Long-term Follow-up and Muscle Imaging Findings in Brachio-Cervical Inflammatory Myopathy

Systemic sclerosis associated myopathy: how to treat

Purpose of review

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and myositis are two different entities that may coexist as an overlap syndrome. Immunological biomarkers such as anti-PM/Scl or anti-Ku reinforce the syndrome. This review is focused on the treatment of different and characteristic manifestations of this syndrome.

Recent findings

Among the different phenotypes of muscle involvement in patients with SSc, the fibrotic pattern and the sporadic inclusion body myositis must be identified early to avoid a futile immunosuppressive treatment. Other forms such as dermatomyositis, non-specific myositis and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy need to receive conventional immunosuppressive therapy considering that high dose of glucocorticoids may induce a scleroderma renal crisis in patients with SSc. Physicians must be aware of the existence of a "double trouble" association of hereditary myopathy with an autoimmune phenomenon. Several autoantibodies, mainly anti-PM/Scl and anti-Ku may help to define specific phenotypes with characteristic clinical manifestations that need a more specific therapy. Vasculopathy is one of the underlying mechanisms that link SSc and myositis. Recent advances in this topic are reviewed.

Summary

Current treatment of SSc associated myopathy must be tailored to specific organs involved. Identifying the specific clinical, pathological, and immunological phenotypes may help to take the correct therapeutic decisions.

255th ENMC workshop: Muscle imaging in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies. 15th January, 16th January and 22nd January 2021 - virtual meeting and hybrid meeting on 9th and 19th September 2022 in Hoofddorp, The Netherlands

The 255th ENMC workshop on Muscle Imaging in Idiopathic Inflammatory myopathies (IIM) aimed at defining recommendations concerning the applicability of muscle imaging in IIM. The workshop comprised of clinicians, researchers and people living with myositis. We aimed to achieve consensus on the following topics: a standardized protocol for the evaluation of muscle images in various types of IIMs; the exact parameters, anatomical localizations and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques; ultrasound as assessment tool in IIM; assessment methods; the pattern of muscle involvement in IIM subtypes; the application of MRI as biomarker in follow-up studies and clinical trials, and the place of MRI in the evaluation of swallowing difficulty and cardiac manifestations. The following recommendations were formulated: In patients with suspected IIM, muscle imaging is highly recommended to be part of the initial diagnostic workup and baseline assessment. MRI is the preferred imaging modality due to its sensitivity to both oedema and fat accumulation. Ultrasound may be used for suspected IBM. Repeat imaging should be considered if patients do not respond to treatment, if there is ongoing diagnostic uncertainty or there is clinical or laboratory evidence of disease relapse. Quantitative MRI is established as a sensitive biomarker in IBM and could be included as a primary or secondary outcome measure in early phase clinical trials, or as a secondary outcome measure in late phase clinical trials. Finally, a research agenda was drawn up.

Myositis with prominent B cell aggregates may meet classification criteria for sporadic inclusion body myositis

The objective of this study was to report the clinical, serological and pathological features of patients with autoimmune myositis other than dermatomyositis, who displayed both muscle weakness on physical examination and prominent B cell aggregates on muscle pathology, defined as ≥ 30 CD20+ cells/aggregate. Specifically, the presence of a brachio-cervical inflammatory myopathies or a sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) phenotype was recorded. Over a three-year period, eight patients were identified from two university neuropathology referral centers. Seven of 8 (88%) patients had an associated connective tissue disease (CTD): rheumatoid arthritis (n=3), systemic sclerosis (n=2), Sjögren's syndrome (n=1) and systemic lupus erythematosus (n=1), while one patient died on initial presentation without a complete serological and cancer investigation. A brachio-cervical phenotype, i.e. neck weakness, proximal weakness more than distal and shoulder abduction weakness greater than hip flexors, was seen in two patients (25%), while one patient had both proximal and diaphragmatic weakness. In contrast, an IBM-like clinical phenotype was seen in the last five patients (63%), who either had finger flexor weakness and/or quadriceps weakness ≤ 4 on the manual muscle testing MRC-5 scale. Although these 5 patients met at least one set of classification criteria for sIBM, an integrated clinico-sero-pathological approach argued against a diagnosis of sIBM. In summary, in a weak patient with myositis plus an associated CTD and lymphoid aggregates at muscle pathology, B cell predominant aggregates may represent a morphological biomarker against a diagnosis of sIBM.