The Surgeon and Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer

Comparison of survival of patients receiving laparoscopic and open radical resection for stage II colon cancer

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare the survival of patients receiving laparoscopic vs. open radical resection for stage II colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and twenty patients with stage II colon cancer were enrolled from Beijing Chaoyang Hospital of Capital Medical University from January 2000 to December 2009, including 61 patients in the laparoscopic radical resection group and 159 patients in the open radical resection group. The survival data in both groups were compared using the log rank test based on Kaplan-Meier survival curves.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference in the 3-year survival (88.5% vs. 80.5%; X(2)=1.98, P=0.159) and the 5-year survival (81.9% vs. 69.2%; X(2)=1.98, P=0.159) between both groups. However, statistically significant difference was found in median overall survival (mOS), which was 102.6 (95% CI: 76.8-122.7) months in the laparoscopic group and 90.0 (95% CI: 70.4-109.6) months in the open radical resection group (X(2)=4.183, P=0.041). mOS was 96 (95% CI: 68.6-111.4) months and 92.6 (95% CI: 56.8-107.2) months in those with and without postoperative chemotherapy, respectively (X(2)=6.389, P=0.011). For patients older than 75 years the mOS was 90.0 (95% CI: 25.3-105.0) months and 83.4 (95% CI: 13.1-96.9) months in the laparoscopic and open group, respectively. The difference between the both groups was statistically significant (X(2)=6.191, P=0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The mOS of patients receiving laparoscopic radical resection was better than open radical resection for stage II colon cancer, especially for patients over 75 years old.

Multimarker phenotype predicts adverse survival in patients with lymph node-negative colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The heterogeneity of stage II colon cancer underlines the need for identifying high-risk, lymph node-negative patients. The objective of this study was to define a multimarker prognostic model of 5-year survival in patients with lymph node-negative, mismatch repair (MMR)-proficient colorectal cancer (CRC).

METHODS

Immunohistochemistry for 13 tumor markers was performed on 587 lymph node-negative, MMR-proficient CRC samples by using a tissue microarray. Immunoreactivity was evaluated semiquantitatively. A receiver-operating characteristic-based approach was used to detect clinically relevant tumor markers and to determine cutoff scores for tumor positivity. Univariate and multivariate analyses stratified by pathologic T3 (pT3) or pT4 tumor classification were performed.

RESULTS

In univariate analysis, the absence of CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) (P < .001), loss of p27 (P = .006), positive urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) expression (P = .002), and positive uPA receptor (uPAR) expression (P = .037) were associated with an adverse prognosis. In multivariate analysis, CD8 (P = .001), p27 (P = .031), and uPA (P = .014) were independent prognostic factors. The multimarker phenotype of negative CD8, loss of p27, and positive uPA expression led to significantly worse survival compared with all other combinations of these features. Stratified by pT3 or pT4 stage, CD8 (P = .006) and uPA (P = .011) had independent prognostic value. Combined CD8 negativity and uPA positivity led to a more adverse prognosis in both patients with pT3 tumors and patients with pT4 tumors (P < .001). No difference was observed in the length of survival between patients with pT3 tumors who had CD8 negativity and uPA positivity and patients with pT4 tumors (P = .267).

CONCLUSIONS

The multimarker phenotype of the absence of CD8+ TILs, loss of p27, and positive uPA expression was predictive of an adverse prognosis in patients with lymph node-negative, MMR-proficient CRC. The current findings suggested that a subgroup of patients with high-risk, lymph node-negative pT3 tumors should be considered for adjuvant therapy.