1
|
Naal H, Daou T, Brome D, Mansour R, Sittah GA, Giannou C, Steiger E, Saleh S. Evaluating a research training programme for frontline health workers in conflict-affected and fragile settings in the middle east. BMC Med Educ 2023; 23:240. [PMID: 37055781 PMCID: PMC10099017 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04176-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health Research Capacity Building (HRCB) is key to improving research production among health workers in LMICs to inform related policies and reduce health disparities in conflict settings. However, few HRCB programmes are available in the MENA region, and few evaluations of HRCB globally are reported in the literature. METHODS Through a qualitative longitudinal design, we evaluated the first implementation of the Center for Research and Education in the Ecology of War (CREEW) fellowship. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with fellows (n = 5) throughout the programme at key phases during their completion of courses and at each research phase. Additional data was collected from supervisors and peers of fellows at their organizations. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis and presented under pre-identified themes. RESULTS Despite the success of most fellows in learning on how to conduct research on AMR in conflict settings and completing the fellowship by producing research outputs, important challenges were identified. Results are categorized under predefined categories of (1) course delivery, (2) proposal development, (3) IRB application, (4) data collection, (5) data analysis, (6) manuscript write-up, (7) long-term effects, and (8) mentorship and networking. CONCLUSION The CREEW model, based on this evaluation, shows potential to be replicable and scalable to other contexts and other health-related topics. Detailed discussion and analysis are presented in the manuscript and synthesized recommendations are highlighted for future programmes to consider during the design, implementation, and evaluation of such programmes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hady Naal
- Global Health Institute at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Tracy Daou
- Global Health Institute at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Dayana Brome
- Global Health Institute at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Rania Mansour
- St George's Hospital Medical School, St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Ghassan Abu Sittah
- Global Health Institute at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Christos Giannou
- Global Health Institute at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Shadi Saleh
- Global Health Institute at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
- Faculty of Health Sciences at the American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ateudjieu J, Tchio-Nighie KH, Kemta Lekpa F, Koutio Douanla IM, Kiadjieu Dieumo FF, Ntsekendio PN, Naah F, Bekolo CE, Bisseck AC. Training needs of health researchers in research ethics in Cameroon: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22:697. [PMID: 36175947 PMCID: PMC9523981 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03767-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Researchers are responsible for the protection of health research participants. The purpose of this study was to identify and prioritize the training needs of researchers involved in human health research in Cameroon. METHODS It was a cross-sectional study conducted in all the Cameroon regions in the last quarter of 2020. It targeted researchers involved in human health research selected by systematic stratified sampling from health and training institutions, and health facilities. Data were collected using a face-to-face administered questionnaire deployed in Smartphones via the ODK-collect. The distribution of participants' exposure to research ethics training was described as well as their knowledge on the related regulatory texts. A score was used to rank the training needs identified by the participants. RESULTS Of 168 reached participants, 134 (79.76%) participated in the study. A total of 103 (76.87%) researchers reported having received training in human health research ethics and 98 (73.13%) perceived need of training in research ethics. Of those involved in clinical, vaccine, and field trials, 63.64, 33.33, 52.53% have been exposed respectively to related training regarding participants' protection. Having received at least one training in research ethics significantly increase the proportion of researchers systematically submitting application for ethical evaluation prior to implementation (OR = 3.20 (1.31-7.78)). Training priorities identified by researchers include: guidelines and regulations on health research ethics and research participant's protection in Cameroon, procedures for evaluating research protocols, protection of research participants in clinical trials, and fundamental ethics principles. CONCLUSION The coverage of researchers in training regarding research participant protection remains limited in a number of areas including those related to clinical trial participant protection and research participant protection in Cameroon. Improving this coverage and addressing perceived needs of researchers are expected to contribute in improving their ability in playing their role in research participant protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome Ateudjieu
- Department of Health Research, M.A. SANTE (Meilleur Accès aux Soins de Santé), P.O. Box: 3390, Yaounde, Cameroon
- Division of Health Operations Research, Cameroon Ministry of Public Health, Yaounde, Cameroon
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
| | - Ketina Hirma Tchio-Nighie
- Department of Health Research, M.A. SANTE (Meilleur Accès aux Soins de Santé), P.O. Box: 3390, Yaounde, Cameroon.
