Detecting recurrent prostate Cancer using multiparametric MRI, influence of PSA and Gleason grade

Head-to-head comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Our main goal of this meta-analytical analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) against multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the context of identifying biochemical recurrence in patients with prostate cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough search covering articles published until March 2023 was carried out across major databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Studies examining the direct comparison of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in patients with PCa suffering biochemical recurrence were included in the inclusion criteria. Using the renowned Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 technique, each study's methodological rigor was assessed.

RESULTS

We analyzed data from six eligible studies involving 290 patients in total. The combined data showed that for PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI, respectively, the pooled overall detection rates for recurrent PCa after definitive treatment were 0.69 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.45-0.89) and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.44-0.91). The detection rates for local recurrence were specifically 0.52 (95% CI: 0.39-0.65) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.31-0.89), while they were 0.50 (95% CI: 0.26-0.74) and 0.32 (95% CI: 0.18-0.48) for lymph node metastasis. Notably, there was no discernible difference between the two imaging modalities in terms of the overall detection rate (P = 0.95). The detection rates for local recurrence and lymph node metastasis did not differ statistically significantly (P = 0.55, 0.23).

CONCLUSION

The performance of PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in identifying biochemical recurrence in PCa appears to be comparable. However, the meta-analysis' findings came from research with modest sample sizes. In this context, more extensive research should be conducted in the future.

Assessing the effectiveness of MRI, 18F-fluciclovine PET, SUVmax, and PSA in detecting local recurrence of prostate cancer after prostatectomy

Purpose

The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), 18F-fluciclovine positron emission tomography (PET), maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and combinations of these diagnostic modalities for detecting local prostate cancer recurrence in the setting of rising PSA after radical prostatectomy.

Material and methods

Patients were characterised for clinical features such as Gleason score, PSA at surgery, PSA at follow-up, follow-up MRI result, follow-up PET result, follow-up SUVmax, and follow-up disease status. The utility of diagnostic parameters for detecting disease recurrence at the prostatectomy bed was assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis to determine the area under the curve (AUC) for each model. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive/negative predictive values were also calculated. Optimal cut-off points for continuous variables were determined based on maximum Youden's J statistics.

Results

The study found that MRI had the highest concordance (96%), sensitivity (100%), specificity (91%), positive predictive value (93%), and negative predictive value (100%) among the diagnostic modalities. The AUC for MRI was 0.9545, indicating a high discriminatory ability for detecting prostate cancer local recurrence. When combined, PET and SUVmax (cut-off value of 2.85) showed an improved performance compared to using them individually, with an AUC of 0.8925.

Conclusions

The analysis suggests that MRI is the most effective imaging modality for detecting local prostate cancer recurrence, with 18F-fluciclovine PET and SUVmax also showing promising combined results. PSA has moderate discriminatory utility at follow-up but can still provide valuable information in detecting prostate cancer recurrence. Further research and recent references are needed to support these findings.

Role of psa levels and pathological stadiation before radiation therapy in predicting mp-MRI results in patients with prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate PSA value in mp-MRI results prediction, analyzing patients with high (GS≥8, pT≥3, pN1) and low grade (GS<8, pT<3, pN0) Prostate Cancer (PCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred eighty-eight patients underwent 1.5-Tmp-MRI after Radical Prostatectomy (RP) and before Radiotherapy (RT). They were divided into 2 groups: A and B, for patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR) and without BCR but with high local recurrence risk. Considering Gleason Score (GS), pT and pN as independent grouping variables, ROC analyses of PSA levels at primary PCa diagnosis and PSA before RT were performed in order to identify the optimal cut-off to predict mp-MRI result.

RESULTS

Group A and B showed higher AUC for PSA before RT than PSA at PCa diagnosis, in low and high grade tumors. For low grade tumors the best AUC was 0.646 and 0.685 in group A and B; for high grade the best AUC was 0.705 and 1 in group A and B, respectively. For low grade tumors the best PSA cut-off was 0.565-0.58ng/mL in group A (sensitivity, specificity: 70.5%, 66%), and 0.11-0.13ng/mL in B (sensitivity, specificity: 62.5%, 84.6%). For high grade tumors, the best PSA cut-off obtained was 0.265-0.305ng/mL in group A (sensitivity, specificity: 95%, 42.1%), and 0.13-0.15ng/mL in B (sensitivity, specificity: 100%).

