Dextromethorphan or dextrorphan have a local anesthetic effect on infiltrative cutaneous analgesia in rats

A comparative study of serotonin and norepinephrine as adjuncts to improve cutaneous antinociception of mexiletine in response to skin pinpricks in rats

As adrenaline, serotonin and norepinephrine are two other vasoconstrictors and both of which have been proved to increase the quality and duration of local anesthetics when added as adjuvants. However, the difference in the improvement of the nociception of local anesthetics between the two adjuvants remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the cutaneous nociception of mexiletine by coadministration with serotonin and norepinephrine. Subcutaneous injection of drugs or combinations includes mexiletine 0.6, 1.8, 6.0 μmol, serotonin 1.6500 μmol, noradrenaline 0.8895 nmol, saline, mexiletine 1.8 and 6.0 μmol, respectively combined with serotonin 0.4125, 0.8250, 1.6500 μmol and noradrenaline 0.0356, 0.1779, 0.8895 nmol, with each injection dose of 0.6 ml. The nociception of mexiletine alone and mexiletine coadministered with serotonin and norepinephrine was assessed after subcutaneous injection. Subcutaneous injections of mexiletine elicited dose-related cutaneous antinociception (P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001). Compared with mexiletine (1.8 μmol), adding norepinephrine (except for lowest dose) and serotonin to mexiletine (1.8 μmol) solutions for skin nociceptive block potentiated and prolonged the action (P < 0.01 or 0.001). Mexiletine (6.0 μmol) combined with norepinephrine and serotonin extended the duration of cutaneous antinociception when compared with mexiletine (6.0 μmol) alone (P < 0.05, 0.01, or 0.001). Both serotonin and norepinephrine improve the sensory block and enhances the nociceptive block duration of mexiletine, and serotonin is superior to that of norepinephrine.

Comparison of Adrenaline and Dexmedetomidine in Improving the Cutaneous Analgesia of Mexiletine in Response to Skin Pinpricks in Rats

BACKGROUND

Adrenaline (Adr) and dexmedetomidine (Dex) are commonly used adjuvants of local anesthetics; however, the difference in the improvement of analgesia of local anesthetics between the 2 adjuvants remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this experimental research was to evaluate the cutaneous analgesic effect of mexiletine (Mex) by coadministration with Dex or Adr.

METHODS

The effect of a nociceptive block was assessed based on the inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex in response to skin pinpricks in rats. The analgesic activity of Mex alone and Mex coadministered with Dex or Adr was evaluated after subcutaneous injections. Subcutaneous injections of drugs or combinations include Mex 0.6, 1.8, and 6.0 μmol; Adr 13.66 nmol; Dex 1.05600 nmol; saline; and Mex 1.8 and 6.0 μmol, respectively, combined with Dex 0.01056, 0.10560, and 1.05600 nmol or Adr 0.55, 2.73, and 13.66 nmol, with each injection dose of 0.6 mL.

RESULTS

Subcutaneous injections of Mex elicited dose-related cutaneous analgesia. Compared with Mex (1.8 μmol), adding Dex or Adr to Mex (1.8 μmol) solutions for skin nociceptive block potentiated and prolonged the action. Mex (6.0 μmol) combined with Dex or Adr extended the duration of cutaneous analgesia when compared with Mex (6.0 μmol) alone. A high dose of Adr is more effective with Mex 1.8 μmol than that of Dex, whereas medium and low doses were less effective. Mex 6.0 μmol combined with any dose of Adr is superior to that of Dex.

CONCLUSIONS

Both Dex and Adr improve the sensory block and enhance the nociceptive block duration of Mex. But in most cases, Adr is superior to Dex. It may be that different mechanisms of action of the 2 adjuvants lead to the differences.

Dopamine enhancement of dextrorphan-induced skin antinociception in response to needle pinpricks in rats

BACKGROUND

Dextrorphan with long-acting local anesthetic effects did not cause system toxicity as fast as bupivacaine, while catecholamines (i.e., epinephrine) with the vasoconstrictive characteristics enhanced the effects of local anesthetic drugs. The objective of the experiment was to examine the synergistic effect of local dopamine (a catecholamine) injection on cutaneous antinociception of dextrorphan.

