Tolcapone in stable Parkinson's disease: efficacy and safety of long-term treatment. The Tolcapone Stable Study Group

Structural and Computational Analyses of the Unique Interactions of Opicapone in the Binding Pocket of Catechol O-Methyltransferase: A Crystallographic Study and Fragment Molecular Orbital Analyses

A third-generation inhibitor of catechol O-methyltransferase (COMT), opicapone (1), has the 3-nitrocatechol scaffold as do the second-generation inhibitors such as entacapone (2) and tolcapone (3), but only 1 can sustainably inhibit COMT activity making it suitable for a once-daily regimen. These improvements should be attributed to the optimized sidechain moiety (oxidopyridyloxadiazolyl group) of 1 substituted at the 5-position of the 3-nitrocatechol ring. We analyzed the role of the sidechain moiety by solving the crystal structures of COMT/S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)/Mg/1 and COMT/S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH)/Mg/1 complexes. Fragment molecular orbital (FMO) calculations elucidated that the dispersion interaction between the sidechains of Leu 198 and Met 201 on the β6β7-loop and the oxidopyridine ring of 1 were unique and important in both complexes. In contrast, the catechol binding site made a remarkable difference in the sidechain conformation of Lys 144. The ε-amino group of Lys 144 was outside of the catalytic pocket and was replaced by a water molecule in the COMT/SAH/Mg/1 complex. No nitrocatechol inhibitor has ever been reported to make a complex with COMT and SAH. Thus, the conformational change of Lys 144 found in the COMT/SAH/Mg/1 complex is the first crystallographic evidence that supports the role of Lys 144 as a catalytic base to take out a proton ion from the reaction site to the outside of the enzyme. The fact that 1 generated a complex with SAH and COMT also suggests that 1 could inhibit COMT twofold, as a typical substrate mimic competitive inhibitor and as a product-inhibition enhancer.

Clinical benefit of MAO-B and COMT inhibition in Parkinson's disease: practical considerations

Inhibitors of monoamine oxidase B (MAO-B) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) are major strategies to reduce levodopa degradation and thus to increase and prolong its effect in striatal dopaminergic neurotransmission in Parkinson's disease patients. While selegiline/rasagiline and tolcapone/entacapone have been available on the market for more than one decade, safinamide and opicapone have been approved in 2015 and 2016, respectively. Meanwhile, comprehensive data from several post-authorization studies have described the use and specific characteristics of the individual substances in clinical practice under real-life conditions. Here, we summarize current knowledge on both medication classes, with a focus on the added clinical value in Parkinson's disease. Furthermore, we outline practical considerations in the treatment of motor fluctuations and provide an outlook on ongoing studies with MAO-B and COMT inhibitors.

Optimizing levodopa therapy, when and how? Perspectives on the importance of delivery and the potential for an early combination approach

INTRODUCTION

There is currently a resurgence of levodopa as the initial treatment of choice for most patients with Parkinson's disease, albeit at lower doses than previously used. The addition of adjuvant treatments (including MAO-B inhibitors, COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists) is an established strategy to reduce motor complications that develop with sustained levodopa therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the evidence underpinning current levodopa optimization strategies, during early disease and once motor complications occur. To support the discussion, the authors performed a broad PubMed search with the terms 'levodopa/L-dopa/L-Dopa, and Parkinson's disease,' restricted to clinical trials. There is now a wealth of evidence that improving levodopa delivery to the brain improves outcomes and we discuss how agents can be combined earlier in the course of disease to leverage the full potential of this strategy.

EXPERT OPINION

Levodopa remains the cornerstone of antiparkinsonian therapy. Several promising advances in formulation have been made and include novel extended-release oral drugs as well as non-oral delivery systems. However, evidence has long suggested that anti-parkinsonian medications may be better used in combination earlier in the disease, and consequently patients will benefit from low doses of several agents rather than ever larger levodopa doses.

Effect of Carbidopa Dose on Levodopa Pharmacokinetics With and Without Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Inhibition in Healthy Subjects

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD) is still symptomatic since disease-modifying treatments for PD are not available. Oral levodopa is the gold standard for the treatment of PD motor symptoms. However, incomplete and fluctuating plasma exposure of levodopa leads to suboptimal treatment of the symptoms. The main objective of this study was to investigate to what extent increased carbidopa doses (50 and 100 mg) increase the plasma levels of 100-mg immediate-release (IR) levodopa compared to a 25-mg carbidopa dose with and without co-administration of 200 mg entacapone.

METHODS

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover, phase I, pharmacokinetic study with 25 healthy volunteers was conducted. In addition, a semi-mechanistic pharmacokinetic model was built to theoretically evaluate the effect of inhibiting aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) mediated metabolism of levodopa on the exposure of levodopa.

RESULTS

The effect of increased carbidopa doses 50 and 100 mg on the total exposure (AUC) of 100 mg IR levodopa was +29% and +36%, respectively, when entacapone was co-administered. Without entacapone, the corresponding increases were +13% and +17%. With entacapone co-administration, the increased carbidopa dose also clearly increased levodopa trough concentration. There was no significant effect on the peak concentrations of levodopa.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing carbidopa doses significantly increased the exposure and reduced the fluctuation of IR levodopa in plasma during simultaneous COMT inhibition with entacapone. Theoretical pharmacokinetic simulations suggested that the plasma profile of oral IR levodopa can be even further improved by optimizing AADC and COMT inhibition.

Different Catechol-O-Methyl Transferase Inhibitors in Parkinson's Disease: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a common, chronic, progressive, debilitating neurodegenerative disease. The current levodopa treatment requires the addition of other drugs, such as catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibitors, to alleviate motor fluctuations in advanced PD. Therefore, a theoretical reference for treatment is urgently needed. In this study, an appropriate search strategy was used to screen eligible studies on different drugs to treat patients with PD from the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Library. The publication dates were from January 1990 to June 2021. We integrated eligible randomized controlled trials, and statistical analysis was performed on three kinds of effectiveness outcomes and two types of safety outcomes. We assessed the average difference or odds ratio between each drug and placebo and summarized them as the average and 95% confidence interval (CI), respectively. In terms of efficacy, entacapone (mean difference [MD], 0.64 h; 95% CI, 0.29–1.0), opicapone (MD, 0.92 h; 95% CI, 0.35–1.5), and tolcapone (MD, 3.2 h; 95% CI, 2.1–4.2) increased patients' total ON-time compared to placebo. Tolcapone (MD, −100 mg; 95% CI −160 to −45) reduced the total daily dose of levodopa therapy. None of these three drugs was found to have statistical significance in mean change from baseline in UPDRS part III scores when compared with others. In terms of safety, tolcapone (MD, 3.8; 95% CI, 2.1–6.8), opicapone (MD, 3.7; 95% CI, 2–7.2), and entacapone (MD, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5–3.3) increased the number of cases of dyskinesia compared to placebo. Entacapone (MD, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3–2.2) and tolcapone (MD, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3–15) were more likely to cause adverse events than placebo. In conclusion, opicapone showed higher efficiency and fewer safety problems in five indicators we selected when compared with the other two drugs.

Redefining the strategy for the use of COMT inhibitors in Parkinson's disease: the role of opicapone

INTRODUCTION

Levodopa remains the gold-standard Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment, but the inevitable development of motor complications has led to intense activity in pursuit of its optimal delivery.

