A genome-wide association study of survival in patients with sepsis

Using Mendelian randomization provides genetic insights into potential targets for sepsis treatment

Sepsis is recognized as a major contributor to the global disease burden, but there is a lack of specific and effective therapeutic agents. Utilizing Mendelian randomization (MR) methods alongside evidence of causal genetics presents a chance to discover novel targets for therapeutic intervention. MR approach was employed to investigate potential drug targets for sepsis. Pooled statistics from IEU-B-4980 comprising 11,643 cases and 474,841 controls were initially utilized, and the findings were subsequently replicated in the IEU-B-69 (10,154 cases and 454,764 controls). Causal associations were then validated through colocalization. Furthermore, a range of sensitivity analyses, including MR-Egger intercept tests and Cochran's Q tests, were conducted to evaluate the outcomes of the MR analyses. Three drug targets (PSMA4, IFNAR2, and LY9) exhibited noteworthy MR outcomes in two separate datasets. Notably, PSMA4 demonstrated not only an elevated susceptibility to sepsis (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.20-1.45, p = 1.66E-08) but also exhibited a robust colocalization with sepsis (PPH4 = 0.74). According to the present MR analysis, PSMA4 emerges as a highly encouraging pharmaceutical target for addressing sepsis. Suppression of PSMA4 could potentially decrease the likelihood of sepsis.

Genetically determined metabolites in allergic conjunctivitis: A Mendelian randomization study

Background

Allergic conjunctivitis (AC) afflicts a significant portion of the global populace. Yet, its metabolic foundations remain largely unexplored.

Methods

We applied Mendelian Randomization (MR) and Linkage Disequilibrium Score Regression (LDSC) to scrutinize a cohort comprising 20 958 AC cases and 356 319 controls. Data were amalgamated from the metabolomics GWAS server and the FinnGen project, under strict quality control protocols.

Results

Using two-sample MR analysis, 486 blood metabolites were investigated in relation to AC. The IVW approach highlighted 18 metabolites as closely tied to AC risk; of these, 16 retained significance post sensitivity assessments for heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy. LDSC analysis, adopted to bolster our findings and negate confounders from shared genetic markers, revealed 8 metabolites with marked heritability, including: palmitate (OR = 0.614), 3-methoxytyrosine (OR = 0.657), carnitine (OR = 1.368), threonate (OR = 0.828), N-[3-(2-Oxopyrrolidin-1-yl)propyl]acetamide (OR = 1.257), metoprolol acid metabolite (OR = 0.982), oleoylcarnitine (OR = 0.635), and 2-palmitoylglycerophosphocholine (OR = 1.351).

Conclusion

AC is precipitated by ocular responses to environmental allergens. Our study unveils a causal link between 8 blood metabolites and AC. This insight accentuates the role of metabolites in AC onset, suggesting novel avenues for its early prediction, targeted prevention, and tailored therapeutic interventions.

Identification of immune characteristic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in cuproptosis for sepsis by integrated bioinformatics analysis and single-cell RNA sequencing analysis

Background

Cuproptosis is a copper-dependent cell death that is connected to the development and immune response of multiple diseases. However, the function of cuproptosis in the immune characteristics of sepsis remains unclear.

Method

We obtained two sepsis datasets (GSE9960 and GSE134347) from the GEO database and classified the raw data with R packages. Cuproptosis-related genes were manually curated, and differentially expressed cuproptosis-related genes (DECuGs) were identified. Afterwards, we applied enrichment analysis and identified key DECuGs by performing machine learning techniques. Then, the immune cell infiltrations and correlation between DECuGs and immunocyte features were created by the CIBERSORT algorithm. Subsequently, unsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis was performed based on key DECuGs. We then constructed a ceRNA network based on key DECuGs by using multi-step computational strategies and predicted potential drugs in the DrugBank database. Finally, the role of these key genes in immune cells was validated at the single-cell RNA level between septic patients and healthy controls.

Results

Overall, 16 DECuGs were obtained, and most of them had lower expression levels in sepsis samples. Afterwards, we obtained six key DECuGs by performing machine learning. Then, the LIPT1-T-cell CD4 memory resting was the most positively correlated DECuG-immunocyte pair. Subsequently, two different subclusters were identified by six DECuGs. Bioinformatics analysis revealed that there were different immune characteristics between the two subclusters. Moreover, we identified the key lncRNA OIP5-AS1 within the ceRNA network and obtained 4 drugs that may represent novel drugs for sepsis. Finally, these key DECuGs were statistically significantly dysregulated in another validation set and showed a major distribution in monocytes, T cells, B cells, NK cells and platelets at the single-cell RNA level.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that cuproptosis might promote the progression of sepsis by affecting the immune system and metabolic dysfunction, which provides a new direction for understanding potential pathogenic processes and therapeutic targets in sepsis.

Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities 2023

OBJECTIVES

To identify research priorities in the management, epidemiology, outcome, and pathophysiology of sepsis and septic shock.

DESIGN

Shortly after publication of the most recent Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines, the Surviving Sepsis Research Committee, a multiprofessional group of 16 international experts representing the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine and the Society of Critical Care Medicine, convened virtually and iteratively developed the article and recommendations, which represents an update from the 2018 Surviving Sepsis Campaign Research Priorities.

METHODS

Each task force member submitted five research questions on any sepsis-related subject. Committee members then independently ranked their top three priorities from the list generated. The highest rated clinical and basic science questions were developed into the current article.

