amina Tariq
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Melissa Baysari
- Biomedical Informatics and Digital Health, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Robin Blythe
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Rex Parsons
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Steven M McPhail
- Australian Centre for Health Services Innovation and Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Public Health and Social Work, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Winter PD, Chico TJA. Using the Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) Framework to Identify Barriers and Facilitators for the Implementation of Digital Twins in Cardiovascular Medicine. Sensors (Basel) 2023; 23:6333. [PMID: 37514627 PMCID: PMC10385429 DOI: 10.3390/s23146333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
A digital twin is a computer-based "virtual" representation of a complex system, updated using data from the "real" twin. Digital twins are established in product manufacturing, aviation, and infrastructure and are attracting significant attention in medicine. In medicine, digital twins hold great promise to improve prevention of cardiovascular diseases and enable personalised health care through a range of Internet of Things (IoT) devices which collect patient data in real-time. However, the promise of such new technology is often met with many technical, scientific, social, and ethical challenges that need to be overcome-if these challenges are not met, the technology is therefore less likely on balance to be adopted by stakeholders. The purpose of this work is to identify the facilitators and barriers to the implementation of digital twins in cardiovascular medicine. Using, the Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability (NASSS) framework, we conducted a document analysis of policy reports, industry websites, online magazines, and academic publications on digital twins in cardiovascular medicine, identifying potential facilitators and barriers to adoption. Our results show key facilitating factors for implementation: preventing cardiovascular disease, in silico simulation and experimentation, and personalised care. Key barriers to implementation included: establishing real-time data exchange, perceived specialist skills required, high demand for patient data, and ethical risks related to privacy and surveillance. Furthermore, the lack of empirical research on the attributes of digital twins by different research groups, the characteristics and behaviour of adopters, and the nature and extent of social, regulatory, economic, and political contexts in the planning and development process of these technologies is perceived as a major hindering factor to future implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter D Winter
- School of Sociology, Politics, and International Studies (SPAIS), University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK
| | - Timothy J A Chico
- Department of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease (IICD), University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Livingstone KM, Rawstorn JC, Partridge SR, Godrich SL, McNaughton SA, Hendrie GA, Blekkenhorst LC, Maddison R, Zhang Y, Barnett S, Mathers JC, Packard M, Alston L. Digital behaviour change interventions to increase vegetable intake in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2023; 20:36. [PMID: 36973716 PMCID: PMC10042405 DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01439-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital interventions may help address low vegetable intake in adults, however there is limited understanding of the features that make them effective. We systematically reviewed digital interventions to increase vegetable intake to 1) describe the effectiveness of the interventions; 2) examine links between effectiveness and use of co-design, personalisation, behavioural theories, and/or a policy framework; and 3) identify other features that contribute to effectiveness. METHODS A systematic search strategy was used to identify eligible studies from MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, INFORMIT, IEEE Xplore and Clinical Trial Registries, published between January 2000 and August 2022. Digital interventions to increase vegetable intake were included, with effective interventions identified based on statistically significant improvement in vegetable intake. To identify policy-action gaps, studies were mapped across the three domains of the NOURISHING framework (i.e., behaviour change communication, food environment, and food system). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane tools for randomized, cluster randomized and non-randomized trials. RESULTS Of the 1,347 records identified, 30 studies were included. Risk of bias was high or serious in most studies (n = 25/30; 83%). Approximately one quarter of the included interventions (n = 8) were effective at improving vegetable intake. While the features of effective and ineffective interventions were similar, embedding of behaviour change theories (89% vs 61%) and inclusion of stakeholders in the design of the intervention (50% vs 38%) were more common among effective interventions. Only one (ineffective) intervention used true co-design. Although fewer effective interventions included personalisation (67% vs 81%), the degree of personalisation varied considerably between studies. All interventions mapped across the NOURISHING framework behaviour change communication domain, with one ineffective intervention also mapping across the food environment domain. CONCLUSION Few digital interventions identified in this review were effective for increasing vegetable intake. Embedding behaviour change theories and involving stakeholders in intervention design may increase the likelihood of success. The under-utilisation of comprehensive co-design methods presents an opportunity to ensure that personalisation approaches better meet the needs of target populations. Moreover, future digital interventions should address both behaviour change and food environment influences on vegetable intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine M Livingstone
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne Burwood Campus, 221 Burwood Highway, VIC, 3125, Melbourne, Australia.