AREAS COVERED

Peripheral inhibition of dopa-decarboxylase has long been considered an essential component of levodopa treatment at every stage of illness. In contrast, only relatively recently have catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors been utilized to block the other major pathway of degradation and optimize levodopa delivery to the brain. First and second-generation COMT inhibitors were deficient because of toxicity, sub-optimal pharmacokinetics or a short duration of effect. As such, they have only been employed once 'wearing-off' has developed. However, the third-generation COMT inhibitor, opicapone has overcome these difficulties and exhibits long-lasting enzyme inhibition without the toxicity observed with previous generations of COMT inhibitors. In clinical trials and real-world PD studies opicapone improves the levodopa plasma profile and results in a significant improvement in ON time in 'fluctuating' disease, but it has not yet been included in the algorithm for early treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

This review argues for a shift in the positioning of COMT inhibition with opicapone in the PD algorithm and lays out a pathway for proving its effectiveness in early disease.

Safety and efficacy of tolcapone in Parkinson's disease: systematic review

PURPOSE

Tolcapone is an efficacious catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor for Parkinson's disease (PD). However, safety issues hampered its use in clinical practice. We aimed to provide evidence of safety and efficacy of tolcapone by a systematic literature review to support clinicians' choices in the use of an enlarging PD therapeutic armamentarium.

METHODS

We searched PubMed for studies on PD patients treated with tolcapone, documenting the following outcomes: liver enzyme, adverse events (AEs), daily Off-time, levodopa daily dose, unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) part-III, quality of life (QoL), and non-motor symptoms. FAERS and EudraVigilance databases for suspected AEs were interrogated for potential additional cases of hepatotoxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies were included, for a total of 4780 patients treated with tolcapone. Pertaining safety, 0.9% of patients showed liver enzyme elevation > 2. Over 23 years, we found 7 cases of severe liver injury related to tolcapone, 3 of which were fatal. All fatal cases did not follow the guidelines for liver function monitoring. FAERS and EudraVigilance database search yielded 61 reports of suspected liver AEs possibly related to tolcapone. Pertaining efficacy, the median reduction of hours/day spent in Off was 2.1 (range 1-3.2), of levodopa was 108.9 mg (1-251.5), of "On" UPDRS-III was 3.6 points (1.1-6.5). Most studies reported a significant improvement of QoL and non-motor symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Literature data showed the absence of relevant safety concerns of tolcapone when strict adherence to hepatic function monitoring is respected. Given its high efficacy on motor fluctuations, tolcapone is probably an underutilized tool in the therapeutic PD armamentarium.

Are There Benefits in Adding Catechol-O Methyltransferase Inhibitors in the Pharmacotherapy of Parkinson's Disease Patients? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

A qualified consensus suggests that a combination of levodopa with a peripherally acting dopa decarboxylase inhibitor continues to present the gold standard treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, as the disease progresses the therapeutic window of levodopa becomes narrowed. Pharmacological strategies for motor fluctuations are focused on providing less pulsatile and more continuous dopaminergic stimulation. Peripheral catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibition improves the bioavailability of levodopa and results in a prolonged response.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the two available COMT inhibitors; entacapone and tolcapone and the recently introduced opicapone.

METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched for original studies published within the last 37 years. In addition, lists of identified studies, reviews and their references were examined.

RESULTS

Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 3701 patients with PD were included in this systematic review.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant treatment of PD patients experiencing motor fluctuations with entacapone resulted in improvement of motor function and was well tolerated. Therefore, entacapone presented an acceptable benefit to risk ratio. Tolcapone appeared to result in a greater therapeutic effect. However, this was not consistent across all motor variables and studies, and thus would not support its use, given the current onerous monitoring that is required. Opicapone was not associated with adverse reactions in a phase III trial but did not present a greater efficacy than entacapone, and thus further studies are required in order to illustrate its cost effectiveness.

Therapeutics in the Neurorehabilitation of Parkinson's Disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) affects 1 percent of the population over the age of 65. The number of people with this disorder is steadily rising. Therapy for PD remains primarily pharmacologic, with medications that target the depleted dopaminergic system being the mainstay of therapy. Surgical therapies, both ablative and stimulatory, are in creasingly being used for patients with more advanced disease and/or complications of drug therapy. Experimental therapies aimed at restoring dopaminergic function and protecting dopaminergic cells are being studied. Alternate neurotransmitter systems are being evaluated as potential targets for therapy. Complete treatment of patients with PD utilizes education, physical therapy, support groups, and medication. When a comprehensive approach is used, PD is treatable and manageable.

Pathophysiology of L-dopa-induced motor and non-motor complications in Parkinson's disease

Involuntary movements, or dyskinesia, represent a debilitating complication of levodopa (L-dopa) therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD). L-dopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) are ultimately experienced by the vast majority of patients. In addition, psychiatric conditions often manifested as compulsive behaviours, are emerging as a serious problem in the management of L-dopa therapy. The present review attempts to provide an overview of our current understanding of dyskinesia and other L-dopa-induced dysfunctions, a field that dramatically evolved in the past twenty years. In view of the extensive literature on LID, there appeared a critical need to re-frame the concepts, to highlight the most suitable models, to review the central nervous system (CNS) circuitry that may be involved, and to propose a pathophysiological framework was timely and necessary. An updated review to clarify our understanding of LID and other L-dopa-related side effects was therefore timely and necessary. This review should help in the development of novel therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing the generation of dyskinetic symptoms.

Pharmacological strategies for the management of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in patients with Parkinson's disease

L-Dopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) are the most common adverse effects of long-term dopaminergic therapy in Parkinson's disease (PD). However, the exact mechanisms underlying dyskinesia are still unclear. For a long time, nigrostriatal degeneration and pulsatile stimulation of striatal postsynaptic receptors have been highlighted as the key factors for the development of LID. In recent years, PD models have revealed a wide range of non-dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems involved in pre- and postsynaptic changes and thereby contributing to the pathophysiology of LID. In the current review, we focus on therapeutic LID targets, mainly based on agents acting on dopaminergic, glutamatergic, serotoninergic, adrenergic, and cholinergic systems. Despite a large number of clinical trials, currently only amantadine and, to a lesser extent, clozapine are being used as effective strategies in the treatment of LID in clinical settings. Thus, in the second part of the article, we review the placebo-controlled trials on LID treatment in order to disentangle the changing scenario of drug development. Promising results include the extension of L-dopa action without inducing LID of the novel monoamine oxidase B- and glutamate-release inhibitor safinamide; however, this had no obvious effect on existing LID. Others, like the metabotropic glutamate-receptor antagonist AFQ056, showed promising results in some of the studies; however, confirmation is still lacking. Thus, to date, strategies of continuous dopaminergic stimulation seem the most promising to prevent or ameliorate LID. The success of future therapeutic strategies once moderate to severe LID occur will depend on the translation from preclinical experimental models into clinical practice in a bidirectional process.

Summary of the recommendations of the EFNS/MDS-ES review on therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the 2010 EFNS/MDS-ES evidence-based treatment recommendations for the management of Parkinson's disease (PD). This summary includes the treatment recommendations for early and late PD.

METHODS

For the 2010 publication, a literature search was undertaken for articles published up to September 2009. For this summary, an additional literature search was undertaken up to December 2010. Classification of scientific evidence and the rating of recommendations were made according to the EFNS guidance. In cases where there was insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement ('good practice point') is made.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

For each clinical indication, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of rasagiline as adjunctive therapy in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

Rasagiline, an MAO-B inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD). In this post hoc analysis, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rasagiline as an adjunct to levodopa were compared with placebo in elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients with PD.

