Prediction of Recurrence Patterns from Hepatic Parenchymal Disease After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Clearing Steatosis Prior to Liver Surgery for Colorectal Metastasis: A Narrative Review and Case Illustration

Over recent years, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common liver disorder in the developed world, accounting for 20% to 46% of liver abnormalities. Steatosis is the hallmark of NAFLD and is recognized as an important risk factor for complication and death after general surgery, even more so after liver resection. Similarly, liver steatosis also impacts the safety of live liver donation and transplantation. We aim to review surgical outcomes after liver resection for colorectal metastases in patients with steatosis and discuss the most common pre-operative strategies to reduce steatosis. Finally, as illustration, we report the favorable effect of a low-caloric, hyper-protein diet during a two-stage liver resection for colorectal metastases in a patient with severe steatosis.

The impact of hepatic steatosis on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

It is unclear how hepatic steatosis impacts patient prognosis in the case of colorectal cancer with liver metastases (CRLM). The purpose of this review was to assess the effect of hepatic steatosis on patient survival and disease-free survival (DFS) in the case of CRLM.

Methods

We examined the databases of PubMed, CENTRAL, Embase, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect for studies reporting outcomes of CRLM patients with and without hepatic steatosis. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis using multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (HR).

Results

Nine studies reporting data of a total of 14,197 patients were included. All patients had undergone surgical intervention. Pooled analysis of seven studies indicated that hepatic steatosis had no statistically significant impact on patient survival in CRLM (HR: 0.92 95% CI: 0.82, 1.04, I² = 82%, p = 0.18). Specifically, we noted that there was a statistically significant improvement in cancer-specific survival amongst patients with hepatic steatosis (two studies; HR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.76, 0.95, I² = 41%, p = 0.005) while there was no difference in overall survival (five studies; HR: 0.97 95% CI: 0.83, 1.13, I² = 78%, p = 0.68). On meta-analysis of four studies, we noted that the presence of hepatic steatosis resulted in statistically significant reduced DFS in patients with CRLM (HR: 1.32 95% CI: 1.08, 1.62, I² = 67%, p = 0.007).

Conclusion

The presence of hepatic steatosis may not influence patient survival in CRLM. However, scarce data is suggestive of poor DFS in CRLM patients with hepatic steatosis. Further prospective studies taking into account different confounding variables are needed to better assess the effect of hepatic steatosis on outcomes of CRLM.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced], identifier [CRD42022320665].

Fat signal fraction assessed with MRI predicts hepatic recurrence following hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases

PURPOSE

The effect of hepatic steatosis on the development of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unknown. This study evaluated the usefulness of fat signal fraction assessed with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the effect of hepatic steatosis on hepatic recurrences following initial hepatectomy for CRLM.

METHODS

Between January 2013 and December 2019, 64 patients underwent initial hepatectomy for CRLM. The medical records of these patients were reviewed to evaluate the recurrence and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The fat signal fraction was positively correlated with the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease activity score and liver-spleen ratio. Recurrence following the initial hepatectomy was observed in 48/64 patients, and hepatic recurrence was observed in 30/64 patients. The fat signal fraction was significantly higher in patients with hepatic recurrence after initial hepatectomy. The hepatic recurrence rate was 69.2% in patients with fat signal fraction ≥ 0.0258, which was significantly higher than that in patients with fat signal fraction < 0.0258. Hepatic recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in patients with fat signal fraction < 0.0258 than in those with fat signal fraction ≥ 0.0258. Multivariate analyses revealed that fat signal fraction ≥ 0.0258 was an independent risk factor for hepatic recurrence.

CONCLUSION

The fat signal fraction assessed with MRI was significantly associated with hepatic recurrence following initial hepatectomy for CRLM.

Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy for malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical safety and efficacy of robotic hepatectomy (RH) versus conventional laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for malignancy using meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, EMBASE, Medline and the Cochrane Library databases up to September 2020 for studies, which limited to comparative articles of RH or LH for malignant tumors. Stata14.0 was performed in the meta-analysis. Six studies with a total of 1093 patients (345 RH and 748 LH) were eligible for inclusion. Operative time, tumor size, open procedure rate and the proportion of right hepatectomy were found to be significantly different between RH and LH in the pooled analysis (P < 0.05). Compared to LH, RH was associated with longer operative time, larger tumor size, lower open procedure rate and more common use for right hepatectomy. On the other hand, there was no difference in the operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), blood transfusion rate, hospital stay, R0 resection rate, complications, resection margin, left lateral sectionectomy and left hepatectomy (P > 0.05). For malignant tumors that require hepatectomy, robotic approaches have demonstrated similar safety and feasibility to laparoscopy, with lower open procedure rate, were suitable for larger tumor size, and have a high right hepatectomy utilization rate. These results still need to be confirmed by multicenter, high-quality randomized controlled studies.