Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of organs at risk between the prone and supine positions in postoperative radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Factors Affecting Prostate Displacement During Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Prone Position After High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer

Purpose

In irradiating the prostate and pelvic lymph node regions, registration based on bony structures matches the pelvic lymph node regions but not necessarily the prostate position, and it is important to identify factors that influence prostate displacement. Therefore, we investigated factors influencing prostate displacement during volumetric modulated arc therapy after single-fraction high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) for prostate cancer and the trends in displacement for each fraction.

Methods and Materials

Seventy patients who underwent pelvic volumetric modulated arc therapy of 46 Gy in the prone position 15 days after 13 Gy HDR-BT were included. Prostate displacement relative to bony structures was calculated using cone beam computed tomography. Systematic error (SE) and random error (RE) were evaluated in the right-left (RL), craniocaudal (CC), and anteroposterior (AP) directions. The association with clinical and anatomic factors on the planning computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was analyzed. Prostate volume change (PVC) was defined as the volume change at 2 days after HDR-BT. Displacement trends were individually examined from the first to 23rd fractions.

Results

The mean SE in the RL, CC, and AP directions was -0.01 mm, -2.34 mm, and -0.47 mm, respectively. The root mean square of the RE in the RL, CC, and AP directions was 0.44 mm, 1.14 mm, and 1.10 mm, respectively. SE in the CC direction was independently associated with bladder volume (P = .021, t statistic = 2.352) and PVC (P < .001, t statistic = -8.526). SE in the AP direction was independently associated with bladder volume (P = .013, t statistic = -2.553), PVC (P < .001, t statistic = 5.477), and rectal mean area (P = .008, t statistic = 2.743). RE in the CC direction was independently associated with smoking (P = .035). RE in the AP direction was associated with PVC (P = .043). Gradual displacement caudally and posteriorly occurred during the irradiation period.

Conclusions

Anatomic characteristics of the bladder, rectum, and prostate predict SE. Smoking and PVC predict RE. In particular, whether PVC is ≥140% affects setting internal margins.

Comparison between supine and prone patient setup for lumbosacral spinal stereotactic body radiosurgery with CyberKnife

Objective

The aim of this study is to analyze which tracking modality is more suitable for stereotactic body radiosurgery of lumbosacral spinal tumors by comparing prone and supine patient treatment setup.

Methods

Eighteen patients with lumbosacral spinal tumors were selected. CT simulation was performed in the supine position (fixed with a vacuum cushion) and prone position (fixed with a thermoplastic mask and prone plate), respectively. The plans in the supine and prone positions were designed using the xsight spine tracking (XST) and xsight spine prone tracking (XSPT) modalities, respectively. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters, namely, V100%, D95%, Dmean, conformity index (CI), and heterogeneity index (HI) in planning target volume (PTV), as well as Dmax, D0.1cc, D1cc, and D5cc in the cauda equina and bowel were recorded. The supine plans were simulation plans and were not used for treatment, which were only used to record the alignment errors. The spinal tracking correction errors (alignment error) and correlation errors of the synchrony respiratory model in the prone position were recorded during the treatment. After treatment, the simulation plan of the supine position was implemented and the spinal tracking correction errors were recorded. The parameters of correction error and DVH parameters for the two positions were analyzed using the paired t-test to compare the difference in positioning accuracy and dose distribution. In addition, the correlation errors of the synchrony respiratory model in the prone position were analyzed to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the synchrony model.

Results

For patient setup, the correction error of the supine position in interior/posterior was (0.18 ± 0.16) mm and the prone position was (0.31 ± 0.26) mm (P&lt; 0.05). The correction error of the supine position in inferior/superior was (0.27 ± 0.24) mm, and the prone position was (0.5 ± 0.4) mm (P&lt; 0.05). The average correlation errors of the synchrony model for left/right, inferior/superior, and anterior/posterior in the prone position were (0.21 ± 0.11) mm, (0.41 ± 0.38) mm, and (0.68 ± 0.42) mm, respectively. For the dose distribution, compared with prone plans, the average CI in supine plans was increased by 4.5% (P&lt; 0.05). There was no significant difference in HI, PTV V100%, D95%, and Dmean between the prone and supine plans. Compared with supine plans, average D1cc and D5cc for the cauda equina was significantly decreased by 4.7 and 15.3% in the prone plan (P&lt; 0.05). For the bowel, average Dmax, D0.1cc, D1cc, and D5cc were reduced by 8.0, 7.7, 5.2, and 26.6% in prone plans (P&lt; 0.05) compared with supine plans.

Conclusion

Compared with the supine setup, the prone setup combined with XSPT modality for the lumbosacral spinal stereotactic body radiosurgery can spare the bowel and cauda equina of the middle and low dose irradiation, and decrease the number of beams and monitor units.

