Identifying attitudinal barriers to family management of cancer pain in palliative care in Taiwan

Family Caregivers' Challenges in Cancer Pain Management for Patients Receiving Palliative Care

CONTEXT

Family caregivers (FCs) of cancer patients play a crucial role in managing their care partner's pain, but little research has examined FCs' specific challenges regarding the provision of pain management (PM) to cancer patients receiving palliative care.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the demographic and clinical characteristics of FCs who encounter challenges in PM and to elucidate the specific challenges that FCs face when managing pain for their care partner with cancer.

METHODS

We conducted a secondary analysis of 40 interview transcripts of FCs who were caring for persons with cancer. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using deductive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

The three major identified challenges to PM for FCs of persons with cancer were: (1) communication and teamwork issues, (2) caregiver-related issues, and (3) patient-related issues. Communication and teamwork issues encompassed caregivers' receipt of inadequate information regarding PM, and inappropriate and ineffective communication from the healthcare team. Caregiver issues pertained to caregivers' fear and beliefs, concurrent responsibilities, and lack of pain-related knowledge and skills. Patient issues related to their own fear and beliefs, psychological and physiological well-being, adherence to medications, and reluctance to report pain.

CONCLUSION

Findings of this study have implications for future research and practice related to cancer PM in palliative care. Results suggest the need for FC training in PM as well as clear clinical practice guidelines and resources to help providers prepare, educate, and communicate with FCs regarding PM.

Patient beliefs associated with medication hesitancy in palliative care: A systematic review using the theory of planned behavior

CONTEXT

The demand of palliative care is increasing due to the aging population and treatment hesitancy or intentional avoidance compromises symptom management.

OBJECTIVES

To identify patient beliefs associated with medication hesitancy by using the theory of planned behavior (TPB) namely, attitudes, subjective norms, behavioral intention, and perceived behavioral control associated with medication hesitancy or intentional noncompliance by avoidance.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline was followed to conduct a systematic literature search involving the CINAHL, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases from inception until March 2022. Hand-searched articles from reference lists and gray literature were included. Thematic analysis was conducted on qualitative data and triangulated with quantitative data.

RESULTS

About 554 articles were retrieved from the literature search and 17 articles were included based on the eligibility criteria. Three subthemes that were identified under TPB constructs were attitude: negative attitude toward medications, passive attitude toward illness and inaccurate information about disease or medication; one subtheme was identified under subjective norms: perceived negative opinions from others; and one subtheme was identified under perceived behavioral control: perception of manageable symptoms. Quantitative data provided triangulation of qualitative findings related to fear of addiction and side effects, feelings of hopelessness, unclear direction and information, social stigma, endurable symptoms, and illness as determinants for medication avoidance.

SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS

This systematic review highlighted some patient beliefs related to medication hesitancy or avoidance. Clinicians should take patient beliefs and concerns into consideration when creating treatment regimens for people receiving palliative care to optimize medication adherence and the quality of care.

Family Caregiver Challenges in Pain Management for Patients with Advanced Illnesses: A Systematic Review

Although pain management is integral to the caregiving role, there is a paucity of evidence synthesizing specific challenges family caregivers (FCs) face when managing pain for their care partners. This review comprehensively identified and summarized such challenges in the setting of advanced illnesses. Electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments) were searched using index and keyword methods for all articles published before April 2021. Fifty-five studies were included in this review. Most articles were published within the last 10 years (54%) in community settings, with home hospice care comprising the majority (50%). Most studies included patients with an advanced cancer diagnosis (84%), and 16% of the studies included patients with a noncancer diagnosis. Four major categories of challenges were identified: (1) caregiver-related issues (e.g., fears, beliefs, function), (2) caregivers' limited knowledge and skills in pain management (e.g., verbal and nonverbal pain assessment skills, pharmacological knowledge, documentation, safe management of medication), (3) communication challenges with health care providers, and (4) patient-related issues (e.g., inability to report pain). Many of these challenges have not been fully addressed in prior literature. Thus, this review provides a framework for needed future research to develop interventions that target FCs' specific challenges in providing pain management. The results also highlight a significant lack of research surrounding challenges faced by caregivers of care partners having a noncancer, dementia, or multimorbidity diagnosis.

