1
|
Dietz S, Fritzmann J, Weidlich A, Schaser KD, Weitz J, Kirchberg J. [Treatment strategies for recurrent rectal cancer]. Chirurgie (Heidelb) 2024; 95:495-509. [PMID: 38739162 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-024-02087-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/14/2024]
Abstract
Multimodal treatment approaches with neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy followed by oncological and total mesorectal excision (TME) have significantly reduced the recurrence rate even in locally advanced rectal cancer. Nevertheless, up to 10% of patients develop a local relapse. Surgical R0 resection is the only chance of a cure in the treatment of locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). Due to the altered anatomy and physiology of the true pelvis as a result of the pretreatment and operations as well as the localization and extent of the recurrence, the treatment decision is individualized and remains a challenge for the interdisciplinary team. Even locally advanced tumors with involvement of adjacent structures can be treated in designated centers using multimodal treatment concepts with potentially curative intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Dietz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (NCT/UCC): Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Johannes Fritzmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (NCT/UCC): Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Anne Weidlich
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (NCT/UCC): Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
- UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie, Unfall- & Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Klaus-Dieter Schaser
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (NCT/UCC): Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
- UniversitätsCentrum für Orthopädie, Unfall- & Plastische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Jürgen Weitz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (NCT/UCC): Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland
| | - Johanna Kirchberg
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
- Nationales Centrum für Tumorerkrankungen Dresden (NCT/UCC): Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, Medizinische Fakultät der Technischen Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Custers PA, Beets GL, Bach SP, Blomqvist LK, Figueiredo N, Gollub MJ, Martling A, Melenhorst J, Ortega CD, Perez RO, Smith JJ, Lambregts DMJ, Beets-Tan RGH, Maas M. An International Expert-Based Consensus on the Definition of a Clinical Near-Complete Response After Neoadjuvant (Chemo)radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:782-795. [PMID: 38701503 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A variety of definitions for a clinical near-complete response after neoadjuvant (chemo) radiotherapy for rectal cancer are currently used. This variety leads to inconsistency in clinical practice, long-term outcome, and trial enrollment. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to reach expert-based consensus on the definition of a clinical near-complete response after (chemo) radiotherapy. DESIGN A modified Delphi process, including a systematic review, 3 surveys, and 2 meetings, was performed with an international expert panel consisting of 7 surgeons and 4 radiologists. The surveys consisted of individual features, statements, and feature combinations (endoscopy, T2-weighted MRI, and diffusion-weighted MRI). SETTING The modified Delphi process was performed in an online setting; all 3 surveys were completed online by the expert panel, and both meetings were hosted online. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome was to reach consensus (80% or more agreement). RESULTS The expert panel reached consensus on a 3-tier categorization of the near-complete response category based on the likelihood of the response to evolve into a clinical complete response after a longer waiting interval. The panelists agreed that a near-complete response is a temporary entity only to be used in the first 6 months after (chemo)radiotherapy. Furthermore, consensus was reached that the lymph node status should be considered when deciding on a near-complete response and that biopsies are not always needed when a near-complete response is found. No consensus was reached on whether primary staging characteristics have to be taken into account when deciding on a near-complete response. LIMITATIONS This 3-tier subcategorization is expert-based; therefore, there is no supporting evidence for this subcategorization. Also, it is unclear whether this subcategorization can be generalized into clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS Consensus was reached on the use of a 3-tier categorization of a near-complete response, which can be helpful in daily practice as guidance for treatment and to inform patients with a near-complete response on the likelihood of successful organ preservation. See Video Abstract. UN CONSENSO INTERNACIONAL BASADO EN EXPERTOS ACERCA DE LA DEFINICIN DE UNA RESPUESTA CLNICA CASI COMPLETA DESPUS DE QUIMIORADIOTERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE CONTRA EL CNCER DE RECTO ANTECEDENTES:Actualmente, se utilizan una variedad de definiciones para una respuesta clínica casi completa después de quimioradioterapia neoadyuvante contra el cáncer de recto. Esta variedad resulta en inconsistencia en la práctica clínica, los resultados a largo plazo y la inscripción en ensayos.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue llegar a un consenso de expertos sobre la definición de una respuesta clínica casi completa después de quimioradioterapia.DISEÑO:Se realizó un proceso Delphi modificado que incluyó una revisión sistemática, 3 encuestas y 2 reuniones con un panel internacional de expertos compuesto por siete cirujanos y 4 radiólogos. Las encuestas consistieron en características individuales, declaraciones y combinaciones de características (endoscopía, T2W-MRI y DWI).AJUSTE:El proceso Delphi modificado se realizó en un entorno en línea; el panel de expertos completó las tres encuestas en línea y ambas reuniones se realizaron en línea.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue llegar a un consenso (≥80% de acuerdo).RESULTADOS:El panel de expertos llegó a un consenso sobre una categorización de tres niveles de la categoría de respuesta casi completa basada en la probabilidad de que la respuesta evolucione hacia una respuesta clínica completa después de un intervalo de espera más largo. Los panelistas coincidieron en que una respuesta casi completa es una entidad temporal que sólo debe utilizarse en los primeros 6 meses después de la quimioradioterapia. Además, se llegó a un consenso en que se debe considerar el estado de los nódulos linfáticos al decidir sobre una respuesta casi completa y que no siempre se necesitan biopsias cuando se encuentra una respuesta casi completa. No se llegó a un consenso sobre si se deben tener en cuenta las características primarias de estadificación al decidir una respuesta casi completa.LIMITACIONES:Esta subcategorización de 3 niveles está basada en expertos; por lo tanto, no hay evidencia que respalde esta subcategorización. Además, no está claro si esta subcategorización puede generalizarse a la práctica clínica.CONCLUSIONES:Se alcanzó consenso sobre el uso de una categorización de 3 niveles de una respuesta casi completa que puede ser útil en la práctica diaria como guía para el tratamiento y para informar a los pacientes con una respuesta casi completa sobre la probabilidad de una preservación exitosa del órgano. (Traducción - Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra A Custers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Geerard L Beets
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Simon P Bach
- Department of Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Lennart K Blomqvist
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Nuno Figueiredo
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Lusiadas Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Division of Coloproctology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jarno Melenhorst
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Cinthia D Ortega
- Department of Radiology, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo O Perez
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York
| | - Doenja M J Lambregts
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Regina G H Beets-Tan
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique Maas
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
El Homsi M, Bercz A, Chahwan S, Fernandes MC, Javed-Tayyab S, Golia Pernicka JS, Nincevic J, Paroder V, Ruby L, Smith JJ, Petkovska I. Watch & wait - Post neoadjuvant imaging for rectal cancer. Clin Imaging 2024; 110:110166. [PMID: 38669916 PMCID: PMC11090716 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2024] [Revised: 04/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
Rectal cancer management has evolved over the past decade with the emergence of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). For select patients who achieve a clinical complete response following TNT, organ preservation by means of the watch-and-wait (WW) strategy is an increasingly adopted alternative that preserves rectal function and quality of life without compromising oncologic outcomes. Recently, published 5-year results from the OPRA trial demonstrated that organ preservation can be achieved in approximately half of patients managed with the WW strategy, with most local regrowth events occurring within two years. Considering the potential for local regrowth, the implementation of the WW strategy mandates rigorous clinical and radiographic surveillance. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) serves as the conventional imaging modality for local staging and surveillance of rectal cancer given its excellent soft-tissue resolution. This review will discuss the current evidence for the WW strategy and the role of restaging rectal MRI in determining patient eligibility for this strategy. Restaging rectal MRI acquisition parameters and treatment response assessment, including important factors to assess, pitfalls, and classification systems, will be discussed in the context of the WW strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria El Homsi
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Aron Bercz
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Stephanie Chahwan
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Maria Clara Fernandes
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Sidra Javed-Tayyab
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Jennifer S Golia Pernicka
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Josip Nincevic
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Lisa Ruby
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Iva Petkovska
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Affleck AG, Herzig D. Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer. Surg Clin North Am 2024; 104:609-617. [PMID: 38677824 DOI: 10.1016/j.suc.2023.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/29/2024]
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer has traditionally included sequenced multimodal therapy including radiation, chemotherapy, and surgery. The relative contribution of each and the order of treatments have evolved over the years. By the early twenty-first century, there was widespread use of the German Rectal Cancer Trial approach: preoperative chemoradiation, followed by standardized surgery including total mesorectal excision, and finally adjuvant chemotherapy. Recent advances have defined the superiority of moving the chemotherapy into the preoperative setting. This approach, termed total neoadjuvant therapy promises better systemic control and overall survival and expaned options for omitting surgery in selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur G Affleck
- Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR 97239, USA. https://twitter.com/AffleckIv
| | - Daniel Herzig
- Division of General and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 Southwest Sam Jackson Park Road, Mail Code L-223A, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Medioni M, Cervantes B, Huguet F, Bachet JB, Parc Y, André T, Lefèvre JH, Cohen R. [An update on total neoadjuvant treatment of adenocarcinoma of the rectum]. Bull Cancer 2024; 111:483-495. [PMID: 38553289 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2024.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024]
Abstract
A major advance has been made in the management of rectal cancer, with the emergence in 2021 of total neoadjuvant treatment. The main publications from the RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23 trials reported a significant improvement in progression-free survival and the pathological complete response rate. The aim of this review is to synthesize recent data on neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer, to explain the long-term results of the RAPIDO and PRODIGE-23 trials, and to put them into perspective, considering current advances in de-escalation strategies. The update of the 5-year survival data from the RAPIDO trial highlights an increased risk of loco-regional relapse, with 11.7% of relapses in the experimental group and 8.1% in the control group, while the update of the PRODIGE-23 trial confirms the benefits of this treatment regimen, with a significant improvement in overall survival. In addition, the results of the OPRA and PROPSPECT trials confirm the benefit of total neoadjuvant treatment with induction chemotherapy, as well as the possibility of surgical de-escalation in the OPRA trial and radiotherapy in the PROSPECT trial. The challenge for the future is to identify patients who require total neoadjuvant treatment with the aim of curative surgery to obtain a cure without local or distant relapse, and those for whom therapeutic de-escalation can be envisaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maroussia Medioni
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Baptiste Cervantes
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Florence Huguet
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Tenon, AP-HP, service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière, AP-HP, service d'hépato-gastroentérologie, Paris, France
| | - Yann Parc
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service de chirurgie générale et digestive, Paris, France
| | - Thierry André
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France; INSERM URMS_938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, SIRIC CURAMUS, équipe instabilité des microsatellites et cancer, équipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie H Lefèvre
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service de chirurgie générale et digestive, Paris, France
| | - Romain Cohen
- Sorbonne université, hôpital Saint-Antoine, AP-HP, service d'oncologie médicale, 75012 Paris, France; INSERM URMS_938, centre de recherche Saint-Antoine, SIRIC CURAMUS, équipe instabilité des microsatellites et cancer, équipe labellisée par la Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Krasnick BA, Kalady MF. Management of Rectal Cancer in Lynch Syndrome: Balancing Risk Reduction and Quality of Life. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:180-184. [PMID: 38606049 PMCID: PMC11006439 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
Patients with Lynch syndrome are predisposed to developing colorectal cancer and a variety of extracolonic malignancies, at a young age. The management of rectal cancer in the setting of Lynch syndrome is a complex clinical scenario that requires the expertise of a multidisciplinary management team. In this review, we delve into the approach for rectal cancer in these patients, and specifically focus on several key aspects of treatment. Some unique aspects of rectal cancer in Lynch syndrome include the decision between proctectomy alone versus total proctocolectomy with or without an ileal pouch, the utility of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, nonoperative rectal cancer management, and the management of rectal polyps. Throughout, we highlight the delicate interplay between future cancer risk reduction and quality of life optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley A. Krasnick
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Matthew F. Kalady
