1
|
Ning C, Sun Z, Shen D, Lin C, Li J, Wei Q, Chen L, Huang G. Is Contemporary Open Pancreatic Necrosectomy Still Useful In The Minimally Invasive Era? Surgery 2024; 175:1394-1401. [PMID: 38378349 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.01.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2023] [Revised: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have shown that open pancreatic necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis was associated with high morbidity and mortality. However, these results were mostly concluded from historical cohorts with traditional early necrosectomy in the absence of a minimally invasive step-up approach. OBJECTIVE To explore the value of contemporary open pancreatic necrosectomy for infected pancreatic necrosis in the minimally invasive era. METHODS A post hoc analysis was performed in a prospective maintained database of 320 patients with infected pancreatic necrosis from January 2011 to December 2022 at a large Chinese tertiary hospital. RESULTS A total of 320 patients with infected pancreatic necrosis received either a minimally invasive step-up approach (245, 76.6%) or open pancreatic necrosectomy (75, 23.4%), which included upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy (32, 10.0%) and salvage open pancreatic necrosectomy (43, 13.4%). Upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy was associated with similar morbidity and mortality rates but fewer surgical interventions compared with a minimally invasive step-up approach. However, salvage open pancreatic necrosectomy was associated with significantly higher mortality (48.8% vs 18.8%, P = .007), gastrointestinal fistula (44.2% vs 18.8%, P = .021), hemorrhage (48.8% vs 15.6%, P = .003), and intensive care unit stay (25 vs 7 days, P = .040) compared with upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy. Multivariate analysis suggested that multiple organ failure (hazard ratio = 5.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-18.2, P = .013) and synchronous critical acute pancreatitis (hazard ratio = 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-8.6, P = .040) were 2 independent risk factors of death for patients who received open pancreatic necrosectomy. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing upfront open pancreatic necrosectomy received fewer surgical interventions with comparable efficacy compared to the minimally invasive step-up approach. Salvage open pancreatic necrosectomy was potentially lifesaving, though it carried high morbidity and mortality. Multiple organ failure and synchronous critical acute pancreatitis were 2 independent risk factors of death for patients who received open pancreatic necrosectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caihong Ning
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Zefang Sun
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Dingcheng Shen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Chiayen Lin
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Jiarong Li
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Qin Wei
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Lu Chen
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China
| | - Gengwen Huang
- Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of General Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China; National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nasa P, Chanchalani G, Juneja D, Malbrain MLNG. Surgical decompression for the management of abdominal compartment syndrome with severe acute pancreatitis: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:1879-1891. [PMID: 37901738 PMCID: PMC10600763 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i9.1879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Intra-abdominal hypertension (IAH) and abdominal compartment syndrome (ACS) play a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) and contribute to new-onset and persistent organ failure. The optimal management of ACS involves a multi-disciplinary approach, from its early recognition to measures aiming at an urgent reduction of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). A targeted literature search from January 1, 2000, to November 30, 2022, revealed 20 studies and data was analyzed on the type and country of the study, patient demographics, IAP, type and timing of surgical procedure performed, post-operative wound management, and outcomes of patients with ACS. There was no randomized controlled trial published on the topic. Decompressive laparotomy is effective in rapidly reducing IAP (standardized mean difference = 2.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.19-1.47, P < 0.001; 4 studies). The morbidity and complications of an open abdomen after decompressive laparotomy should be weighed against the inadequately treated but, potentially lethal ACS. Disease-specific patient selection and the role of less-invasive decompressive measures, like subcutaneous linea alba fasciotomy or component separation techniques, is lacking in the 2013 consensus management guidelines by the Abdominal Compartment Society on IAH and ACS. This narrative review focuses on the current evidence regarding surgical decompression techniques for managing ACS in patients with SAP. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence on patient selection, timing, and modality of surgical decompression. Large prospective trials are needed to identify triggers and effective and safe surgical decompression methods in SAP patients with ACS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Prashant Nasa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, NMC Specialty Hospital, Dubai 7832, United Arab Emirates
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates
| | - Gunjan Chanchalani
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, K.J. Somaiya Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai 400022, India
| | - Deven Juneja
- Institute of Critical Care Medicine, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi 110017, India
| | - Manu LNG Malbrain
- First Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin 20-954, Poland
- Executive Administration, International Fluid Academy, Lovenjoel 3360, Belgium
- Medical Data Management, Medaman, Geel 2440, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roberts DJ, Leppäniemi A, Tolonen M, Mentula P, Björck M, Kirkpatrick AW, Sugrue M, Pereira BM, Petersson U, Coccolini F, Latifi R. The open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery: comprehensive, expert, narrative review. BJS Open 2023; 7:zrad084. [PMID: 37882630 PMCID: PMC10601091 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The open abdomen is an innovation that greatly improved surgical understanding of damage control, temporary abdominal closure, staged abdominal reconstruction, viscera and enteric fistula care, and abdominal wall reconstruction. This article provides an evidence-informed, expert, comprehensive narrative review of the open abdomen in trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery. METHODS A group of 12 international trauma, acute care, and vascular and endovascular surgery experts were invited to review current literature and important concepts surrounding the open abdomen. RESULTS The open abdomen may be classified using validated systems developed by a working group in 2009 and modified by the World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome-The Abdominal Compartment Society in 2013. It may be indicated in major trauma, intra-abdominal sepsis, vascular surgical emergencies, and severe acute pancreatitis; to facilitate second look laparotomy or avoid or treat abdominal compartment syndrome; and when the abdominal wall cannot be safely closed. Temporary abdominal closure and staged abdominal reconstruction methods include a mesh/sheet, transabdominal wall dynamic fascial traction, negative pressure wound therapy, and hybrid negative pressure wound therapy and dynamic fascial traction. This last method likely has the highest primary fascial closure rates. Direct peritoneal resuscitation is currently an experimental strategy developed to improve primary fascial closure rates and reduce complications in those with an open abdomen. Primary fascial closure rates may be improved by early return to the operating room; limiting use of crystalloid fluids during the surgical interval; and preventing and/or treating intra-abdominal hypertension, enteric fistulae, and intra-abdominal collections after surgery. The majority of failures of primary fascial closure and enteroatmospheric fistula formation may be prevented using effective temporary abdominal closure techniques, providing appropriate resuscitation fluids and nutritional support, and closing the abdomen as early as possible. CONCLUSION Subsequent stages of the innovation of the open abdomen will likely involve the design and conduct of prospective studies to evaluate appropriate indications for its use and effectiveness and safety of the above components of open abdomen management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek J Roberts
- Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Clinical Epidemiology Program, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Matti Tolonen
- Abdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Panu Mentula
- Abdominal Center, Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Martin Björck
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- TeleMentored Ultrasound Supported Medical Interventions (TMUSMI) Research Group, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Department of Surgery Letterkenny, University Hospital Donegal, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Bruno M Pereira
- Department of Surgery, Masters Program in Health Applied Sciences, Vassouras University, Vassouras, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
- Department of Surgery, Campinas Holy House General Surgery Residency Program Director, Campinas, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Ulf Petersson
- Department of Surgery, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|