1
|
Večerić-Haler Ž, Sever M, Kojc N, Halloran PF, Boštjančič E, Mlinšek G, Oblak M, Poženel P, Švajger U, Hartman K, Kneževič M, Barlič A, Girandon L, Aleš Rigler A, Zver S, Buturović Ponikvar J, Arnol M. Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection: Report of the Phase I/II Clinical Trial Case Series. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10772. [PMID: 36484064 PMCID: PMC9722440 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) therapy has already been studied in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and the available data showed that it is safe and well tolerated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous MSCs in combination with standard therapy in KTRs with biopsy-proven chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Patients with biopsy-proven chronic active AMR received treatment with autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (3 × 106 cells/kg iv) after completion of standard therapy and were followed for up to 12 months. The primary endpoints were safety by assessment of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included assessment of kidney graft function, immunological and histological changes related to AMR activity and chronicity assessed by conventional microscopy and molecular transcripts. A total of 3 patients were enrolled in the study before it was terminated prematurely because of adverse events. We found that AMR did not improve in any of the patients after treatment with MSCs. In addition, serious adverse events were observed in one case when autologous MSCs therapy was administered in the late phase after kidney transplantation, which requires further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Željka Večerić-Haler
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,*Correspondence: Željka Večerić-Haler,
| | - Matjaž Sever
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Department of Haematology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nika Kojc
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Philip F. Halloran
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Emanuela Boštjančič
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gregor Mlinšek
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Manca Oblak
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primož Poženel
- Division for Cells and Tissue, Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Urban Švajger
- Division for Cells and Tissue, Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Katrina Hartman
- Division for Cells and Tissue, Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Ariana Barlič
- Educell d.o.o Cell Therapy Service, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Andreja Aleš Rigler
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Samo Zver
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Department of Haematology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jadranka Buturović Ponikvar
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Miha Arnol
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen JM, Huang QY, Zhao YX, Chen WH, Lin S, Shi QY. The Latest Developments in Immunomodulation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Intrauterine Adhesions, Both Allogeneic and Autologous. Front Immunol 2021; 12:785717. [PMID: 34868069 PMCID: PMC8634714 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.785717] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Intrauterine adhesion (IUA) is an endometrial fibrosis disease caused by repeated operations of the uterus and is a common cause of female infertility. In recent years, treatment using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) has been proposed by many researchers and is now widely used in clinics because of the low immunogenicity of MSCs. It is believed that allogeneic MSCs can be used to treat IUA because MSCs express only low levels of MHC class I molecules and no MHC class II or co-stimulatory molecules. However, many scholars still believe that the use of allogeneic MSCs to treat IUA may lead to immune rejection. Compared with allogeneic MSCs, autologous MSCs are safer, more ethical, and can better adapt to the body. Here, we review recently published articles on the immunomodulation of allogeneic and autologous MSCs in IUA therapy, with the aim of proving that the use of autologous MSCs can reduce the possibility of immune rejection in the treatment of IUAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Ming Chen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Qiao-Yi Huang
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Yun-Xia Zhao
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Shenzhen Hospital of University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wei-Hong Chen
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| | - Shu Lin
- Centre of Neurological and Metabolic Research, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.,Diabetes and Metabolism Division, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Qi-Yang Shi
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shaw BI, Ord JR, Nobuhara C, Luo X. Cellular Therapies in Solid Organ Allotransplantation: Promise and Pitfalls. Front Immunol 2021; 12:714723. [PMID: 34526991 PMCID: PMC8435835 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.714723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Donor specific transfusions have been the basis of tolerance inducing protocols since Peter Medawar showed that it was experimentally feasible in the 1950s. Though trials of cellular therapies have become increasingly common in solid organ transplantation, they have not become standard practice. Additionally, whereas some protocols have focused on cellular therapies as a method for donor antigen delivery—thought to promote tolerance in and of itself in the correct immunologic context—other approaches have alternatively focused on the intrinsic immunosuppressive properties of the certain cell types with less emphasis on their origin, including mesenchymal stem cells, regulatory T cells, and regulatory dendritic cells. Regardless of intent, all cellular therapies must contend with the potential that introducing donor antigen in a new context will lead to sensitization. In this review, we focus on the variety of cellular therapies that have been applied in human trials and non-human primate models, describe their efficacy, highlight data regarding their potential for sensitization, and discuss opportunities for cellular therapies within our current understanding of the immune landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian I Shaw
- Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Jeffrey R Ord
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Chloe Nobuhara
- School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Xunrong Luo
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|