1
|
Zhou P, Yu X, He D. Case report: A rare case of coexistence of low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasia and goblet cell adenocarcinoma in the appendix. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1313548. [PMID: 38500658 PMCID: PMC10944911 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1313548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Primary appendiceal tumors are rare. Low-grade appendiceal mucinous neoplasia (LAMN) and goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) account for 20% and 14% of primary appendiceal tumors, respectively. The coexistence of LAMN and GCA is an extremely rare event. This report presents a case of an elderly male patient with an appendiceal tumor composed of LAMN and GCA in the same appendix. Case presentation A 72-year-old male patient was admitted to our institution presenting with a history of abdominal pain localized to the right lower quadrant for two months. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) showed a large dilated thickened cystic mass in the appendix, along with a small duodenal diverticulum. Laboratory tests indicated elevated levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cancer antigen 199 (CA19-9) markers. The patient underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy and exploration of the duodenal diverticulum, and there was no finding of perforation of the duodenal diverticulum. Focal positivity for chromogranin A (CgA) and synaptophysin (Syn) was observed in the tumor cells of GCA. The final pathological diagnosis revealed the coexistence of LAMN staged pT4a and grade 1 GCA staged pT3 in the appendix. Unfortunately, the patient died due to severe septic shock and circulatory failure secondary to a perforated duodenal diverticulum. Conclusions The coexistence of LAMN and GCA are extremely rare in the appendix and may result from the proliferation of two independent cellular lines. The coexistence of distinct neoplasms poses diagnostic and management challenges. Multidisciplinary team discussion may be essential in the effective management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Du He
- Department of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Nakashima K, Hashimoto M, Kitamura Y, Shinohara M, Yamaguchi M, Hamaoka M, Miguchi M, Misumi T, Fujikuni N, Ikeda S, Matsugu Y, Nishisaka T, Nakahara H. Peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma mimicking white pus caused by peritonitis following appendicitis: an instructive case report. Surg Case Rep 2024; 10:45. [PMID: 38383872 PMCID: PMC10881908 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-024-01847-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell adenocarcinoma is an extremely rare tumor in which the same cells exhibit both mucinous and neuroendocrine differentiation. It is considered more aggressive compared to conventional carcinoids and more likely to cause metastasis. CASE PRESENTATION We report a case of goblet cell adenocarcinoma with peritoneal metastases. A 62-year-old man underwent appendectomy for acute appendicitis. Intraoperatively, inflammatory white pus and a small amount of dirty ascites were observed in the lower abdomen with severely inflamed appendix. Histopathological examination of the specimen collected during appendectomy revealed goblet cell adenocarcinoma with a positive surgical margin. One month later, additional ileal resection was planned. Laparoscopic examination revealed disseminated nodules throughout the abdominal cavity. Therefore, the patient underwent resection of the peritoneal nodules. The peritoneal specimens confirmed the histopathological findings. Thus we diagnosed the patient with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS In cases wherein white pus is observed during surgery for acute appendicitis, considering the possibility of dissemination, collecting samples for histopathological examination, and initiating early treatment are crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keigo Nakashima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Masakazu Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan.