Barriers to Pain Management: Incongruence in Black Cancer Caregiving Dyads

CONTEXT

To effectively manage cancer pain, there is a need to understand how caregiving dyads appraise symptoms. Dyadic appraisal of symptoms influences whether the dyad perceives the patient's pain is managed well and whether they are on the same page with their appraisal. Beliefs can act as barriers to the dyadic appraisal.

OBJECTIVES

This secondary data analysis examined incongruence within Black cancer caregiving dyads regarding beliefs about pain management and potential medication side effects using the Barriers Questionnaire-13. Associated factors were also examined.

METHODS

Guided by the Theory of Dyadic Illness Management, dyadic multilevel modeling was conducted with data from 60 Black cancer caregiving dyads to determine the dyadic appraisal of beliefs about pain management and potential medication side effects, which includes the average perception of barriers within the dyad (i.e., dyadic average) and the dyadic incongruence (i.e., gap between patient and caregiver).

RESULTS

On average, Black cancer caregiving dyads reported moderate barriers regarding pain management (2.262 (SE=0.102, P<0.001) and medication side effects (2.223 (SE=0.144, P<0.001). There was significant variability across dyads regarding barriers to pain management and medication side effects. Lower patient education and higher patient-reported pain interference were significantly associated with more perceived barriers to pain management and potential medication side effects. Incongruence within dyads regarding barriers to pain management and medication side effects were significantly associated with the caregiver's report of patient's pain interference.

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest the importance of appraisal that includes both members of Black cancer caregiving dyads regarding pain management.

The Process of Pain Management in Cancer Patients at Home: Causing the Least Harm - A Grounded Theory Study

Background

Cancer pain management at home is a complicated and multidimensional experience that affects the foundational aspects of patients and their families' lives. Understanding the pain relief process and the outcomes of palliative care at home is essential for designing programs to improve the quality of life of patients and their families.

Objective

To explore family caregivers and patients' experiences of pain management at home and develop a substantive theory.

Design

The study was carried out using a grounded theory methodology.

Setting/Participants

Twenty patients and 32 family caregivers were recruited from Oncology wards and palliative medicine clinics in the hospitals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences using Purposeful and theoretical sampling.

Results

The core category in this study was "pain relief with the least harm." Other categories were formed around the core category including "pain assessment, determining the severity of pain, using hierarchical approaches to pain relief, assessing the results of applied approaches, determining the range of effectiveness, and barriers and facilitators of pain relief." The substantive theory emerged from these categories was "Pain management process in cancer patients at home: Causing the least harm" that explains the stages of applying hierarchical approaches to pain relief, family care givers try to make decisions in a way that maximize pain relief and minimize damage to the patient. Along with using a hierarchical pattern, the process is featured with a circular pattern at broader perspective, which reflects dynamism of the process.

Conclusion

The inferred categories and theory can expand knowledge and awareness about the stages of pain relief process, the pattern of using pain relief approaches, and the barriers and facilitators of pain relief process at home. Health-care professionals may use these findings to assess the knowledge, skill, capability, problems, and needs of family caregivers and patients and develop supportive and educational programs to improve the efficiency of pain relief process at home and improve the patients' quality of life.

Barriers to Effective Cancer Pain Management in Home Setting: A Qualitative Study

BACKGROUND

Pain is one of the most disturbing and distressing symptoms experienced by cancer patients, and it is the most stressful factor affecting all aspects of patients and their families' lives. Understanding the barriers to effective cancer pain management in home setting is essential for designing programs to improve the quality of the patients and their families' lives.

AIM

Exploring family caregivers' and cancer patients' experiences of barriers to pain management at home.

DESIGN

Qualitative exploratory descriptive study.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Twenty patients and 32 family caregivers were recruited from oncology wards and palliative medicine clinics in hospitals affiliated to Iran University of Medical Sciences.

METHOD

In-depth interviews were conducted with each participant, and audio-recorded and transcribed interviews were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Ten major themes emerged regarding barriers to cancer pain management in home setting: "Drug dependence and addiction," "Malingering," "Negative attitudes towards opioid analgesia," "Concealing pain," "Painful comorbidities," "Conflict in family members' perspectives," "Inaccessibility of pain relief facilities," "Poor skill and knowledge," "Patients' feelings of depression and hopelessness," and "Caregiver burden."

