High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for PARDS: awaiting PROSPect

Biomarker-Based Risk Stratification Tool in Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Single-Center, Longitudinal Validation in a 2014-2019 Cohort

OBJECTIVES

The Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Biomarker Risk Model (PARDSEVERE) used age and three plasma biomarkers measured within 24 hours of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) onset to predict mortality in a pilot cohort of 152 patients. However, longitudinal performance of PARDSEVERE has not been evaluated, and it is unclear whether the risk model can be used to prognosticate after day 0. We, therefore, sought to determine the test characteristics of PARDSEVERE model and population over the first 7 days after ARDS onset.

DESIGN

Secondary unplanned post hoc analysis of data from a prospective observational cohort study carried out 2014-2019.

SETTING

University-affiliated PICU.

PATIENTS

Mechanically ventilated children with ARDS.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Between July 2014 and December 2019, 279 patients with ARDS had plasma collected at day 0, 266 at day 3 (11 nonsurvivors, two discharged between days 0 and 3), and 207 at day 7 (27 nonsurvivors, 45 discharged between days 3 and 7). The actual prevalence of mortality on days 0, 3, and 7, was 23% (64/279), 14% (38/266), and 13% (27/207), respectively. The PARDSEVERE risk model for mortality on days 0, 3, and 7 had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC [95% CI]) of 0.76 (0.69-0.82), 0.68 (0.60-0.76), and 0.74 (0.65-0.83), respectively. The AUROC data translate into prevalence thresholds for the PARDSEVERE model for mortality (i.e., using the sensitivity and specificity values) of 37%, 27%, and 24% on days 0, 3, and 7, respectively. Negative predictive value (NPV) was high throughout (0.87-0.90 for all three-time points).

CONCLUSIONS

In this exploratory analysis of the PARDSEVERE model of mortality risk prediction in a population longitudinal series of data from days 0, 3, and 7 after ARDS diagnosis, the diagnostic performance is in the "acceptable" category. NPV was good. A major limitation is that actual mortality is far below the prevalence threshold for such testing. The model may, therefore, be more useful in cohorts with higher mortality rates (e.g., immunocompromised, other countries), and future enhancements to the model should be explored.

Corticosteroids treatment for pediatric acute respiratory syndrome: A critical review

Approximately 25% of all pediatric consultations are due to respiratory conditions, 10% of which are for asthma. Regarding prevalence, bronchiolitis, acute bronchitis, and respiratory infections are other leading pediatric respiratory illnesses. Compared to the aforementioned diseases, pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is rare but lethal in the Intensive Care Unit patients. According to global studies, the mortality in PARDS ranges from 13.3% to 60.7%. Before the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC), adult acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) management guidelines were used for PARDS. The PALICC set new criteria to identify PARDS with a different treatment and management approach. Steroids have been used to treat ARDS in some cases, although their effectiveness in treating pediatric patients is highly debated in the scientific community. This review examines steroid use in treating PARDS, emphasizes current developments in the field, and gives a broad overview of PARDS management.

Paediatrics: how to manage acute respiratory distress syndrome

Background

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a significant cause of mortality and morbidity amongst critically ill children. The purpose of this narrative review is to provide an up-to-date review on the evaluation and management of paediatric ARDS (PARDS).

Methods

A PubMed search was performed with Clinical Queries using the key term "acute respiratory distress syndrome". The search strategy included clinical trials, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, observational studies and reviews. Google, Wikipedia and UpToDate were also searched to enrich the review. The search was restricted to the English literature and children.

Discussion

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, lung-protective ventilation strategies, conservative fluid management and adequate nutritional support all have proven efficacy in the management of PARDS. The Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference recommends the use of corticosteroids, high-frequency oscillation ventilation and inhaled nitric oxide in selected scenarios. Partial liquid ventilation and surfactant are not considered efficacious based on evidence from clinical trials.

Conclusion

PARDS is a serious but relatively rare cause of admission into the paediatric intensive care unit and is associated with high mortality. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation, lung-protective ventilation strategies, conservative fluid management and adequate nutrition are advocated. As there has been a lack of progress in the management of PARDS in recent years, further well-designed, large-scale, randomized controlled trials in this field are urgently needed.