| | - Yoshihito Kitamura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Makoto Shinohara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Mizuki Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Michinori Hamaoka
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Masashi Miguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Misumi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Fujikuni
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Matsugu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishisaka
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hideki Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54 Ujinakannda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8530, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kozacek K, Reese R, Laczek J, Voorhees P. Taking Caution at Road's End: Incidental Finding of Appendiceal Goblet Cell Tumor on Colonoscopy. ACG Case Rep J 2023; 10:e01211. [PMID: 38025845 PMCID: PMC10651346 DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000001211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cancer of the appendix is an uncommon malignancy that is rarely diagnosed on colonoscopy. We present a case of incidentally discovered goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix and the subsequent management. The patient initially presented with progressive epigastric pain in the setting of a family history of gastric cancer and personal history of colon polyps, for which surveillance was due. Bidirectional endoscopy was performed, from which biopsied tissue of an abnormal-appearing appendiceal orifice confirmed goblet cell adenocarcinoma. This case highlights the importance of identification of the appendiceal orifice in all colonoscopies and tissue sampling in cases of atypical-appearing anatomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyler Kozacek
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Capital Consortium, Bethesda, MD
| | - Ruth Reese
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Capital Consortium, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jeffrey Laczek
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Capital Consortium, Bethesda, MD
| | - Patrick Voorhees
- Department of Pathology, National Capital Consortium, Bethesda, MD
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shiota T, Murata K, Kishimoto M, Yao T, Noura S, Morita S, Akiyoshi T, Okamura S, Imasato M, Furuhata T, Suto T, Takemasa I, Shingai T, Ueda M, Mizuno H, Hisamatsu Y, Takeda T, Fujii M, Kagawa Y, Sugihara K. Clinicopathological features of appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma in Japan: a multicenter retrospective study. Surg Today 2023; 53:174-181. [PMID: 35913635 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-022-02562-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the 5th edition of the World Health Organization classification, appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) is categorized separately from neuroendocrine tumors and other appendiceal adenocarcinomas. We clarified the clinicopathological characteristics of Japanese appendiceal GCA. METHODS We designed a retrospective multicenter cohort study and retrieved the data of patients with appendiceal neoplasms and histologically diagnosed appendiceal goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) treated from January 2000 to December 2017 in Japan. The available GCC slides were reviewed and diagnosed with a new grading system of GCA. RESULTS A total of 922 patients from 43 institutions were enrolled; of these, 32 cases were patients with GCC (3.5%), and 20 cases were ultimately analyzed. The 5-year survival rate was 61.4% (95% confidence interval: 27.4-83.2), and the median survival time was 93.1 months. For peritoneal metastasis, regional lymph node metastasis was a significant factor (p = 0.04), and Grade 3 was a potential factor (p = 0.07). No peritoneal metastasis was observed in either T1/2 patients (n = 2) or Grade 1 patients (n = 4). We were unable to detect any significant factors associated with regional lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION For peritoneal metastasis, regional lymph node metastasis was a significant factor, and Grade 3 was a potential factor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuya Shiota
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kobe City Nishi-Kobe Medical Center, Kobe, Japan.
| | - Kohei Murata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Amagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Takashi Yao
- Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shingo Noura
- Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shunji Morita
- Department of Surgery, Itami City Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Akiyoshi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shu Okamura
- Department of Surgery, Suita Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Tomohisa Furuhata
- Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, St. Marianna University Toyoko Hospital, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Takeshi Suto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Yamagata, Japan
| | - Ichiro Takemasa
- Department of Surgery, Surgical Oncology, and Science, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Tatsushi Shingai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masami Ueda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Mizuno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nippon Life Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hisamatsu
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Takashi Takeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Minoh City Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Fujii
- Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Kagawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bell PD, Pai RK. Goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix: an update and practical approach to diagnosis and grading. Hum Pathol 2023; 132:183-196. [PMID: 35691370 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2022.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Goblet cell adenocarcinoma is a rare appendiceal tumour with amphicrine differentiation that has distinct morphologic and clinical features compared to carcinomas seen elsewhere in the gastrointestinal tract. These tumors have engendered considerable confusion in the literature regarding their classification, and they have been described under several different names including goblet cell carcinoid, adenocarcinoid, and adenocarcinoma, among others. In the recent fifth edition of the World Health Organization Classification of Digestive System Tumors, goblet cell adenocarcinoma is the preferred diagnosis because of the increasing recognition of a frequent co-existing high-grade adenocarcinoma component. This review will present the clinicopathologic, molecular, and immunohistochemical features of goblet cell adenocarcinoma and discuss the current challenges in diagnosis, grading, and clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoenix D Bell
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
| | - Reetesh K Pai
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Foster JM, Zhang C, Rehman S, Sharma P, Alexander HR. The contemporary management of peritoneal metastasis: A journey from the cold past of treatment futility to a warm present and a bright future. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:49-71. [PMID: 35969103 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Revised: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is often regarded as a less frequent pattern of spread; however, collectively across all spectra of primary tumors, the consequences of PM impact a large population of patients annually. Unlike other modes of metastasis, symptoms at presentation or during the treatment course are common, representing an additional challenge in the management of PM. Early efforts with chemotherapy and incomplete surgical interventions transiently improved symptoms, but durable symptom control and survival extension were rare, which established a perspective of treatment futility for PM through most of the 20th century. Notably, the continued development of better systemic therapy combinations, optimization of cytoreductive surgery (CRS), and rigorous investigation of combining regional therapy-specifically hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy-with CRS, have resulted in more effective multimodal treatment options for patients with PM. In this article, the authors provide a comprehensive review of the data establishing the contemporary approach for tumors with a high frequency of PM, including appendix, colorectal, mesothelioma, and gastric cancers. The authors also explore the emerging role of adding hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy to the well established paradigm of CRS and systemic therapy for advanced ovarian cancer, as well as the recent clinical trials identifying the efficacy of poly(adenosine diphosphate ribose) polymerase maintenance therapy. Finally, recent data are included that explore the role of precision medicine technology in PM management that, in the future, may help further improve patient selection, identify the best systemic therapy regimens, detect actionable mutations, and identify new targets for drug development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason M Foster
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Chunmeng Zhang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Shahyan Rehman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cho YM, Abidoye O, Wang J, Bhushan S, Miyara SJ, Guevara S, Molmenti EP, LoCicero RJ, Ilyas JA. A rare case of advance goblet cell carcinoma and a narrative review. Current Problems in Cancer: Case Reports 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpccr.2022.100181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
|
8
|
Palmer K, Weerasuriya S, Chandrakumaran K, Rous B, White BE, Paisey S, Srirajaskanthan R, Ramage JK. Goblet Cell Adenocarcinoma of the Appendix: A Systematic Review and Incidence and Survival of 1,225 Cases From an English Cancer Registry. Front Oncol 2022; 12:915028. [PMID: 35903705 PMCID: PMC9314749 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.915028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundGoblet cell adenocarcinoma (GCA) of the appendix is a rare and aggressive tumour with varying nomenclature and classification systems. This has led to heterogeneity in published data, and there is a lack of consensus on incidence, survival, and management.MethodsWe provide an overview of GCA with a comprehensive systematic review using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology and a retrospective analysis of all cases recorded in the English National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database between 1995 and 2018. The Kaplan–Meier estimator was used to calculate overall survival, and Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify prognostic factors.ResultsThe systematic review demonstrated an incidence of 0.05–0.3 per 100,000 per year among North American registry studies. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate was 95.5%, 85.9%–87.6%, and 76.0%–80.6%, respectively. Age, stage, and grade were identified as prognostic factors for survival. Our analysis included 1,225 cases. Age-standardised incidence was 0.0335 per year in 1995 and gradually rose to 0.158 per year in 2018. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rate was 90.0% [95% confidence interval (95% CI): 85.4–94.0], 76.0% (95% CI: 73.8–80.9), and 68.6% (95% CI: 65.9–72.2), respectively. On univariate Cox regression analyses, female sex, stage, and grade were associated with worse overall survival. On multivariate analysis, only stage remained a statistically significant prognostic factor.ConclusionsGCA of the appendix is rare, but incidence is increasing. We report a lower incidence and survival than North American registry studies. Higher stage was associated with decreased survival. Further prospective studies are required to establish optimal management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kieran Palmer