CONCLUSION

The study documented the need for supportive and educational programs for cancer patients and their family caregivers in an attempt to improve the effectiveness of pain managment and cancer patients' quality of life.

Managing Pain in People with Cancer-a Systematic Review of the Attitudes and Knowledge of Professionals, Patients, Caregivers and Public

Cancer pain is a common symptom experienced by patients, caused either by the disease or its treatment. Morphine remains the most effective and recommended treatment for cancer pain. However, cancer patients still do not receive appropriate management for their pain, and under-treatment is common. Lack of knowledge and negative attitudes towards cancer pain and analgesia among professionals, patients and family caregivers are reported as one of the most common barriers to effective cancer pain management (CPM). To systematically review research on the nature and impact of attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, a systematic literature search of 6 databases (the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science and EMBASE) was undertaken in July 2018. Additionally, hand-searching of Google, Google Scholar and reference lists was conducted. The inclusion criteria were adult (18-65 years of age), studies which included attitudes and knowledge towards CPM, studies written in English, published literature only and cross-sectional design. Included studies were critically appraised by two researchers independently using the Joanna Briggs Institute Analytical Cross Sectional Studies Assessment (JBI-ACSSA). A total of 36 studies met the inclusion criteria. The main finding was that among professionals, patients, caregivers and the public there were similar attitudinal barriers to effective CPM. The most commonly cited barriers were fear of drug addiction, tolerance of medication and side effects of opioids. We also found differences between professional groups (physicians versus nurses) and between different countries based on their potential exposure to palliative care training and services. There are still barriers to effective CPM, which might result in unrelieved cancer pain. Therefore, more educational programmes and training for professionals on CPM are needed. Furthermore, patients, caregivers, and the public need more general awareness and adequate level of knowledge about CPM.

Attitudinal Barriers to Pain Management and Associated Factors Among Cancer Patients in Mainland China: Implications for Cancer Education

Attitudinal barriers to pain management are supposed to contribute to the uncontrolled cancer pain in mainland China. The purpose of this study was (1) to investigate the attitudinal barriers to pain management among cancer patients in mainland China, (2) to examine relationships between the attitudinal barriers and patients' pain management conditions in the light of medication adherence and adequacy of analgesic use, and (3) to identify factors associated with the attitudinal barriers. A cross-sectional questionnaire survey, including the Barriers Questionnaire-Chinese (BQ-C) and two scales that measure the medication adherence and the adequacy of analgesic use, was carried out among patients with a variety of cancers. The questionnaires were completed by 246 cancer patients (response rate 94.6%); their mean age was 51.5 years (SD = 11.7). Almost all the patients had various attitudinal barriers to pain management. The mean scores for the total scale and several subscales of the BQ-C were significantly different by the patients' characteristics, the medication adherence, and the adequacy of analgesic use. The associations with these variables for a given subscale, e.g., the subscale regarding concerns about side effects, were different from those for other subscales, e.g., the subscale regarding fatalism that cancer pain is uncontrollable. The findings suggest that a nurse-led educational program in the light of patients' characteristics is required for overcoming the attitudinal barriers to pain management among cancer patients in mainland China.

Adapting the Family Management Styles Framework to Include Children

EMPIRICAL STUDY PURPOSE

Propose an adapted Family Management Style Framework that includes the perspectives of children with chronic health conditions.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Building on the current Family Management Style Framework, the authors used recent empirical studies with children to further develop the framework. Definitions of each dimension and component of the framework were reviewed and revised to reflect the perspectives of the child, based on the child data and prior work.

RESULTS

The Family Management Style Framework was adapted to reflect children's perspectives of themselves and their family. Based upon our understanding of the components of the framework, we expanded the components and revised the definitions of the dimensions to reflect the child perspectives.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating the perspectives of children allows us to consider the transactions that occur during condition management between parents, children and families. Additional research is needed to explore this interaction and the implications it has on the outcomes.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

Children experience the way their family manages their chronic health condition and incorporate those experiences as part of their developing understanding of themselves and their condition. Practitioners should encourage children to express their understanding of their condition and its management to model and encourage them to dialogue about management with their families.