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
| | - Jonathan C Rawstorn
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Stephanie R Partridge
- Engagement and Co-Design Research Hub, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephanie L Godrich
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Bunbury, WA, 6230, Australia
| | - Sarah A McNaughton
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Gilly A Hendrie
- Human Health Program, Health & Biosecurity, CSIRO, Adelaide, SA, 5000, Australia
| | - Lauren C Blekkenhorst
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Nutrition and Health Innovation Research Institute, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Australia
| | - Ralph Maddison
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Yuxin Zhang
- Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| | - Scott Barnett
- Applied Artificial Intelligence Institute (A²I²), Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| | - John C Mathers
- Human Nutrition & Exercise Research Centre, Centre for Healthier Lives, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE2 4HH, UK
| | - Maria Packard
- The National Heart Foundation of Australia, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Deakin Rural Health, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Australia
- The Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bright S, Moses F, Ridout A, Sam B, Momoh M, Goodhart V, Smart F, Mannah M, Issa S, Herm-Singh S, Reid F, Seed PT, Bunn J, Shennan A, Augustin K, Sandall J. Scale-up of a novel vital signs alert device to improve maternity care in Sierra Leone: a mixed methods evaluation of adoption. Reprod Health 2023; 20:6. [PMID: 36609353 PMCID: PMC9817393 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-022-01551-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The CRADLE (Community blood pressure monitoring in Rural Africa: Detection of underLying pre-Eclampsia) Vital Signs Alert device-designed specifically to improve maternity care in low resource settings-had varying impact when trialled in different countries. To better understand the contextual factors that may contribute to this variation, this study retrospectively evaluated the adoption of CRADLE, during scale-up in Sierra Leone. METHODS This was a mixed methods study. A quantitative indicator of adoption (the proportion of facilities trained per district) was calculated from existing training records, then focus groups were held with 'CRADLE Champions' in each district (n = 32), to explore adoption qualitatively. Template Analysis was used to deductively interpret qualitative data, guided by the NASSS (non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, sustainability) Framework. FINDINGS Substantial but non-significant variation was found in the proportion of facilities trained in each district (range 59-90%) [X2 (7, N = 8) = 10.419, p = 0.166]. Qualitative data identified complexity in two NASSS domains that may have contributed to this variation: 'the technology' (for example, charging issues, difficulty interpreting device output and concerns about ongoing procurement) and 'the organisation' (for example, logistical barriers to implementing training, infighting and high staff turnover). Key strategies mentioned to mitigate against these issues included: transparent communication at all levels; encouraging localised adaptations during implementation (including the involvement of community leaders); and selecting Champions with strong soft skills (particularly conflict resolution and problem solving). CONCLUSIONS Complexity related to the technology and the organisational context were found to influence the adoption of CRADLE in Sierra Leone, with substantial inter-district variation. These findings emphasise the importance of gaining an in-depth understanding of the specific system and context in which a new healthcare technology is being implemented. This study has implications for the ongoing scale-up of CRADLE, and for those implementing or evaluating other health technologies in similar contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Bright
- grid.11835.3e0000 0004 1936 9262School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England
| | - Francis Moses
- Reproductive Health and Family Planning, MoHS, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
| | - Alex Ridout
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764King’s College London (KCL), London, England
| | - Betty Sam
- Welbodi Partnership, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Mariama Momoh
- grid.463455.50000 0004 1799 2069Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MoHS), Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Francis Smart
- Planning and Information, MoHS, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Sattu Issa
- Reproductive Health and Family Planning, MoHS, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Fiona Reid
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Population Health Sciences, KCL, London, England
| | - Paul T. Seed
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Women and Children’s Health, KCL, London, England
| | - James Bunn
- World Health Organization, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Andrew Shennan
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Department of Women and Children’s Health, KCL, London, England
| | - Katrin Augustin
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, KCL, London, England
| | - Jane Sandall
- grid.13097.3c0000 0001 2322 6764Women’s Health Academic Centre, KCL, London, England
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abimbola S, Liu H. Adoption and scale-up of the cardiovascular Polypill: a realist institutional analysis. Health Policy Plan 2023; 38:15-27. [PMID: 36271837 PMCID: PMC9825725 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czac088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Efforts to promote the adoption and scale-up of health system innovations must contend with the existing institutional context. But there are no commonly used frameworks to ensure that the insights of actors involved in such institutional efforts connect to one another. To test and modify a potential framework-the 'four-by-four' framework-we interviewed researcher-entrepreneurs involved in the unfolding story of the cardiovascular Polypill. The framework has four types/levels of institutions that affect adoption and scale-up: (1) informal institutions (L1, e.g. social norms), (2) formal institutions (L2, e.g. government policies and regulation), (3) organizational structures (L3, e.g. organizational boards and mission) and (4) everyday exchange (L4, e.g. service delivery), vis-à-vis four potential entrepreneurial strategies in response: (1) abide by existing institutions, (2) evade them, (3) alter them and/or (4) exit entrepreneurial action. Using this framework, we conducted a realist-informed analysis to understand how context (i.e. institutions) and mechanism (i.e. entrepreneurial strategies) influence each other to shape outcomes (i.e. adoption and scale-up). We found that researcher-entrepreneurs began with efforts to abide with existing institutions but encountered institutional obstacles at each level. Efforts to abide were followed by seeking to evade and/or alter unfavourable institutions, with greater success evading and/or altering lower (L3 and L4) than upper (L1 and L2) institutions. Exit considerations followed the failure of the evade or alter strategy. Shifts between strategies were propelled by 'learning'. The 'four-by-four' framework can be used as a scaffold to generate narratives of adoption or scale-up efforts, a sensitizing tool to prospectively map out contingencies and a matrix to synthesize narratives and experiences across multiple innovations or settings. Used in these ways, the 'four-by-four' framework can help to optimize the transferability and cumulation of insights on how to promote the adoption and scale-up of health system innovations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seye Abimbola
