1
|
Sugumar K, Stitzel H, Wu V, Bajor D, Chakrabarti S, Conces M, Henke L, Lumish M, Mahipal A, Mohamed A, Winter JM, Hardacre JM, Ammori JB, Selfridge JE, Ocuin LM. Outcomes of Hepatic Artery-Based Therapies and Systemic Multiagent Chemotherapy in Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2024:10.1245/s10434-024-15187-y. [PMID: 38502296 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15187-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of unresectable colorectal liver metastases (UCRLM) includes locoregional and systemic therapy. A comprehensive analysis capturing long-term outcomes of these treatment options has not been performed. OBJECTIVE A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to calculate pooled outcomes of hepatic artery infusion with systemic chemotherapy (HAI-S), transarterial chemoembolization with systemic chemotherapy (TACE-S), transarterial radioembolization with systemic chemotherapy (TARE-S), doublet (FOLFOX, FOLFIRI), and triplet chemotherapy (FOLFOXIRI). METHODS Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), rate of conversion to resection (CTR), and response rate (RR). RESULTS A total of 32, 7, 9, and 14 publications were included in the HAI-S, TACE-S, and TARE-S chemotherapy arms. The 6/12/24/36-month OS estimates for HAI-S, TACE-S, TARE-S, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFOXIRI were 97%/80%/54%/35%, 100%/83%/40%/14%, 82%/61%/34%/21%, 96%/83%/53%/36%, and 96%/93%/72%/55%. Similarly, the 6/12/24/36-month PFS estimates were 74%/44%/19%/14%, 66%/20%/9%/3%, 57%/23%/10%/3%, 69%/30%/12%/7%, and 88%/55%/18%/11%. The corresponding CTR and RR rates were 31, 20%, unmeasurable (TARE-S), 35, 53; and 49, 45, 45, 50, 80%, respectively. The majority of chemotherapy studies included first-line therapy and liver-only metastases, whereas most HAI-S studies were pretreated. On subgroup analysis in first-line setting with liver-only metastases, the HAI-S arm had comparable outcomes to FOLFOXIRI and outperformed doublet chemotherapy regimens. Although triplet chemotherapy appeared to outperform other arms, high toxicity and inclusion of potentially resectable patients must be considered while interpreting results. CONCLUSIONS HAI-S and multiagent chemotherapy are effective therapies for UCRLM. To make definitive conclusions, a randomized trial with comparable patient characteristics and line of therapy will be required. The upcoming EA2222 PUMP trial may help to address this question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kavin Sugumar
- Department of Surgery, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Henry Stitzel
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Victoria Wu
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - David Bajor
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sakti Chakrabarti
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Madison Conces
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lauren Henke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Melissa Lumish
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Amr Mohamed
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Winter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jeffrey M Hardacre
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - John B Ammori
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jennifer E Selfridge
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center, case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Lee M Ocuin
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marcinak CT, Schwartz PB, Basree MM, Hurst N, Bassetti M, Kratz JD, Uboha NV. Treatment of Oligometastatic GI Cancers. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2024; 44:e430152. [PMID: 38190577 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_430152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024]
Abstract
Oligometastatic state is believed to potentially represent a transitional stage between early, locoregional state disease and widely metastatic disease. Historically, locoregional approaches, particularly in advanced colorectal cancers, have demonstrated efficacy in select patients with limited burden of metastatic disease. Recent strides in systemic therapies, including biomarker-based treatments and immunotherapy, alongside innovations in surgical techniques and novel locoregional approaches such as stereotactic radiotherapy and ablation, have ushered in a new era of therapeutic possibilities across all oligometastatic GI cancers. Despite these advancements, there remains a significant gap in high-quality prospective evidence guiding patient selection and treatment decisions across various disease types. Ongoing clinical trials are anticipated to provide crucial insights into oligometastatic states, fostering the refinement of disease-specific oligometastatic state definitions and treatment algorithms. This article reviews existing data on the management of oligometastatic GI cancer, summarizes current state of knowledge for each disease state, and provides updates on ongoing studies in this space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clayton T Marcinak
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Patrick B Schwartz
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
| | - Mustafa M Basree
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Newton Hurst
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Michael Bassetti