The association between different opioid doses and the survival of advanced cancer patients receiving palliative care

Background

Concerns that opioids may hasten death can be a cause of the physicians’ reluctance to prescribe opioids, leading to inadequate symptom palliation. Our aim was to find if there was an association between different opioid doses and the survival of the cancer patients that participated in our palliative care program.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok between January 2013 and December 2015. All of the cancer patients that were referred to palliative care teams by their primary physicians were included in the study. The study data included the patients’ demographics, disease status, comorbidities, functional status, type of services, cancer treatments, date of consultation, and the date of the patient’s death or last follow-up. The information concerning opioid use was collected by reviewing the medical records and this was converted to an oral morphine equivalent (OME), following a standard ratio. The time-varying covariate in the Cox regression analysis was applied in order to determine the association between different doses of opioids and patient survival.

Results

A total of 317 cancer patients were included in the study. The median (IQR) of the OME among our patients was 6.43 mg/day (0.53, 27.36). The univariate Cox regression analysis did not show any association between different opioid doses (OME ≤ 30 mg/day and > 30 mg/day) and the patients’ survival (p = 0.52). The PPS levels (p < 0.01), palliative care clinic visits (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.24–0.43), home visits (HR 0.75, 95%CI 0.57–0.99), chemotherapy (HR 0.32, 95%CI 0.22–0.46), and radiotherapy (HR 0.53, 95%CI 0.36–0.78) were identified as factors that increased the probability of survival.

Conclusions

Our study has demonstrated that different opioid doses in advanced cancer patients are not associated with shortened survival period.

Mediating Effect of Family Caregivers' Hesitancy to Use Analgesics on Homecare Cancer Patients' Analgesic Adherence

CONTEXT

Family caregivers play an increasingly critical role in cancer patients' symptom management as the number of cancer patients receiving home care grows. However, there is a lack of research measuring the impact of the family caregivers' hesitancy to use analgesics on analgesic adherence and the resulting influence on patient pain intensity.

OBJECTIVES

To examine whether family caregivers' hesitancy to use analgesics is a mediator that influences patient adherence and investigate how analgesic regimen adherence affects pain intensity.

METHODS

This study used a cross-sectional and descriptive design. One hundred seventy-six patient-family caregiver dyads (N = 352) were recruited from one local hospital in southern Taiwan. Instruments included the Short Version of the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan, the Morisky Medication Adherence Measure-Taiwan, the Brief Pain Inventory-Chinese, and demographic and illness questionnaires. A one-way analysis of variance and post hoc comparisons were performed to assess the influence of analgesic regimen adherence on pain intensity. Sobel tests were used to examine mediating effects.

RESULTS

Family caregivers' hesitancy to use analgesics was a significant mediator between patient barriers to use analgesics and patient analgesic regimen adherence (P < 0.0001). Patients with low and moderate adherence levels reported significantly higher levels of pain severity (F = 3.83, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study showed that family caregivers' hesitancy to use analgesics was a significant mediator associated with their hesitancy to use analgesics and the patients' analgesic adherence. It is important for health care providers to consider family caregivers' hesitancy to use analgesics when attempting to improve adherence to pain management regimens in clinical practice.

Attitudes of Hungarian adults toward use of opioids in pain management

Introduction: Though the most effective pain medication is already available in Western countries, cancer pain is often undertreated. The primary causes of this phenomenon are the fears of opioids, which haven’t been explored systematically in Hungary. Aims: Exploration of the attitudes toward opioids among healthy Hungarian adults. Methods: The participants (88/143 male/female, 29.47 ± 11.05 years) were asked to complete story of a patient who was suggested to accept opioid therapy. The stories were rated by independent raters on Likert-scales to access the strength of attitudes toward pain medication [1]. Results: Only an average 29.6% of the stories expressed positive attitudes, but varied fears (of addiction: 20.9%, nearing death: 10.5%, the inattention of the doctor: 4.7%), and hopes connected to alternative therapies (4.7%) emerged, too. Conclusions: The compliance of the patient and his/her family members is a very important factor of effective medical treatment, therefore individual attitudes must be considered. Orv. Hetil., 2013, 154, 455–463.