- Barts Cancer Centre, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Kieran Palmer,
| | - Scott Weerasuriya
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, King’s College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kandiah Chandrakumaran
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Brian Rous
- National Health Service (NHS) Digital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Benjamin E. White
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Sangeeta Paisey
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
| | - Rajaventhan Srirajaskanthan
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, King’s College Hospital National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - John K. Ramage
- Surgical Division, Hampshire Hospitals National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, Basingstoke, United Kingdom
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gangi A, Shah R. The Landmark Series: Appendiceal Primary Peritoneal Surface Malignancy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:2056-2068. [PMID: 34853944 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10856-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Appendiceal primary peritoneal surface malignancies are rare and include a broad spectrum of pathologies ranging from indolent disease to aggressive disease. As such, the data that drive the management of appendiceal peritoneal surface malignancies is generally not based on prospective clinical trial data, but rather consists of level 1 data based on retrospective studies and high-volume institutional experiences. Complete surgical debulking typically offers the best chance for long-term survival. This review highlights the landmark articles on which management of primary appendiceal peritoneal surface malignancies are based.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Gangi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Rupen Shah
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alabraba E, Pritchard DM, Griffin R, Diaz-Nieto R, Banks M, Cuthbertson DJ, Fenwick S. Appendiceal goblet cell carcinomas have poor survival despite completion surgery. Endocrine 2021; 73:734-744. [PMID: 33891259 DOI: 10.1007/s12020-021-02727-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Appendiceal goblet cell carcinomas (aGCCs) are rare but aggressive tumours associated with significant mortality. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of aGCC patients treated at our tertiary referral centre. METHODS We analysed aGCC patients, diagnosed between 1990-2016, assessing the impact of completion surgery and tumour factors on survival. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS We identified 41 patients (23 F, 18 M); median age 61 (range 27-79) years. Mean tumour size was 10.5 (range 0.5-50) mm; most tumours were located in the appendiceal tip (n = 18, 45%). Appendicectomy was the index surgery in 32 patients, 24 of whom subsequently underwent completion surgery at median 3 (range 1.3-13.3) months later. Histology from completion surgery showed residual disease in 8 patients: nodal disease (n = 2) or residual tumour (n = 6). Index surgery for the rest was either colectomy (n = 7) or cytoreductive surgery plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) (n = 1). Index and completion surgery had 0% mortality and 2.5% morbidity. Overall and recurrence-free survival were not significantly affected by tumour grade or completion surgery. Disease recurred in 9 patients after a median follow-up of 57.0 (4.6-114.9) months; 7 of these patients died during follow-up. Recurrences were treated with CRS-HIPEC (n = 1), palliative chemotherapy (n = 3) or supportive care (n = 5). Five- and ten- year overall survival were 85.3% and 62.3% respectively; 5-year and 10-year recurrence-free survival were 73.6% and 50.6%. CONCLUSION The prognosis of aGCCs remains relatively poor. Completion surgery did not prevent recurrence or improve survival, but this needs to be verified with a larger patient cohort. The high mortality associated with tumour recurrence questions current treatment recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Alabraba
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
| | - David Mark Pritchard
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine; Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca Griffin
- Liverpool Clinical and Cancer Research UK Trials Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rafael Diaz-Nieto
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Melissa Banks
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Daniel James Cuthbertson
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
- Department of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, Institute of Life Course and Medical Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen Fenwick
- ENETS Centre of Excellence, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kowalsky SJ, Nassour I, AlMasri S, Paniccia A, Zureikat AH, Choudry HA, Pingpank JF. Omission of Right Hemicolectomy May be Safe for Some Appendiceal Goblet Cell Adenocarcinomas: A Survival Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:8916-8925. [PMID: 34409541 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10191-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appendiceal goblet cell adenocarcinomas (GCC) are rare tumors with clinical behavior between classic carcinoids and adenocarcinomas. Current guidelines recommend right hemicolectomy for all GCCs. PATIENTS AND METHODS The National Cancer Database was retrospectively queried for appendiceal GCCs undergoing appendectomy or right hemicolectomy between 2004 and 2016. Demographics, tumor characteristics, and post-operative outcomes were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival, which was examined by surgical type and tumor T stage. Multivariate logistic regression was utilized to identify predictors of survival. RESULTS In total, 1083 GCCs were included, and 81.8% underwent right hemicolectomy. Mean age was 57 years, and 89% were White. Patients undergoing hemicolectomy had higher T-stage tumors (66.6%/14.4% T3/T4 vs. 55.8%/8.1%, p < 0.001). Lymph node positivity increased with T stage (1.1%, 2.1%, 9.9%, and 29.1% for T1-T4). GCCs undergoing colectomy were more frequently moderately or poorly differentiated (16.7%/9.0% vs. 12.2%/6.6%, p = 0.011). Appendectomy surgical margins were positive in 17.3% (3.4% hemicolectomy, p < 0.001). In T3/T4 tumors, a significant survival benefit at 5 years was observed in patients undergoing colectomy as compared with appendectomy (85.4% vs. 82.0%, p = 0.028). On multivariate analysis, lymph node positivity markedly decreased survival overall for the entire cohort (HR 7.58, p < 0.001) and for T3/T4 tumors (HR 7.63, p < 0.001). In patients with T3/T4 tumors, there was a trend towards improved survival with right hemicolectomy (HR 0.42, p = 0.068). CONCLUSION Omitting right hemicolectomy can be considered for select T1/T2 appendiceal GCCs with negative appendectomy margins, given low rates of lymph node metastases and lack of survival benefit with right hemicolectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy J Kowalsky
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Samer AlMasri
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer H Zureikat
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Haroon A Choudry
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - James F Pingpank
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, UPMC Cancer Pavilion, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Zakka K, Williamson S, Jiang R, Reid MD, Alese OB, Shaib WL, Wu C, Behera M, El-Rayes BF, Akce M. Is adjuvant chemotherapy beneficial for stage II-III goblet cell carcinoid/goblet cell adenocarcinoma of the appendix? Surg Oncol 2020; 36:120-129. [PMID: 33360118 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2020] [Revised: 11/06/2020] [Accepted: 12/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoma (GCC), formerly known as goblet cell carcinoid, of the appendix constitutes less than 14% of all primary appendiceal neoplasms. Surgical resection is the main treatment and the role of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is not established. This study aims to evaluate the impact of AC in stage II-III appendiceal GCC. METHODS Patients with pathological stage II and III GCC who underwent surgical resection between 2006 and 2015 were identified from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) using ICD-O-3 morphology and topography codes: 8243/3 (goblet cell carcinoid) and C18.1. Patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic and/or radiation therapy and adjuvant radiation were excluded. Univariate and multivariable analyses were conducted, and Kaplan-Meier Curves were used to compare overall survival (OS) based on treatment received with Log-rank test. RESULTS A total of 619 patients were identified. 54.4% males and 89.0% Caucasian; median age 56 (range, 23-90) years. Distribution across pathological stages II-III was 82.7% (N = 512) and 17.3% (N = 107) respectively. AC was administered in 9.4% (N = 48) of stage II and 47.7% (N = 51) of stage III patients. For stage II patients, AC was not associated with better OS in univariate (HR 0.32; 95% CI 0.04-2.34; p = 0.261) or multivariable analyses (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.04-2.12; p = 0.221). By contrast, in stage III patients, AC was associated with better OS in univariate (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.17-0.71; p = 0.004) and multivariable analyses (HR 0.25; 95% CI 0.07-0.88; p = 0.031). In the entire cohort 5-year OS for patients that received AC was 85.5% (74.0%, 92.1%) versus 82.7% (77.5%, 86.8%) (p = 0.801) with no AC. For stage II patients, 5-year OS was 96.9% with AC vs. 89.1% with no AC (p = 0.236). For stage III patients, 5-year OS was 77.1% with AC vs. 42.8% with no AC (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION AC was associated with improved OS in patients with pathological stage III GCC of the appendix, but not with pathological stage II.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina Zakka
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shayla Williamson
- Winship Research Informatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Renjian Jiang
- Winship Research Informatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michelle D Reid
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, USA
| | - Olatunji B Alese
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Walid L Shaib
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Christina Wu
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Madhusmita Behera
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA; Winship Research Informatics, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bassel F El-Rayes
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mehmet Akce
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
AlMasri S, Nassour I, Kowalsky SJ, Hrebinko K, Singhi AD, Lee KK, Choudry HA, Bartlett D, Zureikat A, Paniccia A. The Role of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Goblet Cell Carcinoid of the Appendix: An 11-Year Experience from the National Cancer Database. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:3873-3881. [PMID: 33231767 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09389-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoids (GCC) are an aggressive, albeit rare, subtype of appendiceal tumors that exhibit distinct histologic features and lack clear treatment guidelines. We aimed to ascertain the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for GCC in a national cohort of patients. METHODS Patients who underwent a right hemicolectomy for stage I-III GCC of the appendix between 2006 and 2016 were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Stratification based on AC receipt was performed. Kaplan-Meier survival estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression were used to identify predictors of overall survival (OS). RESULTS A total of 867 patients were identified, of whom 124 (14%) received AC. Patients in the AC group were significantly younger (54 vs. 57 years; p = 0.006) and were predominantly of male sex (60 vs. 48%; p = 0.012). On histopathology, patients in the AC group had a higher proportion of poorly/undifferentiated grade (27 vs. 5%; p < 0.001), T4 disease (35 vs. 11%; p < 0.001), and lymph node-positive disease (45 vs. 7%; p < 0.001) than patients who did not receive AC. After excluding patients diagnosed in 2016 due to a lack of follow-up data (n = 162), a survival advantage for the AC group was detected only after stratification for lymph node-positive disease (p = 0.007). On Cox proportional hazard regression, AC demonstrated an independent association with improved OS (hazard ratio 0.24, 95% confidence interval 0.084-0.683; p = 0.007). CONCLUSION The current analysis from the NCDB supports the role of AC for GCC of the appendix, chiefly for patients with lymph node metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samer AlMasri