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin Hospital and Clinics, Madison, WI
| | - Jeremy D Kratz
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
- Center for Human Genomics and Precision Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
- William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI
| | - Nataliya V Uboha
- University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
- University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miller ED, Hitchcock KE, Romesser PB. Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Review of Definitions and Patient Selection for Local Therapies. J Gastrointest Cancer 2023; 54:1116-1127. [PMID: 36652155 PMCID: PMC10352468 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-022-00900-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Nearly one-third of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) will ultimately develop metastatic disease. While a small percentage of patients can be considered for curative resection, more patients have limited disease that can be considered for local therapy. Challenges remain in defining oligometastatic CRC as well as developing treatment strategies guided by high level evidence. METHODS In this review, we present the challenges in defining oligometastatic CRC and summarize the current literature on treatment and outcomes of local therapy in patients with metastatic CRC. RESULTS For patients with liver- and/or lung-confined CRC metastases, surgical resection is the standard of care given the potential for long-term progression-free and overall survival. For patients with liver- or lung-confined disease not amenable to surgical resection, non-surgical local therapies, such as thermal ablation, hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP), or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), should be considered. For patients with more advanced disease, such as lymph node or bony metastases, the role of metastasis-directed therapy is controversial. Emerging data suggests that SBRT to ablate all metastases can improve progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSION Multidisciplinary management is critical for patients with metastatic CRC due to the complexity of their cases and the nuanced patient, tumor, biological, and anatomical factors that must be weighed when considering local therapy. High-quality prospective randomized data in CRC are needed to further clarify the role of local ablative therapy in patients with unresectable oligometastatic CRC with ongoing studies including the RESOLUTE trial (ACTRN12621001198819) and the upcoming NCTN ERASur trial (NCT05673148).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric D Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 460 W. 10Th Ave., Room A209, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Kathryn E Hitchcock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida Health, Gainesville, FL, USA
| | - Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alonso JC, Casans I, González FM, Fuster D, Rodríguez A, Sánchez N, Oyagüez I, Williams AO, Espinoza N. Economic evaluations of radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a systematic review. BMC Gastroenterol 2023; 23:181. [PMID: 37226091 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-02793-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 05/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 (Y-90 TARE) microspheres therapy has demonstrated positive clinical benefits for the treatment of liver metastases from colorectal cancer (lmCRC). This study aims to conduct a systematic review of the available economic evaluations of Y-90 TARE for lmCRC. METHODS English and Spanish publications were identified from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, MEDES health technology assessment agencies, and scientific congress databases published up to May 2021. The inclusion criteria considered only economic evaluations; thus, other types of studies were excluded. Purchasing-power-parity exchange rates for the year 2020 ($US PPP) were applied for cost harmonisation. RESULTS From 423 records screened, seven economic evaluations (2 cost-analyses [CA] and 5 cost-utility-analyses [CUA]) were included (6 European and 1 USA). All included studies (n = 7) were evaluated from a payer and the social perspective (n = 1). Included studies evaluated patients with unresectable liver-predominant metastases of CRC, refractory to chemotherapy (n = 6), or chemotherapy-naïve (n = 1). Y-90 TARE was compared to best supportive care (BSC) (n = 4), an association of folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) (n = 1), and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) (n = 2). Y-90 TARE increased life-years gained (LYG) versus BSC (1.12 and 1.35 LYG) and versus HAI (0.37 LYG). Y-90 TARE increased the quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) versus BSC (0.81 and 0.83 QALY) and versus HAI (0.35 QALY). When considering a lifetime horizon, Y-90 TARE reported incremental cost compared to BSC (range 19,225 to 25,320 $US PPP) and versus HAI (14,307 $US PPP). Y-90 TARE reported incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) between 23,875 $US PPP/QALY to 31,185 $US PPP/QALY. The probability of Y-90 TARE being cost-effective at £ 30,000/QALY threshold was between 56% and 57%. CONCLUSIONS Our review highlights that Y-90 TARE could be a cost-effective therapy either as a monotherapy or when combined with systemic therapy for treating ImCRC. However, despite the current clinical evidence on Y-90 TARE in the treatment of ImCRC, the global economic evaluation reported for Y-90 TARE in ImCRC is limited (n = 7), therefore, we recommend future economic evaluations on Y-90 TARE versus alternative options in treating ImCRC from the societal perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J C Alonso
