[CARD study: relevance for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND

 Various life-prolonging therapy options are available for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

OBJECTIVE

 The optimal therapy sequence for mCRPC has been discussed for years. With the final results of the CARD study, important prospective data are available to enlighten the discussion about the therapy sequence.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

 CARD is a randomised phase IV trial in patients with mCRPC who were previously treated with docetaxel and an anti-androgen receptor (ARTA). The study showed significant efficacy benefits in favour of further treatment with cabazitaxel versus a second ARTA therapy. The study results are presented and discussed in the context of previous study data with regard to their importance for everyday clinical practice.

RESULTS

 The CARD study data confirm cabazitaxel as an effective therapy option for mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel and an ARTA. Cabazitaxel was safe to apply. The study results confirm the cross resistance between the two ARTAs Abiraterone and Enzalutamide.

CONCLUSION

In mCRPC patients eligible for chemotherapy, the therapy sequence should be chosen so that the patients also receive cabazitaxel. A direct therapy sequence with two ARTAs should be avoided or, at least, only considered if other substances are contraindicated.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Overall Survival of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in the US Prior to PARP Inhibitors

Introduction

Therapeutic options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients are continuously advancing. We described mCRPC treatment patterns in the US from 2013 to 2019.

Methods

Patients with a confirmed mCRPC diagnosis and adenocarcinoma histology were included in the US Flatiron Health Electronic Health Record-derived de-identified database. Treatment patterns [including treatment per lines of therapies (LOTs), LOT sequences, and time on treatment] and overall survival (OS) have been described in mCRPC settings.

Results

Of 5213 patients (mean age: 72.6 years), 4374 (83.9%) were treated with ≥ 1 LOT post-mCRPC diagnosis (among those with ≥ 1 LOT, 55.3%, 29.5%, 14.7%, and 6.7% had ≥ 2, 3, 4, and 5 LOTs, respectively). In first line (1L), the main treatment class was next-generation hormonal agents (NHA; 62.5% of patients with ≥ 1 LOT), while the shortest and longest time on 1L were observed for chemotherapy (median 2.8 months) and NHA (median 5.1 months), respectively. The most common LOT sequences were NHA → NHA (29.4% of patients with ≥ 2 LOTs) and NHA → NHA → chemotherapy (16.7% of patients with ≥ 3 LOTs). In Kaplan–Meier analyses, the median OS was 19.4, 14.6, and 11.1 months post-1L, 2L, and 3L start, respectively. Patients who moved rapidly through LOTs had an increased risk of death.

Conclusions

NHA were widely used as 1L therapy in mCRPC patients from 2013 to 2019, but time on 1L NHA treatment was on average < 6 months. While NHA → NHA was the most observed 1L → 2L LOT sequence, a plethora of other LOT sequences were observed. OS was poor, highlighting an unmet need for life-prolonging treatments.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12325-021-01823-6.

Sequencing Life-Prolonging Agents in Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients: Comparison of Sequences With and Without 223Ra

Background: The retrospective studies that have so far described the outcomes of the sequential use of life-prolonging agents (LPAs) did not include metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients who received radium-223 (²²³Ra) as part of their treatment. Consequently, it is not known whether including ²²³Ra in the therapeutic sequence has an impact on cumulative survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate this impact by comparing the cumulative overall survival (OS) in two series of mCRPC patients sequentially treated with two or three LPAs after first-line docetaxel (DOC), including ²²³Ra and not. Materials and Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of mCRPC patients with bone involvement alone who received two or three LPAs (including ²²³Ra) after first-line DOC. The control group was a contemporary series of mCRPC patients with bone involvement alone treated with sequences of two or three LPAs other than ²²³Ra after first-line DOC. Results: Median cumulative OS was 40.6 months in the ²²³Ra group of 78 patients and 36.2 months in the non-²²³Ra group of 186 patients (p = 0.08). OS outcomes were significantly influenced by the number of treatment lines, and baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) and prostate-specific antigen levels. Conclusions: To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first study designed to evaluate the impact of introducing ²²³Ra in the treatment sequences for mCRPC patients, and the results show that its use does not negatively affect cumulative OS.

[Changes in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer-new data and open questions]

The availability of taxane-based chemotherapy and androgen-receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs) have significantly broadened the therapeutic options for patients with metastatic prostate cancer and may also result in longer patient survival. The therapeutic sequence of ARTAs and taxanes may influence outcome and therefore decisions should be made on an individual basis. This article provides guidance for therapeutic decision-making in daily clinical practice by working out criteria that can be used to support individual therapeutic decisions. The focus is on metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer, oligometastatic disease as well as non-metastatic and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.