METHODS

Data were pooled from the Parkinson's Rasagiline: Efficacy and Safety on the Treatment of 'OFF' and Lasting effect in Adjunct therapy with Rasagiline Given Once daily randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials with the primary efficacy end-point being the reduction from baseline in daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy end-points included scores for Clinical Global Improvement (CGI)-Examiner during ON time, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-ADL during OFF time, UPDRS-Motor during ON time and total daily ON time with and without troublesome dyskinesia. Tolerability was evaluated from adverse events (AEs) in the two age groups.

RESULTS

Rasagiline decreased daily OFF time versus placebo (P<0.01) and improved CGI-Examiner score (P=0.001) and UPDRS-Motor ON score (P<0.05). Changes in UPDRS-ADL OFF score and total daily ON time without dyskinesia also favoured rasagiline but were not significant. Between-group comparisons (≥70 vs. <70 years) showed that efficacy was unaffected by age for all end-points (P>0.1), and rasagiline was well tolerated amongst both groups of patients with a comparable incidence of total and dopaminergic AEs (P>0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunct rasagiline is efficacious and well tolerated in elderly non-demented patients (≥70 years) with moderate to advanced PD. Confirmation of the efficacy and safety of rasagiline in the elderly patient subgroup is especially relevant because of the increasing number of elderly patients with PD.

A double-blind, delayed-start trial of rasagiline in Parkinson's disease (the ADAGIO study): prespecified and post-hoc analyses of the need for additional therapies, changes in UPDRS scores, and non-motor outcomes

BACKGROUND

The ADAGIO study investigated whether rasagiline has disease-modifying effects in Parkinson's disease. Rasagiline 1 mg per day, but not 2 mg per day, was shown to be efficacious in the primary analysis. Here, we report additional secondary and post-hoc analyses of the ADAGIO study.

METHODS

ADAGIO was a placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicentre, delayed-start study, in which 1176 patients with untreated early Parkinson's disease were randomly assigned to receive rasagiline 1 mg or 2 mg per day for 72 weeks (early-start groups) or placebo for 36 weeks followed by rasagiline 1 mg or 2 mg per day for 36 weeks (delayed-start groups). We assessed the need for additional antiparkinsonian therapy and changes in non-motor experiences of daily living and fatigue scales (prespecified outcomes) and changes in unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) scores and subscores in placebo and active groups (post-hoc outcomes). The ADAGIO study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00256204.

FINDINGS

The need for additional antiparkinsonian therapy was reduced with rasagiline 1 mg (25 of 288 [9%] patients) and 2 mg (26 of 293 [9%]) versus placebo (108 of 593 [18%]; odds ratio for 1 mg rasagiline vs placebo 0·41, 95% CI 0·25-0·65, p=0·0002; 2 mg rasagiline vs placebo 0·41, 0·26-0·64, p=0·0001). At week 36, both doses significantly improved UPDRS motor subscores compared with placebo (1 mg rasagiline mean difference -1·88 [SE 0·35]; 2 mg rasagiline -2·18 [0·35]; both p<0·0001) and activities of daily living subscores (ADL; 1 mg rasagiline -0·86 [0·18]; 2 mg rasagiline -0·88 [0·18]; both p<0·0001), and 1 mg rasagiline significantly improved UPDRS mentation subscore (-0·22 [0·08]; p=0·004). At week 72, the only significant difference between early-start and delayed-start groups was for ADL subscore with the 1 mg dose (-0·62 [0·29]; p=0·035). When assessed for the effect on non-motor symptoms at week 36, both doses showed benefits on the Parkinson fatigue scale versus placebo (1 mg rasagiline mean difference -0·14 [SE 0·05], p=0·0032; 2 mg rasagiline -0·19 [0·05], p<0·0001), and the 1 mg dose showed benefits on the scale for non-motor experiences of daily living compared with placebo (mean difference -0·33 [0·17]; p=0·049). The rate of progression of total UPDRS score for patients in the placebo group was 4·3 points [SE 0·3] over 36 weeks, with extrapolation to about 6 units per year. In the placebo group, patients with the lowest quartile of baseline UPDRS scores (≤14; n=160) progressed more slowly than did those with highest scores (>25·5; n=145; mean difference -3·46 [SE 0·77]; p<0·0001).

INTERPRETATION

These findings show that rasagiline delayed the need for symptomatic antiparkinsonian drugs and emphasise the contribution of the UPDRS ADL in the response of the rasagiline 1 mg per day early-start versus delayed-start group. The rate of UPDRS deterioration was less than was anticipated from previous studies and correlated with baseline severity. Understanding of the pattern of UPDRS deterioration is essential to assess disease modification.

FUNDING

Teva Pharmaceutical Industries and H Lundbeck A/S.

A double-blind, randomized, placebo and active-controlled study of nebicapone for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease

To determine the efficacy, safety and tolerability of nebicapone, a new catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor for the treatment of motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease (PD), we conducted a multicenter, randomized, 8-week double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group study comparing nebicapone 50 mg, 100 mg, or 150 mg, entacapone 200 mg (active control) or placebo administered concomitantly with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide. Two hundred and fifty-two PD patients with motor fluctuations treated with levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide (4-8 daily doses) were enrolled and 250 patients were eligible for intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis on the basis of having at least one efficacy assessment. The primary endpoint was 8-week change from baseline in absolute "Off" time duration noted in self-scoring diaries. At 8 weeks of treatment the mean daily "Off" time decreased significantly compared to placebo for nebicapone 150 mg (-106 min; 95%CI: -192; -21) and entacapone 200 mg (-81 min; 95%CI: -142; -19). The decrease in "Off" time with nebicapone 50 mg or 100 mg did not reach statistical significance. Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported by 32% to 49% of patients in any treatment group, with no observed dose relationship in the nebicapone groups. Clinically relevant elevations in aspartate transaminase (AST) and/or alanine transaminase (ALT) were observed in 4 of 46 patients with the nebicapone 150 mg dose. The results of this study show that nebicapone 150 mg is efficacious for the treatment of motor fluctuations in PD patients. However, the risk of increasing liver transaminases and its clinically relevance deserves further evaluation.

Chronopharmacology of nebicapone, a new catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the chronopharmacology of nebicapone, a new catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor currently being developed for use as an adjunct to levodopa/carbidopa or levodopa/benserazide in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Eighteen Caucasian subjects were randomly assigned to treatment with either nebicapone 100 mg (n = 6), nebicapone 200 mg (n = 6) or placebo (n = 6) at 4-h intervals for 7 days. First dose occurred at 8:00 AM on day 1 and last dose at 8:00 AM on day 8. Blood samples for the determination of plasma drug concentrations of nebicapone and its glucuronidated and methylated metabolites and for the assay of erythrocyte soluble COMT (S-COMT) activity were taken at frequent times following the first and last doses, and before the 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM doses on days 2-7.

RESULTS

Three men and three women in each group participated in the study. Mean +/- SD (range) age of study participants was 23.7 +/- 3.1 (21-28) years in the nebicapone 100 mg group, 22.2 +/- 0.4 (22-23) years in the nebicapone 200 mg group and 24.3 +/- 5.4 (18-32) in the placebo group. A circadian variation in the pre-dose nebicapone and nebicapone-glucuronide plasma concentrations was apparent. Both nebicapone and nebicapone-glucuronide levels were lower before the 8 PM dose in comparison to the 8 AM dose, suggesting that the absorption of nebicapone may follow a circadian variation. S-COMT activity showed no circadian variation in the placebo group. Therefore, the S-COMT activity variation found in nebicapone-treated subjects is considered to be due to changes in plasma concentrations of nebicapone, which is consistent with the fact that the pre-dose S-COMT activity was lower at the time at which nebicapone levels were maximal. Four subjects in the nebicapone 100 mg and placebo groups and six subjects in the nebicapone 200 mg group reported at least one adverse event (AE). All AEs were of mild or moderate intensity. Both nebicapone treatment regimens were subjectively well-tolerated, but a clinically relevant elevation in aspartate transaminase was observed in one subject of each nebicapone group.