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Labadie KP, Olson KA, Sun SH, Ituarte PHG, Hanna M, Zerhouni Y, Lai LL, Sentovich SM, Kaiser AM, Melstrom KA. Outcomes of rectal cancer patients who refuse surgery after incomplete clinical response to neoadjuvant therapy. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1131-1138. [PMID: 38396372 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Total mesorectal excision (TME) remains the standard of care for patients with rectal cancer who have an incomplete response to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). A minority of patients will refuse curative intent resection. The aim of this study is to examine the outcomes for these patients. METHODS A retrospective cohort study of stage 1-3 rectal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy or TNT at a single institution. Patients either underwent TME, watch-and-wait protocol, or if they refused TME, were counseled and watched (RCW). Clinical outcomes and resource utilization were examined in each group. RESULTS One hundred seventy-one patients (Male 59%) were included with a median surveillance of 43 months. Twenty-nine patients (17%) refused TME and had shortened overall survival (OS). Twelve patients who refused TME converted to a complete clinical response (cCR) on subsequent staging with a prolonged OS. 92% of these patients had a near cCR at initial staging endoscopy. Increased physician visits and testing was utilized in RCW and WW groups. CONCLUSION A significant portion of patients convert to cCR and have prolonged OS. Lengthening the time to declare cCR may be considered in select patients, such as those with a near cCR at initial endoscopic staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Steven H Sun
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | - Mark Hanna
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | - Lily L Lai
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Duarte, California, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Smithson M, Diffalha SA, Irwin RK, Williams G, McLeod MC, Somasundaram V, Bellis SL, Hardiman KM. ST6GAL1 is associated with poor response to chemoradiation in rectal cancer. Neoplasia 2024; 51:100984. [PMID: 38467087 PMCID: PMC11026834 DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2024.100984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer is the third most common cause of cancer death. Rectal cancer makes up a third of all colorectal cases. Treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer includes chemoradiation followed by surgery. We have previously identified ST6GAL1 as a cause of resistance to chemoradiation in vitro and hypothesized that it would be correlated with poor response in human derived models and human tissues. METHODS Five organoid models were created from primary human rectal cancers and ST6GAL1 was knocked down via lentivirus transduction in one model. ST6GAL1 and Cleaved Caspase-3 (CC3) were assessed after chemoradiation via immunostaining. A tissue microarray (TMA) was created from twenty-six patients who underwent chemoradiation and had pre- and post-treatment specimens of rectal adenocarcinoma available at our institution. Immunohistochemistry was performed for ST6GAL1 and percent positive cancer cell staining was assessed and correlation with pathological grade of response was measured. RESULTS Organoid models were treated with chemoradiation and both ST6GAL1 mRNA and protein significantly increased after treatment. The organoid model targeted with ST6GAL1 knockdown was found to have increased CC3 after treatment. In the tissue microarray, 42 percent of patient samples had an increase in percent tumor cell staining for ST6GAL1 after treatment. Post-treatment percent staining was associated with a worse grade of treatment response (p = 0.01) and increased staining post-treatment compared to pre-treatment was also associated with a worse response (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION ST6GAL1 is associated with resistance to treatment in human rectal cancer and knockdown in an organoid model abrogated resistance to apoptosis caused by chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Smithson
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA
| | - Sameer Al Diffalha
- Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA
| | - Regina K Irwin
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA
| | - Gregory Williams
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA
| | - M Chandler McLeod
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA
| | - Vivek Somasundaram
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA
| | - Susan L Bellis
- Department of Cell, Developmental, and Integrative Biology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA
| | - Karin M Hardiman
- Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA; Department of Surgery, Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Al 35294, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cai J, Lin K, Luo T, Weng J, Liu H, Yuan Z, Wan Z, Han J, Lin J, Liu X, Wang X, Huang M, Luo Y, Yu H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is noninferior to chemoradiotherapy for early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer in the FOWARC trial. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1434-1440. [PMID: 38472421 PMCID: PMC11058860 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02652-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The early-onset rectal cancer with rapidly increasing incidence is considered to have distinct clinicopathological and molecular profiles with high-risk features. This leads to challenges in developing specific treatment strategies for early-onset rectal cancer patients and questions of whether early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) needs aggressive neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS In this post hoc analysis of FOWARC trial, we investigated the role of preoperative radiation in early-onset LARC by comparing the clinicopathological profiles and short-term and long-term outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. RESULTS We revealed an inter-tumor heterogeneity of clinical profiles and treatment outcomes between the early-onset and late-onset LARCs. The high-risk features were more prevalent in early-onset LARC. The neoadjuvant radiation brought less benefits of tumor response and more risk of complications in early-onset group (pCR: OR = 3.75, 95% CI = 1.37-10.27; complications: HR = 11.35, 95% CI = 1.46-88.31) compared with late-onset group (pCR: OR = 5.33, 95% CI = 1.83-15.58; complications: HR = 5.80, 95% CI = 2.32-14.49). Furthermore, the addition of radiation to neoadjuvant chemotherapy didn't improve long-term OS (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 0.49-3.87) and DFS (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.58-1.90) for early-onset patients. CONCLUSION Preoperative radiation plus chemotherapy may not be superior to the chemotherapy alone in the early-onset LARC. Our findings provide insight into the treatment of early-onset LARC by interrogating the aggressive treatment and alternative regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinlin Cai
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Kaixin Lin
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Tongfeng Luo
- Department of Anaesthesia, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jingrong Weng
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Haotian Liu
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ze Yuan
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zixiao Wan
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Junyi Han
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Jinxin Lin
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaoxia Liu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaolin Wang
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Meijin Huang
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yanxin Luo
- Department of General Surgery (Colorectal Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Huichuan Yu
- Guangdong Institute of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- Biomedical Innovation Center, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
- Key Laboratory of Human Microbiome and Chronic Diseases (Sun Yat-sen University), Ministry of Education, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Brewer J, Kamara M, Huebner M, Taxakis E, Grajewski K, Ramm C, Cleary RK. Operative trends following the adoption of nonoperative management of rectal cancer. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:1139-1149. [PMID: 38406980 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 02/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differentiating clinical near-complete and complete responses (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy (NT) is challenging in rectal cancer patients. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging staging limitations for low rectal cancers may increase the proportion of abdominoperineal resection (APR) with permanent colostomy for those without a cCR. METHODS Single institution retrospective analysis of rectal cancer cases before and after adoption of nonoperative "watch and wait" (W&W) pathway. APR as a percentage of rectal resections was the primary outcome. RESULTS There were 76 total mesorectal excisions (TME) in the pre-W&W group and 98 in the post-W&W group. NT was significantly more common in the post-W&W group. There was no significant difference in the APR primary outcome (pre-W&W APR 33.3% vs. post-W&W APR 26.5%, p = 0.482). APR patients had fewer complete TME grades (69.2% vs. 46.2%) and more pathologic complete responses (0% vs. 26.9%) in the post-W&W period. The cCR rate for patients with nonoperative management was 51.4% (n = 37) and 13.5% (n = 5) had regrowths, all of whom underwent salvage surgery. CONCLUSION APR for those without a cCR to NT has not increased in the nonoperative management era. Balancing the pathologic complete response rate may require restaging some patients with clinical near-complete responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Brewer
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Maseray Kamara
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Marianne Huebner
- Center for Statistical Training and Consulting, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | - Elias Taxakis
- Department of Radiology, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Karen Grajewski
- Department of Radiology, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Carole Ramm
- Department of Academic Research, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Robert K Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Ioffe D, McSweeny M, Hall MJ. Precision Medicine in the Era of Genetic Testing: Microsatellite Instability Evolved. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2024; 37:157-171. [PMID: 38617845 PMCID: PMC11007599 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1770385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/16/2024]
Abstract
The recognized importance of microsatellite instability (MSI) in cancer has evolved considerably in the past 30 years. From its beginnings as a molecular predictor for Lynch syndrome, MSI first transitioned to a universal screening test in all colorectal and endometrial cancers, substantially increasing the identification of patients with Lynch syndrome among cancer patients. More recently, MSI has been shown to be a powerful biomarker of response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy across a diversity of tumor types, and in 2017 was granted Food and Drug Administration approval as the first tumor histology-agnostic biomarker for a cancer therapy. Focusing on colorectal cancer specifically, immune checkpoint blockade therapy has been shown to be highly effective in the treatment of both MSI-high (MSI-H) colon and rectal cancer, with data increasingly suggesting an early role for immune checkpoint blockade therapy in MSI-H colorectal tumors in the neoadjuvant setting, with the potential to avoid more toxic and morbid approaches using traditional chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and surgery. The success of MSI as an immune checkpoint blockade target has inspired ongoing vigorous research to identify new similar targets for immune checkpoint blockade therapy that may help to one day expand the reach of this revolutionary cancer therapy to a wider swath of patients and indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michelle McSweeny
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael J. Hall
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
De Felice F, Miccini M, Botticelli A, Roberto M, Petrucciani N. The multidisciplinary management of locally advanced rectal cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2024:1-7. [PMID: 38676281 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2024.2349137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The classic paradigm for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) consists of (chemo)radiotherapy (C)RT), total mesorectal excision, and adjuvant chemotherapy (CHT). At present, due to the high rate of distant metastasis (up to 30%), the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) with the administration of systemic CHT in the neoadjuvant setting has gained acceptance as standard of care.Our aim is to critically review the current literature on LARC management and summarize the different approaches recently proposed to improve clinical outcomes. It represents a starting step to develop an effective strategy that ultimately could harmonize the standard of care in daily clinical practice. AREAS COVERED Studies reporting the impact of TNT approaches were deemed eligible. De-escalation strategies, including non-operative management (NOM) after TNT, as well as RT omission or systemic therapy alone, were also investigated. EXPERT OPINION The year 2020 has seen promising new data from randomized phase III trials in the field of LARC management. Nowadays, TNT strategy has been accepted as the primary treatment for LARC. The role of de-escalation strategies is still unknown. The goal is to achieve better survival outcomes with improving quality of life. Only selected patients are likely to benefit from NOM or immunotherapy alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca De Felice
- Department of Radiotherapy, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Botticelli
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Roberto
- Department of Oncology, Policlinico Umberto I, Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Niccolò Petrucciani
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, St Andrea University Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nguyen TM, Traeger L, Overall B, Sammour T, Thomas M. Functional outcomes following anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a needs assessment and proposal of a nurse-led remote management algorithm. ANZ J Surg 2024. [PMID: 38680012 DOI: 10.1111/ans.19010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/01/2024]
Abstract
AIM With the rise of structured, remote follow-up of colorectal cancers, there is the potential risk of underdiagnosing and undermanaging low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This cohort study aims to determine the rate of LARS and its patterns of care, with the aim of generating a risk-stratified management algorithm that can be employed for nurse-led follow-up. METHOD Patients who underwent elective anterior resection for the management of colorectal cancer between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2021 were sent quality-of-life questionnaires (EORTC-QLQ-CR29 and LARS score) and surveyed for LARS symptoms and management utilized. RESULTS Out of 70 patients who completed questionnaires, 71.4% had LARS and 42.9% had major LARS. The international Delphi consensus definition identified more patients (n = 50) with LARS than the LARS score (n = 41). Tumours located <8 cm from the anal verge, ULAR, and temporary stoma were predictive of major LARS on univariate analysis. However, only temporary stoma was predictive for LARS (OR 7.89 (1.15-53.95), P = 0.035) and majors LARS (8.14 (1.79-37.01), P = 0.007) on multivariate analysis. Forty-four percent of patients with LARS did not have input from any health professional for this condition. Consultation with specialist allied health and/or colorectal surgeons ranged from 4% to 22%. CONCLUSIONS Our study highlights that with the current remote follow-up system focused on cancer outcomes a significant proportion of patients with LARS are overlooked, resulting in the underutilization of relevant health professionals and management options. We propose a nurse-led management algorithm to address this issue while still minimizing surgical outpatient load.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy-My Nguyen