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - I Casans
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
| | - F M González
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario Central, Asturias, Spain
| | - D Fuster
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Rodríguez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Virgen de las Nieves, Granada, Spain
| | - N Sánchez
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - I Oyagüez
- Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain
| | - A O Williams
- Boston Scientific Marlborough, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | - N Espinoza
- Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB), Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sharma NK, Kappadath SC, Chuong M, Folkert M, Gibbs P, Jabbour SK, Jeyarajah DR, Kennedy A, Liu D, Meyer JE, Mikell J, Patel RS, Yang G, Mourtada F. The American Brachytherapy Society consensus statement for permanent implant brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 microsphere radioembolization for liver tumors. Brachytherapy 2022; 21:569-591. [PMID: 35599080 PMCID: PMC10868645 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2022.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2021] [Revised: 03/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multidisciplinary consensus for high quality multidisciplinary implementation of brachytherapy using Yttrium-90 (90Y) microspheres transarterial radioembolization (90Y TARE) for primary and metastatic cancers in the liver. METHODS AND MATERIALS Members of the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) and colleagues with multidisciplinary expertise in liver tumor therapy formulated guidelines for 90Y TARE for unresectable primary liver malignancies and unresectable metastatic cancer to the liver. The consensus is provided on the most recent literature and clinical experience. RESULTS The ABS strongly recommends the use of 90Y microsphere brachytherapy for the definitive/palliative treatment of unresectable liver cancer when recommended by the multidisciplinary team. A quality management program must be implemented at the start of 90Y TARE program development and follow-up data should be tracked for efficacy and toxicity. Patient-specific dosimetry optimized for treatment intent is recommended when conducting 90Y TARE. Implementation in patients on systemic therapy should account for factors that may enhance treatment related toxicity without delaying treatment inappropriately. Further management and salvage therapy options including retreatment with 90Y TARE should be carefully considered. CONCLUSIONS ABS consensus for implementing a safe 90Y TARE program for liver cancer in the multidisciplinary setting is presented. It builds on previous guidelines to include recommendations for appropriate implementation based on current literature and practices in experienced centers. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use this document as a guide to formulate their clinical practices and to adopt the most recent dose reporting policies that are critical for a unified outcome analysis of future effectiveness studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navesh K Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penn State Hershey School of Medicine, Hershey, PA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Michael Chuong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Michael Folkert
- Northwell Health Cancer Institute, Radiation Medicine at the Center for Advanced Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Personalised Oncology Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - David Liu
- Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | - Rahul S Patel
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Gary Yang
- Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA
| | - Firas Mourtada
- Helen F. Graham Cancer Center & Research Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Randrian V, Pernot S, Sionneau B, Smith D, Lim A, Touchefeu Y, Gallois C, Turpin A, Javed S, Guimbaud R, Rivera P, Karoui M, Auclin E, Taieb J. Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy With Folfirinox or Oxaliplatin Alone in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:830595. [PMID: 35783637 PMCID: PMC9243466 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.830595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapy is an option for the treatment of patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (LMCRC). Though HAI with oxaliplatin (HAI-Ox) is generally used, intravenous (IV) 5-fluoro-uracil (5FU)-oxaliplatin-irinotecan HAI (HAI-Folfirinox) is feasible and leads to curative-intent surgery in 30% of pretreated patients. We compared the efficacy and safety of HAI-Ox and HAI-Folfirinox. Methods Patients who underwent HAI chemotherapy for LMCRC were retrospectively included from 2008 to 2019 from six French expert centers. Results Data were collected from 273 previously treated patients with LMCRC. Patients received HAI-Folfirinox (n = 52) or HAI-Ox (n = 221) combined with IV chemotherapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was 43.2% in patients with HAI-Folfirinox and 45.9% (ns) in patients with HAI-Ox. Median overall survival (OS) was 17 months (95% CI: 15–32.3) with HAI-Folfirinox and 26.2 months (95% CI: 19.4–34.4; p = 0.1) with HAI-Ox. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.9 months (95% CI: 4.9–10.3) with HAI-Folfirinox and 6.4 months (95% CI: 6.0–7.7; p = 0.6) with HAI-Ox. The secondary liver resection rate was 35.6% with HAI-Folfirinox and 16.7% with HAI-Ox (p = 0.007). Grade 2 and above toxicities were significantly more frequent with HAI-Folfirinox. In the global population, only 2 factors were prognostic for OS in multivariable analyses: liver-only disease [hazard ratio (HR): 0.4; 95% CI 0.20–0.83; p = 0.013] and local complications of the catheter (HR: 3.8; 95% CI 1.6–9.0; p = 0.002). Conclusion Hepatic arterial infusion results in high response rates, secondary resections, and long survival in pretreated patients with LMCRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Violaine Randrian
- Department of Hepato-Gastro-Enterology, CHU Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - Simon Pernot
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Denis Smith
- Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Annie Lim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Clinique Santé Atlantique, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Yann Touchefeu
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Digestive Oncology, Nantes University Hospital, Nantes, France
| | - Claire Gallois
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Université de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | | - Sahir Javed
- Department of Oncology, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Department of Digestive Oncology, IUCT-Rangueil, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Pascale Rivera
- Department of Digestive Oncology, IUCT-Rangueil, CHU Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Mehdi Karoui
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Université de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Edouard Auclin
- Methodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Bourgogne Franche-Comté University, INSERM, EFS BFC, UMR 1098, Interactions Hôte-Greffon-Tumeur/Ingénierie Cellulaire et Génique, Besançon, France
- Department of Medical Oncology, Université de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Université de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
- *Correspondence: Julien Taieb,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kwan J, Pua U. Review of Intra-Arterial Therapies for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13061371. [PMID: 33803606 PMCID: PMC8003062 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Colorectal cancer liver metastasis occurs in more than 50% of patients with colorectal cancer and is thought to be the most common cause of death from this cancer. The mainstay of treatment for inoperable liver metastasis has been combination systemic chemotherapy with or without the addition of biological targeted therapy with a goal for disease downstaging, for potential curative resection, or more frequently, for disease control. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies including hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are alternative treatment strategies that have shown promising results, most commonly in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. In recent years, their role in the first-line setting in conjunction with concurrent systemic chemotherapy has also been explored. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future. Abstract The liver is frequently the most common site of metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer, occurring in more than 50% of patients. While surgical resection remains the only potential curative option, it is only eligible in 15–20% of patients at presentation. In the past two decades, major advances in modern chemotherapy and personalized biological agents have improved overall survival in patients with unresectable liver metastasis. For patients with dominant liver metastatic disease or limited extrahepatic disease, liver-directed intra-arterial therapies such as hepatic arterial chemotherapy infusion, chemoembolization and radioembolization are treatment strategies which are increasingly being considered to improve local tumor response and to reduce systemic side effects. Currently, these therapies are mostly used in the salvage setting in patients with chemo-refractory disease. However, their use in the first-line setting in conjunction with systemic chemotherapy as well as to a lesser degree, in a neoadjuvant setting, for downstaging to resection have also been investigated. Furthermore, some clinicians have considered these therapies as a temporizing tool for local disease control in patients undergoing a chemotherapy ‘holiday’ or acting as a bridge in patients between different lines of systemic treatment. This review aims to provide an update on the current evidence regarding liver-directed intra-arterial treatment strategies and to discuss potential trends for the future.