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Ibrahim Nassour
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Stacy J Kowalsky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Katherine Hrebinko
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Aatur D Singhi
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Kenneth K Lee
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Haroon A Choudry
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - David Bartlett
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Amer Zureikat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Alessandro Paniccia
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sluiter NR, van der Bilt JD, Croll DMR, Vriens MR, de Hingh IHJT, Hemmer P, Aalbers AGJ, Bremers AJA, Ceelen W, D'Hoore A, Schoonmade LJ, Coupé V, Verheul H, Kazemier G, Tuynman JB. Cytoreduction and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Versus Surgery Without HIPEC for Goblet-Cell Carcinoids and Mixed Adenoneuroendocrine Carcinomas: Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Centers in the Netherlands and Belgium. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 19:e87-e99. [PMID: 32651131 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Revised: 07/22/2019] [Accepted: 01/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The value of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for patients with peritoneally metastasized goblet-cell carcinoids (GCCs) and mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinomas (MANECs) is currently unclear. We compared outcomes of CRS-HIPEC to surgery alone for peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two cohorts were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 569): patients with peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs treated with CRS-HIPEC in Dutch and Belgian centers (n = 45), and patients treated with surgery alone. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were morbidity and hospital mortality. After propensity score matching, OS was compared in univariate and multivariate analyses. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines from database inception to June 25, 2018. RESULTS After matching for sex, tumor stage, lymph node stage, and liver metastases, CRS-HIPEC was associated with improved median OS in the combined GCC and MANEC group and the separate GCC subgroup in univariate (GCC + MANEC: 39 vs. 12 months, P < .001; GCC: 39 vs. 12 months, P = .017) and multivariate analysis (GCC + MANEC: hazard ratio 4.27, 95% confidence interval 1.88-9.66, P = .001; GCC: hazard ratio 2.77, 95% confidence interval 1.06-7.26, P = .038). Acceptable grade III-IV morbidity (17.5%) and mortality (0) were seen after CRS-HIPEC. The literature review supported these findings. CONCLUSION CRS-HIPEC is associated with substantial survival benefit in patients with peritoneally metastasized GCCs and MANECs compared to surgery alone and is a safe treatment option. These data support centralized care of GCC and MANEC patients with peritoneal spread in expert centers offering CRS-HIPEC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina R Sluiter
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Dorothée M R Croll
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Menno R Vriens
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Patrick Hemmer
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Arend G J Aalbers
- Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas J A Bremers
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Wim Ceelen
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Ghent, Gent, Belgium
| | - Andre D'Hoore
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Linda J Schoonmade
- Medical Library, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Veerle Coupé
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Verheul
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jurriaan B Tuynman
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To synthesize the current knowledge and guidelines on the management of appendiceal neuroendocrine neoplasms (ANENs). RECENT FINDINGS Most recent guidelines are essentially based on heterogeneous retrospective series. With the advent of a more precise classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms, this heterogeneity is rightly criticized and many 'grey areas' are now debated in expert literature. The only way to solve these issues is through the conduct of large prospective multicentre studies, but this seems somewhat utopian, given the rarity of this disease. SUMMARY ANENs are rare tumours with a favourable prognosis, and mainly diagnosed in young patients. They are predominantly localized, and diagnosed incidentally on appendectomy. This procedure is curative for the vast majority of patients but ANENs can relapse even a significant time after the first diagnosis. Identifying the risks for recurrence is challenging, with some factors thought to be predictive of nodal involvement. The presence of one or more of these factors justifies an oncological radicalization of the surgical procedure (right hemicolectomy with lymphadenectomy). However, the beneficial impact of this surgical procedure on survival is still unproven.