CONCLUSION

Nebicapone showed chronopharmacology in young Caucasian healthy subjects. The clinical impact of the circadian variation in the nebicapone metabolism and activity in Parkinson's disease patients deserves evaluation as it may have implications for drug prescription by modulating the distribution of the total daily dose along the 24-h scale.

Toxicology and safety of COMT inhibitors

The development of catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors for the adjunct treatment to levodopa and aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) inhibitors in Parkinson's disease started in the late 1950s. The first-generation inhibitors were associated with toxic properties: they induced convulsions, or they were toxic to the liver. None of them was taken into clinical use. The second-generation inhibitors entacapone and tolcapone have now been in clinical use for over a decade, and some new inhibitors are under development. The main adverse events in the use of entacapone and tolcapone are dopaminergic and dependent of the concomitant use of levodopa, but the symptoms are generally moderate or mild. Among the non-dopaminergic adverse events, diarrhea is the most prominent one induced by both entacapone and tolcapone. In clinical use, entacapone has been safe, but tolcapone is under strict regulations on liver enzyme monitoring, since in the early years, a few hepatotoxicity cases appeared, three of them with fatal outcome. The mechanism behind tolcapone-induced liver toxicity has been evaluated both in vitro and in vivo, but no clear answer exists at the moment. In the regulatory animal studies, both inhibitors have been safe with no reported toxicity. Also nebicapone, the latest of the second-generation inhibitors in clinical trials has shown some liver enzyme elevations in human subjects. New inhibitors with a structure differing from nitrocatechols are under development. No safety concerns have been reported connected to COMT inhibiton as such. COMT knockout mice are fertile without any pathologies due to the total COMT inhibition.

Quality of life in Parkinson's disease patients following adjunctive tolcapone therapy: results of an open-label, multicenter, community-based trial

OBJECTIVE

To examine changes in quality of life (QOL) and global clinical status after 30 days of adjunctive treatment with tolcapone, a revers-ible inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase, in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease.

METHODS

This 30-day, multicenter, open-label, community-based study enrolled fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients to receive tolcapone 100 mg TID as an adjunct to levodopa/carbidopa. The primary end point was QOL change assessed using the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-8. Clinical change was assessed using the investigator-rated Clinical Global Impression of Improvement Scale (CGI-I).

RESULTS

Fifty-six physicians enrolled 202 patients; 138 (68%) were > or = 65 years of age and 116 (57%) had Parkinson's disease for > or = 5 years. The mean PDQ-8 total score improved from 42.1 to 34.8 after 30 days of tolcapone (P<.0001). Sixty-nine percent of patients improved on the CGI-I. Physicians planned to continue tolcapone beyond the 30 days in 72%, most commonly because of positive changes in motor function and overall general improvement. No patient discontinued because of liver adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjunctive tolcapone treatment was associated with statistically significant improvement in QOL in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients. A majority of patients experienced clinical benefits and continued treatment beyond the end of this study. No liver-related adverse events were reported.

Problems with the present inhibitors and a relevance of new and improved COMT inhibitors in Parkinson's disease

Entacapone and tolcapone are reversible COMT inhibitors which have been approved for clinical use in patients with Parkinson disease (PD). Nebicapone is a third COMT inhibitor which has been studied in humans. COMT inhibitors are used in combination with levodopa and a dopa decarboxylase (DDC) inhibitor. Each of them has problems either in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, or in safety. All three inhibitors have short elimination half-lives, about 2-3h. Tolcapone is longer acting and more potent COMT inhibitor than entacapone; nebicapone lies in between. However, none of the present inhibitors cause a complete peripheral COMT inhibition. Tolcapone and nebicapone have increased more levodopa AUC than entacapone which is reflected also in their clinical efficacy. The most common adverse event with COMT inhibitors is dyskinesia which is usually managed by decreasing levodopa dose. The greatest problem with tolcapone and probably also with nebicapone is their liver toxicity which is not seen with entacapone. Tolcapone causes severe diarrhea more often than entacapone. Though the present COMT inhibitors have improved significantly the treatment of advanced PD patients, they still have several problems and weaknesses leaving room for developing better COMT inhibitors.

Tolcapone: review of its pharmacology and use as adjunctive therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease

Levodopa has been the gold standard therapy for the motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease for more than three decades. Although it remains the most effective treatment, its long-term use is associated with motor fluctuations and dyskinesias that can be disabling for patients and difficult for physicians to manage medically. In the last 10 years, the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor tolcapone has been studied for its efficacy as an adjunctive treatment to levodopa plus a dopa decarboxylase inhibitor. Adjunctive therapy with tolcapone can significantly reduce the dose of levodopa required. Moreover, treatment with tolcapone significantly reduces wearing off and on-off periods in fluctuating patients and improves ‘on’ time in patients with stable disease. Tolcapone has assumed a new place in the arsenal of medications for Parkinson’s disease. This paper reviews the pharmacology, safety and efficacy of tolcapone in patients with advanced Parkinson’s disease. After some initial concerns about its safety, tolcapone has been shown to be safe if used and monitored according to guidelines regarding liver function. Tolcapone produces expected dopaminergic side effects, including headache, nausea, insomnia, as well as diarrhea; however, these side effects are generally mild and as a rule do not result in discontinuation of therapy.

Delivery of peptide and protein drugs over the blood-brain barrier. Prog Neurobiol. 2009;87:212-251. [PMID: 19395337 DOI: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2008.12.002]

Peptide and protein (P/P) drugs have been identified as showing great promises for the treatment of various neurodegenerative diseases. A major challenge in this regard, however, is the delivery of P/P drugs over the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Intense research over the last 25 years has enabled a better understanding of the cellular and molecular transport mechanisms at the BBB, and several strategies for enhanced P/P drug delivery over the BBB have been developed and tested in preclinical and clinical-experimental research. Among them, technology-based approaches (comprising functionalized nanocarriers and liposomes) and pharmacological strategies (such as the use of carrier systems and chimeric peptide technology) appear to be the most promising ones. This review combines a comprehensive overview on the current understanding of the transport mechanisms at the BBB with promising selected strategies published so far that can be applied to facilitate enhanced P/P drug delivery over the BBB.

Pharmacologic treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease: a meta-analysis of COMT inhibitors and MAO-B inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials evaluating catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors or monoamine oxidase type B (MAO-B) inhibitors in addition to levodopa versus levodopa alone for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed between 1990 and October 2007. The primary outcome measures assessed were the reduction in scores of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) total, activities of daily living (ADL) and motor scores from baseline. Other efficacy and safety endpoints were also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 13 trials (n=3775 subjects) were included in the meta-analysis. As compared to placebo, COMT and MAO-B inhibitor use resulted in greater improvement in UPDRS total score (weighted mean difference [WMD] -2.13, 95%CI -0.46 to -0.20; and WMD -5.03, 95%CI -7.38 to -2.68) ADL scores (WMD -0.99, 95%CI -1.56 to -0.43; and WMD -1.48, 95%CI -2.13 to -0.83) and motor scores (WMD -1.50, 95%CI -2.70 to -0.30; and WMD -3.19, 95%CI -4.57 to -1.80) as well as increase in "on" time, reduction in "off" time and decreased need in levodopa dose compared to placebo. Incidences of dyskinesia were significantly higher with the COMT and MAO-B inhibitors compared to placebo.