- School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Hueiming Liu
- The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Meunier PY, Raynaud C, Guimaraes E, Gueyffier F, Letrilliart L. Barriers and Facilitators to the Use of Clinical Decision Support Systems in Primary Care: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. Ann Fam Med 2023; 21:57-69. [PMID: 36690490 PMCID: PMC9870646 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Revised: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To identify and quantify the barriers and facilitators to the use of clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) by primary care professionals (PCPs). METHODS A mixed-methods systematic review was conducted using a sequential synthesis design. PubMed/MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Embase, CINAHL, and the Cochrane library were searched in July 2021. Studies that evaluated CDSSs providing recommendations to PCPs and intended for use during a consultation were included. We excluded CDSSs used only by patients, described as concepts or prototypes, used with simulated cases, and decision supports not considered as CDSSs. A framework synthesis was performed according to the HOT-fit framework (Human, Organizational, Technology, Net Benefits), then a quantitative synthesis evaluated the impact of the HOT-fit categories on CDSS use. RESULTS A total of 48 studies evaluating 45 CDSSs were included, and 186 main barriers or facilitators were identified. Qualitatively, barriers and facilitators were classified as human (eg, perceived usefulness), organizational (eg, disruption of usual workflow), and technological (eg, CDSS user-friendliness), with explanatory elements. The greatest barrier to using CDSSs was an increased workload. Quantitatively, the human and organizational factors had negative impacts on CDSS use, whereas the technological factor had a neutral impact and the net benefits dimension a positive impact. CONCLUSIONS Our findings emphasize the need for CDSS developers to better address human and organizational issues, in addition to technological challenges. We inferred core CDSS features covering these 3 factors, expected to improve their usability in primary care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre-Yves Meunier
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Camille Raynaud
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuelle Guimaraes
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| | - François Gueyffier
- Laboratoire de biométrie et biologie évolutive, département biostatistiques et modélisation pour la santé et l'environnement, CNRS UMR5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Fédération de Recherche Santé Lyon Est, PAM Santé Publique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| | - Laurent Letrilliart
- Collège universitaire de médecine générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
- Research on Healthcare Performance (RESHAPE), INSERM U1290, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Minian N, Mehra K, Rose J, Veldhuizen S, Zawertailo L, Ratto M, Lecce J, Selby P. Cocreation of a conversational agent to help patients adhere to their varenicline treatment: A study protocol. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231182807. [PMID: 37377562 PMCID: PMC10291536 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231182807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Varenicline is the most efficacious approved smoking cessation medication, making it one of the most cost-effective clinical interventions for reducing tobacco-related morbidity and mortality. Adhering to varenicline is strongly associated with smoking cessation. Healthbots have the potential to help people adhere to their medications by scaling up evidence-based behavioral interventions. In this protocol, we outline how we will follow the UK's Medical Research Council's guidance to codesign a theory-informed, evidence-based, and patient-centered healthbot to help people adhere to varenicline. Methods The study will utilize the Discover, Design and Build, and Test framework and will include three phases: (a) a rapid review and interviews with 20 patients and 20 healthcare providers to understand barriers and facilitators to varenicline adherence (Discover phase); (b) Wizard of Oz test to design the healthbot and get a sense of the questions that chatbot has to be able to answer (Design phase); and (c) building, training, and beta-testing the healthbot (Building and Testing phases) where the Nonadoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework will be used to develop the healthbot using the simplest sensible solution, and 20 participants will beta test the healthbot. We will use the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behavior (COM-B) model of behavior change and its associated framework, the Theoretical Domains Framework, to organize the findings. Conclusions The present approach will enable us to systematically identify the most appropriate features for the healthbot based on a well-established behavioral theory, the latest scientific evidence, and end users' and healthcare providers' knowledge.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Minian
- INTREPID Lab (formerly Nicotine Dependence Service), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kamna Mehra
- INTREPID Lab (formerly Nicotine Dependence Service), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan Rose
- Edward S. Rogers Sr. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Scott Veldhuizen
- INTREPID Lab (formerly Nicotine Dependence Service), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laurie Zawertailo
- INTREPID Lab (formerly Nicotine Dependence Service), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Matt Ratto
- Faculty of Information, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Schwartz Reisman Institute for Technology and Society, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julia Lecce
- INTREPID Lab (formerly Nicotine Dependence Service), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Selby