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Luke Traeger
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Bronwyn Overall
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michelle Thomas
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alvarez J, Shi Q, Dasari A, Garcia-Aguilar J, Sanoff H, George TJ, Hong TS, Yothers G, Philip PA, Nelson GD, Al Baghdadi T, Alese O, Zambare W, Omer DM, Verheij FS, Buckley J, Williams H, George M, Garcia R, O'Reilly EM, Meyerhardt JA, Shergill A, Horvat N, Romesser PB, Hall WA, Smith JJ. ALLIANCE A022104/NRG-GI010: The Janus Rectal Cancer Trial: a randomized phase II/III trial testing the efficacy of triplet versus doublet chemotherapy regarding clinical complete response and disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. medRxiv 2024:2024.04.25.24306396. [PMID: 38712176 PMCID: PMC11071544 DOI: 10.1101/2024.04.25.24306396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
Background Recent data have demonstrated that in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), a total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) approach improves compliance with chemotherapy and increases rates of tumor response compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) alone. They further indicate that the optimal sequencing of TNT involves consolidation (rather than induction) chemotherapy to optimize complete response rates. Data, largely from retrospective studies, have also shown that patients with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant therapy may be managed safely with the watch and wait approach (WW) instead of preemptive total mesorectal resection (TME). However, the optimal consolidation chemotherapy regimen to achieve cCR has not been established, and a randomized clinical trial has not robustly evaluated cCR as a primary endpoint. Collaborating with a multidisciplinary oncology team and patient groups, we designed this NCI-sponsored study of chemotherapy intensification to address these issues and to drive up cCR rates, to provide opportunity for organ preservation, improve quality of life for patients and improve survival outcomes. Methods In this NCI-sponsored multi-group randomized, seamless phase II/III trial (1:1), up to 760 patients with LARC, T4N0, any T with node positive disease (any T, N+) or T3N0 requiring abdominoperineal resection or coloanal anastomosis and distal margin within 12 cm of anal verge will be enrolled. Stratification factors include tumor stage (T4 vs T1-3), nodal stage (N+ vs N0) and distance from anal verge (0-4; 4-8; 8-12 cm). Patients will be randomized to receive neoadjuvant long course chemoradiation (LCRT) followed by consolidation doublet (mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX) or triplet chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX) for 3-4 months. LCRT in both arms involves 4500 cGy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks + 900 cGy boost in 5 fractions with a fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine preferred). Patients will undergo assessment 8-12 (+/- 4) weeks post-TNT completion. The primary endpoint for the phase II portion will compare cCR between treatment arms. A total number of 296 evaluable patients (148 per arm) will provide statistical power of 90.5% to detect an 17% increase in cCR rate, at a one-sided alpha=0.048. The primary endpoint for the phase III portion will compare disease-free survival (DFS) between treatment arms. A total of 285 DFS events will provide 85% power to detect an effect size of hazard ratio 0.70 at a one-sided alpha of 0.025, requiring enrollment of 760 patients (380 per arm). Secondary objectives include time-to event outcomes (overall survival, organ preservation time and time to distant metastasis) and adverse effects. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, plasma and buffy coat in EDTA tubes, and serial rectal MRIs will be collected for exploratory correlative research. This study, activated in late 2022, is open across the NCTN and has a current accrual of 312. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Discussion Building off of data from modern day rectal cancer trials and patient input from national advocacy groups, we have designed the current trial studying chemotherapy intensification via a consolidation chemotherapy approach with the intent to enhance cCR and DFS rates, increase organ preservation rates, and improve quality of life for patients with rectal cancer. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05610163 ; Support includes U10CA180868 (NRG) and U10CA180888 (SWOG).
Collapse
|
15
|
Sullo FG, Passardi A, Gallio C, Molinari C, Marisi G, Pozzi E, Solaini L, Bittoni A. Advancing Personalized Medicine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2562. [PMID: 38731090 PMCID: PMC11084727 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13092562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Rectal cancer presents a significant burden globally, often requiring multimodal therapy for locally advanced cases. Long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) followed by surgery have been conventional neoadjuvant approaches. Recent trials favor LCRT due to improved local control. However, distant tumor recurrence remains a concern, prompting the exploration of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) as a comprehensive treatment strategy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) show promise, particularly in mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors, potentially revolutionizing neoadjuvant regimens. Nonoperative management (NOM) represents a viable alternative post-neoadjuvant therapy for selected patients achieving complete clinical response (cCR). Additionally, monitoring minimal residual disease (MRD) using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) emerges as a non-invasive method for the assessment of treatment response. This review synthesizes current evidence on TNT, ICIs, NOM, and ctDNA, elucidating their implications for rectal cancer management and highlighting avenues for future research and clinical application.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Giulio Sullo
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Alessandro Passardi
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Gallio
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| | - Chiara Molinari
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (C.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Giorgia Marisi
- Biosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (C.M.); (G.M.)
| | - Eleonora Pozzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 47121 Forlì, Italy (L.S.)
| | - Leonardo Solaini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, University of Bologna, 47121 Forlì, Italy (L.S.)
| | - Alessandro Bittoni
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, via P. Maroncelli 40, 47014 Meldola, Italy; (F.G.S.); (C.G.); (A.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ali A, Lee WF, O'Leary MP, Whealon M. Great Debates: Surgery or Watch and Wait After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer. Am Surg 2024:31348241248812. [PMID: 38655585 DOI: 10.1177/00031348241248812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Locally advanced rectal cancer has traditionally been treated with multimodal therapy including neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. More recent data suggests that in appropriate patients, total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) makes it possible to adopt a "watch and wait" approach. Advocates for watch and wait argue that patients with a complete or near-complete clinical response to TNT have comparable overall and disease-free survival to their counterparts who undergo surgical resection, and also have a better quality of life, fewer complications, and potentially avoid a stoma. The dogma of surgery as regional curative intent therapy has been challenged by similar recurrence rates among those treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) and those treated with watch and wait. Furthermore, those who develop local recurrence in the watch and wait groups are equally salvageable, either by surgery, brachytherapy, or chemotherapy. While watch and wait is not appropriate in all patients, this manuscript highlights the benefits and drawbacks of both therapeutic modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayaa Ali
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Wang Fai Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Michael P O'Leary
- Department of Surgery, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Matthew Whealon
- Department of Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Temmink SJD, Peeters KCMJ, Nilsson PJ, Martling A, van de Velde CJH. Surgical Outcomes after Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1539. [PMID: 38672621 PMCID: PMC11048284 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2024] [Revised: 04/12/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the past decade, the treatment of rectal cancer has changed considerably. The implementation of TME surgery has, in addition to decreasing the number of local recurrences, improved surgical morbidity and mortality. At the same time, the optimisation of radiotherapy in the preoperative setting has improved oncological outcomes even further, although higher perineal infection rates have been reported. Radiotherapy regimens have evolved through the adjustment of radiotherapy techniques and fields, increased waiting intervals, and, for more advanced tumours, adding chemotherapy. Concurrently, imaging techniques have significantly improved staging accuracy, facilitating more precise selection of advanced tumours. Although chemoradiotherapy does lead to the downsizing and -staging of these tumours, a very clear effect on sphincter-preserving surgery and the negative resection margin has not been proven. Aiming to decrease distant metastasis and improve overall survival for locally advanced rectal cancer, systemic chemotherapy can be added to radiotherapy, known as total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). High complete response rates, both pathological (pCR) and clinical (cCR), are reported after TNT. Patients who follow a Watch & Wait program after a cCR can potentially avoid surgical morbidity and colostomy. For both early and more advanced tumours, trials are now investigating optimal regimens in an attempt to offer organ preservation as much as possible. Multidisciplinary deliberation should include patient preference, treatment toxicity, and likelihood of end colostomy, but also the burden of intensive surveillance in a W&W program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofieke J. D. Temmink
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Koen C. M. J. Peeters
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Per J. Nilsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Martling
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, 171 76 Stockholm, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Soomro MY, Khan SR, Muhammad H, Ahmad S, Zehra N, Ali I, Samar MR, Hameed A, Moosajee M, Rashid YA. Exploring treatment outcomes in Stage II-III rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy at a tertiary care center in Pakistan: a comprehensive analysis of pathological outcomes. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:479. [PMID: 38627736 PMCID: PMC11020334 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12241-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rectal cancer treatment has transformed in recent years, with neoadjuvant treatment (NT) and total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) aiming to enhance pathological responses. This pioneering study in our country delves into rectal cancer management, offering crucial insights by examining pathological outcomes in patients treated with the NT and TNT approach, shaping the evolving landscape. METHODS In this retrospective-cohort study spanning January 2017 to December 2022 at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan, ethical approval was obtained to examine outcomes of two treatments. Patients were divided into TNT (chemoradiation and pre-surgery 5 FU-based chemotherapy) and NT (chemoradiation, surgery, and subsequent 5 FU-based chemotherapy). The primary end-point was response rates-no response, pathological complete response (pCR), near complete response (near CR), and partial response (PR). The Chi-Square Test for Independence assessed the association between treatment response and type (TNT or NT). Data analysis used STATA MP 64; significance was set at p < 0.05 for all two-tailed tests. RESULTS We analyzed 77 patients, 60 underwent standard neoadjuvant chemoradiation, and 17 followed the total neoadjuvant approach. Predominantly male, most were > 65 with ECOG 0-1. The TNT group showed higher response rates (76% vs 62%, p = 0.039), with 40.38% achieving pCR. In the overall population, pCR and near-CR were similar (27.2% vs 26%), while PR were 14%. Treatment characteristics correlated significantly with chemotherapy type, concurrent chemoradiation, LVI, PNI, and T, N, M staging (p < 0.05). Median overall survival was not reached, and mean survival was 89.1 months (CI: 95.0 to 83.3). Side effects varied, with notable differences in neuropathy, diarrhea, oral mucositis, and thrombocytopenia between NT and TNT groups. CONCLUSION Our study adds to evidence favoring neoadjuvant approaches in managing rectal cancer in pakistan. Demonstrating a favorable pcr rate, ongoing research with extended follow-up is essential, given the dynamic landscape of rectal cancer treatment for improved patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saqib Raza Khan
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
- Department of Medical Oncology, Section of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
| | | | - Sujjawal Ahmad
- Aga Khan University Centre for Regenerative Medicine and Stem Cell Research, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Insia Ali
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | - Arif Hameed
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Takagawa Y, Suzuki M, Seto I, Azami Y, Machida M, Takayama K, Sulaiman NS, Nakasato T, Kikuchi Y, Murakami M, Honda M, Teranishi Y, Kono K. Proton beam reirradiation for locally recurrent rectal cancer patients with prior pelvic irradiation. J Radiat Res 2024:rrae019. [PMID: 38604182 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to report the feasibility of proton beam reirradiation for patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) with prior pelvic irradiation. The study population included patients who were treated with proton beam therapy (PBT) for LRRC between 2008 and December 2019 in our institution. Those who had a history of distant metastases of LRRC, with or without treatment, before reirradiation, were excluded. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and local control (LC) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Ten patients were included in the present study. The median follow-up period was 28.7 months, and the median total dose of prior radiotherapy (RT) was 50 Gy (range, 30 Gy-74.8 Gy). The median time from prior RT to reirradiation was 31.5 months (range, 8.1-96.6 months), and the median reirradiation dose was 72 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) (range, 56-77 Gy). The 1-year/2-year OS, PFS and LC rates were 100%/60.0%, 20.0%/10.0% and 70.0%/58.3%, respectively, with a median survival time of 26.0 months. Seven patients developed a Grade 1 acute radiation dermatitis, and no Grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity was recorded. Grade ≥ 3 late toxicity was recorded in only one patient, who had developed a colostomy due to radiation-related intestinal bleeding. Reirradiation using PBT for LRRC patients who had previously undergone pelvic irradiation was feasible. However, the indications for PBT reirradiation for LRRC patients need to be considered carefully due to the risk of severe late GI toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshiaki Takagawa
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Motohisa Suzuki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Ichiro Seto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yusuke Azami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masanori Machida