Collapse
|
16
|
Livoff A, Asna N, Gallego-Colon E, Daum AZ, Harkovsky T, Schaffer M. Goblet cell carcinoid of the appendix: Two case reports and a review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol 2019; 11:493-497. [PMID: 31620280 PMCID: PMC6787945 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2019.1921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2019] [Accepted: 08/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Goblet cell carcinoid or carcinoma (GCC) is a rare tumor found incidentally during routine management of acute appendicitis. GCCs are more aggressive compared with conventional appendiceal tumors but less aggressive compared with adenocarcinomas, and they often present with serosal and mesoappendiceal involvement. We herein report two cases of acute appendicitis in a 45-year-old female and a 60-year-old male with varied clinical symptoms. Pathological examination of the appendix revealed the presence of adenocarcinoma with goblet cells and a Ki-67 index of 25% (grade 3) and 15% (grade 2), respectively. Subsequent right hemicolectomy was performed according to the current guidelines. No signs of disease recurrence or metastasis were detected during regular follow-up. However, the lack of a standardized classification system for GCC and the discrepancies in specific reliable markers renders their prognostic and predictive value in GCC at diagnosis insufficient. The present study also aimed to address current concerns regarding the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of GCC, as well as the need to review and update current guidelines. To conclude, proper clinical management and the prediction of outcome for patients with GCC varies according to the classifications or staging criteria used by the clinicians; hence, a review of the current guidelines should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Livoff
- Department of Pathology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel
| | - Noam Asna
- Department of Oncology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel
| | | | - Aner Zeev Daum
- Department of Pathology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel
| | | | - Moshe Schaffer
- Department of Oncology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon 30604, Israel.,Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben Gurion University, Be'er Sheva 8410501, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fields AC, Lu P, Enzinger A, Goldberg J, Irani J, Bleday R, Nash G, Melnitchouk N. Treatment patterns and outcomes in goblet cell carcinoid tumors of the appendix. J Surg Oncol 2019; 120:1096-1101. [PMID: 31592538 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Goblet cell carcinoid (GCC) tumors of the appendix are a rare malignancy. We aim to examine the overall survival per stage and the relationship between different treatment modalities and outcomes for patients with GCC tumors of the appendix. METHODS We identified patients with GCC tumors of the appendix from the National Cancer Database. The main outcome was overall patient survival and cox proportional hazard models were used to ascertain predictors of survival. RESULTS There were 2552 patients identified. The median age of diagnosis was 57 (interquartile range: 49-65) and 52.3% of patients were female. The 5-year survival for Stage I disease was 91.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 82.2%-95.7%), for Stage II disease was 90.5% (95% CI: 85.8%-93.7%), for Stage III disease was 57.0% (95% CI: 45.0%-67.3%), and for Stage IV disease was 18.9% (95% CI: 9.3%-31.0%). In a Cox proportional hazard model, older age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.1; 95% CI: 1.03-1.12; P < .001), lymph node metastasis (HR: 6.9; 95% CI: 2.76-17.01; P < .001), and positive surgical margins (HR: 2.9; 95% CI:1.13-7.26; P = .003) were associated with worse overall survival for Stages I to III disease while only older age (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.002-1.06; P = .04) was associated with worse overall survival for Stage IV disease. CONCLUSIONS Patients with GCC tumors of the appendix who have the nonmetastatic disease have a high 5-year survival. We have identified several prognostic factors for GCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam C Fields
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Pamela Lu
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrea Enzinger
- Center for Gastrointestinal Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joel Goldberg
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Irani
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ronald Bleday
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Garrett Nash
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Nelya Melnitchouk
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Surgery, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Affiliation(s)
- Erica S Tsang
- Division of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hagen F Kennecke
- Virginia Mason Hospital and Seattle Medical Center, Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|