METHODS

The panniculus reflex in response to skin stimulation with a needle was used as the primary endpoint when dextrorphan (1.50, 2.61, 5.46, 10.20 and 20.40 μmol) alone, dopamine (16.20, 32.40, 51.60, 60.00 and 81.60 μmol) alone, or dopamine + dextrorphan (a ratio of ED₅₀vs. ED₅₀) was injected subcutaneously on the rat's back. We used an isobolographic modelling approach to determine whether a synergistic effect would be observed.

RESULTS

We showed that dextrorphan, dopamine, or the mixture of dopamine and dextrorphan produced dose-related skin antinociception. The potency (ED₅₀, 50% effective dose) for cutaneous antinociception was dextrorphan [6.02 (5.93-6.14) μmol] greater than dopamine [48.91 (48.80-49.06) μmol] (p < 0.01). The duration of nociceptive inhibition induced by dopamine was longer than that induced by dextrorphan (p <  0.01) based on their equipotent doses (ED₂₅, ED₅₀, and ED₇₅). Enhancement and prolongation of skin antinociception occurred after co-administration of dopamine with dextrorphan.

CONCLUSIONS

When compared to dopamine, dextrorphan was more potent and had a shorter duration of skin nociceptive block. Dopamine produced a synergistic effect on dextrorphan-mediated antinociception, and prolonged dextrorphan's antinociceptive duration.

Intravenous dextromethorphan/quinidine inhibits activity of dura-sensitive spinal trigeminal neurons in rats

BACKGROUND

Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder characterized by episodes of throbbing headaches. Practically all medications currently used in migraine prophylaxis have a number of substantial disadvantages and use limitations. Therefore, the further search for principally new prophylactic antimigraine agents remains an important task. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effects of a fixed combination of dextromethorphan hydrobromide and quinidine sulphate (DM/Q) on activity of the spinal trigeminal neurons in an electrophysiological model of trigemino-durovascular nociception.

METHODS

The study was performed in 15 male Wistar rats, which were anaesthetized with urethane/α-chloralose and paralysed using pipecuronium bromide. The effects of cumulative intravenous infusions of DM/Q (three steps performed 30 min apart, 15/7.5 mg/kg of DM/Q in 0.5 mL of isotonic saline per step) on ongoing and dural electrical stimulation-induced neuronal activities were tested in a group of eight rats over 90 min. Other seven animals received cumulative infusion of equal volumes of saline and served as control.

RESULTS

Cumulative administration of DM/Q produced steady suppression of both the ongoing activity of the spinal trigeminal neurons and their responses to electrical stimulation of the dura mater.

CONCLUSIONS

It is evident that the observed DM/Q-induced suppression of trigeminal neuron excitability can lead to a reduction in nociceptive transmission from meninges to higher centres of the brain. Since the same mechanism is believed to underlie the pharmacodynamics of many well-known antimigraine drugs, results of the present study enable us to anticipate the potential efficacy of DM/Q in migraine.

The spinal anaesthetic effect of dextromethorphan, dextrorphan, and 3-methoxymorphinan

Dextromethorphan, an antitussive, has a complex pharmacologic profile and has not been well studied. Our aim was to evaluate whether dextromethorphan and its metabolites, dextrorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan, have a spinal anaesthetic effect. Using a method of spinal blockade in rats, we evaluated the potencies and durations of the effects of dextromethorphan and its metabolites on spinal blockades of motor function and nociception. Bupivacaine was the active control. We found that dextromethorphan and its metabolites produced a dose-related spinal blockade of motor function and nociception. On an ED(50) basis, the ranks of potencies were bupivacaine>dextrorphan>3-methoxymorphinan>dextromethorphan (p<0.05 for the differences). On an equipotent basis, dextrorphan and bupivacaine produced similarly longer nociceptive blockades than did dextromethorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan (p<0.05 for the differences). Co-administration of dextromethorphan or its metabolites with bupivacaine produced an additive effect. In conclusion, intrathecal injections of dextromethorphan or its metabolites, dextrorphan and 3-methoxymorphinan, produced dose-related spinal blockades of motor function and nociception. The suitability of these drugs as clinical spinal anaesthetics is worth further evaluation.