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Kanako Takayama
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Nor Shazrina Sulaiman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiko Nakasato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Kikuchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Masao Murakami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern TOHOKU Proton Therapy Center, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Michitaka Honda
- Department of Minimally Invasive Surgical and Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Yasushi Teranishi
- Department of Surgery, Southern TOHOKU General Hospital, Fukushima, Japan
| | - Koji Kono
- Department of Gastrointestinal Tract Surgery, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cui Y, Song M, Tie J, Li S, Wang H, Zhang Y, Geng J, Liu Z, Teng H, Sui X, Zhu X, Cai Y, Li Y, Wang W. Clinicopathological factors predict residual lymph node metastasis in locally advanced rectal cancer with ypT0-2 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2024; 150:176. [PMID: 38575793 PMCID: PMC10995092 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-024-05662-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Residual lymph node metastases (RLNM) remained a great concern in the implementation of organ-preserving strategies and led to poor prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). In this study, we aimed to identify the clinicopathological factors correlated with RLNM in LARC patients with ypT0-2 after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT). METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 417 patients histologically diagnosed middle-low LARC after NCRT and total mesorectal excision (TME), whose pathological staging was ypT0-2. All patients received pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) before NCRT. The radiation doses were 50-50.6 Gy for the planning gross tumor volume and 41.8-45 Gy for the planning target volume, respectively. A nomogram for predicting RLNM was constructed using a binary logistic regression. Nomogram performance was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA) and clinical impact curve (CIC). RESULTS After surgery, 191 patients (45.8%) were ypT0, 43 patients (10.3%) were ypT1 and 183 patients (43.9%) were ypT2, and a total of 49 patients (11.8%) were found the presence of RLNM. Multivariable analyses identified MRI-defined mesorectal fascia (MRF)-positive, high-grade histopathology at biopsy, advanced ypT-category, and the presence of perineural invasion (PNI) as the predictive factors. The nomogram, incorporating all these predictors, showed good discrimination and calibration efficacy, with the areas under the ROC curve of 0.690 (95% CI: 0.610-0.771). Both DCA and CIC demonstrated that this nomogram has good clinical usefulness. CONCLUSION The nomogram model can predict RLNM in patients with ypT0-2 tumors. It can help select suitable patients for performing organ-preserving strategies after NCRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujun Cui
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Maxiaowei Song
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Jian Tie
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Shuai Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Hongzhi Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yangzi Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Jianhao Geng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Zhiyan Liu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Huajing Teng
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xin Sui
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xianggao Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yong Cai
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yongheng Li
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| | - Weihu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Safont MJ, García-Figueiras R, Hernando-Requejo O, Jimenez-Rodriguez R, Lopez-Vicente J, Machado I, Ayuso JR, Bustamante-Balén M, De Torres-Olombrada MV, Domínguez Tristancho JL, Fernández-Aceñero MJ, Suarez J, Vera R. Interdisciplinary Spanish consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:825-835. [PMID: 37787973 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03322-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023]
Abstract
Watch-and-wait has emerged as a new strategy for the management of rectal cancer when a complete clinical response is achieved after neoadjuvant therapy. In an attempt to standardize this new clinical approach, initiated by the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumors (TTD), and with the participation of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP), the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP), the Spanish Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (SEED), the Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology (SEOR), and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (SERAM), we present herein a consensus on a watch-and-wait approach for the management of rectal cancer. We have focused on patient selection, the treatment schemes evaluated, the optimal timing for evaluating the clinical complete response, the oncologic outcomes after the implementation of this strategy, and a protocol for surveillance of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Jose Safont
- Oncology Department, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia. Valencia University, Av. de les Tres Creus, 2, 46014, València, Spain.
| | - Roberto García-Figueiras
- Radiology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | | | | | - Jorge Lopez-Vicente
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de Mostoles, Mósteles, Spain
| | - Isidro Machado
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia, Spain
- Pathology Department, Patologika Laboratory QuironSalud, Valencia, Spain
- Pathology Department, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | - Mª Jesús Fernández-Aceñero
- Surgical Pathology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdiSSC, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Javier Suarez
- General Surgery Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Ruth Vera
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Navarra, Instituto de Investigación (Idisna), Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Willett CG, Acklin-Wehnert S. Neoadjuvant Short- Vs. Long-Course Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: How to Choose. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:427-433. [PMID: 38386240 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01185-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Over the past decades, the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer has evolved dramatically due to improvements in diagnostic imaging, surgical technique, and the addition of radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Fractionation of neoadjuvant radiotherapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy remains the subject of discussion and the question multiple recent trials have aimed to answer. In light of recent data and concern for locoregional recurrence, our institution favors long-course chemoradiation in most cases, especially in low-lying primaries, threatened circumferential resection margin, consideration of non-operative management, or if the surgeon has concerns for resectability. Exceptions would include cases of oligometastatic disease planned for metastasectomy in which curative-intent treatment was pursued or if additional factors required a reduction in treatment time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher G Willett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3085 Med Ctr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Scarlett Acklin-Wehnert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3085 Med Ctr, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kim YI, Hong SW, Lim SB, Yang DH, Kim EB, Kim MH, Kim CW, Lee JL, Yoon YS, Park IJ, Yu CS. Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:1775-1783. [PMID: 38278933 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10661-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An anastomotic stricture after colorectal surgery is principally managed by endoscopic balloon dilation (EBD). Although this intervention is effective, however, subsequent procedures or surgical interventions are often required. This study aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of EBD for anastomotic stricture arising from colorectal cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed 173 patients who received curative surgery for colorectal cancer at our hospital between January 2000 and December 2022 and had undergone EBD to manage anastomotic stricture. The medical records of these cases were retrospectively reviewed to assess the outcomes and risk factors for restenosis and permanent stoma. RESULTS Of the 173 study patients, 41 (23.7%) presented with restenosis with a median time to recurrence of 49 [37-150] days. The restenosis group was significantly younger (55.6 years versus 60.8 years), with a more prominent rectal location (80.5% versus 57.6%), a higher incidence of hand-sewn anastomosis (24.4% versus 5.3%), and a higher percentage of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (34.1% versus 5.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis indicated neoadjuvant radiotherapy (adjusted HR 2.48; 95% CI 1.03-5.95) and cerebral vascular disease (adjusted HR 6.97; 95% CI 2.15-22.54) as independent prognostic factors for restenosis. Fourteen patients (8.1%) required a permanent stoma due to treatment failure. All cases needing a permanent stoma were male (14 patients, 100%, P = 0.007) and this group had a higher rate of neoadjuvant radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and hand-sewn anastomosis. CONCLUSION Patients receiving neoadjuvant radiotherapy are most prone to restenosis after an EBD intervention to manage an anastomotic stricture. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy is also a strong risk factor for requiring a permanent stomas due to treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Il Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Seung Wook Hong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok-Byung Lim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea.
| | - Dong-Hoon Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Eon Bin Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Min Hyun Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Chan Wook Kim
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Jong Lyul Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Yong Sik Yoon
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - In Ja Park
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| | - Chang Sik Yu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wang C, Liu X, Wang W, Miao Z, Li X, Liu D, Hu K. Treatment Options for Distal Rectal Cancer in the Era of Organ Preservation. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:434-452. [PMID: 38517596 PMCID: PMC10997725 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01194-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The introduction of total mesorectal excision into the radical surgery of rectal cancer has significantly improved the oncological outcome with longer survival and lower local recurrence. Traditional treatment modalities of distal rectal cancer, relying on radical surgery, while effective, take their own set of risks, including surgical complications, potential damage to the anus, and surrounding structure owing to the pursuit of thorough resection. The progress of operating methods as well as the integration of systemic therapies and radiotherapy into the peri-operative period, particularly the exciting clinical complete response of patients after neoadjuvant treatment, have paved the way for organ preservation strategy. The non-inferiority oncological outcome of "watch and wait" compared with radical surgery underscores the potential of organ preservation not only to control local recurrence but also to reduce the need for treatments followed by structure destruction, hopefully improving the long-term quality of life. Radical radiotherapy provides another treatment option for patients unwilling or unable to undergo surgery. Organ preservation points out the direction of treatment for distal rectal cancer, while additional researches are needed to answer remaining questions about its optimal use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoliang Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Weiping Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zheng Miao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoyan Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Dingchao Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Ke Hu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, NO.1 Shuaifuyuan Wangfujing, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Feferman Y, Rosen R, Gebran S, Yuval JB, Kerioui M, Gonen M, Wei IH, Widmar M, Nash GM, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Hajj C, O’Brien DR, Romesser PB, Crane C, Smith JJ, Aguilar JG, Pappou EP. Anal Adenocarcinoma Treated in the Era of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy and Nonoperative Management. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:496-504. [PMID: 38127627 PMCID: PMC10922541 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Anal adenocarcinoma bears a treatment strategy unique to other anal cancers. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe oncologic outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy followed by watch-and-wait approach for anal adenocarcinoma. DESIGN Retrospective analysis. SETTINGS This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS Patients with anal adenocarcinoma treated between 2004 and 2019 were selected. INTERVENTIONS Fifty-four patients received neoadjuvant therapy and were divided into 2 groups according to their treatment strategy: total neoadjuvant therapy versus single neoadjuvant modality therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Organ preservation, tumor regrowth, local failure, distant metastasis rates, recurrence-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS This study included 70 patients with anal adenocarcinoma. Fifty-four patients (77%) received neoadjuvant therapy, of whom 30 (42%) received total neoadjuvant therapy and 24 (34%) received single neoadjuvant modality. Twenty-three (33%) patients achieved complete clinical response and were managed by watch-and-wait approach. The proportion of patients able to continue to watch-and-wait approach was higher after receiving total neoadjuvant therapy (60%) compared with single neoadjuvant modality therapy (20%; p = 0.004). A tumor regrowth rate of 22% was observed in the total neoadjuvant therapy group. The 5-year overall survival rate was 70% (95% CI, 59%-83%), including 61% (95% CI, 42%-88%) for the total neoadjuvant therapy and 65% (95% CI, 48%-88%) for the single neoadjuvant modality groups. Colostomy was avoided in 50% of patients who received total neoadjuvant therapy and 83% of watch-and-wait patients. Five-year recurrence-free survival rates of 55% (95% CI, 39%-79%) and 30% (95% CI, 15%-58%) were observed in the total neoadjuvant therapy and single neoadjuvant modality groups. LIMITATIONS Retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS This is the first report in the literature describing the safety and feasibility of nonoperative management for anal adenocarcinoma. Anal adenocarcinoma treated with total neoadjuvant therapy and nonoperative management achieve regrowth rates comparable to those observed in rectal cancer, with oncologic outcomes similar to those of traditional treatment strategies. See Video Abstract . ADENOCARCINOMA ANAL TRATADO EN LA ERA DE LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE TOTAL Y EL TRATAMIENTO NO QUIRRGICO ANTECEDENTES:El adenocarcinoma anal conlleva una estrategia de tratamiento único para otros cánceres anales.OBJETIVO:Describir los resultados oncológicos de la terapia neoadyuvante total seguida de observar y esperar en adenocarcinoma anal.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Este estudio se llevó a cabo en un centro oncológico integral.PACIENTES:Se seleccionaron pacientes con adenocarcinoma anal tratados entre 2004-2019.INTERVENCIONES:Cincuenta y cuatro pacientes recibieron terapia neoadyuvante y se dividieron en dos grupos según su estrategia de tratamiento: terapia neoadyuvante total versus terapia de modalidad neoadyuvante única.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Preservación de órganos, recurrencia tumoral, falla local, tasas de metástasis a distancia, libre de recurrencia y supervivencia general.RESULTADOS:El estudio incluyó a 70 pacientes con adenocarcinoma anal. Cincuenta y cuatro pacientes (77%) recibieron terapia neoadyuvante, de los cuales 30 (42%) recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total y 24 (34%) recibieron modalidad neoadyuvante única. Veintitrés (33%) pacientes presentaron una respuesta clínica completa y fueron tratados con vigilancia y espera. La proporción de pacientes capaces de continuar en observar y esperar fue mayor después de recibir terapia neoadyuvante total (60%) en comparación con la terapia de modalidad neoadyuvante única (20%) ( p = 0,004). Se observó una tasa de recurrencia tumoral del 22% en el grupo de terapia neoadyuvante total. La tasa de supervivencia general a 5 años fue del 70% (IC95% 59%-83 %), incluido el 61% (IC95% 42%-88%) para la terapia neoadyuvante total y el 65% (IC95% 48%-88%) para grupos de modalidad neoadyuvante única. Se evitó la colostomía en el 50% de los pacientes que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante total y el 83% de los pacientes en observar y esperar. Se observaron tasas de supervivencia libre de recurrencia a cinco años del 55% (IC95% 39%-79%) y del 30% (IC95% 15%-58%) en los grupos de terapia neoadyuvante total y modalidad neoadyuvante única, respectivamente.LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:Este es el primer informe en la literatura que describe la seguridad y viabilidad del tratamiento no quirúrgico del adenocarcinoma anal. El adenocarcinoma anal tratado con terapia neoadyuvante total y manejo no quirúrgico logra tasas de recurrencia comparables a las observadas en el cáncer de recto, con resultados oncológicos similares a las estrategias de tratamientos tradicionales. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yael Feferman