CONCLUSION

The use of COMT or MAO-B inhibitors plus levodopa is superior to levodopa alone at reducing PD symptoms in patients with advanced PD. While combination therapies with COMT or MAO-B inhibitor plus levodopa seem especially useful amongst PD patients with wearing-off phenomenon, they are associated with more adverse events.

Pharmacologic Options for Treatment of Levodopa-Associated ``Wearing Off''

Levodopa remains the gold standard drug for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, but the combination of disease progression and prolonged treatment can lead to ``wearing-off'' problems in the majority of patients. This constitutes the onset of motor fluctuations which includes nonmotor sensory, psychiatric, and autonomic ``off '' symptoms. There are several pharmacologic options to minimize the ``wearing-off'' phenomenon, including adjustment of levodopa treatment, the use of long-acting dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase type B inhibition, or catechol-O-methyl-transferase inhibition in combination with levodopa. Dopamine agonists may reduce levodopa requirements. Monoamine oxidase type B inhibition can increase dopamine availability by preventing its metabolism. Similarly catechol-O-methyl-transferase inhibitors can increase the half-life of levodopa and the amount available to cross the blood-brain barrier by preventing its breakdown. The selection of a treatment for the management of ``wearing off'' should consider the relief of symptoms and also the potential adverse effects of adjunctive therapy.

Current status of symptomatic medical therapy in Parkinson's disease

Symptomatic medical therapies for Parkinson's disease (PD) have been disease modifying and have led to improvement in daily function, quality of life, and survival. For 40 years, these therapies have been primarily dopaminergic, and currently include the dopamine (DA) precursor levodopa (LD), DA agonists, catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors, and monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibitors. The roles of all these classes of agents have evolved, with significant changes occurring since the early 2000s. This article reviews the current literature for each of these classes of drugs, with a focus on efficacy and place in the therapeutic scheme. Levodopa is no longer considered to be toxic and, thus, its early use is not only appropriate but recommended. Ergot agonists are no longer in use, and new agents administered in patch form or subcutaneous injections have been approved. The COMT inhibitor tolcapone, with its significant efficacy, has been reintroduced, and two new MAO inhibitors have been approved. Selected safety issues are discussed, including the incidence of melanoma in relation to LD; pathological gambling and DA agonists; hepatic toxicity of tolcapone; and the tyramine or so-called cheese reaction with MAO B inhibitors. The article closes with a discussion of future directions and new drugs under development.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase and its inhibitors in Parkinson's disease

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurological disorder characterized by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons, with consequent reduction in striatal dopamine levels leading to characteristic motor symptoms. The most effective treatment for this disease continues to be the dopamine replacement therapy with levodopa together with an inhibitor of aromatic amino acid decarboxylase (AADC). The efficacy of this therapy, however, decreases with time and most patients develop fluctuating responses and dyskinesias. The last decade showed that the use of catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors as adjuvants to the levodopa/AADC inhibitor therapy, significantly improves the clinical benefits of this therapy. The purpose of this article is to review the current knowledge on the enzyme catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) and the role of COMT inhibitors in PD as a new therapeutic approach to PD involving conversion of levodopa to dopamine at the target region in the brain and facilitation of the continuous action of this amine at the receptor sites. A historical overview of the discovery and development of COMT inhibitors is presented with a special emphasis on nebicapone, presently under clinical development, as well as entacapone and tolcapone, which are already approved as adjuncts in the therapy of PD. This article reviews human pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these drugs as well as their clinical efficacy and safety.

Safety and tolerability of adjunctive tolcapone treatment in patients with early Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

The safety and tolerability of adjunctive tolcapone initiated simultaneously with levodopa was evaluated with a focus on increases in liver transaminase and hepatotoxicity.

METHODS

677 levodopa-naïve patients with early stage Parkinson's disease (PD) were randomised to receive placebo or tolcapone 100 mg three times daily, added to standard doses of levodopa plus carbidopa or benserazide.

RESULTS

Increases in liver transaminase above the upper limit of normal (ULN) occurred in 69/342 (20.2%) and 92/335 (27.5%) patients in the placebo and tolcapone groups, respectively. Increases > or = 3 times the ULN occurred in 4/342 (1.2%) and 6/335 (1.8%) patients receiving placebo and tolcapone, respectively (p = 0.5). Liver transaminase values returned to normal in 65% of placebo and 80% of tolcapone treated patients. No instances of serious hepatotoxicity were seen. Diarrhoea was the most commonly reported AE-36/342 (11.0%) placebo v 98/335 (29.0%) tolcapone-and caused discontinuation in 9.9% of tolcapone treated patients. Overall, study discontinuation due to adverse effects was 2.9% in the placebo group and 17.3% in the tolcapone group.

CONCLUSIONS

Tolcapone seemed to be safe and was generally well tolerated as an adjunctive treatment in patients starting treatment with carbidopa/levodopa for symptomatic PD. Mild increases in transaminase levels--< 3 times the ULN--occurred commonly in both placebo and tolcapone treated patients, whereas potentially serious increases of up to > or = 3 times the ULN were infrequent.

Results From a 2-Year Centralized Tolcapone Liver Enzyme Monitoring Program

OBJECTIVES

Tolcapone, administered with levodopa/carbidopa to patients with Parkinson disease, is an effective and generally well-tolerated adjunctive therapy. However, 4 early cases of hepatotoxicity causing 3 deaths in patients not properly monitored gave rise to more rigorous liver function test monitoring guidelines and a liver function test monitoring program in which blood samples from tolcapone-treated patients were tested and results were collected in a central database. We analyzed these results to determine the percentages of patients with at least 1 aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) elevation above the upper limit of normal (ULN) and at least 1 elevation greater than 2 times the ULN.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational analysis included all AST and ALT values recorded in the database from 11,883 samples from patients who received tolcapone for up to 2 years or longer (January 1999-January 2001).

RESULTS

Of 1725 patients who had at least 1 AST or ALT measurement, 3.9% (n = 67) had elevations above the ULN. Less than 1% (15/1725) of patients had AST or ALT elevations greater than 2 times the ULN. Most values returned to normal during continued tolcapone treatment. In 472 patients monitored biweekly while receiving tolcapone for 20 to 114 consecutive weeks, only 0.6% (n = 3) had an AST or ALT value greater than 2 times the ULN; no significant elevations occurred in the remaining 469 (99.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis of results from the central monitoring program suggests that significant transaminase elevations are rare, typically transient, and may return to normal in the face of continued tolcapone therapy in most patients.

Tolcapone

Tolcapone (Tasmar), an inhibitor of catechol-O-methyltransferase, is an effective antiparkinsonian agent when used as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease who have end-of-dose motor fluctuations. In clinical trials, tolcapone significantly reduced "off" time and levodopa requirements. The drug is generally well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being dopaminergic related. However, clinical trials demonstrated dose-related increases in liver enzymes, and postmarketing surveillance noted 4 cases of acute hepatotoxicity with 3 fatalities that were attributed to tolcapone. For this reason, the drug was withdrawn from the market in some countries, and its use was severely restricted in the United States. An analysis of safety data indicates that, since the labeling restrictions in 1998, there have been more than 40,000 patient-years of tolcapone treatment worldwide, with only 3 reports of severe, but reversible, liver injury and no reports of hepatic fatality. It can be concluded that severe liver injury due to tolcapone is a rare event. Based on these data, the drug has been reintroduced to the market in several European countries, and the Food and Drug Administration in the United States has modified monitoring requirements. The new labeling recommends monitoring of liver function every 2 to 4 weeks for 6 months and at the physician's discretion thereafter. In addition, patients must be taken off the drug if blood tests show enzyme elevation of greater than twice the upper limit of normal. This article reviews the data pertaining to the safety and efficacy of tolcapone.