CONCLUSION

Mp-MRI should be performed as added diagnostic tool always when a BCR is detected, especially in high grade PCa. In patients without BCR, mp-MRI results, although poorly related to pathological stadiation, still have a good diagnostic performance, mostly when PSA>0.1-0.15ng/mL.

Diagnostic performance of 18F-labeled PSMA PET/CT in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

After initial treatment of prostate cancer, increases in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels commonly signify potential relapse or metastasis. 18F-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is considered a promising treatment due to its favorable physical properties.

PURPOSE

To investigate the diagnostic value of 18F-PSMA PET/CT for the recurrence and/or metastasis of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BRPca).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases. Combined sensitivity and specificity values for the use of 18F-PSMA PET/CT in patients with BRPca were obtained. The quality of the studies was tested using the Diagnostic Accuracy Research Quality Assessment tool. Meta-analysis was performed using STATA 15 software, and heterogeneity was subsequently tested.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies (1162 patients) were enrolled and had significant heterogeneity. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC values for 18F-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate recurrence and/or metastasis were 0.93 (0.89-0.95), 0.94 (0.85-0.98), and 0.96 (0,94-0.98), respectively. Meta-regression analyses showed that the sources of heterogeneity did not relate to ligands, study designs, or participants. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT were 0.90 (0.85-0.94) and 0.89 (0.85-0.93), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT were 0.89 (0.85-0.93) and 0.93 (0.70-0.99), respectively. The per-patient pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.92 (0.86-0.96) and 0.83 (0.41-0.97), respectively. The per-lesion pooled sensitivity and specificity values were 0.91 (0.86-0.94) and 0.91 (0.86-0.94), respectively.

CONCLUSION

According to our meta-analysis, 18F-PSMA PET/CT has the potential to be critical for the diagnosis of recurrence and/or metastasis in patients with BRPca.

Application of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MR Imaging in Early Biochemical Recurrence of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Prospective Study of 60 Patients with Very Low PSA Levels ≤ 0.5 ng/mL

The use of 18F-PSMA-1007 and the role of PET/MR in the diagnosis of prostate cancer are not conclusively confirmed. There are reports indicating the potential pros and cons of using 18F-PSMA-1007 as well as the PET/MR technique in prostate cancer recurrence, but they are not yet included in the EAU guidelines. The aim of the study was to assess the effectiveness of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MR in detecting BCR lesions at very low PSA levels <0.5 ng/mL.

METHODS

Sixty patients with BCR after radical prostatectomy (RP) with PSA ranged 0.1-0.5 ng/mL were enrolled in a prospective study. All patients underwent simultaneous whole-body and pelvic 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MR. The obtained results were verified by 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Fifty-three lesions were detected in 45 patients with 75% detection rate. The mean PSA value was 0.31 ng/mL. Of all PSMA-positive foci, 91% were localized in the pelvis, and only 9% of lesions were located in the extrapelvic region. Local recurrences were detected in 29%, PSMA-positive lymph nodes were detected in 64% of patients and bone metastases lesions were detected in 7% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/MR seems to be an excellent diagnostic tool in patients with early BCR with very low PSA levels, especially with dt PSA < 6 months. The synergistic effect of combining 18F-PSMA-1007 and whole-body PET/MR with precise multiparametric assessment of pelvic lesions is of particular benefit in early BCR.

