Fundamental concepts and the latest evidence for esophageal pressure monitoring

Effect of Individualized PEEP Guided by Driving Pressure on Diaphragm Function in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Resection of Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND The concept of driving pressure (ΔP) has been established to optimize mechanical ventilation-induced lung injury. However, little is known about the specific effects of setting individualized positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with driving pressure guidance on patient diaphragm function. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety patients were randomized into 3 groups, with PEEP set to 0 in group C; 5 cmH₂O in group F; and individualized PEEP in group I, based on esophageal manometry. Diaphragm ultrasound was performed in the supine position at 6 consecutive time points from T0-T5: diaphragm excursion, end-expiratory diaphragm thickness (Tdi-ee), and diaphragm thickening fraction (DTF) were measured. Primary indicators included diaphragm excursion, Tdi-ee, and DTF at T0-T5, and the correlation between postoperative DTF and ΔP. Secondary indicators included respiratory mechanics, hemodynamic changes at intraoperative d0-d4 time points, and postoperative clinical pulmonary infection scores. RESULTS (1) Diaphragm function parameters reached the lowest point at T1 in all groups (P<0.001). (2) Compared with group C, diaphragm excursion decreased, Tdi-ee increased, and DTF was lower in groups I and F at T1-T5, with significant differences (P<0.05), but the differences between groups I and F were not significant (P>0.05). (3) DTF was significantly and positively correlated with mean intraoperative ΔP in each group at T3, and the correlation was stronger at higher levels of ΔP. CONCLUSIONS Individualized PEEP, achieved by esophageal manometry, minimizes diaphragmatic injury caused by mechanical ventilation based on lung protection, but its protection of the diaphragm during laparoscopic surgery is not superior to that of conventional ventilation strategies.

Comparative analysis of novel esophageal pressure monitoring catheters versus commercially available alternatives in a biomechanical model of the thoracic cavity

Transpulmonary pressure can be estimated using esophageal balloon (EB) catheters, which come in a variety of manufacturing configurations. We assessed the performance of novel polyurethane EB designs, Aspisafe NG and NG+, against existing alternatives. We created a biomechanical model of the chest cavity using a plastic chamber and an ex-vivo porcine esophagus. The chamber was pressurized (- 20 and + 20 cmH2O) to simulate pleural pressures. We conducted tests with various EB inflation volumes and measured transesophageal pressure (TEP). TEP measurement was defined as accurate when the difference between pressure within the EB and chamber was 0 ± 1 cmH2O. We computed the minimal (Vaccuracy-min) and maximal (Vaccuracy-max) EB inflation volumes of accuracy. Inflation volumes were further validated using a surrogate method derived by the clinically validated positive pressure occlusion test (PPOT). When the esophageal balloons were filled with inflation volumes within the range provided by the manufacturers, the accuracy of TEP measurements was marginal. Our tests found median Vaccuracy-min across EB of 0.00-0.50 mL (p = 0.130), whereas Vaccuracy-max ranged 0.50-2.25 mL (p = 0.002). Post PPOT validation, median TEP was - 0.4 cmH2O (- 1.5 to 0.3) (p < 0.001 among catheters). The Aspisafe NG and NG+ were accurate in 81.7% and 77.8% of the measurements, respectively. We characterized two new EBs, which demonstrated good benchtop accuracy in TEP measurements. However, accuracy was notably influenced by the precise selection of EB inflation volumes.

State of the art: Monitoring of the respiratory system during veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Monitoring the patient receiving veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) is challenging due to the complex physiological interplay between native and membrane lung. Understanding these interactions is essential to understand the utility and limitations of different approaches to respiratory monitoring during ECMO. We present a summary of the underlying physiology of native and membrane lung gas exchange and describe different tools for titrating and monitoring gas exchange during ECMO. However, the most important role of VV ECMO in severe respiratory failure is as a means of avoiding further ergotrauma. Although optimal respiratory management during ECMO has not been defined, over the last decade there have been advances in multimodal respiratory assessment which have the potential to guide care. We describe a combination of imaging, ventilator-derived or invasive lung mechanic assessments as a means to individualise management during ECMO.

Changes in pulmonary mechanics from supine to prone position measured through esophageal manometry in critically ill patients with COVID-19 severe acute respiratory distress syndrome

OBJECTIVE

To describe changes in pulmonary mechanics when changing from supine position (SP) to prone position (PP) in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) due to severe COVID-19.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Intensive Care Unit of the National Institute of Respiratory Diseases (Mexico City).

PATIENTS

COVID-19 patients on MV due to ARDS, with criteria for PP.

INTERVENTION

Measurement of pulmonary mechanics in patients on SP to PP, using esophageal manometry.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

Changes in lung and thoracic wall mechanics in SP and PP RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Changes during first prone positioning were reported. Reductions in lung stress (10.6 vs 7.7, p=0.02), lung strain (0.74 vs 0.57, p=0.02), lung elastance (p=0.01), chest wall elastance (p=0.003) and relation of respiratory system elastances (p=0.001) were observed between patients when changing from SP to PP. No differences were observed in driving pressure (p=0.19) and transpulmonary pressure during inspiration (p=0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in pulmonary mechanics were observed when patients were comparing values of supine position with measurements obtained 24h after prone positioning. Esophageal pressure monitoring may facilitate ventilator management despite patient positioning.