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Roni Rosen
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Selim Gebran
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jonathan B. Yuval
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Marion Kerioui
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mithat Gonen
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Iris H. Wei
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Garrett M. Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Martin R. Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Philip B. Paty
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Carla Hajj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Diana Roth O’Brien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul B. Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Christopher Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - J. Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Emmanouil P. Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wurschi GW, Rühle A, Domschikowski J, Trommer M, Ferdinandus S, Becker JN, Boeke S, Sonnhoff M, Fink CA, Käsmann L, Schneider M, Bockelmann E, Krug D, Nicolay NH, Fabian A, Pietschmann K. Patient-Relevant Costs for Organ Preservation versus Radical Resection in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1281. [PMID: 38610958 PMCID: PMC11011197 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an evolving treatment schedule for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), allowing for organ preservation in a relevant number of patients in the case of complete response. Patients who undergo this so-called "watch and wait" approach are likely to benefit regarding their quality of life (QoL), especially if definitive ostomy could be avoided. In this work, we performed the first cost-effectiveness analysis from the patient perspective to compare costs for TNT with radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) in the German health care system. Individual costs for patients insured with a statutory health insurance were calculated with a Markov microsimulation. A subgroup analysis from the prospective "FinTox" trial was used to calibrate the model's parameters. We found that TNT was less expensive (-1540 EUR) and simultaneously resulted in a better QoL (+0.64 QALYs) during treatment and 5-year follow-up. The average cost for patients under TNT was 4711 EUR per year, which was equivalent to 3.2% of the net household income. CRT followed by resection resulted in higher overall costs for ostomy care, medication and greater loss of earnings. Overall, TNT appeared to be more efficacious and cost-effective from a patient's point of view in the German health care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georg W. Wurschi
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany;
- Clinician Scientist Program, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF), Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 07747 Jena, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Freiburg—Medical Center, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Justus Domschikowski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany (A.F.)
| | - Maike Trommer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Center for Molecular Medicine Cologne, University of Cologne, 50931 Cologne, Germany
| | - Simone Ferdinandus
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
- Center of Integrated Oncology, Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne and Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan-Niklas Becker
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Simon Boeke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | - Mathias Sonnhoff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Hannover Medical School, 30625 Hannover, Germany
- Center for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, 28239 Bremen, Germany
| | - Christoph A. Fink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lukas Käsmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
- Comprehensive Pneumology Center Munich (CPC-M), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), 81377 Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, 81377 Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie Schneider
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TUD Dresden University of Technology, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Elodie Bockelmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany (A.F.)
| | - Nils H. Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Alexander Fabian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, 24105 Kiel, Germany (A.F.)
| | - Klaus Pietschmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Jena University Hospital, 07747 Jena, Germany;
- Cancer Center Central Germany (CCCG), 07747 Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Obonyo D, Uslar V, Weyhe D, Tabriz N. Personalized medicine for locally advanced rectal cancer: five years of complete clinical response after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy-a case report with a literature review. Front Surg 2024; 11:1385378. [PMID: 38590724 PMCID: PMC10999613 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1385378] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
We present a case report of a 73-year-old male patient with a complete clinical response following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of mid-rectal adenocarcinoma. The patient was initially diagnosed with stage IIIB microsatellite stable mid-rectal adenocarcinoma in February 2017. During restaging in June 2017, which included rectoscopy, endosonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, a complete clinical response was observed. After appropriate consultation, a watch-and-wait strategy was chosen. During stringent follow-up every 3 months for the first 3 years and thereafter every 6 months, no recurrence or regrowth was observed. After the fifth year of complete clinical response, we recommended an annual follow-up. As of November 2023, the patient has no signs of recurrence or late toxicity after radiochemotherapy. The omission of resection in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and the establishment of a watch-and-wait strategy are currently under discussion as possible treatment courses in patients with complete clinical response. Long-term data on watch-and-wait strategies for patients with a complete clinical response in locally advanced rectal cancer are rare. A clear national and international accepted standardization of follow-up programs for patients managed by a watch-and-wait strategy in the long-term is missing. Here, we report the case of a patient who had undergone a follow-up program for more than five years and discuss the current literature. Our case report and literature review highlights that a watch-and-wait strategy does not seem to increase the risk of systemic disease or compromise survival outcomes in selected locally advanced rectal cancer patients. Thus, our case contributes to the growing body of knowledge on personalized and precision medicine for rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Obonyo
- Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, University Clinic for Visceral Surgery, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nazari R, Piozzi GN, Ghalehtaki R, Ahmadi-Tafti SM, Behboudi B, Mousavi Darzikolaee N, Aghili M, Gambacorta MA. Role of Oxaliplatin in the Neoadjuvant Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Review of Evidence. Clin Med Insights Oncol 2024; 18:11795549241236409. [PMID: 38510317 PMCID: PMC10952988 DOI: 10.1177/11795549241236409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024] Open
Abstract
The treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a challenging situation for radiation oncologists and colorectal surgeons. Most current approaches recommend neoadjuvant fluorouracil or capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery as a standard of care. Intensification of concurrent chemotherapy by adding oxaliplatin to fluorouracil or capecitabine backbone to get better outcomes is the matter that has remained unresolved. In this review, we searched Medline and Google Scholar databases and selected 28 prospective phase II and III clinical trials that addressed this question. We discussed the potential advantages and drawbacks of incorporating oxaliplatin into concurrent chemoradiation therapy. We tried to define whether adding oxaliplatin to concurrent chemoradiation with excellent performance and high-risk features benefits some subpopulations. The available literature suggests that by adding oxaliplatin there are some benefits in enhancing response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, however, without any translated improvements in long-term outcomes including overall and disease-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Nazari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Reza Ghalehtaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
| | - Behnam Behboudi
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran
| | - Nima Mousavi Darzikolaee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahdi Aghili
- Radiation Oncology Research Center, Cancer Institute, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Maria Antonietta Gambacorta
- UOC di Radioterapia Oncologica, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Hrebinko K, Anto VP, Reitz KM, Gamboa AC, Regenbogen SE, Hawkins AT, Hopkins MB, Ejaz A, Bauer PS, Wise PE, Balch GC, Holder-Murray J. Prophylactic defunctioning stomas improve clinical outcomes of anastomotic leak following rectal cancer resections: An analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium. Int J Colorectal Dis 2024; 39:39. [PMID: 38498217 PMCID: PMC10948474 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-024-04600-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anastomotic leak (AL) is a complication of low anterior resection (LAR) that results in substantial morbidity. There is immense interest in evaluating immediate postoperative and long-term oncologic outcomes in patients who undergo diverting loop ileostomies (DLI). The purpose of this study is to understand the relationship between fecal diversion, AL, and oncologic outcomes. METHODS This is a retrospective multicenter cohort study using patient data obtained from the US Rectal Cancer Consortium database compiled from six academic institutions. The study population included patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing LAR. The primary outcome was the incidence of AL among patients who did or did not receive DLI during LAR. Secondary outcomes included risk factors for AL, receipt of adjuvant therapy, 3-year overall survival, and 3-year recurrence. RESULTS Of 815 patients, 38 (4.7%) suffered AL after LAR. Patients with AL were more likely to be male, have unintentional preoperative weight loss, and are less likely to undergo DLI. On multivariable analysis, DLI remained protective against AL (p < 0.001). Diverted patients were less likely to undergo future surgical procedures including additional ostomy creation, completion proctectomy, or pelvic washout for AL. Subgroup analysis of 456 patients with locally advanced disease showed that DLI was correlated with increased receipt of adjuvant therapy for patients with and without AL on univariate analysis (SHR:1.59; [95% CI 1.19-2.14]; p = 0.002), but significance was not met in multivariate models. CONCLUSION Lack of DLI and preoperative weight loss was associated with anastomotic leak. Fecal diversion may improve the timely initiation of adjuvant oncologic therapy. The long-term outcomes following routine diverting stomas warrant further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Hrebinko
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Vincent P Anto
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Katherine M Reitz
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Austin, USA
| | - Scott E Regenbogen
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Alexander T Hawkins
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - M Benjamin Hopkins
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Division of General Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Philip S Bauer
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, USA
| | - Paul E Wise
- Section of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, USA
| | - Glen C Balch
- Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, USA
| | - Jennifer Holder-Murray
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Kaufmann Medical Office Building, Suite 603, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Fokas E, Smith JJ, Garcia-Aguilar J, Glynne-Jones R, Buyse M, Rödel C. Early Efficacy End Points in Neoadjuvant Rectal Cancer Trials: Surrogacy Revisited. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:872-875. [PMID: 37890124 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Revised: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Trial-level surrogacy is critical before early response endpoints are used to approve new therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmanouil Fokas
- Department of Radiotherapy of Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Colorectal Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Robert Glynne-Jones
- Department of Radiotherapy, Mount Vernon Centre for Cancer Treatment, Northwood, Middlesex, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Buyse
