Roles of extracellular and cytoplasmic domains of the prolactin receptor in signal transduction to milk protein genes

Positive and negative regulatory elements in the late lactation protein-A gene promoter from the tammar wallaby (Macropus eugenii)

Little is known about the regulation of the marsupial-specific late lactation protein-A (LLP-A) gene, first expressed at mid-lactation in the mammary gland of the tammar wallaby. A genomic clone of LLP-A was sequenced and shown to include seven exons. The LLP-A promoter region of 1969 bp ligated to a secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) gene reporter was co-transfected into CHO-K1 cells with prolactin (PRL) receptor cDNA. Transfected cells cultured with insulin, cortisol and PRL did not secrete SEAP into media. Similarly, this construct was not expressed in the mammary gland of eight lines of transgenic mice. In contrast, when the LLP-A promoter region was reduced to 850 bp, the expression of the SEAP reporter in CHO-K1 cells was constitutive and PRL-independent, despite the presence of two low affinity Stat5 binding sites. The 1969 bp promoter was analyzed using nine serial deletions ligated to the SEAP gene. The expression of these constructs was PRL-independent. Five putative inhibitory elements were identified between -1969 and -1796, -1404 and -1184, -1184 and -992, -992 and -757, and -591 and -425, and a putative enhancer or core transcription element between -425 and-239. These studies indicate that the complex temporal regulation of the LLP-A gene involves elements in its 5'-regulatory region.

Simulation model of defective insulin receptors as byproducts of receptor recycling

Our simulation model assumes that the defective insulin-binding receptors in non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) patients result from functional receptor recycling. The model is a short program written in MS DOS 5.0 Qbasic. MODEL DESIGN: Receptors with intracellular portions damaged in the process of recycling are considered defective since they bind insulin but do mediate insulin effects, or recycle. Their occurrence depends on the average activation rate of functional receptors. The insulin-binding receptors (defective and functional) are objects of slow and time-dependent turnover defined by the turnover rate. Recycled receptors rejoin functional receptors or enter the pool of defective receptors. The waste in the functional receptors' pool is covered by a limited amount of newly synthesized receptors. The defective receptors often accumulate in cases of increased activation of functional receptors. SIMULATION RESULTS: The insulin-binding receptor quantity is determined, in the model, only by the number of newly synthesized receptors, reflecting the intensity of insulin stimulation. Synthesis is increased following variable insulin stimulations and decreased after sustained, intensive insulin stimulation. The number of functional receptors inversely reflects the average activation rate of functional receptors compared with the insulin-binding receptors turnover rate. High activation rates can diminish the proportion of functional receptors to less than 5% of that of all insulin-binding receptors. The model predicts that cells bearing only functional receptors show progressively shortened half-lives of receptors, reflecting the receptor activation intensity. On the other hand, cells bearing both defective and functional receptors show stable receptors' half-lives (20-36% of the defective receptors' half-life). Simulation results suggest that reduced functional receptor proportions in NIDDM patients might reflect the imbalance between the activation of functional receptors and the slow catabolism of defective receptors.