Hybrid magnetic resonance and PET imaging for prostate cancer recurrence

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recurrence post definitive local therapy by prostatectomy or radiation therapy is often detected via rise in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels; however, PSA rise does not localize the disease. Distinguishing local versus distant recurrence guides whether to choose subsequent local versus systemic therapy. The purpose of this article is to review imaging for prostate cancer recurrence post local therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Among imaging modalities, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) is commonly used to assess for local recurrence. New radiopharmaceuticals target prostate cancer cells and enable whole-body imaging. These tend to be more sensitive for lymph node metastases than MRI or computed tomography (CT) and for bone lesions than bone scan at lower PSA levels but can be limited for local prostate cancer recurrence. Given greater soft tissue contrast, similar criteria for lymph nodes, and greater sensitivity for prostate bone metastases, MRI is advantageous to CT. MRI of the whole body and mpMRI are now feasible within a reasonable time frame and complementary to PET imaging, enabling whole-body and pelvis-focused PET-MRI, which should be advantageous in the setting of recurrent prostate cancer.

SUMMARY

Hybrid PET-MRI with prostate cancer targeted radiopharmaceuticals and whole body with local multiparametric MRI can be complementary for detecting local and distant recurrence to guide treatment planning.

Head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in the detection of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: summary of head-to-head comparison studies

PURPOSE

Our meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT vs. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI for biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.

METHODS

We searched for relevant articles in PubMed and Embase until February 2022. Studies evaluating head-to-head comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in men with prostate cancer biochemical recurrence were included. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies with 219 patients were included in the analysis. The pooled overall detection rates of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI in detecting recurrent PCa after definitive treatment were 0.89 (95% CI: 0.65-1.00), 0.92 (95% CI: 0.77-1.00), while the detection rates were 0.20 (95% CI: 0.05-0.41) and 0.29 (95% CI: 0.10-0.53) in local recurrence, 0.51 (95% CI: 0.33-0.69) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.44-0.61) in lymph node metastasis, 0.18 (95% CI: 0.07-0.33) and 0.20 (95% CI: 0.09-0.35) in bone metastasis. There was no significant difference between the two imaging modalities in the overall detection rate (P = 0.82). In addition, detection rates were also not significantly different in local recurrence, lymph node metastasis, or bone metastasis (P = 0.54, 1.00, 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI seem to have equivalent performance in detecting biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer. However, the results of the meta-analysis were drawn from studies with small samples. Further larger studies in this setting are warranted.

Pathological predictors of 18 F-DCFPyL prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive recurrence after radical prostatectomy

Objectives

To assess the correlation of pathological radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen features and prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) characteristics to imaging findings on subsequent ¹⁸F‐DCFPyL positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in patients with biochemical failure (BF).

Patients and Methods

Retrospective analysis of combined ¹⁸F‐DCFPyL PET/CT database of patients from centres in Australia and New Zealand was performed. A total of 205 patients presenting with BF after RP were included in this study. Imaging findings on ¹⁸F‐DCFPyL PET/CT were recorded and correlated with the PSA characteristics at BF and pathological features of the original tumour.

Results

Of the 205 patients, 120 (58.5%) had evidence of abnormal prostate‐specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression compatible with recurrent prostate cancer. Increasing PSA velocity (P = 0.01), International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (P = 0.02), lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.05) and nodal positivity (P = 0.02) at the time of RP were more likely to demonstrate PSMA positivity. Multivariable logistic regression revealed a higher PSA level prior to PSMA PET/CT (P < 0.01), adjuvant radiotherapy (P = 0.09), Gleason score ≥8 (P < 0.01) and nodal positivity (P = 0.05) were all predictive of PSMA positivity.

Conclusion

¹⁸F‐DCFPyL PET/CT positivity, both generally and site specific, correlates with PSA and RP pathological factors. Our results echo cohorts focussing on post‐RP patients, those imaged with ⁶⁸Ga‐PSMA and those concerning biochemical persistence. Nomograms that include risk factors for ‘PSMA‐positive recurrence’ in the BF population may increase the catchment of patients with disease confined to the prostate bed or pelvis who have a greater probability of prolonged disease‐free survival.

Application Value of Radiomic Nomogram in the Differential Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer and Hyperplasia

Objective

Prostate cancer and hyperplasia require different treatment strategies and have completely different outcomes; thus, preoperative identification of prostate cancer and hyperplasia is very important. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-derived radiomic nomogram based on T2-weighted images (T2WI) in differentiating prostate cancer and hyperplasia.

