The Role of Prolonged Bed Rest in Postoperative Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage After Surgery of Intradural Pathology-A Retrospective Cohort Study

A Retrospective Cohort Study Evaluating the Comparative Effectiveness of Unilateral Hemilaminectomy and Bilateral Laminectomy in the Resection of Spinal Meningiomas

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The primary treatment modality for spinal meningiomas (SM) is surgical resection. In recent years, minimal invasive spine surgery has gained considerable popularity, attributing its growth to advancements in surgical technologies and improved training of surgeons. Nonetheless, the suitability and effectiveness of minimal invasive spine surgery for intradural spinal tumor resection remain a subject of debate. In this cohort study, we aimed to compare the extent of resection of the unilateral hemilaminectomy approach, a less invasive technique, with the more traditional and invasive bilateral laminectomy.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study including patients with SM who underwent surgery at our department between 1996 and 2020. Cohorts included patients who underwent tumor resection through bilateral laminectomy and patients who underwent a unilateral hemilaminectomy. The primary end point was extent of resection according to the Simpson classification.

RESULTS

Of 131 with SM, 36 had a bilateral laminectomy and 95 were operated through a unilateral hemilaminectomy. In both groups, gross total resection, Simpson grades 1 and 2, was achieved in 94.44% and 94.74%, respectively (P = .999). The neurological outcome was also comparable in both cohorts (P = .356). Both length of hospital stay and estimated blood loss were significantly lower in the unilateral cohort (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the unilateral hemilaminectomy yields comparable results in both oncological and neurological outcome when compared with the bilateral laminectomy. Thus, unilateral hemilaminectomy may serve as a viable and safe alternative for the surgical removal of SM.

Does Early Mobilization Following Resection of Spinal Intra-Dural Pathology Increase the Risk of Cerebrospinal Fluid Leaks?-A Dual-Center Comparative Effectiveness Research

Background and Objectives: Prolonged bed rest after the resection of spinal intradural tumors is postulated to mitigate the development of cerebrospinal fluid leaks (CSFLs), which is one of the feared postoperative complications. Nonetheless, the empirical evidence supporting this conjecture remains limited and requires further investigation. The goal of the study was to investigate whether prolonged bed rest lowers the risk of CSFL after the resection of spinal intradural tumors. The primary outcome was the rate of CSFL in each cohort. Materials and Methods: To validate this hypothesis, we conducted a comparative effectiveness research (CER) study at two distinct academic neurosurgical centers, wherein diverse postoperative treatment protocols were employed. Specifically, one center adopted a prolonged bed rest regimen lasting for three days, while the other implemented early postoperative mobilization. For statistical analysis, case-control matching was performed. Results: Out of an overall 451 cases, we matched 101 patients from each center. We analyzed clinical records and images from each case. In the bed rest center, two patients developed a CSFL (n = 2, 1.98%) compared to four patients (n = 4, 3.96%) in the early mobilization center (p = 0.683). Accordingly, CSFL development was not associated with early mobilization (OR 2.041, 95% CI 0.365-11.403; p = 0.416). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified expansion duraplasty as an independent risk factor for CSFL (OR 60.33, 95% CI: 0.015-0.447; p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this CER, we demonstrate that early mobilization following the resection of spinal intradural tumors does not confer an increased risk of the development of CSFL.

Resection of Intramedullary Hemangioblastoma: Timing of Surgery and Its Impact on Neurological Outcome and Quality of Life

Background and Objectives: Spinal intramedullary hemangioblastomas (SIMH) are benign vascular lesions that are pathological hallmarks of von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL) and constitute the third most common intramedullary neoplasm in adults. So far, maximal and safe resection is the first choice of treatment. However, as SIMH show no malignant transformation, it remains unclear whether surgical resection is beneficial for all patients. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the surgical outcomes of 27 patients who were treated between 2014 and 2022 at our neurosurgical department and investigated potential risk factors that influence the surgical outcome. Pre- and postoperative neurological status were classified according to the McCormick scale. Furthermore, surgical quality indicators, such as length of hospital stay (LOS; days), 90-day readmissions, nosocomial infections, and potential risk factors that might influence the surgical outcome, such as tumor size and surgical approach, have been analyzed. In addition to that, patients were asked to fill out the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire to assess their quality of life after surgery. Results: Surgery on SIMH patients that display no or minor neurological deficits (McCormick scale I or II) is associated with a favorable postoperative outcome and overall higher quality of life compared to those patients that already suffer from severe neurological deficits (McCormick scale III or IV). Conclusion: Early surgical intervention prior to the development of severe neurological deficits may offer a better neurological outcome and quality of life.