Collapse
|
8
|
|
9
|
Ellis RJ, Angelos P, Jarnagin WR, Kemeny NE, Merkow RP. Abrupt Discontinuation of the Codman Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump: Considerations in the Era of Precision Medicine. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229:217-219. [PMID: 30878584 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 03/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Ellis
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Peter Angelos
- Department of Surgery and MacLean Center for Clinical Medical Ethics, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Nancy E Kemeny
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Ryan P Merkow
- Surgical Outcomes and Quality Improvement Center (SOQIC), Department of Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Northwestern Institute for Comparative Effectiveness Research in Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Magge DR, Zenati MS, Hamad A, Rieser C, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ, Hogg ME. Comprehensive comparative analysis of cost-effectiveness and perioperative outcomes between open, laparoscopic, and robotic distal pancreatectomy. HPB (Oxford) 2018; 20:1172-1180. [PMID: 31217087 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.05.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 05/08/2018] [Accepted: 05/18/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND NSQIP data show that half of distal pancreatectomies (DP) are performed by a minimally invasive approach (MIS). Advantages have been demonstrated for MIS DP, yet comparative cost data are limited. Outcomes and cost were compared in patients undergoing open (ODP), laparoscopic (LDP), and robotic (RDP) approaches at a single institution. METHODS A retrospective review was performed on patients undergoing DP between 1/2010-5/2016. Analysis was intention-to-treat, and cost was available after 1/2013. RESULTS DP was performed in 374 patients: ODP = 85, LDP = 93, and RDP = 196. Operating time was lowest in the RDP cohort (p < 0.0001). ODP had higher estimated blood loss (p < 0.0001) and transfusions (p < 0.0001) than LDP and RDP. LDP had greater conversions to open procedures than RDP (p = 0.001). Postoperative outcomes were similar between groups. Length of stay was higher in the ODP group (p = 0.0001) than LDP and RDP. Overall cost for the ODP was higher than the RDP and LDP group (p = 0.002). On multivariate analysis, RDP reduced LOS (ODP: Odds = 6.5 [p = 0.0001] and LDP: Odds = 2.1 [p = 0.036]) and total cost (ODP: Odds = 5.7 [p = 0.002] and LDP: Odds = 2.8 [p = 0.042]) independently of all demographics and illness covariates. CONCLUSIONS A robotic approach is associated with reduced length of stay and cost compared to open and laparoscopic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deepa R Magge
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| | - Mazen S Zenati
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| | - Ahmad Hamad
- Department of Surgery, Ohio State University, USA
| | - Caroline Rieser
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| | | | - Melissa E Hogg
- Division of GI Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chakedis J, Beal EW, Sun S, Galo J, Chafitz A, Davidson G, Reardon J, Dillhoff M, Pawlik TM, Abdel-Misih S, Bloomston M, Schmidt CR. Implementation and early outcomes for a surgeon-directed hepatic arterial infusion pump program for colorectal liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:1065-1073. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 09/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffery Chakedis
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Eliza W. Beal
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Steven Sun
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Jason Galo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Aaron Chafitz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Gail Davidson
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Joshua Reardon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Timothy M. Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | - Sherif Abdel-Misih
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| | | | - Carl R. Schmidt
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery; The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute; Columbus Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Johnson BW, Wright GP. Regional therapies for the treatment of primary and metastatic hepatic tumors: A disease-based review of techniques and critical appraisal of current evidence. Am J Surg 2018; 217:541-545. [PMID: 30782316 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/09/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The practice of hepatic surgery has become increasingly complex as additional therapeutic options emerge to treat both primary and metastatic tumors of the liver. Liver-directed therapy options include selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT), stereotactic body radiation therapy, chemoembolization, bland embolization, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), and ablative techniques such as microwave or radiofrequency ablation. Hepatocellular carcinoma has been treated with many of these therapies for palliation of symptoms, definitive treatment, and as a bridge to transplantation. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, particularly patients with unresectable disease, have demonstrated clinical responses to both SIRT as well as HAIC. Colorectal liver metastases have been treated with all of these techniques with varying degrees of success depending on the clinical scenario. A detailed understanding of these technologies and the evidence supporting their use is essential for the modern hepatic surgeon to properly sequence therapies and provide salvage options when first-line treatment has failed. This review describes these techniques and their appropriate usage based on the disease of interest and the respective evidence currently available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin W Johnson
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency Program, Grand Rapids, MI, USA; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Department of Surgery, Grand Rapids, MI, USA
| | - G Paul Wright
- Spectrum Health General Surgery Residency Program, Grand Rapids, MI, USA; Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Department of Surgery, Grand Rapids, MI, USA; Spectrum Health Medical Group, Division of Surgical Oncology, Grand Rapids, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dhir M, Zureikat AH. ASO Author Reflections: Hepatic Artery Infusion (HAI) Chemotherapy is Associated with Improved Survival Compared with Radioembolization (Y90) in Patients with Isolated Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:782-783. [PMID: 30298325 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6834-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mashaal Dhir
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|