Materials and Methods

One hundred forty-six patients (66 cases of prostate cancer and 80 cases of prostate hyperplasia) who were confirmed by surgical pathology between September 2019 and September 2019 were selected. We manually delineated T2WI of all patients using ITK-SNAP software and radiomic analysis using Analysis Kit (AK) software. A total of 396 tumor texture features were extracted. Subsequently, the effective features were selected using the LASSO algorithm, and the radiomic feature model was constructed. Next, combined with independent clinical risk factors, a multivariate Logistic regression model was used to establish a radiomic nomogram. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the prediction performance of the radiomic nomogram. Finally, the clinical application value of the nomogram was evaluated by decision curve analysis.

Results

The PSA and the selected imaging features were significantly correlated with the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and hyperplasia. The radiomic model had good discrimination efficiency for prostate cancer and hyperplasia. The training set (AUC = 0.85; 95% CI: 0.77–0.92) and testing set (AUC = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.72–0.96) were effective. The radiomic nomogram, combined with the radiomic characteristics of MRI and independent clinical risk factors, showed better differentiation efficiency in the training set (AUC = 0.91; 95% CI: 0.85–0.97) and testing set (AUC = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.81–0.99). The decision curve showed the clinical application value of the radiomic nomogram.

Conclusion

The radiomic nomogram of T2-MRI combined with clinical risk factors can easily identify prostate cancer and hyperplasia. It also provides suggestions for further clinical events.

Diffusion-Weighted MRI in the Genitourinary System

Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) constitutes a major functional parameter performed in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The DW sequence is performed by acquiring a set of native images described by their b-values, each b-value representing the strength of the diffusion MR gradients specific to that sequence. By fitting the data with models describing the motion of water in tissue, an apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map is built and allows the assessment of water mobility inside the tissue. The high cellularity of tumors restricts the water diffusion and decreases the value of ADC within tumors, which makes them appear hypointense on ADC maps. The role of this sequence now largely exceeds its first clinical apparitions in neuroimaging, whereby the method helped diagnose the early phases of cerebral ischemic stroke. The applications extend to whole-body imaging for both neoplastic and non-neoplastic diseases. This review emphasizes the integration of DWI in the genitourinary system imaging by outlining the sequence's usage in female pelvis, prostate, bladder, penis, testis and kidney MRI. In gynecologic imaging, DWI is an essential sequence for the characterization of cervix tumors and endometrial carcinomas, as well as to differentiate between leiomyosarcoma and benign leiomyoma of the uterus. In ovarian epithelial neoplasms, DWI provides key information for the characterization of solid components in heterogeneous complex ovarian masses. In prostate imaging, DWI became an essential part of multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) to detect prostate cancer. The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring the probability of significant prostate tumors has significantly contributed to this success. Its contribution has established mpMRI as a mandatory examination for the planning of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy. Following a similar approach, DWI was included in multiparametric protocols for the bladder and the testis. In renal imaging, DWI is not able to robustly differentiate between malignant and benign renal tumors but may be helpful to characterize tumor subtypes, including clear-cell and non-clear-cell renal carcinomas or low-fat angiomyolipomas. One of the most promising developments of renal DWI is the estimation of renal fibrosis in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. In conclusion, DWI constitutes a major advancement in genitourinary imaging with a central role in decision algorithms in the female pelvis and prostate cancer, now allowing promising applications in renal imaging or in the bladder and testicular mpMRI.

[Salvage radiotherapy after prostatectomy - what do do in case of elevated post operative PSA or macroscopic relapse?]

The management of the postoperative biological relapse of prostate cancer is most often based on salvage radiotherapy (RT) and a variable duration of hormone therapy (HT) in addition. The indications for RT±HT become more consensual for the adjuvant postoperative situation or in the event of a rising PSA level after a period where an undetectable PSA level was achieved. On the other hand, in the event of detectable PSA immediately postoperatively or in the event of a biological recurrence with macroscopic relapse in the prostate bed seen on conventional imaging assessment, the treatment options are still being evaluated. This article will describe these 2 situations and their current management but also will come through assessments with the contribution of modern imaging and new treatment options in terms of RT dose and RT±HT combination.