- INTREPID Lab (formerly Nicotine Dependence Service), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Martens M, Wouters E, van Olmen J, Klemenc Ketiš Z, Chhim S, Chham S, Buffel V, Danhieux K, Stojnić N, Zavrnik Č, Poplas Susič A, Van Damme W, Ir P, Remmen R, Ku GMV, Klipstein-Grobusch K, Boateng D. Process evaluation of the scale-up of integrated diabetes and hypertension care in Belgium, Cambodia and Slovenia (the SCUBY Project): a study protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062151. [PMID: 36581422 PMCID: PMC9806029 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Integrated care interventions for type 2 diabetes (T2D) and hypertension (HT) are effective, yet challenges exist with regard to their implementation and scale-up. The 'SCale-Up diaBetes and hYpertension care' (SCUBY) Project aims to facilitate the scale-up of integrated care for T2D and HT through the co-creation and implementation of contextualised scale-up roadmaps in Belgium, Cambodia and Slovenia. We hereby describe the plan for the process and scale-up evaluation of the SCUBY Project. The specific goals of the process and scale-up evaluation are to (1) analyse how, and to what extent, the roadmap has been implemented, (2) assess how the differing contexts can influence the implementation process of the scale-up strategies and (3) assess the progress of the scale-up. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A comprehensive framework was developed to include process and scale-up evaluation embedded in implementation science theory. Key implementation outcomes include acceptability, feasibility, relevance, adaptation, adoption and cost of roadmap activities. A diverse range of predominantly qualitative tools-including a policy dialogue reporting form, a stakeholder follow-up interview and survey, project diaries and policy mapping-were developed to assess how stakeholders perceive the scale-up implementation process and adaptations to the roadmap. The role of context is considered relevant, and barriers and facilitators to scale-up will be continuously assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval has been obtained from the Institutional Review Board (ref. 1323/19) at the Institute of Tropical Medicine (Antwerp, Belgium). The SCUBY Project presents a comprehensive framework to guide the process and scale-up evaluation of complex interventions in different health systems. We describe how implementation outcomes, mechanisms of impact and scale-up outcomes can be a basis to monitor adaptations through a co-creation process and to guide other scale-up interventions making use of knowledge translation and co-creation activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Martens
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Edwin Wouters
- Centre for Population, Family & Health, Department of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Centre for Health Systems Research & Development, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | - Josefien van Olmen
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Zalika Klemenc Ketiš
- Community Health Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
- Department of Family Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Srean Chhim
- National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Savina Chham
- Centre for Population, Family & Health, Department of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Veerle Buffel
- Centre for Population, Family & Health, Department of Social Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Katrien Danhieux
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | | | - Črt Zavrnik
- Community Health Center Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Wim Van Damme
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Gerontology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Por Ir
- National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Roy Remmen
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Grace Marie V Ku
- Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Kerstin Klipstein-Grobusch
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, Gauteng, South Africa
| | - Daniel Boateng
- Julius Global Health, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ashanti, Ghana
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Chen W, O’Bryan CM, Gorham G, Howard K, Balasubramanya B, Coffey P, Abeyaratne A, Cass A. Barriers and enablers to implementing and using clinical decision support systems for chronic diseases: a qualitative systematic review and meta-aggregation. Implement Sci Commun 2022; 3:81. [PMID: 35902894 PMCID: PMC9330991 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-022-00326-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Clinical decision support (CDS) is increasingly used to facilitate chronic disease care. Despite increased availability of electronic health records and the ongoing development of new CDS technologies, uptake of CDS into routine clinical settings is inconsistent. This qualitative systematic review seeks to synthesise healthcare provider experiences of CDS—exploring the barriers and enablers to implementing, using, evaluating, and sustaining chronic disease CDS systems. Methods A search was conducted in Medline, CINAHL, APA PsychInfo, EconLit, and Web of Science from 2011 to 2021. Primary research studies incorporating qualitative findings were included if they targeted healthcare providers and studied a relevant chronic disease CDS intervention. Relevant CDS interventions were electronic health record-based and addressed one or more of the following chronic diseases: cardiovascular disease, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, hypertension, and hypercholesterolaemia. Qualitative findings were synthesised using a meta-aggregative approach. Results Thirty-three primary research articles were included in this qualitative systematic review. Meta-aggregation of qualitative data revealed 177 findings and 29 categories, which were aggregated into 8 synthesised findings. The synthesised findings related to clinical context, user, external context, and technical factors affecting CDS uptake. Key barriers to uptake included CDS systems that were simplistic, had limited clinical applicability in multimorbidity, and integrated poorly into existing workflows. Enablers to successful CDS interventions included perceived usefulness in providing relevant clinical knowledge and structured chronic disease care; user confidence gained through training and post training follow-up; external contexts comprised of strong clinical champions, allocated personnel, and technical support; and CDS technical features that are both highly functional, and attractive. Conclusion This systematic review explored healthcare provider experiences, focussing on barriers and enablers to CDS use for chronic diseases. The results provide an evidence-base for designing, implementing, and sustaining future CDS systems. Based on the findings from this review, we highlight actionable steps for practice and future research. Trial registration PROSPERO CRD42020203716 Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00326-x.