- Interuniversity Institute for Biostatistics and Statistical Bioinformatics, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- International Drug Development Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy of Oncology, University of Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site: Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- Frankfurt Cancer Institute (FCI), Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu IC, Gearhart S, Ke S, Hu C, Chung H, Efron J, Gabre-Kidan A, Najjar P, Atallah C, Safar B, Christenson ES, Azad NS, Lee V, Zaheer A, Birkness-Gartman JE, Reddy AV, Narang AK, Meyer J. Surgical and local control outcomes after sequential short-course radiation therapy and chemotherapy for rectal cancer. Surg Open Sci 2024; 18:42-49. [PMID: 38318322 PMCID: PMC10838936 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is an accepted approach for the management of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and is associated with a decreased risk of development of metastatic disease compared to standard neoadjuvant therapy. However, questions remain regarding surgical outcomes and local control in patients who proceed to surgery, particularly when radiation is given first in the neoadjuvant sequence. We report on our institution's experience with patients who underwent short-course radiation therapy, consolidation chemotherapy, and surgery. Methods We retrospectively reviewed surgical specimen outcomes, postoperative complications, and local/pelvic control in a large cohort of patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant therapy incorporating upfront short-course radiation therapy followed by consolidation chemotherapy. Results In our cohort of 83 patients who proceeded to surgery, a complete/near-complete mesorectal specimen was achieved in 90 % of patients. This outcome was not associated with the time interval from completion of radiation to surgery. Postoperative complications were acceptably low. Local control at two years was 93.4 % for all patients- 97.6 % for those with low-risk disease and 90.4 % for high-risk disease. Conclusion Upfront short-course radiation therapy and consolidation chemotherapy is an effective treatment course. Extended interval from completion of short-course radiation therapy did not impact surgical specimen quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Chia Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Susan Gearhart
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Suqi Ke
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chen Hu
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Haniee Chung
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan Efron
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alodia Gabre-Kidan
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Peter Najjar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Research Unit, Ravitch Division of Colorectal Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Chady Atallah
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bashar Safar
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric S. Christenson
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Nilofer S. Azad
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Valerie Lee
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Atif Zaheer
- Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Abhinav V. Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Amol K. Narang
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jeffrey Meyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology & Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Troester AM, Gaertner WB. Contemporary management of rectal cancer. Surg Open Sci 2024; 18:17-22. [PMID: 38312301 PMCID: PMC10832461 DOI: 10.1016/j.sopen.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of rectal cancer has undergone significant changes over the past 50 years, and this has been associated with major improvements in overall outcomes and quality of life. From standardization of total mesorectal excision to refinements in radiation delivery and shifting of chemoradiotherapy treatment to favor a neoadjuvant approach, as well as the development of targeted chemotherapeutics, these management strategies have continually aimed to achieve locoregional and systemic control while limiting adverse effects and enhance overall survival. This article highlights evolving aspects of rectal cancer therapy including improved staging modalities, total neoadjuvant therapy, the role of short-course and more selective radiotherapy strategies, as well as organ preservation. We also discuss the evolving role of minimally invasive surgery and comment on lateral pelvic lymph node dissection. Key message Rectal cancer management is constantly evolving through refinements in radiation timing and delivery, modification of chemoradiotherapy treatment schedules, and increasing utilization of minimally invasive surgical techniques and organ preservation strategies. This manuscript aims to provide a synopsis of recent changes in the management of rectal cancer, highlighting contemporary modifications in neoadjuvant approaches and surgical management to enhance the knowledge of surgeons who care for this challenging population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M. Troester
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| | - Wolfgang B. Gaertner
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
- Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Daamen L, Westerhoff J, Couwenberg A, Braam P, Rütten H, den Hartogh M, Christodouleas J, Hall W, Verkooijen H, Intven M. Quality of life and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated on a 1.5T MR-Linac within the MOMENTUM study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 45:100721. [PMID: 38274389 PMCID: PMC10808928 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose This study assessed quality of life (QoL) and clinical outcomes in rectal cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance (MR) guided short-course radiation therapy (SCRT) on a 1.5 Tesla (T) MR-Linac during the first 12 months after treatment. Materials and methods Rectal cancer patients treated with 25 Gy SCRT in five fractions with curative intent in the Netherlands (2019-2022) were identified in MOMENTUM (NCT04075305). Toxicity (CTCAE v5) and QoL (EORTC QLQ-C30 and -CR29) was primarily analyzed in patients without metastatic disease (M0) and no other therapies after SCRT. Patients who underwent tumor resection were censored from surgery. A generalized linear mixed-model was used to investigate clinically meaningful (≥10) and significant (P < 0.05) QoL changes. Clinical and pathological complete response (cCR and pCR) rates were calculated in patients in whom response was documented. Results A total of 172 patients were included, of whom 112 patients were primarily analyzed. Acute and late radiation-induced high-grade toxicity were reported in one patient, respectively. CCR was observed in 8/64 patients (13 %), 14/37 patients (38 %) and 13/16 patients (91 %) at three, six and twelve months; pCR was observed in 3/69 (4 %) patients. After 12 months, diarrhea (mean difference [MD] -17.4 [95 % confidence interval [CI] -31.2 to -3.7]), blood and mucus in stool (MD -31.1 [95 % CI -46.4 to -15.8]), and anxiety (MD -22.4 [95 % CI -34.0 to -10.9]) were improved. Conclusion High-field MR-guided SCRT for the treatment of patients with rectal cancer is associated with improved disease-related symptom management and functioning one year after treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L.A. Daamen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - J.M. Westerhoff
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A.M. Couwenberg
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - P.M. Braam
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - H. Rütten
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - J.P. Christodouleas
- Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Radiation Oncology, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - W.A. Hall
- Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - H.M. Verkooijen
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Division of Imaging and Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - M.P.W. Intven
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Williams H, Thompson HM, Lin ST, Verheij FS, Omer DM, Qin LX, Garcia-Aguilar J. Endoscopic Predictors of Residual Tumor After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis From the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:369-376. [PMID: 38039292 PMCID: PMC10922113 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Restaging endoscopy plays a critical role in selecting patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who respond to neoadjuvant therapy for nonoperative management. OBJECTIVE This study evaluated the restaging endoscopic features that best predict the presence of residual tumor in the bowel wall. DESIGN This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective randomized trial. SETTINGS The Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial randomly assigned patients across 18 institutions with stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma to receive either induction or consolidation total neoadjuvant therapy. Surgeons completed a restaging tumor assessment form, which stratified patients across 3 tiers of clinical response. PATIENTS Patients enrolled in the Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma Trial with a completed tumor assessment form were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The main outcome was residual tumor, which was defined as either an incomplete clinical response or local tumor regrowth within 2 years of restaging. Independent predictors of residual tumor were identified using backward-selected multivariable logistic regression analysis. Subgroup analyses for complete and near complete clinical responders were performed. RESULTS Surgeons completed restaging forms for 263 patients at a median of 7.7 weeks after neoadjuvant therapy; 128 patients (48.7%) had a residual tumor. On multivariable regression analysis, several characteristics of a near complete response, including ulcer (OR 6.66; 95% CI, 2.54-19.9), irregular mucosa (OR 3.66; 95% CI, 1.61-8.68), and nodularity (OR 2.96; 95% CI, 1.36-6.58), remained independent predictors of residual tumor. A flat scar was associated with lower odds of harboring residual disease (OR 0.32; 95% CI, 0.11-0.93) for patients categorized as clinical complete responders. LIMITATIONS Limitations include analysis of endoscopic features at a single time point and ambiguities in tumor assessment form response criteria. CONCLUSIONS Patients with ulcer, nodularity, or irregular mucosa, on restaging endoscopy have higher odds of residual tumor. Recognizing negative prognostic implications of these features will help surgeons better select candidates for nonoperative management and suggests that patients with high-risk characteristics would benefit from close interval surveillance. See Video Abstract . PREDICTORES ENDOSCPICOS DE TUMOR RESIDUAL DESPUS DE TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE TOTAL UN ANLISIS POST HOC DEL ENSAYO DE PRESERVACIN DE RGANOS EN ADENOCARCINOMA RECTAL ANTECEDENTES:La reestadificación por endoscopia juega un papel crítico en la selección de pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que responden a la terapia neoadyuvante para el manejo no quirúrgico.OBJETIVO:Este estudio evaluó las características endoscópicas de reestadificación que mejor predicen la presencia de tumor residual en la pared intestinal.DISEÑO:Este fue un análisis post hoc de un ensayo prospectivo aleatorizado.ESCENARIO:El ensayo Organ Preservation in Rectal Adenocarcinoma aleatorizó a pacientes de 18 instituciones con adenocarcinoma de recto en estadio II/III para recibir terapia neoadyuvante total de inducción o consolidación. Los cirujanos completaron un formulario de reestadificación de evaluación del tumor, que estratificó a los pacientes en tres niveles de respuesta clínica.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes inscritos en el ensayo de preservación de órganos en adenocarcinoma rectal con un formulario de evaluación del tumor completado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El resultado principal fue presencia de tumor residual, que se definió como una respuesta clínica incompleta o un nuevo crecimiento local del tumor dentro de los dos años posteriores a la reestadificación. Los predictores independientes de tumor residual se identificaron mediante un análisis de regresión logística multivariable seleccionado hacia atrás. Se realizaron análisis de subgrupos para pacientes con respuesta clínica completa y casi completa.RESULTADOS:Los cirujanos completaron formularios de reestadificación para 263 pacientes en una mediana de 7.7 semanas después de la terapia neoadyuvante; 128 (48.7%) tenían tumor residual. En el análisis de regresión multivariable, varias características de una respuesta casi completa, incluyendo úlcera (OR 6.66; IC 95% 2.54-19.9), mucosa irregular (OR 3.66; IC 95% 1.61-8.68) y nodularidad (OR 2.96; IC 95% 1.36 -6.58) siguieron siendo predictores independientes de tumor residual. Una cicatriz plana se asoció con menores probabilidades de albergar enfermedad residual (OR 0.32; IC del 95 %: 0.11-0.93) para los pacientes clasificados como respondedores clínicos completos.LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones de este estudio incluyen el análisis de las características endoscópicas en un solo momento y las ambigüedades en los criterios de respuesta.en la forma de evaluación del tumorCONCLUSIONES:Los pacientes con úlcera, nodularidad o mucosa irregular en la endoscopia de reestadificación tienen mayores probabilidades de tumor residual. El reconocer las implicaciones pronósticas negativas de estas características ayudará a los cirujanos a seleccionar mejor a los candidatos para el tratamiento no quirúrgico y sugiere que los pacientes con características de alto riesgo se beneficiarían de una vigilancia a intervalos estrechos. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Williams
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Hannah M. Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Sabrina T. Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Floris S. Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Dana M. Omer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vailati BB, Cerdán-Santacruz C, São Julião GP, Corbi LE, Perez RO. RAPIDO: Condolences. Dis Colon Rectum 2024; 67:e206. [PMID: 38064238 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Bruna B Vailati
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
| | | | - Guilherme P São Julião
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Leonardo Ervolino Corbi
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Rodrigo O Perez
- Angelita and Joaquim Gama Institute, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Hospital Beneficencia Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil
- Hospital Alemão Oswaldo Cruz, São Paulo, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bedrikovetski S, Traeger L, Sammour T. ASO Author Reflections: Impact of RAS Mutations on Total Neoadjuvant Therapy Outcomes in Rectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1692-1693. [PMID: 38127218 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14826-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Luke Traeger
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Bedrikovetski S, Traeger L, Fitzsimmons T, Price TJ, Ruszkiewicz AR, Vather R, Sammour T. Association Between RAS/BRAF Mutations and Complete Response Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicentered Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1681-1689. [PMID: 38071720 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14722-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of RAS/BRAF mutation on primary response rates after total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in patients with advanced rectal cancer is unclear. The aim of this study was to assess complete response rates after TNT according to RAS/BRAF mutation status. METHODS A prospective observational study was performed in patients with rectal cancer who underwent TNT with curative intent at three South Australian hospitals between 2019 and 2023. Patients were classified according to their mutation status: mutant RAS/BRAF (mutRAS) or wild-type RAS/BRAF (wtRAS). The primary endpoint was overall complete response (oCR) rate, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved clinical complete response (cCR) and/or pathological complete response (pCR). RESULTS Of the 150 patients eligible for inclusion, 80 patients with RAS/BRAF status available were identified. Of these, 43 (53.8%) patients were classified as mutRAS and 37 (46.3%) patients as wtRAS. Patients with mutRAS had significantly lower cCR and oCR rates after TNT than patients with wtRAS (14% vs. 37.8%, p = 0.014; 11.6% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in pCR rate between the groups. Of the 80 rectal cancer patients tested, 35 (43.8%) had metastatic disease (M1). There was no significant difference in complete M1 response rates between the groups (17.6% vs. 38.9%, p = 0.254). CONCLUSION RAS/BRAF mutations negatively impact primary tumor response rates after TNT in patients with advanced rectal cancer. Large-scale national studies are needed to determine whether RAS/BRAF status could be used to select optimal oncologic therapy in rectal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergei Bedrikovetski
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
| | - Luke Traeger
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tracy Fitzsimmons