Tolcapone in the management of Parkinson's disease

Although levodopa remains the gold standard treatment for Parkinson's disease, many patients develop motor complications with chronic levodopa exposure. Tolcapone is a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor that extends the action of levodopa. When used in conjunction with levodopa, tolcapone has been shown to be effective in improving motor fluctuations and reducing levodopa requirements in Parkinson's disease patients. However, rare reports of severe hepatotoxicity have limited its use. A recent review of the data on tolcapone-treated patients suggests that, with proper monitoring of liver function, the potential for hepatotoxicity with tolcapone use is negligibly small.

Review of the therapeutic management of Parkinson's disease. Report of a joint task force of the European Federation of Neurological Societies and the Movement Disorder Society-European Section. Part I: early (uncomplicated) Parkinson's disease

The aim of the study was to provide evidence-based recommendations for the management of early (uncomplicated) Parkinson's disease (PD), based on a review of the literature. Uncomplicated PD refers to patients suffering from the classical motor syndrome of PD only, without treatment-induced motor complications and without neuropsychiatric or autonomic problems. MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment (INAHTA) database literature searches were conducted. National guidelines were requested from all European Federation of Neurological Societies (EFNS) societies. Non-European guidelines were searched for using MEDLINE. Part I of the guidelines deals with prevention of disease progression, symptomatic treatment of motor features (parkinsonism), and prevention of motor and neuropsychiatric complications of therapy. For each topic, a list of therapeutic interventions is provided, including classification of evidence. Following this, recommendations for management are given, alongside ratings of efficacy. Classifications of evidence and ratings of efficacy are made according to EFNS guidance. In cases where there is insufficient scientific evidence, a consensus statement (good practice point) is made.

Tolcapone: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson's disease

Tolcapone (Tasmar) is a selective, reversible inhibitor of peripheral and central catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT). Results of well designed studies indicate that oral tolcapone is an effective adjunct to levodopa plus a peripheral dopa-decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease. Tolcapone significantly improves levodopa-induced motor fluctuations and significantly reduces levodopa requirements. The drug is generally well tolerated, with the most commonly occurring adverse events being dopaminergic related. Thus, tolcapone is a useful option in patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease who are receiving levodopa/DDCI and are not responding to, or are not candidates for, other adjunctive treatments.

Role of COMT inhibitors and dopamine agonists in the treatment of motor fluctuations

Although levodopa remains the most effective drug for the symptomatic treatment of Parkinson's disease (PD), there are significant limitations to its chronic use. Growing preclinical and clinical evidence suggests that the severity of motor fluctuations is influenced both by PD severity and pulsatile stimulation of striatal dopamine receptors. Current management of motor fluctuations is based primarily on strategies to prolong the effects of dopaminergic stimulation. This prolongation is accomplished either through the use of long-acting dopaminergic drugs or prolonging of the effects of levodopa. During the past decade, the armamentarium of dopamine agonists increased and agents that prolong the plasma half-life of levodopa became available. Furthermore, recent clinical trials provide evidence-based approaches to improve the management of motor fluctuations in patients with advanced and early PD.

Catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitors for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson's disease

BACKGROUND

As Parkinson's disease progresses the control of motor symptoms often requires the addition of other drugs to levodopa. The principle aim of COMT inhibitor therapy is to increase the duration of effect of each levodopa dose and thus reduce the time patients spend in the relatively immobile 'off' phase.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and safety of adjuvant COMT inhibitor therapy versus placebo in patients with Parkinson's disease, already established on levodopa and suffering from motor complications.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches of the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2003), MEDLINE (1966-2003), EMBASE (1974-2003), were conducted. Grey literature was hand searched and the reference lists of identified studies and reviews examined. The manufacturers of COMT inhibitors were contacted.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of adjuvant COMT inhibitor therapy versus a placebo in patients with a clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease and long-term complications of levodopa therapy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were abstracted independently by the authors and differences settled by discussion. The outcome measures used included Parkinson's disease rating scales, levodopa dosage, 'off' time measurements and the frequency of withdrawals and adverse events.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria. 2566 patients with Parkinson's disease and motor fluctuations were included in this review. Eight trials examined entacapone versus placebo in a total of 1560 patients. These trials were between two and twelve months in duration. Six trials examined tolcapone versus placebo in a total of 1006 patients. These trials were between six weeks and twelve months in duration. Both tolcapone and entacapone reduced 'off' time, reduced levodopa dose and modestly improved motor impairments and disability. This was at the expense of increased risk of dyskinesias, nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. A few participants taking tolcapone were found to have raised liver enzyme levels.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

In the management of the motor complications seen in Parkinson's disease, tolcapone and entacapone can be used to reduce off time, reduce levodopa dose, and modestly improve motor impairment and disability. This is based on, at best, medium term evidence. However some participants on tolcapone had raised liver enzymes. This combined with three cases of fatal hepatic toxicity found during post-marketing surveillance has raised concerns over the safety of tolcapone.

Tolcapone-related liver dysfunction: implications for use in Parkinson's disease therapy

Levodopa is the cornerstone of idiopathic Parkinson's disease (PD) treatment. However, after long-term use of levodopa, a significant percentage of patients experience motor fluctuations, which worsen their quality of life. Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors reduce levodopa metabolism and enhance the respective plasma levels, resulting in improvements in symptoms and overall quality of life. Tolcapone was the first drug of this class to be marketed, but was withdrawn in the European Union due to its implication in the deaths of three PD patients due to hepatic failure. Three deaths from fulminant hepatic failure in 40000 patient-years is a number that is 10-100 times higher than the expected incidence in the general population and, according to the manufacturer's own information, the number is probably underestimated due to under-reporting of cases. In the US, tolcapone was not withdrawn, but restrictive liver enzyme monitoring measures were issued by authorities, which severely limited its use. No further deaths from hepatic failure were reported since these measures were implemented. The mechanisms by which tolcapone may induce liver toxicity are still under debate. It was thought that mitochondrial uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation by tolcapone, and consequent impairment of energy production by hepatocytes, could be responsible for the observed effects. Some experts consider that the restrictive guidelines issued in the US regarding tolcapone use may be loosened with no consequential reductions in safety. It was suggested that ongoing clinical information about safety should be considered and periodical revisions of the restrictions made accordingly. The identification of the molecular and biochemical basis of tolcapone hepatotoxicity, when completed, should also provide important indications for the clinical use of this drug. In conclusion, appropriate monitoring of liver function can ensure adequate safety in PD patients receiving tolcapone, who can therefore benefit from the symptomatic improvements obtained with this drug.

Entacapone is beneficial in both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, six month study

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of entacapone, a specific peripherally acting catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor used in combination with levodopa treatment, in cases of Parkinson's disease with both fluctuating and non-fluctuating response to treatment.