Family caregivers and cancer pain management: a review

Due to the critical role of family caregivers in cancer pain management, this systematic review was undertaken to examine what is known about of their experiences and needs. Searches were conducted using electronic databases, and research reports from 1991 to 2007 were analyzed using a matrix method. Family caregivers were actively engaged in assisting with pain management and experienced significant needs and concerns related to this role. Myths and fears about opioid use remain widespread across cultures studied and across care settings. Family caregivers need education about pain management, training in problem-solving skills, and recognition from providers about their role in pain management. When clinicians better understand and respond to the needs of the family caregivers, they can enhance the quality of life and care outcomes for both patients and their caregivers.

Barriers to pain management in a community sample of Chinese American patients with cancer

Barriers to cancer pain management can contribute to the undertreatment of cancer pain. No studies have documented barriers to cancer pain management in Chinese American patients. The purposes of this study in a community sample of Chinese Americans were to: describe their perceived barriers to cancer pain management; examine the relationships between these barriers and patients' ratings of pain intensity, pain interference with function, mood disturbances, education, and acculturation level; and determine which factors predicted barriers to cancer pain management. Fifty Chinese Americans with cancer pain completed the following instruments: Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Scale, Barriers Questionnaire (BQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Suinn-Lew Asian Self-Identity Acculturation Scale (SL-ASIA), and a demographic questionnaire. The mean total BQ score was in the moderate range. The individual barriers with the highest scores were: tolerance to pain medicine; time intervals used for dosage of pain medicine; disease progression; and addiction. Significant correlations were found between the tolerance subscale and least pain (r=0.380) and the religious fatalism subscale and average pain (r=0.282). These two subscales were positively correlated with anxiety and depression levels: (tolerance: r=0.282, r=0.284, respectively; religious fatalism: r=0.358, r=0.353, respectively). The tolerance subscale was positively correlated with pain interference (r=0.374). Approximately 21% of the variance in the total BQ score was explained by patients' education level, acculturation score, level of depression, and adequacy of pain treatment. Chinese American cancer patients need to be assessed for pain and perceived barriers to cancer pain management to optimize pain management.

Assessing analgesic regimen adherence with the Morisky Medication Adherence Measure for Taiwanese patients with cancer pain

The purposes of this study were (1) to examine the psychometric properties of the Taiwanese version of the Morisky Medication Adherence Measure (MMAM), including its validity and reliability, (2) to investigate levels of analgesic regimen adherence, and (3) to explore the predictors of adherence to the analgesic regimen in a sample of Taiwanese cancer patients with pain. One hundred thirty-five patients receiving analgesics for cancer pain participated in this study. Instruments consisted of the Taiwanese version of the MMAM, the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, the Chinese version of the Brief Pain Inventory, the American Pain Society Outcome Questionnaire, Karnofsky Performance Status, and a demographic questionnaire. Analgesic use ratios were calculated. The Taiwanese version of the MMAM had good psychometric properties for measuring adherence with the analgesic regimens taken by Taiwanese cancer pain patients. Reliability was supported by good internal consistency Cronbach alpha and test-retest coefficients. Validity was corroborated by good known group validity, construct validity, and criterion-related validity. The majority of the patients (51%) showed low levels of medication adherence. The significant predictors for the medication adherence score were age, the Barriers Questionnaire score, and satisfaction with pain management by clinicians after entering pain severity, pain interference with daily life, age, gender, education, types of analgesics used, functional status, and satisfaction with pain management as independent variables. The model accounted for 63% of the variance in the medication adherence score. The Taiwanese version of the MMAM shows excellent reliability and validity. The use of this reliable, valid, simple, and easily administered tool can improve communication between patients and clinicians about use of analgesics and further improve the analgesic regimen adherence.

Knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative care: a qualitative systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To review current understanding of the knowledge and information needs of informal caregivers in palliative settings.

DATA SOURCES

Seven electronic databases were searched for the period January 1994--November 2006: Medline, CINAHL, PsychINFO, Embase, Ovid, Zetoc and Pubmed using a meta-search engine (Metalib). Key journals and reference lists of selected papers were hand searched.