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Timothy J Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Andrew R Ruszkiewicz
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Surgical Pathology, SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Ryash Vather
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Biology, University of South Australia and SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Tarik Sammour
- Colorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia
- Discipline of Surgery, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Li H, Chai L, Pu H, Yin LL, Li M, Zhang X, Liu YS, Pang MH, Lu T. T2WI-based MRI radiomics for the prediction of preoperative extranodal extension and prognosis in resectable rectal cancer. Insights Imaging 2024; 15:57. [PMID: 38411722 PMCID: PMC10899552 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01625-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate whether T2-weighted imaging (T2WI)-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics can predict extranodal extension (ENE) and prognosis in patients with resectable rectal cancer. METHODS One hundred sixty-seven patients with resectable rectal cancer including T3T4N + cases were prospectively included. Radiomics features were extracted from intratumoral, peritumoral 3 mm, and peritumoral-mesorectal fat on T2WI images. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression were used for feature selection. A radiomics signature score (Radscore) was built with logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the performance of each Radscore. A clinical-radiomics nomogram was constructed by the most predictive radiomics signature and clinical risk factors. A prognostic model was constructed by Cox regression analysis to identify 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS). RESULTS Age, cT stage, and lymph node-irregular border and/or adjacent fat invasion were identified as independent clinical risk factors to construct a clinical model. The nomogram incorporating intratumoral and peritumoral 3 mm Radscore and independent clinical risk factors achieved a better AUC than the clinical model in the training (0.799 vs. 0.736) and validation cohorts (0.723 vs. 0.667). Nomogram-based ENE (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.625, 95% CI = 1.233-5.586, p = 0.012) and extramural vascular invasion (EMVI) (HR = 2.523, 95% CI = 1.247-5.106, p = 0.010) were independent risk factors for predicting 3-year RFS. The prognostic model constructed by these two indicators showed good performance for predicting 3-year RFS in the training (AUC = 0.761) and validation cohorts (AUC = 0.710). CONCLUSION The nomogram incorporating intratumoral and peritumoral 3 mm Radscore and clinical risk factors could predict preoperative ENE. Combining nomogram-based ENE and MRI-reported EMVI may be useful in predicting 3-year RFS. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT A clinical-radiomics nomogram could help preoperative predict ENE, and a prognostic model constructed by the nomogram-based ENE and MRI-reported EMVI could predict 3-year RFS in patients with resectable rectal cancer. KEY POINTS • Intratumoral and peritumoral 3 mm Radscore showed the most capability for predicting ENE. • Clinical-radiomics nomogram achieved the best predictive performance for predicting ENE. • Combining clinical-radiomics based-ENE and EMVI showed good performance for 3-year RFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hang Li
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 32# Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610070, China
| | - Li Chai
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Hong Pu
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 32# Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610070, China
| | - Long-Lin Yin
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 32# Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610070, China
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Mou Li
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 32# Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610070, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Pharmaceutical Diagnostic Team, GE Healthcare, Beijing, 100176, China
| | - Yi-Sha Liu
- Department of Pathology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 32# Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610070, China
| | - Ming-Hui Pang
- Department of Geriatric Surgery, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 32# Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610070, China
| | - Tao Lu
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 32# Second Section of First Ring Road, Qingyang District, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610070, China.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Glimelius B. Recent advances in rectal cancer treatment - are we on the right track? Ups J Med Sci 2024; 129:10537. [PMID: 38449909 PMCID: PMC10916366 DOI: 10.48101/ujms.v129.10537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 03/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Staging and treatment of rectal cancer have evolved over several decades with considerably fewer locoregional recurrences but no marked improved survival since systemic recurrence risks remain virtually unchanged. This development will briefly be summarised followed by a thorough discussion of two recent developments. Methods A systematic approach towards the literature is aimed at focusing on organ preservation and the delivery of all non-surgical treatments prior to surgery or total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT). Results Organ preservation, that is to defer surgery if the tumour happens to disappear completely after any pre-treatment given to locally advanced tumours to decrease recurrence risks has increased in popularity and is, if not universally, widely accepted. To give neo-adjuvant treatment to intentionally obtain a clinically complete remission to avoid surgery is practised in some environments but is mostly still experimental. TNT, that is to provide both radiotherapy and chemotherapy aimed at killing microscopic disease in the pelvis or elsewhere has been subject to several trials. Collectively, they show that the chance of achieving a complete response, pathologically or clinically, has approximately doubled, increasing the chance for organ preservation, and the risk of distant metastasis has decreased at least in some trials. The best schedule remains to be established. Conclusions To obtain substantial progress and also improve survival, the systemic treatments need to be improved even if preoperative delivery is more effective and better tolerated than postoperative. The locoregional treatment may be further optimised through better risk prediction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Romesser PB, Capdevila J, Garcia-Carbonero R, Philip T, Fernandez Martos C, Tuli R, Rodriguez-Gutierrez A, Kuipers M, Becker A, Coenen-Stass A, Sarholz B, You X, Miller ED. A Phase Ib Study of the DNA-PK Inhibitor Peposertib Combined with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:695-702. [PMID: 38051750 PMCID: PMC10870114 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Peposertib-an orally administered DNA-dependent protein kinase inhibitor-has shown potent radiosensitization in preclinical models. This dose-escalation study (NCT03770689) aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of peposertib plus capecitabine-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and assessed its safety and efficacy in locally advanced rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were treated for 5 to 5.5 weeks with 50- to 250-mg peposertib once daily, capecitabine 825 mg/m2 twice daily, and radiotherapy (RT), 5 days per week. Following clinical restaging (8 weeks after CRT completion), patients with clinical complete response (cCR) could opt for surveillance. Total mesorectal excision was recommended upon incomplete response (IR). RESULTS Nineteen patients were treated with peposertib at doses of 50 mg (n = 1), 100 mg, 150 mg, and 250 mg (n = 6 each). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in one out of five (100 mg), one out of six (150 mg), and three out of six (250 mg) evaluable patients. Peposertib ≤150 mg once daily was tolerable in combination with CRT. After 8 weeks of treatment with peposertib and CRT, the cCR was 15.8% (n = 3). Among the three patients with cCR, two underwent surgery and had residual tumors. Among the 16 patients with IR, seven underwent surgery and had residual tumors; five of the remaining nine patients opted for consolidative chemotherapy. The combined cCR/pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 5.3% (n = 1, 100 mg cohort). CONCLUSIONS Peposertib did not improve complete response rates at tolerable dose levels. The study was closed without declaring the MTD/RP2D.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jaume Capdevila
- Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Institute of Oncology (VHIO), IOB Quiron-Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Tony Philip
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Lake Success, New York
| | | | - Richard Tuli
- USF Health Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida
| | | | - Mirjam Kuipers
- The health care business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Andreas Becker
- The health care business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Eric D. Miller
- Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Verheij FS, Omer DM, Williams H, Lin ST, Qin LX, Buckley JT, Thompson HM, Yuval JB, Kim JK, Dunne RF, Marcet J, Cataldo P, Polite B, Herzig DO, Liska D, Oommen S, Friel CM, Ternent C, Coveler AL, Hunt S, Gregory A, Varma MG, Bello BL, Carmichael JC, Krauss J, Gleisner A, Guillem JG, Temple L, Goodman KA, Segal NH, Cercek A, Yaeger R, Nash GM, Widmar M, Wei IH, Pappou EP, Weiser MR, Paty PB, Smith JJ, Wu AJ, Gollub MJ, Saltz LB, Garcia-Aguilar J. Long-Term Results of Organ Preservation in Patients With Rectal Adenocarcinoma Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy: The Randomized Phase II OPRA Trial. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:500-506. [PMID: 37883738 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2023] [Revised: 07/29/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.To assess long-term risk of local tumor regrowth, we report updated organ preservation rate and oncologic outcomes of the OPRA trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02008656). Patients with stage II/III rectal cancer were randomly assigned to receive induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation (INCT-CRT) or chemoradiation followed by consolidation chemotherapy (CRT-CNCT). Patients who achieved a complete or near-complete response after finishing treatment were offered watch-and-wait (WW). Total mesorectal excision (TME) was recommended for those who achieved an incomplete response. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). The secondary end point was TME-free survival. In total, 324 patients were randomly assigned (INCT-CRT, n = 158; CRT-CNCT, n = 166). Median follow-up was 5.1 years. The 5-year DFS rates were 71% (95% CI, 64 to 79) and 69% (95% CI, 62 to 77) for INCT-CRT and CRT-CNCT, respectively (P = .68). TME-free survival was 39% (95% CI, 32 to 48) in the INCT-CRT group and 54% (95% CI, 46 to 62) in the CRT-CNCT group (P = .012). Of 81 patients with regrowth, 94% occurred within 2 years and 99% occurred within 3 years. DFS was similar for patients who underwent TME after restaging (64% [95% CI, 53 to 78]) and patients in WW who underwent TME after regrowth (64% [95% CI, 53 to 78]; P = .94). Updated analysis continues to show long-term organ preservation in half of the patients with rectal cancer treated with total neoadjuvant therapy. In patients who enter WW, most cases of tumor regrowth occur in the first 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Floris S Verheij
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Dana M Omer
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hannah Williams
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Sabrina T Lin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Li-Xuan Qin
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - James T Buckley
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Hannah M Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan B Yuval
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jin K Kim
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Richard F Dunne
- Department of Medicine, Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Jorge Marcet
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL
| | - Peter Cataldo
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
| | - Blase Polite
- Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Daniel O Herzig
- Division of Gastrointestinal and General Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR
| | - David Liska
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Samuel Oommen
- Division of Gastrointestinal Oncology, John Muir Cancer Institute, John Muir Health, Walnut Creek, CA
| | - Charles M Friel
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Charles Ternent
- Methodist Hospital Physicians Clinic Colon and Rectal Surgery and The Creighton University Clinical Research Center, Omaha, NE
| | - Andrew L Coveler
- Department of Medicine, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Steven Hunt
- Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO
| | - Anita Gregory
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Hospital Orange County, Orange, CA
| | - Madhulika G Varma
- Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Brian L Bello
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC
| | - Joseph C Carmichael
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA
| | - John Krauss
- Department of Medicine, Rogel Cancer Center at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Ana Gleisner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado, Denver, CO
| | - José G Guillem
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Larissa Temple
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Neil H Segal
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Andrea Cercek
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Rona Yaeger
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Garrett M Nash
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Maria Widmar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Iris H Wei
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Emmanouil P Pappou
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Martin R Weiser
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Philip B Paty
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - J Joshua Smith
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Abraham J Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Marc J Gollub
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Leonard B Saltz
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Julio Garcia-Aguilar
- Department of Surgery, Colorectal Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Torresan S, de Scordilli M, Bortolot M, Di Nardo P, Foltran L, Fumagalli A, Guardascione M, Ongaro E, Puglisi F. Liquid biopsy in colorectal cancer: Onward and upward. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 194:104242. [PMID: 38128627 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. In recent years, liquid biopsy has emerged as one of the most interesting areas of research in oncology, leading to innovative trials and practical changes in all aspects of CRC management. RNAs and cell free DNA (cfDNA) methylation are emerging as promising biomarkers for early diagnosis. Post-surgical circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) can aid in evaluating minimal residual disease and personalising adjuvant treatment. In rectal cancer, ctDNA could improve response assessment to neoadjuvant therapy and risk stratification, especially in the era of organ-preservation trials. In the advanced setting, ctDNA analysis offers the opportunity to monitor treatment response and identify driver and resistance mutations more comprehensively than traditional tissue analysis, providing prognostic and predictive information. The aim of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the clinical applications and future perspectives of liquid biopsy in CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Torresan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Marco de Scordilli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy.