| | - Fernando Kemta Lekpa
- Internal Medicine Department, Douala General Hospital, Douala, Cameroon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
| | | | - Frank Forex Kiadjieu Dieumo
- Department of Health Research, M.A. SANTE (Meilleur Accès aux Soins de Santé), P.O. Box: 3390, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Paul Nyibio Ntsekendio
- Department of Health Research, M.A. SANTE (Meilleur Accès aux Soins de Santé), P.O. Box: 3390, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Felicité Naah
- Division of Health Operations Research, Cameroon Ministry of Public Health, Yaounde, Cameroon
| | - Cavin Epie Bekolo
- Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Dschang, Dschang, Cameroon
| | - Anne Cecile Bisseck
- Division of Health Operations Research, Cameroon Ministry of Public Health, Yaounde, Cameroon
- National Agency for AIDS Research, Yaounde, Cameroon
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Okeke C, Uzochukwu B, Onyedinma C, Onwujekwe O. An assessment of Nigeria's health systems response to COVID-19. Ghana Med J 2022; 56:74-84. [PMID: 38322737 PMCID: PMC10630045 DOI: 10.4314/gmj.v56i3s.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aims to understand and report on selected health system interventions considered nationally and sub-nationally of particular significance both in terms of COVID-19 responses and in strengthening the health system for the future. Design A review of published and grey literature, including journals, news/ media and official documents, was conducted from 1st December 2019 to 31st December 2020. The reviewers read and extracted relevant data using FACTIVA in a uniform data extraction template. Responses that related to service delivery were captured. Setting The assessment considered responses at the national and two state levels: Lagos and Enugu, representing the epicentre and a low COVID-19 burden centre. Inclusion criteria Documents and news that mentioned COVID-19 response, particularly service delivery aspects, were included in this review. Results The identified interventions were mostly technical support targeted at health workers: including training of about 17,000 health workers, supervising and engaging more health workers, upgrading laboratories and building new ones to improve screening and diagnosis, and motivation of health workforce with incentives. Furthermore, the influx of philanthropic contributions improved the data and information systems supply of medicines, medical products and non-pharmaceutical protective materials through local production. The presence of political will and the government's efforts in health system's response to COVID-19 facilitated these interventions. Conclusions Interventions of state and non-state actors have strengthened the health systems to some extent. However, more needs to be done to sustain these gains and make the health system resilient to absorb unprecedented shocks. Funding IDRC Canada Grant # 109479-001.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chinyere Okeke
- Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Benjamin Uzochukwu
- Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Chioma Onyedinma
- Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
- Department of Community Medicine, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Obinna Onwujekwe
- Health Policy Research Group, College of Medicine, University of Nigeria, Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
- Department of Health Administration and Management, University of Nigeria Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mirzoev T, Topp SM, Afifi RA, Fadlallah R, Obi FA, Gilson L. Conceptual framework for systemic capacity strengthening for health policy and systems research. BMJ Glob Health 2022; 7:bmjgh-2022-009764. [PMID: 35922082 PMCID: PMC9353002 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2022-009764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Health policy and systems research (HPSR) is critical in developing health systems to better meet the health needs of their populations. The highly contextualised nature of health systems point to the value of local knowledge and the need for context-embedded HPSR. Despite such need, relatively few individuals, groups or organisations carry out HPSR, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries. Greater effort is required to strengthen capacity for, and build the field of, HPSR by capturing the multilevel and nuanced representation of HPSR across contexts. No comprehensive frameworks were found that inform systemic HPSR capacity strengthening. Existing literature on capacity strengthening for health research and development tends to focus on individual-level capacity with less attention to collective, organisational and network levels. This paper proposes a comprehensive framework for systemic capacity strengthening for HPSR, uniquely drawing attention to the blurred boundaries and amplification potential for synergistic capacity strengthening efforts across the individual, organisational and network levels. Further, it identifies guiding values and principles that consciously acknowledge and manage the power dynamics inherent to capacity strengthening work. The framework was developed drawing on available literature and was peer-reviewed by the Board and Thematic Working Groups of Health Systems Global. While the framework focuses on HPSR, it may provide a useful heuristic for systemic approaches to capacity strengthening more generally; facilitate its mainstreaming within organisations and networks and help maintain a focused approach to, and structure repositories of resources on, capacity strengthening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tolib Mirzoev
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK .,Capacity Strengthening Working Group, Health Systems Global, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Stephanie M Topp
- Capacity Strengthening Working Group, Health Systems Global, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rima A Afifi
- Capacity Strengthening Working Group, Health Systems Global, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Community and Behavioral Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Racha Fadlallah