Collapse
|
17
|
Flynn R, Stevens B, Bains A, Kennedy M, Scott SD. Identifying existing approaches used to evaluate the sustainability of evidence-based interventions in healthcare: an integrative review. Syst Rev 2022; 11:221. [PMID: 36243760 PMCID: PMC9569065 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-022-02093-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence to evaluate the sustainability of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) for healthcare improvement. Through an integrative review, we aimed to identify approaches to evaluate the sustainability of evidence-based interventions (EBIs) and sustainability outcomes. METHODS Following Whittemore and Knafl's methodological process: (1) problem identification; (2) literature search; (3) data evaluation; (4) data analysis; and (5) presentation, a comprehensive search strategy was applied across five databases. Included studies were not restricted by research design; and had to evaluate the sustainability of an EBI in a healthcare context. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. RESULTS Of 18,783 articles retrieved, 64 fit the inclusion criteria. Qualitative designs were most commonly used for evaluation (48%), with individual interviews as the predominant data collection method. Timing of data collection varied widely with post-intervention data collection most frequent (89%). Of the 64 studies, 44% used a framework, 26% used a model, 11% used a tool, 5% used an instrument, and 14% used theory as their primary approach to evaluate sustainability. Most studies (77%) did not measure sustainability outcomes, rather these studies focused on sustainability determinants. DISCUSSION It is unclear which approach/approaches are most effective for evaluating sustainability and what measures and outcomes are most commonly used. There is a disconnect between evaluating the factors that may shape sustainability and the outcomes approaches employed to measure sustainability. Our review offers methodological recommendations for sustainability evaluation research and highlights the importance in understanding mechanisms of sustainability to advance the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Flynn
- Faculty of Nursing, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada.
| | - Bonnie Stevens
- Lawrence S Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing and Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.,Associate Chief Nursing Research & Senior Scientist, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, 686 Bay St., Toronto, ON, M5G 0A4, Canada
| | - Arjun Bains
- Faculty of Nursing, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Megan Kennedy
- John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, 2K312 WMC University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Shannon D Scott
- Faculty of Nursing, Level 3, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Makun K, Singh R, Lal S, Chand R. Information and communications technology, health, and gender equality: Empirical evidence from a panel of Pacific developing economies. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0269251. [PMID: 35704646 PMCID: PMC9200337 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269251] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Information and communications technology (ICT) has been widely embraced in many developing economies in recent times. Extant research reveals that ICT increases economic growth. Beyond economic growth, improved access to information, markets and economic opportunities via information and communications technology have the potential to influence other dimensions of public welfare. This study quantitatively examines the effects of ICT on selected health and gender dimensions of Pacific Island developing countries’ populations. The results show a statistically significant and positive impact of ICT on health and gender outcomes. Our results are robust with an alternative modeling approach, different control variables, and different measures of health and gender outcomes. We further establish that the health outcome of technology has a valid pass-through of income. The study suggests policy implications for the Pacific and other developing countries striving to enhance the health and gender outcomes of SGDs.
Collapse
|
19
|
Liverani M, Por I, Perel P, Khan M, Balabanova D, Wiseman V. Assessing the Potential of Wearable Health Monitors for Health System Strengthening in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Prospective Study of Technology Adoption in Cambodia. Health Policy Plan 2022; 37:943-951. [PMID: 35262172 PMCID: PMC9469886 DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czac019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Wearable health monitors are a rapidly evolving technology that may offer new opportunities for strengthening health system responses to cardiovascular and other non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). In light of this, we explored opportunities for, and potential challenges to, technology adoption in Cambodia, considering the complexity of contextual factors that may influence product uptake and sustainable health system integration. Data collection for this study involved in-depth interviews with national and international stakeholders and a literature review. The analytical approach was guided by concepts and categories derived from the non-adoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) framework—an evidence-based framework that was developed for studying health technology adoption and the challenges to scale-up, spread and sustainability of such technologies in health service organizations. Three potential applications of health wearables for the prevention and control of NCDs in Cambodia were identified: health promotion, follow-up and monitoring of patients and surveys of NCD risk factors. However, several challenges to technology adoption emerged across the research domains, associated with the intended adopters, the organization of the national health system, the wider infrastructure, the regulatory environment and the technology itself. Our findings indicate that, currently, wearables could be best used to conduct surveys of NCD risk factors in Cambodia and in other LMICs with similar health system profiles. In the future, a more integrated use of wearables to strengthen monitoring and management of patients could be envisaged, although this would require careful consideration of feasibility and organizational issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Liverani
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.,Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ir Por
- The National Institute of Public Health, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Pablo Perel
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,Centre for Global Chronic Conditions, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mishal Khan
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dina Balabanova
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Virginia Wiseman