Planning study: prone versus supine position for stereotactic body radiotherapy in prostate by CyberKnife

This study aimed to clarify the differences in radiotherapy dose characteristics and delivery efficiency between the supine and prone positions in patients with prostate cancer using the CyberKnife. The planning computed tomography (CT) and delineations of the prone position were obtained by rotating the supine CT images with delineations of 180° using image processing software. The optimization parameters for planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) were based on the prone position. The optimization parameters determined for the prone position were applied to the supine position for optimization and dose calculation. The dosimetric characteristics of the PTV and OARs, and delivery efficiency were compared between the two different patient positions. The plans in the prone position resulted in better PTV conformity index (nCI), rectum V90%, V80%, V75%, V50% and bladder V50%. A significant difference was observed in treatment time and depth along the central axis (dCAX) between the two plans. The mean treatment time per fraction and dCAX for the supine and prone positions were 20.9 ± 1.7 min versus 19.8 ± 1.3 min (P = 0.019) and 151.1 ± 33.6 mm versus 233.2 ± 8.8 mm (P < 0.001), respectively. In this study the prone position was found to improve dosimetric characteristics and delivery efficiency compared with the supine position during prostate cancer treatment with the CyberKnife.

Laparoscopic closure of the pouch of Douglas by a peritoneal running suture. A minimally invasive and prosthetic-free technique to prevent excessive dose delivery to the small bowel during pelvic irradiation for prostate cancer

•

The radiation tolerance of the small bowel is limited.

•

Chronic radiation-induced enteritis affects patients quality of life.

•

Ectopic small bowel loops trapped in the pelvis may challenge prostate radiotherapy.

•

A laparoscopic prosthetic-free technique to cordon off bowel loops from the pelvis.

Background and purpose

Prostate radiotherapy relies on the delivery of high doses that can be obstructed when a small bowel loop descends in the pelvis. We present a laparoscopic minimally invasive prosthetic-free technique closing the Douglas’ pouch with a peritoneal running suture to cordon off the bowel from the pelvis and hence allow optimal irradiation.

Materials and methods

Prostate cancer patients referred for radiotherapy and whose planning-CT revealed a bowel loop trapped in the pelvis were proposed the procedure, followed by a new planning-CT. This proof-of-concept study reports postoperative follow-up and dosimetric benefits.

Results

The procedure was performed in ten patients (2016–2020) as a same-day surgery for nine. Median operative time was 34 min (range 22–50) and no relevant intraoperative complication occurred. The third patient of the series presented a small bowel hernia through the peritoneal suture at the 15th postoperative day requiring a laparotomic desincarceration without major consequences. Regarding the small bowel, median D1cc (dose to 1 cc) was 65.5 Gy and 55.5 Gy (p = 0.005) before and after procedure. Median V60 (volume receiving ≥60 Gy) was 10.2 cc and 0.0 cc (p = 0.005). In the immediate vicinity of the small bowel (5 mm), median D1cc was 68.3 Gy and 57.7 Gy (p = 0.005). Radiotherapy was safely delivered to all patients.

Conclusion

Laparoscopic closure of the Douglas’ pouch by a peritoneal suture is an efficient technique to cordon off inconvenient ectopic small bowel loops. It prevents excessive bowel irradiation and hence facilitates curative prostate radiotherapy. The technique could be applied to other pelvic malignancies.

Evaluation of small bowel motion and feasibility of using the peritoneal space to replace bowel loops for dose constraints during intensity-modulated radiotherapy for rectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study was to assess small bowel motion and explore the feasibility of using peritoneal space (PS) to replace bowel loops (BL) via the dose constraint method to spare the small bowel during intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for rectal cancer.

METHODS

A total of 24 patients with rectal cancer who underwent adjuvant or neoadjuvant radiotherapy were selected. Weekly repeat CT scans from pre-treatment to the fourth week of treatment were acquired and defined as Plan, 1 W, 2 W, 3 W, and 4 W. The 4 weekly CT scans were co-registered to the Plan CT, BL and PS contours were delineated in all of the scans, an IMRT plan was designed on Plan CT using PS constraint method, and then copied to the 4 weekly CT scans. The dose-volume, normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the small bowel and their variations during treatment were evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 109 sets of CT scans from 24 patients were acquired, and 109 plans were designed and copied. The BL and PS volumes were 250.3 cc and 1339.3 cc. The V15 of BL and PS based plan of pre-treatment were 182.6 cc and 919.0 cc, the shift% of them were 28.9 and 11.3% during treatment (p = 0.000), which was less in the prone position than in the supine position (25.2% vs 32.1%, p = 0.000; 9.9% vs 14.9%, p = 0.000). The NTCPC and NTCPA based plan of pre-treatment were 2.0 and 59.2%, the shift% during treatment were 46.1 and 14.0% respectively. Majority of BL's Dmax and V15 were meet the safety standard during treatment using PS dose limit method except 3 times (3/109) of V15 and 5 times of Dmax (5/109).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that small bowel motion may lead to uncertainties in its dose volume and NTCP evaluation during IMRT for rectal cancer. The BL movements were significantly greater than PS, and the prone position was significantly less than the supine position. It is feasibility of using PS to replace BL to spare the small bowel, V15 < 830 cc is the dose constraint standard.