|
1
|
Chang CL, Lin KC, Chen WM, Shia BC, Wu SY. Comparative Effectiveness of Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy Versus Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Patients With Inoperable Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Undergoing Curative-Intent Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy. J Thorac Oncol 2023:S1556-0864(23)02430-9. [PMID: 38154513 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2023.12.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study compared outcomes in patients with inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing curative-intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) versus intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). METHODS The study encompassed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients with inoperable ESCC who underwent curative-intent CCRT from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2020, with data sourced from the Taiwan Cancer Registry Database. In this study, both IMRT and IMPT delivered a total equivalent effective dose of approximately 5040 cGy in 28 fractions, accompanied by platinum-based chemotherapy administered as per established protocols. Multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess oncologic outcomes, and statistical analyses were conducted, including inverse probability of treatment-weighted and Fine and Gray method for competing risks. RESULTS The observed risks of ESCC-specific and all-cause mortality were lower in patients treated with IMPT compared with those treated with IMRT, with adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) of 0.62 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-0.70) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), respectively. IMPT also reduced grade 2 radiation-induced side effects, such as pneumonitis, fatigue, and major adverse cardiovascular events, with aHRs (95% CI) of 0.76 (0.66-0.82), 0.10 (0.07-0.14), and 0.70 (0.67-0.73), respectively. However, IMPT was associated with an increased risk of grade 2 radiation dermatitis, with aHR (95% CI) of 1.48 (1.36-1.60). No substantial differences were found in the incidence of radiation esophagitis between IMPT and IMRT when adjusting for covariates. CONCLUSION IMPT seems to be associated with superiority over IMRT in managing patients with inoperable ESCC undergoing curative-intent CCRT, suggesting improved survival outcomes and reduced toxicity. These findings have significant implications for the treatment of ESCC, particularly when surgery is not an option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chia-Lun Chang
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kuan-Chou Lin
- Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Department of Dentistry, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; School of Dentistry, College of Oral Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wan-Ming Chen
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan; Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ben-Chang Shia
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan; Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Szu-Yuan Wu
- Graduate Institute of Business Administration, College of Management, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan; Artificial Intelligence Development Center, Fu Jen Catholic University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Food Nutrition and Health Biotechnology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; Division of Radiation Oncology, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan; Big Data Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan; Department of Healthcare Administration, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan; Cancer Center, Lo-Hsu Medical Foundation, Lotung Poh-Ai Hospital, Yilan, Taiwan; Centers for Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Taipei Municipal Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Management, College of Management, Fo Guang University, Yilan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|