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.,The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Uribe Guajardo MG, Baillie A, Louie E, Giannopoulos V, Wood K, Riordan B, Haber P, Morley K. The evaluation of the role of technology in the pathways to comorbidity care implementation project to improve management of comorbid substance use and mental disorders. Journal of Multimorbidity and Comorbidity 2022; 12:26335565221096977. [PMID: 35586033 PMCID: PMC9106309 DOI: 10.1177/26335565221096977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
In substance use treatment settings, comorbid mental health problems can occur in up to 70% of people. An integrated approach for managing comorbidity, implementing evidence-based intervention in drug and alcohol settings, remains problematic. Technology can help in adopting evidence-based practice to implement effective treatment healthcare pathways. This study sought to examine aspects of tailored portal utilization (barriers and facilitators) by participants taking part in a program aimed at improving the implementation of evidence-based practice for comorbidity management Pathways to Comorbidity Care (PCC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Gabriela Uribe Guajardo
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Andrew Baillie
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, Discipline of Addiction Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Eva Louie
- Drug Health Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vicki Giannopoulos
- Drug Health Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katie Wood
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, Discipline of Addiction Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ben Riordan
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, Discipline of Addiction Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paul Haber
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, Discipline of Addiction Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Drug Health Service, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten Morley
- National Health and Medical Research Council Centre for Excellence in Mental Health and Substance Use, Discipline of Addiction Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hughes J, Lennon M, Rogerson RJ, Crooks G. Scaling Digital Health Innovation: Developing a New 'Service Readiness Level' Framework of Evidence. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021; 18:ijerph182312575. [PMID: 34886302 PMCID: PMC8656662 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182312575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Digital innovation has scaled exponentially in many sectors including tourism, banking, and retail. It is well cited that the health sector is slower to embrace digital health innovations (DHI) beyond the pilot stage and consequently, many successful DHI pilot projects have failed to scale up. Such failure arises in part from a knowledge gap around what type and level of evidence are needed to convince implementers and decision makers to fund, endorse, or adopt new innovations into care delivery systems and sustainable practice. Much is known about the range of DHI evaluation methods used; however, less is published on the evidence that decision makers need to move innovations to scale. This paper draws on interviews (N = 18) with decision makers/project leads engaged in DHI in Scotland to identify what evidence matters when making DHI adoption/scale decisions. The results are used to present a heuristic service readiness level (SRL) framework that captures the changing nature of the evidence base required over a project lifecycle for progression to scale. We utilise this framework to discuss ‘what evidence’ is required and ‘how data accumulate’ over time to assist project teams to build a ‘DHI case for scale’.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janette Hughes
- Digital Health & Care Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, Inovo Building, 121 George Street, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK;
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +44-(0)141-444-7421
| | - Marilyn Lennon
- Department of Computing & Information Science, Livingstone Tower, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G1 1XQ, UK;
| | - Robert J. Rogerson
- Technology & Innovation Centre, Institute for Future Cities, University of Strathclyde, 99 George Street, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK;
| | - George Crooks
- Digital Health & Care Innovation Centre, University of Strathclyde, Inovo Building, 121 George Street, Glasgow G1 1RD, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Greenhalgh T, Rosen R, Shaw SE, Byng R, Faulkner S, Finlay T, Grundy E, Husain L, Hughes G, Leone C, Moore L, Papoutsi C, Pope C, Rybczynska-Bunt S, Rushforth A, Wherton J, Wieringa S, Wood GW. Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services: A New Conceptual Framework Incorporating Complexity and Practical Ethics. Front Digit Health 2021; 3:726095. [PMID: 34713199 PMCID: PMC8521880 DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.726095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Establishing and running remote consultation services is challenging politically (interest groups may gain or lose), organizationally (remote consulting requires implementation work and new roles and workflows), economically (costs and benefits are unevenly distributed across the system), technically (excellent care needs dependable links and high-quality audio and images), relationally (interpersonal interactions are altered), and clinically (patients are unique, some examinations require contact, and clinicians have deeply-held habits, dispositions and norms). Many of these challenges have an under-examined ethical dimension. In this paper, we present a novel framework, Planning and Evaluating Remote Consultation Services (PERCS), built from a literature review and ongoing research. PERCS has 7 domains-the reason for consulting, the patient, the clinical relationship, the home and family, technologies, staff, the healthcare organization, and the wider system-and considers how these domains interact and evolve over time as a complex system. It focuses attention on the organization's digital maturity and digital inclusion efforts. We have found that both during and beyond the pandemic, policymakers envisaged an efficient, safe and accessible remote consultation service delivered through state-of-the art digital technologies and implemented via rational allocation criteria and quality standards. In contrast, our empirical data reveal that strategic decisions about establishing remote consultation services, allocation decisions for appointment type (phone, video, e-, face-to-face), and clinical decisions when consulting remotely are fraught with contradictions and tensions-for example, between demand management and patient choice-leading to both large- and small-scale ethical dilemmas for managers, support staff, and clinicians. These dilemmas cannot be resolved by standard operating procedures or algorithms. Rather, they must be managed by attending to here-and-now practicalities and emergent narratives, drawing on guiding principles applied with contextual judgement. We complement the PERCS framework with a set of principles for informing its application in practice, including education of professionals and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Sara E. Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Byng
- Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Stuart Faulkner
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Teresa Finlay
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Laiba Husain
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Hughes
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Lucy Moore
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Catherine Pope
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sarah Rybczynska-Bunt
- Plymouth Institute of Health and Care Research, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Rushforth
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Wherton
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sietse Wieringa
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Gary W. Wood
- Independent Research Consultant, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Singh NS, Scott K, George A, LeFevre AE, Ved R. A tale of 'politics and stars aligning': analysing the sustainability of scaled up digital tools for front-line health workers in India. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2021-005041. [PMID: 34312147 PMCID: PMC8728367 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION India has become a lighthouse for large-scale digital innovation in the health sector, particularly for front-line health workers (FLHWs). However, among scaled digital health solutions, ensuring sustainability remains elusive. This study explores the factors underpinning scale-up of digital health solutions for FLHWs in India, and the potential implications of these factors for sustainability. METHODS We assessed five FLHW digital tools scaled at the national and/or state level in India. We conducted in-depth interviews with implementers, technology and technical partners (n=11); senior government stakeholders (n=5); funders (n=1) and evaluators/academics (n=3). Emergent themes were grouped according to a broader framework that considered the (1) digital solution; (2) actors; (3) processes and (4) context. RESULTS The scale-up of digital solutions was facilitated by their perceived value, bounded adaptability, support from government champions, cultivation of networks, sustained leadership and formative research to support fit with the context and population. However, once scaled, embedding digital health solutions into the fabric of the health system was hampered by challenges related to transitioning management and ownership to government partners; overcoming government procurement hurdles; and establishing committed funding streams in government budgets. Strong data governance, continued engagement with FLHWs and building a robust evidence base, while identified in the literature as critical for sustainability, did not feature strongly among respondents. Sustainability may be less elusive once there is more consensus around the roles played between national and state government actors, implementing and technical partners and donors. CONCLUSION The use of digital tools by FLHWs offers much promise for improving service delivery and health outcomes in India. However, the pathway to sustainability is bespoke to each programme and should be planned from the outset by investing in people, relationships and service delivery adjustments to navigate the challenges involved given the dynamic nature of digital tools in complex health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neha S Singh
- Department of Global Health and Development, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Kerry Scott
- Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Asha George
- School of Public Health, University of the Western Cape, Faculty of Community and Health Sciences, Cape Town, Western Province, South Africa
| | - Amnesty Elizabeth LeFevre
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Rajani Ved
- National Health Systems Resource Centre, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dyb K, Berntsen GR, Kvam L. Adopt, adapt, or abandon technology-supported person-centred care initiatives: healthcare providers' beliefs matter. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:240. [PMID: 33731078 PMCID: PMC7968358 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06262-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Technology support and person-centred care are the new mantra for healthcare programmes in Western societies. While few argue with the overarching philosophy of person-centred care or the potential of information technologies, there is less agreement on how to make them a reality in everyday clinical practice. In this paper, we investigate how individual healthcare providers at four innovation arenas in Scandinavia experienced the implementation of technology-supported person-centred care for people with long-term care needs by using the new analytical framework nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability (NASSS) of health and care technologies. We also discuss the usability and sensitivity of the NASSS framework for those seeking to plan, implement, and evaluate technology-supported healthcare programmes. This study is part of an interdisciplinary research and development project called Patients and Professionals in Partnership (2016-2020). It originates at one of ten work packages in this project. METHOD The main data consist of ethnographic field observations at the four innovation arenas and 29 interviews with involved healthcare providers. To ensure continuous updates and status on work in the four innovation arenas, we have also participated in a total of six annual network meetings arranged by the project. RESULTS While the NASSS framework is very useful for identifying and communicating challenges with the adoption and spread of technology-supported person-centred care initiatives, we found it less sensitive towards capturing the dedication, enthusiasm, and passion for care transformation that we found among the healthcare providers in our study. When it comes to technology-supported person-centred care, the point of no return has passed for the involved healthcare providers. To them, it is already a definite part of the future of healthcare services. How to overcome barriers and obstacles is pragmatically approached. CONCLUSION Increased knowledge about healthcare providers and their visions as potential assets for care transformation might be critical for those seeking to plan, implement, and evaluate technology-supported healthcare programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kari Dyb
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 35, N-9038, Tromsø, Norway.