METHODS

A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, six month study was undertaken in 172 fluctuating and 128 non-fluctuating patients. The clinical efficacy and safety of 200 mg entacapone given with each daily levodopa dose was studied. Efficacy was examined using home diaries, the unified Parkinson disease rating scale (UPDRS), and recording of daily levodopa dose.

RESULTS

The primary efficacy variable for fluctuating patients-the proportion of daily ON time-showed a significant increase compared with placebo (p < 0.05). The absolute ON time (mean (SD)) increased from 9.5 (2.5) to 10.8 (2.4) hours (p < 0.01), and the daily OFF time was correspondingly reduced from 7.0 (2.6) to 5.9 (2.5) hours (p < 0.05 v placebo). This improvement was achieved despite a reduction in daily levodopa requirements. The effect was rapidly lost on withdrawal of entacapone. In non-fluctuating patients, the primary efficacy measure was part II of the UPDRS (activities of daily living; ADL). In this group of patients, ADL scores improved in the entacapone group (p < 0.01 v placebo), and there was also a 40 mg reduction in levodopa requirement (p < 0.01 v placebo). Entacapone was well tolerated by both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The ability of entacapone to provide additional benefits to levodopa treatment in increasing ON time in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients was confirmed. A novel finding was that patients without fluctuations also obtained benefit from the addition of entacapone to their levodopa treatment, as evidenced by improved ADL scores and a relatively reduced levodopa requirement.

Kinetics and crystal structure of catechol-o-methyltransferase complex with co-substrate and a novel inhibitor with potential therapeutic application

Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT; E.C. 2.1.1.6) is a ubiquitous enzyme in nature that plays an important role in the metabolism of catechol neurotransmitters and xenobiotics. In particular, inactivation of drugs such as L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA) via O-methylation is of relevant pharmacological importance, because L-DOPA is currently the most effective drug used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease. This justified the interest in developing COMT inhibitors as potential adjuncts to L-DOPA therapy. The kinetics of inhibition by BIA 3-335 (1-[3,4-dihydroxy-5-nitrophenyl]-3-(N-3'-trifluormethylphenyl)-piperazine-1-propanone dihydrochloride) were characterized using recombinant rat soluble COMT. BIA 3-335 was found to act as a potent, reversible, tight-binding inhibitor of COMT with a K(i) of 6.0 +/- 1.6 nM and displaying a competitive inhibition toward the substrate binding site and uncompetitive inhibition toward the S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) binding site. The 2.0-A resolution crystal structure of COMT in complex with its cosubstrate SAM and a novel inhibitor BIA 3-335 shows the atomic interactions between the important residues at the active site and the inhibitor. This is the first report of a three-dimensional structure determination of COMT complexed with a potent, reversible, and tight-binding inhibitor that is expected to have therapeutic applications.

Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used in the treatment of Parkinson's disease

Current research in Parkinson's disease (PD) focuses on symptomatic therapy and neuroprotective interventions. Drugs that have been used for symptomatic therapy are levodopa, usually combined with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, synthetic dopamine receptor agonists, centrally-acting antimuscarinic drugs, amantadine, monoamine oxidase-B (MAO-B) inhibitors and catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitors. Drugs for which there is at least some evidence for neuroprotective effect are certain dopamine agonists, amantadine and MAO-B inhibitors (selegiline). Levodopa remains the most effective drug for the treatment of PD. Several factors contribute to the complex clinical pharmacokinetics of levodopa: erratic absorption, short half-life, peripheral O-methylation and facilitated transport across the blood-brain barrier. In patients with response fluctuations to levodopa, the concentration-effect curve becomes steeper and shifts to the right compared with patients with stable response. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling can affect decisions regarding therapeutic strategies. The dopamine agonists include ergot derivatives (bromocriptine, pergolide, lisuride and cabergoline), non-ergoline derivatives (pramipexole, ropinirole and piribedil) and apomorphine. Most dopamine agonists have their specific pharmacological profile. They are used in monotherapy and as an adjunct to levodopa in early and advanced PD. Few pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data are available regarding centrally acting antimuscarinic drugs. They are characterised by rapid absorption after oral intake, large volume of distribution and low clearance relative to hepatic blood flow, with extensive metabolism. The mechanism of action of amantadine remains elusive. It is well absorbed and widely distributed. Since elimination is primarily by renal clearance, accumulation of the drug can occur in patients with renal dysfunction and dosage reduction must be envisaged. The COMT inhibitors entacapone and tolcapone dose-dependently inhibit the formation of the major metabolite of levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa, and improve the bioavailability and reduce the clearance of levodopa without significantly affecting its absorption. They are useful adjuncts to levodopa in patients with end-of-dose fluctuations. The MAO-B inhibitor selegiline may have a dual effect: reducing the catabolism of dopamine and limiting the formation of neurotoxic free radicals. The pharmacokinetics of selegiline are highly variable; it has low bioavailability and large volume of distribution. The oral clearance is many-fold higher than the hepatic blood flow and the drug is extensively metabolised into several metabolites, some of them being active. Despite the introduction of several new drugs to the antiparkinsonian armamentarium, no single best treatment exists for an individual patient with PD. Particularly in the advanced stage of the disease, treatment should be individually tailored.

Treatment interventions for Parkinson's disease: an evidence based assessment

We did a systematic review, with a uniform method of assessment of efficacy and safety, to assess the different interventions available for the management of Parkinson's disease (drugs, surgical interventions, and physical treatments) with respect to the following indications: prevention of disease progression, symptomatic treatment of motor features (parkinsonism), symptomatic control of motor complications, prevention of motor complications, and symptomatic treatment of non-motor features. Our aim was not to define practice guidelines, but rather to improve clinicians' knowledge of the presently available published clinical evidence, based mainly on randomised controlled trials. We hope that our review will help doctors to incorporate this background into their own decision-making strategy to make appropriate choices with respect to the treatment of individual patients with Parkinson's disease.

Efficacy and safety of entacapone in Parkinson's disease patients with suboptimal levodopa response: a 6-month randomized placebo-controlled double-blind study in Germany and Austria (Celomen study)

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and safety of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor entacapone, used as an adjunct to levodopa, in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this parallel group, randomized, double-blind study, 301 PD patients, the majority with motor fluctuations, received entacapone (200 mg) or placebo with each daily dose of standard or controlled-release (CR) levodopa. The 24-week treatment period was followed by 2 weeks of entacapone withdrawal. Efficacy was determined by home diaries ('on' and 'off' times), Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) and changes in levodopa dosage, and safety by adverse-event inquiry, vital signs, electro cardiography (ECG) and laboratory tests.

RESULTS

In the total population, the UPDRS activities of daily living and motor scores were significantly improved (P < 0.05) by entacapone vs placebo. In fluctuating patients, 'on' time increased (1.7 h) and 'off' time decreased (1.5 h) significantly more with entacapone than with placebo (0.5 and 0.6 h, respectively; P < 0.05), and the daily levodopa dose was reduced by 54 mg with entacapone and increased by 27 mg with placebo (P < 0.05). Entacapone benefit was lost on withdrawal. Entacapone efficacy was comparable between patients using CR and standard levodopa preparations. Increased dyskinesias (entacapone 34%, placebo 26%) and nausea (10 and 5%, respectively), mostly occurring shortly after treatment initiation, were generally managed by reducing the levodopa dose. Diarrhoea (entacapone 8%, placebo 4%) was seldom severe. There were no differences in vital signs, ECG or laboratory results.