REVIEW METHODS

Included studies were peer-reviewed journal articles presenting original research. Given a variety of approaches to palliative care research, a validated systematic review methodology for assessing disparate evidence was used in order to assign scores to different aspects of each study (introduction and aims, method and data, sampling, data analysis, ethics and bias, findings/results, transferability/generalizability, implications and usefulness). Analysis was assisted by abstraction of the key details of each study into a table.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were included from eight different countries. The evidence was strongest in relation to pain management, where inadequacies in caregiver knowledge and the importance of education were emphasized. The significance of effective communication and information sharing between patient, caregiver and service provider was also emphasized. The evidence for other caregiver knowledge and information needs, for example in relation to welfare and social support, was weaker. There was limited literature on non-cancer conditions and the care-giving information needs of black and minority ethnic populations. Overall, the evidence base was predominantly descriptive and dominated by small-scale studies, limiting generalizability.

CONCLUSIONS

As palliative care shifts into patients' homes, a more rigorously researched evidence base devoted to understanding caregivers knowledge and information needs is required. Research design needs to move beyond the current focus on dyads to incorporate the complex, three-way interactions between patients, service providers and caregivers in end-of-life care settings.

Relatives in end-of-life care--part 1: a systematic review of the literature the five last years, January 1999-February 2004

AIM

To review systematically research conducted during the past five years focusing on the relatives' situation and needs in end-of-life care.

BACKGROUND AND AIM

That relatives make a large contribution in the care of the dying is well-known. In this situation, relatives often have to solve many new practical problems in the care as well as dealing with the sorrow of both themselves and the dying person. In recent years, palliative care has been developed in many countries and many new studies have been carried out.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature was performed in the CINAHL and Medline databases. Of the 94 papers analysed, there were 59 qualitative and 35 quantitative studies with differing designs. The studies were carried out in 11 countries and were published in 34 different journals.

RESULTS

The results were categorized in two main themes with several subthemes: (1) being a close relative--the situation: (i) exposed position--new responsibility, (ii) balance between burden and capacity and (iii) positive values; (2) being a close relative--needs: (i) good patient care, (ii) being present, (iii) knowing and communicating and (iv) support from and trusting relationship with the professional. The relative's feelings of security and trust in the professional were found to be of great importance.

CONCLUSION

More than twice as many studies had a descriptive/explorative design, which is of importance in the assessment of evidence. However, different studies complement one another and in summary, it can be said that analytic evidence is unequivocal: good patient care, communication, information and the attitude of the professional are of decisive importance regarding relatives' situation. These results are also in accord with earlier review studies.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Staff members have a great deal of responsibility for assuring that the patient feels as good as possible, facilitating relatives' involvement based on the family's wishes and limiting the stress and difficulties experienced by the family. The results showed that the relative's satisfaction could depend on the attitude of the professional as well as on good communication, good listening and good information. This can also be viewed as a prerequisite for the professional to get to know the family and to provide 'care in the light'.

Long-term effectiveness of a patient and family pain education program on overcoming barriers to management of cancer pain

The purpose of this research was to investigate the effectiveness of a patient and family pain education program on reducing cancer patients' and their families' barriers to (i.e., concerns or misconceptions about) cancer pain management, on increasing patients' adherence to a prescribed analgesic regimen, and on decreasing pain intensity and pain interference with daily life. An experimental and longitudinal design was used. The experimental group consisted of 31 pairs of cancer outpatients and their family carers, while the control group consisted of 30 patient-family pairs (N=122). Patients and their family carers in the experimental group simultaneously received a pain management education program. Both groups had pretest data collection and after-test follow-ups on the second and fourth weeks at the outpatient clinics. Comparisons between those two groups were made using the Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) method. Results revealed that at both the second and fourth weeks, patients and family carers in the experimental group showed a significantly greater reduction in barrier scores than did patients and family carers in the control group. At the second and fourth weeks, patients in the experimental group reported significantly better adherence to a scheduled analgesic regimen than did patients in the control group. In the fourth week, patients in the experimental group reported significantly lower levels of worst pain intensity and pain interference than did patients in the control group. This research provides evidence of the effectiveness of a patient and family pain education program.

Final transitions: family caregiving at the end of life

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to understand how caregivers make the transition to end-stage caregiving and to illuminate its unique aspects using a stress process model.