| | - Martina Bortolot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Paola Di Nardo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Luisa Foltran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Arianna Fumagalli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Michela Guardascione
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Elena Ongaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, 33081 Aviano, Italy; Department of Medicine, University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Leite JS. Rectal cancer - avoiding surgery? Colorectal Dis 2024; 26:383-385. [PMID: 38158617 DOI: 10.1111/codi.16854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Nonoperative treatment of rectal cancer is gaining popularity. Several trials recently demonstrated advantages in disease-free survival with total neoadjuvant treatment (TNT) with the addition of the watch and wait (WW) strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer. On longer follow-up, an unexpected increased risk in local recurrence in the TNT group at the RAPIDO trial suggested early surgery for nonresponding tumours. The WW option is globally accepted for a complete clinical response; however, a high rate of regrowth was found in a registry with an increased risk of distant metastases, questioning the deleterious effect of deferral of surgery in this group. The short- and long-term toxic effects of neoadjuvant treatment are costs to consider in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines compared with the European Society for Medical Oncology guidelines, which favour surgery alone if good mesorectal resection is assured with increasing surgical proficiency adjusted to the precise anatomical location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julio S Leite
- Department of Surgery, Coimbra University Hospital, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Arp DT, Appelt AL, Jensen LH, Havelund BM, Nissen HD, Risumlund SL, Sjölin MEE, Nielsen MS, Poulsen LØ. Treatment planning for patients with low rectal cancer in a multicenter prospective organ preservation study. Phys Med 2024; 118:103206. [PMID: 38224663 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Revised: 10/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-surgical management of rectal cancer relies on (chemo)radiotherapy as the definitive treatment modality. This study reports and evaluates the clinical high dose radiotherapy treatment plans delivered to patients with low resectable rectal cancer in a Danish multicenter trial. METHODS The Danish prospective multicenter phase II Watchful Waiting 2 trial (NCT02438839) investigated definitive chemoradiation for non-surgical management of low rectal cancer. Three Danish centers participated in the trial and committed to protocol-specified treatment planning and delivery requirements. The protocol specified a dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to the elective volume (CTV-/PTV-E) and a concomitant boost of 62 Gy in 28 fractions to the primary target volume (CTV-/PTV-T). RESULTS The trial included 108 patients, of which 106 treatment plans were available for retrospective analysis. Dose coverage planning goals for the main target structures were fulfilled for 94% of the treatment plans. However, large intercenter differences in doses to organs-at-risk (OARs) were seen, especially for the intestines. Five patients had a V60Gy>10 cm3 for the intestines and two patients for the bladder. CONCLUSION Prescribed planning goals for target coverage were fulfilled for 94% of the treatment plans, however analysis of OAR doses and volumes indicated intercenter variations. Dose escalation to 62 Gy (as a concomitant boost to the primary tumor) introduced no substantial high dose volumes (>60 Gy) to the bladder and intestines. The treatment planning goals may be used for future prospective evaluation of highdose radiotherapy for organ preservation for low rectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Tideman Arp
- Department of Medical Physics, Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, and Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Lars Henrik Jensen
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Birgitte Mayland Havelund
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Henrik Dahl Nissen
- Danish Colorectal Cancer Center South, Lillebaelt Hospital - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | | | | | - Martin Skovmos Nielsen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Laurids Østergaard Poulsen
- Department of Oncology, Aalborg University Hospital, and Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ng YY, Seow-En I, Chok AY, Lee TS, Palanisamy P, Tan EK. Surgical and short-term oncological safety of total neoadjuvant therapy in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 2024; 94:175-180. [PMID: 37849414 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) conventionally comprises long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), total mesorectal excision (TME), and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, the RAPIDO study published in 2021 showed that total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) led to better oncological outcomes without increased toxicity. We review the surgical and short-term oncological outcomes of patients with high-risk LARC who underwent TNT or LCCRT before TME. METHODS Patients with high-risk LARC who underwent TNT or LCCRT before TME between 2021 and 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS Thirty-five patients (66%) had TNT as per RAPIDO whilst 18 underwent LCCRT. Median follow-up was 16 months (range 5-25). Of the patients who had TNT, median age was 65 years old (range 44-79), 34 (97%) had clinical Stage 3 LARC and median height FAV was 5 cm (range 0.5-14). Nine (26%) required a dose delay/reduction due to treatment toxicity. Seven (50%) showed resolution of previously enlarged lateral nodes. Three (9%) had pathological complete response. Postoperative major morbidity was 23%, of which 4 patients required a reoperation. Six (17%) patients had disease-related treatment failure, with two having disease progression during TNT, two developed local recurrence, and two developed distal metastasis following surgery. Median duration to surgery following completion of chemotherapy was significantly shorter with TNT (36 days versus 74 days) (P < 0.001). There were no other significant differences in outcomes. CONCLUSION TNT is clinically safe in high-risk LARC patients with no significant difference to surgical and short-term oncological outcomes compared to LCCRT, although a higher incidence of early surgical morbidity was observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Y Ng
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Isaac Seow-En
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Terence S Lee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Prasad Palanisamy
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Emile K Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Audisio A, Fazio R, Daprà V, Assaf I, Hendlisz A, Sclafani F. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage colon cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 2024; 123:102676. [PMID: 38160535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2023.102676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
Surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for early-stage colon cancer. However, evidence has recently emerged for neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with the results of randomised clinical trials sparking debates within multidisciplinary teams and splitting the gastrointestinal oncology community. Further to a systematic search of the literature, we provide a thorough and in-depth analysis of the findings from these trials, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We conclude that, while there is a potential value of moving systemic therapy from the post-operative to the pre-operative setting, the available evidence does not justify a shift in the treatment paradigm of early-stage colon cancer, and surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy should remain the standard approach for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Audisio
- Institut Jules Bordet, The Brussels University Hospital (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roberta Fazio
- Institut Jules Bordet, The Brussels University Hospital (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Valentina Daprà
- Institut Jules Bordet, The Brussels University Hospital (HUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Irene Assaf
- Institut Jules Bordet, The Brussels University Hospital (HUB), Brussels, Belgium; Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Institut Jules Bordet, The Brussels University Hospital (HUB), Brussels, Belgium; Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Francesco Sclafani
- Institut Jules Bordet, The Brussels University Hospital (HUB), Brussels, Belgium; Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Fan A, Zhao B, Vu P, Abbadessa B, Lopez N, Eisenstein S, Ramamoorthy S, Liu S. Increased Pathologic Downstaging with Induction versus Consolidation Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated with Total Neoadjuvant Therapy-A National Cancer Database Analysis. J Clin Med 2024; 13:781. [PMID: 38337475 PMCID: PMC10856059 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13030781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 01/16/2024] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is the recommended treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer. The optimal sequence of TNT is debated: induction (chemotherapy first) or consolidation (chemoradiation first)? We aim to evaluate the practice patterns and clinical outcomes of total neoadjuvant therapy with either induction or consolidation regiments in the United States for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. METHODS This is a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database for patients with clinical stage II or stage III rectal cancer, diagnosed between 2006 and 2017, who underwent total neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. RESULTS From 2006 to 2017, we identified 8999 patients and found that the utilization of induction chemotherapy increased from 2.0% to 35.0%. TNT resulted in pathologic downstaging 46.7% of the time and a pathologic complete response 11.6% of the time. Induction chemotherapy lead to higher pathologic downstaging (58% vs. 44.7%, p < 0.001) and pathologic complete responses (16.8% vs. 10.7%, p < 0.001). Similar trends held true in a multivariate analysis and subset analysis of stage II and III disease. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that induction chemotherapy may be preferred over consolidation chemotherapy when downstaging prior to oncologic resection is desired. The optimal treatment plan for total neoadjuvant therapy is multi-factorial and requires further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Austin Fan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA;
| | - Beiqun Zhao
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Peter Vu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Benjamin Abbadessa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Nicole Lopez
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Samuel Eisenstein
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Sonia Ramamoorthy
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| | - Shanglei Liu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA 92093, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Yang J, Deng Q, Cheng Y, Fu Z, Wu X. Effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcome of rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response. World J Surg Oncol 2024; 22:31. [PMID: 38273352 PMCID: PMC10809453 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-024-03300-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locally advanced rectal cancer is typically treated using a combination of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and total mesorectal resection. While achieving pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has been recognized as a positive prognostic factor in oncology, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response after surgery remains uncertain. The objective of this meta-analysis was to examine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on the oncological outcomes of rectal cancer patients who attain pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS This meta-analysis followed the guidelines outlined in the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA). The Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature. RESULTS A total of 34 retrospective studies, including 9 studies from the NCBD database, involving 31,558 patients with pathological complete response rectal cancer, were included in the meta-analysis. The included studies were published between 2008 and 2023. The pooled analysis demonstrated that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (HR = 0.803, 95% CI 0.678-0.952, P = 0.011), and no heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 0%). Locally advanced rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy exhibited a higher 5-year overall survival rate compared to those who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy (OR = 1.605, 95% CI 1.183-2.177, P = 0.002). However, the analysis also revealed that postoperative ACT did not lead to improvements in disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival within the same patient population. Subgroup analysis indicated that pathological complete response patients with clinical stage T3/T4, lymph node positivity, and younger than 70 years of age may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy in terms of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that adjuvant chemotherapy has a beneficial effect on improving overall survival among rectal cancer patients with pathological complete response. However, no such association was observed in terms of disease-free survival and recurrence-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianguo Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Qican Deng
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Yong Cheng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Zhongxue Fu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China
| | - Xin Wu
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 401120, China.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Ke TW, Liao YM, Chang SC, Lin CH, Chen WTL, Liang JA, Chien CR. Re-evaluating the role of pelvic radiation in the age of modern precision medicine and systemic therapy. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:1-4. [PMID: 38292660 PMCID: PMC10823942 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2023] [Revised: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of pelvic radiation in the management of locally advanced stage rectal cancer has come under scrutiny in the context of modern precision medicine and systemic therapy as evidenced by recent clinical trials such as FOWARC (J Clin Oncol 2019; 37: 3223-3233), NCT04165772 (N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 2363-2376), and PROSPECT (N Engl J Med 2023; 389: 322-334). In this review, we comprehensively assess these pivotal trials and offer additional insights into the evolving role of pelvic radiation in contemporary oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tao-Wei Ke
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Min Liao
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Chi Chang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Che-Hung Lin
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - William Tzu-Liang Chen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, China Medical University Hsinchu Hospital, Hsinchu 30272, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Ji-An Liang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Ru Chien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Devesa JM, Zbar AP, Pescatori M, Ballestero A. Whither the coloproctologist of the future? Returning to the kindred spirit of the barber-surgeon. Tech Coloproctol 2024; 28:26. [PMID: 38236438 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02894-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- J M Devesa
- Colorectal Unit, Hospital Ruber Internacional, C/La Maso, 38, 28034, Madrid, Spain.
| | - A P Zbar
- Department of Neuroscience and Anatomy, University of Melbourne Australia, Melbourne, Australia
| | - M Pescatori
- Coloproctology Units, Parioli Clinic Rome and Cobellis Clinic, Vallo Della Lucania, Italy
| | - A Ballestero
- Department of Surgery, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|