CONCLUSION

Entacapone is an effective and safe levodopa extender and enhancer, improving the symptomatic efficacy of levodopa in PD and adding to the patients' benefit.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship of levodopa with and without tolcapone in patients with Parkinson's disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of administration of the catechol-Omethyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor tolcapone on the concentration-effect relationship of levodopa in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease and on-off fluctuations.

DESIGN

Nonblind single-group 2-period pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic study.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

12 patients, mean age 59 years, with idiopathic Parkinson's disease and response fluctuations.

METHODS

The pharmacokinetics [plasma concentrations of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD)] and motor effects [global score of the Columbia University Rating Scale (CURSsigma)] of levodopa (plus the peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor benserazide 1:4) were determined for 4 consecutive dosage intervals (4 hours each, starting at 8.00am) in 12 patients before (day 1) and during (day 8) coadministration of tolcapone 100 mg 3 times daily for 7 days.

RESULTS

Under tolcapone, exposure to levodopa [area under the plasma concentration-time for the dosage interval (AUCt)] observed for the separate doses increased by 1.6- to 2.2-fold, and peak plasma drug concentrations (Cmax) increased by 1.1 - to 2.1 -fold. 3-OMD concentrations at day 8 were reduced to about 20% of the values at day 1. At baseline (day 1, before the first levodopa dose), CURSsigma averaged 40 +/- 10 points. After the first levodopa dose. CURSsigma declined to 20 +/- 9 points. At day 8. the predose CURSsigma decreased to a final score of 31 +/-13 points, and the maximal decline after the first levodopa dose was to a final score of 16 +/- 8 points. Population analysis (NONMEM) of the concentration-effect relationship of levodopa according to a sigmoidal Emax model and over all dosage intervals did not show differences in levodopa responsiveness with or without tolcapone. The population mean of the 50% effective concentration (EC50) of levodopa was 1350 microg/L with an standard error of the population parameter estimate of 18%: adding tolcapone treatment as a covariate did not significantly change the population fit. Circadian influences on levodopa respon- siveness were not evaluable by the NONMEM model due to overparametrisation, but visual inspection of plotted data did not suggest differences in the concentration-effect relationship between the 4 consecutive dosage intervals on days 1 and 8.

CONCLUSIONS

The gain in clinical improvement with levodopa under tolcapone can be fully explained by tolcapone-induced changes of peripheral levodopa pharmacokinetics. We suggest that this interaction study, performed in patients and using clinical data, excludes any central effects of tolcapone or any inhibiting effect of 3-OMD on levodopa permeation through the blood-brain barrier, which otherwise would have led to a decrease in the EC50 of levodopa.

Expression and characterization of rat soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase fusion protein

Rat soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase cDNA was cloned into the pCAL-n-FLAG vector and expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein with a calmodulin-binding peptide tag. The recombinant protein, comprising up to 30% of the total protein in the soluble fraction of E. coli, was purified by calmodulin affinity chromatography and gel filtration. Up to 16 mg of pure recombinant enzyme was recovered per liter of culture. Recombinant catechol-O-methyltransferase, in the bacterial soluble fraction, exhibited the same affinity for adrenaline as rat liver soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase (K(m) 428 [246, 609] microM and 531 [330, 732] microM, respectively), as well as the same affinity for the methyl donor, S-adenosyl-l-methionine (K(m) 27 [9, 45] microM and 38 [21, 55] microM, respectively). In addition, both the recombinant and the liver enzymes displayed the same sensitivity to the inhibitor 3,5-dinitrocatechol (IC(50) 132 [44, 397] nM and 74 [38, 143] nM, respectively), and both had the same catalytic number, respectively, 10.1 +/- 1.5 min(-1) and 8.3 +/- 0.3 min(-1). The purified recombinant enzyme also displayed the same affinity for the substrate as the purified rat liver catechol-O-methyltransferase (K(m) 336 [75, 597] microM and 439 [168, 711] microM, respectively) as well as the same inhibitor sensitivity (IC(50) 44 [19, 101] nM and 61 [33, 111] nM, respectively). This recombinant form of catechol-O-methyltransferase is kinetically identical to the rat liver enzyme. This system provides an easy and quick way of obtaining large amounts of soluble catechol-O-methyltransferase for both pharmacological and structural studies.

Randomized trial of tolcapone versus pergolide as add-on to levodopa therapy in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations

In this 12-week, randomized, open-label, blinded-rater, parallel-group trial, the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tolcapone and pergolide were compared in parkinsonian patients with a fluctuating response to levodopa. Patients received tolcapone 100 mg three times daily (t.i.d.), with a possible increase to 200 mg t.i.d., or pergolide titrated to a maximum dose of 5 mg/day by week 9 (mean final dose 2.2 mg/day). The trial involved 203 patients. Efficacy variables that decreased from baseline to week 12 with tolcapone and pergolide included "off" time (reduced by 2-3 hours/day), daily levodopa intake, sickness impact profile scores, Parkinson's disease questionnaire (PDQ)-39 scores, and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. Improvements in efficacy variables were similar with tolcapone and pergolide, with the exception of improvements in quality of life, which were significantly greater with tolcapone; the relative changes in PDQ-39 score at week 12 were -8.7 and -14.2 (P < 0.05) with pergolide and tolcapone, respectively. Improvements in the investigator's global assessment (IGA) of overall efficacy were recorded in 86% of tolcapone-treated patients and in 78% of pergolide-treated patients. The proportion of patients who withdrew because of adverse events was higher in the pergolide group (15%) than in the tolcapone group (5%). Confusion, hypotension, nausea, constipation, abdominal pain, and dyspepsia occurred more frequently with pergolide, whereas diarrhea and urine discoloration occurred more frequently with tolcapone. Tolcapone was better tolerated than pergolide (P < 0.01) according to the IGA of overall tolerability. We conclude that, in this 3-month study, both tolcapone and pergolide provided improvements in motor fluctuations and allowed reductions in levodopa intake when added to levodopa therapy; intent to treat analysis and a less than maximal dose of pergolide may have biased the results in favor of tolcapone. Tolcapone provided greater improvements in quality of fife, was better tolerated, and had a more favorable adverse-event profile than pergolide.

Comparison of two dosages of tolcapone added to levodopa in nonfluctuating patients with PD

The efficacy and safety of two dosages of tolcapone were compared in a 12-week crossover trial involving 118 nonfluctuating patients with PD on a stable dose of levodopa (L-Dopa). At trial onset, all patients received open-label tolcapone 100 mg three times daily for 4 weeks. At week 4, 116 eligible patients entered an 8-week double-blind treatment period and were randomized to receive tolcapone three times daily at either 100 mg (group 1; n = 58) or 200 mg (group 2; n = 58) until week 8, followed by the alternative tolcapone dosage until week 12. Ratings included Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Schwab & England, and patient diaries, assessed at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At week 4, the investigator's global assessment (IGA) of efficacy showed improvement in 76% of patients. The mean total daily L-Dopa dose and mean UPDRS scores for subscales II and III decreased significantly (p < 0.001). During the double-blind treatment period, IGA showed improvements at either or both dosages in 61% of patients; further changes in other efficacy variables were minimal and were similar with both tolcapone dosages. The most frequent adverse events were dopaminergic (nausea and dyskinesia); the most frequent nondopaminergic adverse event was diarrhea. The incidence of adverse events during double-blind treatment was slightly higher with tolcapone 200 mg three times daily (33%) than with tolcapone 100 mg three times daily (24%). The authors conclude that tolcapone dosages of 100 mg three times daily and 200 mg three times daily are well tolerated and equally effective in improving function in L-Dopa-treated nonfluctuating patients with PD.