RESULTS

A total of 81 questions were submitted. After merging similar questions, there were 34 clinical and ten basic science research questions submitted for voting. The five top clinical priorities were as follows: 1) what is the best strategy for screening and identification of patients with sepsis, and can predictive modeling assist in real-time recognition of sepsis? 2) what causes organ injury and dysfunction in sepsis, how should it be defined, and how can it be detected? 3) how should fluid resuscitation be individualized initially and beyond? 4) what is the best vasopressor approach for treating the different phases of septic shock? and 5) can a personalized/precision medicine approach identify optimal therapies to improve patient outcomes? The five top basic science priorities were as follows: 1) How can we improve animal models so that they more closely resemble sepsis in humans? 2) What outcome variables maximize correlations between human sepsis and animal models and are therefore most appropriate to use in both? 3) How does sepsis affect the brain, and how do sepsis-induced brain alterations contribute to organ dysfunction? How does sepsis affect interactions between neural, endocrine, and immune systems? 4) How does the microbiome affect sepsis pathobiology? 5) How do genetics and epigenetics influence the development of sepsis, the course of sepsis and the response to treatments for sepsis?

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge advances in multiple clinical domains have been incorporated in progressive iterations of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines, allowing for evidence-based recommendations for short- and long-term management of sepsis. However, the strength of existing evidence is modest with significant knowledge gaps and mortality from sepsis remains high. The priorities identified represent a roadmap for research in sepsis and septic shock.

Causal effects of gut microbiota on sepsis and sepsis-related death: insights from genome-wide Mendelian randomization, single-cell RNA, bulk RNA sequencing, and network pharmacology

BACKGROUND

Gut microbiota alterations have been implicated in sepsis and related infectious diseases, but the causal relationship and underlying mechanisms remain unclear.

METHODS

We evaluated the association between gut microbiota composition and sepsis using two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis based on published genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to validate the robustness of the results. Reverse MR analysis and integration of GWAS and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data were performed to identify potential genes and therapeutic targets.

RESULTS

Our analysis identified 11 causal bacterial taxa associated with sepsis, with increased abundance of six taxa showing positive causal relationships. Ten taxa had causal effects on the 28-day survival outcome of septic patients, with increased abundance of six taxa showing positive associations. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these associations. Reverse MR analysis did not provide evidence of reverse causality. Integration of GWAS and eQTL data revealed 76 genes passing the summary data-based Mendelian randomization (SMR) test. Differential expression of these genes was observed between sepsis patients and healthy individuals. These genes represent potential therapeutic targets for sepsis. Molecular docking analysis predicted potential drug-target interactions, further supporting their therapeutic potential.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides insights for the development of personalized treatment strategies for sepsis and offers preliminary candidate targets and drugs for future drug development.

Analysis of comprehensive biomolecules in critically ill patients via bioinformatics technologies

Each patient with a critical illness such as sepsis and severe trauma has a different genetic background, comorbidities, age, and sex. Moreover, pathophysiology changes dynamically over time even in the same patient. Therefore, individualized treatment is necessary to account for heterogeneity in patient backgrounds. Recently, the analysis of comprehensive biomolecular information using clinical specimens has revealed novel molecular pathological classifications called subtypes. In addition, comprehensive biomolecular information using clinical specimens has enabled reverse translational research, which is a data-driven approach to the identification of drug target molecules. The development of these methods is expected to visualize the heterogeneity of patient backgrounds and lead to personalized therapy.

Genetic Determinants of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a life-threatening lung condition that arises from multiple causes, including sepsis, pneumonia, trauma, and severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Given the heterogeneity of causes and the lack of specific therapeutic options, it is crucial to understand the genetic and molecular mechanisms that underlie this condition. The identification of genetic risks and pharmacogenetic loci, which are involved in determining drug responses, could help enhance early patient diagnosis, assist in risk stratification of patients, and reveal novel targets for pharmacological interventions, including possibilities for drug repositioning. Here, we highlight the basis and importance of the most common genetic approaches to understanding the pathogenesis of ARDS and its critical triggers. We summarize the findings of screening common genetic variation via genome-wide association studies and analyses based on other approaches, such as polygenic risk scores, multi-trait analyses, or Mendelian randomization studies. We also provide an overview of results from rare genetic variation studies using Next-Generation Sequencing techniques and their links with inborn errors of immunity. Lastly, we discuss the genetic overlap between severe COVID-19 and ARDS by other causes.

Biomarkers as Prognostic Predictors and Therapeutic Guide in Critically Ill Patients: Clinical Evidence

A biomarker is a molecule that can be measured in a biological sample in an objective, systematic, and precise way, whose levels indicate whether a process is normal or pathological. Knowing the most important biomarkers and their characteristics is the key to precision medicine in intensive and perioperative care. Biomarkers can be used to diagnose, in assessment of disease severity, to stratify risk, to predict and guide clinical decisions, and to guide treatments and response to them. In this review, we will analyze what characteristics a biomarker should have and how to ensure its usefulness, and we will review the biomarkers that in our opinion can make their knowledge more useful to the reader in their clinical practice, with a future perspective. These biomarkers, in our opinion, are lactate, C-Reactive Protein, Troponins T and I, Brain Natriuretic Peptides, Procalcitonin, MR-ProAdrenomedullin and BioAdrenomedullin, Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and lymphopenia, Proenkephalin, NefroCheck, Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), Interleukin 6, Urokinase-type soluble plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), Presepsin, Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP), and Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3). Finally, we propose an approach to the perioperative evaluation of high-risk patients and critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) based on biomarkers.