Patients' satisfaction with long-acting injectable somatostatin analog therapy for neuroendocrine tumors

Key Device Attributes for Injectable Somatostatin Receptor Ligand Therapy in Acromegaly and Neuroendocrine Tumours

INTRODUCTION

People living with acromegaly and neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) may be treated with injectable somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), administered by either a caregiver or as self-injection via a proprietary or generic device. Injection device attributes that contribute to ease of use and storage, minimise preparation requirements, and reduce injection pain are associated with improved adherence and more favourable therapeutic outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess current opinion surrounding favourable SRL device attributes for people living with acromegaly and NETs as well as that of their caregivers.

METHODS

Participants (healthcare professionals [HCPs] and patients/non-HCP caregivers) from 11 countries were invited to answer survey questions related to their demographic, experience, and preferences as they relate to the real-world use of injectable SRL devices. Questions were developed based on review of available literature and meetings with a Scientific Committee.

RESULTS

Device attributes preferred by the patient/non-HCP caregiver group (n = 211) included confidence that the correct drug amount is delivered (76%), quick administration with minimal pain/discomfort (68%), and device safety (needle-safety and low risk of contamination; 53%). Device attributes preferred by HCPs (n = 52) were quick administration with minimal pain/discomfort (69%), correct use is easy to learn, confidence in handling the device (63%), and confidence that the correct drug amount is delivered (62%).

CONCLUSION

The results identified key features of injection devices for SRL therapy which merit consideration for optimal management and underscore the importance of patient partnership in treatment decisions.

Self-Administration of Long-Acting Somatostatin Analogues in NET Patients—Does It Affect the Clinical Outcome?

Background and Objectives: Long-acting somatostatin analogues (SSA) (octreotide LAR and lanreotide Autogel) are recommended as first line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) with a good expression of somatostatin receptor (SSTR). Both of these SSAs are usually administered via injections repeated every 4 weeks. The purpose of the study was to compare the route of SSA administration (injection performed by professional medical staff and self-administration of the drug) with progression-free survival. Materials and methods: 88 patients in 2019 and 96 patients in 2020 with locally advanced or metastatic well-differentiated NETs were included in the study. All patients had a good expression of SSTR type 2 and had been treated for at least 3 months with a stable dose of long-acting somatostatin analogue every 4 weeks. All of them had received training on drug self-injections from professional NET nurses at the beginning of the COVID-19 epidemic. Results: The rate of NET progression in the study group in 2020 was higher than in 2019 29.1% vs. 18.1% (28 vs. 16 cases), p = 0.081. Conclusions: The method of administration of long-acting SSA injection performed by professional medical staff vs. self-injection of the drug may significantly affect the risk of NET progression. The unequivocal confirmation of such a relationship requires further observation.