- Capacity Strengthening Working Group, Health Systems Global, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Department of Health Management and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Felix Abrahams Obi
- Capacity Strengthening Working Group, Health Systems Global, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,Nigeria Country Office, Results for Development Institute, Abuja, Nigeria.,Health Policy Research Group, University of Nigeria-Enugu Campus, Enugu, Nigeria
| | - Lucy Gilson
- Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.,Capacity Strengthening Working Group, Health Systems Global, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.,School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Utete R. Capacity building as a strategic tool for employment equity implementation in the financial sector. SA Journal of Human Resource Management 2021. [DOI: 10.4102/sajhrm.v19i0.1532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
|
6
|
Ezenwaka U, Onwujekwe O. Getting Evidence From Health Policy and Systems Research Into Policy and Practice for Controlling Endemic Tropical Diseases in Nigeria: Assessing Knowledge, Capacity, and Use. Front Trop Dis 2021. [DOI: 10.3389/fitd.2021.735990] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundGetting evidence from Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) into policy and practice for effective control of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) is essential for providing better service delivery because evidence-informed decision-making improves the effectiveness of a health system and health outcomes. The paper provides new knowledge on the policy-/decision-makers’ level of knowledge, capacity to use, and how evidence from HPSR has been used in decision-making for the control of endemic tropical diseases (ETDs), especially the NTDs and malaria in Nigeria.MethodsA cross-sectional qualitative study of decision-makers was undertaken in Anambra and Enugu states, southeast Nigeria. Data was collected through in-depth interviews (n=22) of purposively selected decision-makers to assess how HPSR evidence is translated into policy and practice for controlling ETDs. The respondents were selected based on their job description, roles, and involvement in the control of ETDs. Data were analyzed using the thematic content approach.ResultsThere is a considerable level of knowledge on HPSR and its relationship with evidence-informed policy- and decision-making towards control of ETDs and health system strengthening. Organizational capacity to use HPSR evidence in decision-making was found to be weak due to various reasons such as no embedded structure for translating research evidence to policy and practice, lack of decision-making autonomy by individuals, and politically driven decisions. Few respondents have either ever used or are currently using HPRS evidence for developing/reviewing and implementing strategies for ETDs programs. Majority of the respondents reported that their main source of evidence was routine data from health information management system, which they found useful due to its representativeness and completeness. Main enabler for using HPSR evidence for decision-making is existing collaborations between researchers and policy-/decision-makers.ConclusionThere is a high level of awareness about evidence from HPSR and the usefulness of such evidence in decision-making. However, this awareness does not translate to optimal use of evidence for decision-making due to weak organizational capacity and other constraints. There is the need to invest in capacity-building activities to develop a critical mass of users of evidence (policy-/decision-makers) to facilitate enhanced uptake of high-quality evidence into policy decisions for better control of ETDs.
Collapse
|
7
|
Mansour R, Naal H, Kishawi T, Achi NE, Hneiny L, Saleh S. Health research capacity building of health workers in fragile and conflict-affected settings: a scoping review of challenges, strengths, and recommendations. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:84. [PMID: 34022883 PMCID: PMC8140497 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00725-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fragile and conflict-affected settings (FCAS) have a strong need to improve the capacity of local health workers to conduct health research in order to improve health policy and health outcomes. Health research capacity building (HRCB) programmes are ideal to equip health workers with the needed skills and knowledge to design and lead health-related research initiatives. The study aimed to review the characteristics of HRCB studies in FCASs in order to identify their strengths and weaknesses, and to recommend future directions for the field. METHODS We conducted a scoping review and searched four databases for peer-reviewed articles that reported an HRCB initiative targeting health workers in a FCAS and published after 2010. Commentaries and editorials, cross-sectional studies, presentations, and interventions that did not have a capacity building component were excluded. Data on bibliographies of the studies and HRCB interventions and their outcomes were extracted. A descriptive approach was used to report the data, and a thematic approach was used to analyse the qualitative data. RESULTS Out of 8822 articles, a total of 20 were included based on the eligibility criteria. Most of the initiatives centred around topics of health research methodology (70%), targeted an individual-level capacity building angle (95%), and were delivered in university or hospital settings (75%). Ten themes were identified and grouped into three categories. Significant challenges revolved around the lack of local research culture, shortages in logistic capability, interpersonal difficulties, and limited assessment and evaluation of HRCB programmes. Strengths of HRCB interventions included being locally driven, incorporating interactive pedagogies, and promoting multidisciplinary and holistic training. Common recommendations covered by the studies included opportunities to improve the content, logistics, and overarching structural components of HRCB initiatives. CONCLUSION Our findings have important implications on health research policy and related capacity building efforts. Importantly, FCASs should prioritize (1) funding HRCB efforts, (2) strengthening equitable international, regional, and national partnerships, (3) delivering locally led HRCB programmes, (4) ensuring long-term evaluations and implementing programmes at multiple levels of the healthcare system, and (5) adopting engaging and interactive approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rania Mansour