| | - Gro Rosvold Berntsen
- Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, P.O. Box 35, N-9038, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Lisbeth Kvam
- Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Levinson AJ, Bousfield J, Douglas W, Ayers S, Sztramko R. A Novel Educational Prescription Web-Based Application to Support Education for Caregivers of People Living With Dementia: Development and Usability Study With Clinicians. JMIR Hum Factors 2020; 7:e23904. [PMID: 33275103 PMCID: PMC7748956 DOI: 10.2196/23904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background It is estimated that 564,000 Canadians are currently living with dementia and there are approximately 486,000 to 1.1 million informal family/friend caregivers. Family/friend caregivers often receive little to no education or training about dementia but are expected to provide ongoing support for a complex condition. Web-based family/friend caregiver interventions may be helpful, but little is known about how best to implement them. Objective The objectives of this study were to 1) design and develop a novel education prescription application to help scale and spread web-based dementia education to family/friend caregivers, 2) conduct user testing, and 3) conduct a larger-scale field trial. Methods A novel education prescription web-based application was designed and developed. Initial user testing used task completion and the “think aloud” technique with a small sample of representative clinicians who work with people living with dementia and family/friend caregivers. Following iterative incorporation of feedback, a larger field trial was conducted with a convenience sample of clinicians. Account invitations were sent to 55 clinicians and, following a 2-month trial period, surveys were administered to participants including the System Usability Scale and the Net Promoter Score. Results During the initial user testing phase, participants (N=7) from representative disciplines easily completed associated tasks, and had very positive feedback with respect to the usability of the application. The System Usability Scale score during this phase was 91.4. Suggestions from feedback were incorporated into the application. During the larger field trial phase, participants (total N=55; activated account n=17; did not activate account n=38) were given access to the iGeriCare education prescription application. During this period, 2 participants created educational prescriptions; a total of 3 educational prescriptions were sent. Survey completers who did not activate their account (n=5) identified that their lack of use was due to time constraints, competing priorities, or forgetting to use the application. Survey completers who activated their account (n=5) identified their lower use was due to lack of time, lack of eligible family/friend caregivers during trial period, and competing priorities due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The System Usability Scale score during this phase was 78.75, and the Net Promoter Score was 50. Conclusions Study findings indicate a generally positive response for the usability of a web-based application for clinicians to prescribe dementia education to family/friend caregivers. The dissonance between the promising data and widespread enthusiasm for the design and purpose of the education prescription application found in the initial user testing phase and subsequent lack of significant adoption in the field trial represents both an important lesson for other novel health technologies and a potential area for further investigation. Further research is required to better understand factors associated with implementation of this type of intervention and impact on dissemination of education to family/friend caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony J Levinson
- Division of e-Learning Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - John Bousfield
- Division of e-Learning Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | | | - Stephanie Ayers
- Division of e-Learning Innovation, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Richard Sztramko
- McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.,GERAS Centre, St. Peter's Hospital, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Manetti S, Vainieri M, Guidotti E, Zuccarino S, Ferré F, Morelli MS, Emdin M. Research protocol for the validation of a new portable technology for real-time continuous monitoring of Early Warning Score (EWS) in hospital practice and for an early-stage multistakeholder assessment. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e040738. [PMID: 33273048 PMCID: PMC7716668 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The real-time continuous monitoring of vital parameters in patients affected by multiple chronic conditions and/or COVID-19 can lead to several benefits to the Italian National Healthcare System (IT-NHS). The UBiquitous Integrated CARE (UBICARE) technology is a novel health digital platform at the validation stage in hospital setting. UBICARE might support the urgent need for digitalisation and early intervention, as well as minimise the face-to-face delivery of care in both hospital and community-based care settings. This research protocol aims to design an early-stage assessment of the multidimensional impact induced by UBICARE within the IT-NHS alongside technology validation in a hospital ward. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The targeted patients will be medium/high-risk hypertensive individuals as an illustrative first example of how UBICARE might bring benefits to susceptible patients. A mixed-method study will be applied to incorporate to the validation study a multistakeholder perspective, including perceived patient experiences and preferences, and facilitate technology adoption. First, semistructured interviews will be undertaken with a variety of stakeholders including clinicians, health managers and policy-makers to capture views on the likely technology utility, economic sustainability, impact of adoption in hospital practice and alternative adoption scenarios. Second, a monocentric, non-randomised and non-comparative clinical study, supplemented by the administration of standardised usability questionnaires to patients and health professionals, will validate the use of UBICARE in hospital practice. Finally, the results of the previous stages will be discussed in a multidisciplinary-facilitated workshop with IT-NHS relevant stakeholders to reconcile stakeholders' perspectives. Limitations include a non-random recruitment strategy in the clinical study, small sample size of the key stakeholders and potential stakeholder recruitment bias introduced by the research technique. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Ethics Committee for Clinical Experimentation of Tuscany Region approved the protocol. Participation in this study is voluntary. Study results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and academic conferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Manetti
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management and EMbeDS Department, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Milena Vainieri
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management and EMbeDS Department, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Elisa Guidotti
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management and EMbeDS Department, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Sara Zuccarino
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management and EMbeDS Department, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | - Francesca Ferré
- Management and Health Laboratory, Institute of Management and EMbeDS Department, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
| | | | - Michele Emdin
- Institute of Life Sciences, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna, Pisa, Italy
- C.O.U of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Gabriele Monasterio Foundation, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amanda Barnard
- Rural Clinical School, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT
| |
Collapse
|