METHODS

Qualitative in-depth interviews were conducted with 74 caregivers of a family member who had been receiving hospice care for at least 2 weeks. Interviews were tape recorded, transcribed, and coded for emergent themes using constant comparative analysis.

RESULTS

End-stage caregiving was characterized in the sample as (1) comprehension of terminality (the interrelationship of information, physical and cognitive decline, and personality change and role losses), (2) near-acute care, (3) executive functions, and (4) final decision making. The comprehension of terminality emerged from three interrelated experiences: receiving and assimilating concrete information about the illness, observing the progression of the disease, and observing the personality change and role loss. The primary stressors (unique end-stage caregiving tasks) were providing near-acute care, assuming an executive function, and beginning and final decision making. The secondary stressors were family role conflict, work conflict, and financial strain. Resources, such as intrinsic and extrinsic religious and faith practices and social support, were identified. Negative outcomes included intense emotional responses, and positive outcomes included heightened development of meaning making.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that palliative care professionals have important opportunities to provide information and support to family caregivers during the final stages of the patient's terminal illness.

Barriers to effective cancer pain management: a survey of Australian family caregivers

Cancer pain continues to be an important focus of health research and intervention development. The continuing shift of cancer care to the community increases the family caregiver's role in pain management and highlights the need to understand family experiences and also family barriers to effective pain management. This paper presents the findings of an Australian study exploring attitudinal barriers to effective pain management amongst 75 family caregivers of people with cancer attending an outpatient clinic. Approximately 75% of the caregivers demonstrated concerns or were unsure about addiction, a belief likely to impact on the use of prescribed opioids in the home. Caregivers demonstrated similar levels of concern about side-effects or whether the presence of pain indicated disease progression. These findings support research in other populations and are further evidence of the need to include family caregivers, along with patients, in intervention studies aimed at reducing the impact of these barriers on effective pain management.

Development and testing of the pain opioid analgesics beliefs scale in Taiwanese cancer patients

The purpose of the study was to develop and preliminarily test the feasibility, validity, reliability, and factor structures of the Pain Opioid Analgesics Beliefs Scale-Cancer (POABS-CA) in hospitalized adults diagnosed with cancer in Taiwan. This scale was developed in three phases. In Phase I, item development was based on qualitative analysis as well as a review of the literature. Face validity, content validity, and feasibility were also evaluated. In Phase II, internal consistency reliability was further tested in 42 subjects with pain. In Phase III, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and essential construct validity were further assessed in a sample of 361 hospitalized cancer patients with pain. The POABS-CA evolved from testing as a 10-item 5-point Likert-type instrument. Higher scores indicated more negative beliefs regarding opioids and their use in managing pain. Satisfactory face validity and content validity were found. The POABS-CA was also shown to be a reliable and stable pain belief scale, with Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability of 0.70 and 0.94, respectively. Two factors, namely pain endurance beliefs and negative effect beliefs, were extracted from the principal component factor analysis to support the construct validity. In conclusion, preliminary evidence indicates the POABS-CA is a reliable, stable, valid and easily applied scale for assessing beliefs regarding opioid use for cancer pain. Further studies should test this scale in different populations to increase its applications in cancer pain management.

Overcoming patient-related barriers to cancer pain management for home care patients. A pilot study

The purpose of this pilot study was to explore the effectiveness of a pain education program to overcome patient-related barriers in managing cancer pain for Taiwanese home care patients with cancer. The pain education program was developed based on previous studies of Taiwanese patient-related barriers to cancer pain management. The Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, the Brief Pain Inventory, the Medication Adherence Questionnaire, and a demographic questionnaire were used for data collection. The sample consisted of 18 patients in the experimental group and 19 patients in the control group. Descriptive statistics, tests, and paired tests were used to analyze the data. Results of this study revealed that patients who received the pain educational program had significantly greater reduction in Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form scores and more improvement in medication adherence compared with patients who did not participate in the program. When compared to pretest scores, patients scores after receiving the pain education intervention showed significant improvement on the Barriers Questionnaire-Taiwan form, medication adherence, pain intensity, and pain interference. The results of this study support the effectiveness of the pain education program on overcoming the barriers to cancer pain management for Taiwanese home care patients with cancer.