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
- St. George’s, University of London, London, UK
| | - Hady Naal
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Tarek Kishawi
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Nassim El Achi
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| | - Layal Hneiny
- Saab Medical Library, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Shadi Saleh
- Global Health Institute, American University of Beirut, Beirut, 1107 2020 Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Okedo-Alex IN, Akamike IC, Olisaekee GO, Okeke CC, Uneke CJ. Identifying advocacy strategies, challenges and opportunities for increasing domestic health policy and health systems research funding in Nigeria: Perspectives of researchers and policymakers. Health Res Policy Syst 2021; 19:41. [PMID: 33752682 PMCID: PMC7983353 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00701-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Poor funding for Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) is a major constraint to the development, generation and uptake of HPSR evidence in Low and Middle-Income countries. The study assessed the status of HPSR domestic funding and advocacy strategies for improving HPSR funding in Nigeria. It equally explored the knowledge and perception of the domestic funding status of HPSR and the effect of capacity building on the knowledge of domestic funding for HPSR in Nigeria. Methods This was a sub-national study involving policymakers and researchers from Enugu and Ebonyi States in Southeast Nigeria who participated in the sub-national Health Systems Global convening for the African region. A before-after study design (workshop) was utilized. Data collection employed semi-structured questionnaires, group and panel discussions. The workshop facilitated knowledge of HPSR, funding processes, and advocacy strategies for increased domestic funding for HPSR. Pre and immediate post-workshop knowledge assessments were done. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25 and thematic analysis. Results Twenty-six participants were involved in the study. Half were females (50.0%) and 46.2% were aged 35–44 years. Policymakers constituted 23.1% of the participants. Domestic funding for HPSR in Nigeria was adjudged to be grossly inadequate. Identified barriers to domestic funding of HPSR included bureaucratic bottlenecks, political and policy transitions, and corruption. Potential opportunities centered on existing policy documents and emerging private sector willingness to fund health research. Multi-stakeholder advocacy coalitions, continuous advocacy and researcher skill-building on advocacy with active private sector involvement were the strategies proffered by the participants. Pre-workshop, understanding of the meaning of HPSR had the highest mean ratings while knowledge of budgeting processes and use of legal action to enable opportunities for budget advocacy for HPSR funding had the lowest mean ratings. Following the capacity-building workshop, all knowledge and understanding parameters markedly improved (percentage increase of 12.5%–71.0%). Conclusion This study found that there was paucity of domestic funding for HPSR in Nigeria alongside poor knowledge of budgeting and advocacy strategies among both policymakers and researchers. We recommend the deployment of these identified strategies and wider national and regional stakeholder engagement towards prioritizing and improving domestic funding for HPSR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ijeoma Nkem Okedo-Alex
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University (EBSU), Abakaliki, Nigeria. .,Department of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
| | - Ifeyinwa Chizoba Akamike
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University (EBSU), Abakaliki, Nigeria.,Department of Community Medicine, Alex Ekwueme Federal University Teaching Hospital, Abakaliki, Ebonyi State, Nigeria
| | | | | | - Chigozie Jesse Uneke
- African Institute for Health Policy and Health Systems, Ebonyi State University (EBSU), Abakaliki, Nigeria
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Core competency is the basis of promoting a competitive advantage for any organization; this study aims to establish an objective and systematic assessment model for companies to identify their capabilities. This model will not only assist companies in understanding their own capabilities but will also allow them to compare their performance with that of main competitors to strengthen their competitiveness. The analysis process involved a combination of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process, fuzzy linguistic value, and the ideal and anti-ideal concept. An objective and systematic model was first developed, which underwent empirical analysis using data from the top three home delivery companies in Taiwan. It was found that “Basic organizational competencies” and “Special competitive competencies” were the two key categories for the home delivery industry. Moreover, “Service price”, “On-time delivery”, and “Secure delivery” were found to be the three most important capabilities needed for home delivery companies. The results showed that the model is able to effectively assist organizations in constructing or assessing their organizational capabilities; in addition, organizations can adjust their service profiles to adapt to today’s turbulent business environment and rapidly changing consumer demands.
Collapse
|