1
|
Liu ZF, Sylivris A, Wu J, Tan D, Hong S, Lin L, Wang M, Chew C. Ultrasound Surveillance in Melanoma Management: Bridging Diagnostic Promise with Real-World Adherence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Clin Dermatol 2024:10.1007/s40257-024-00862-3. [PMID: 38635019 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-024-00862-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/30/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ultrasound surveillance has become the new standard of care in stage III melanoma after the 2017 Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial II (MSLT-II) demonstrated non-inferior 3-year survival compared with complete lymph node dissection. OBJECTIVE We aimed to quantify diagnostic performance and adherence rates of ultrasound surveillance for melanoma locoregional metastasis, offering insights into real-world applicability. METHODS Conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we systematically searched the Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science databases from inception until 11 October 2023. All primary studies that reported data on the diagnostic performance or adherence rates to ultrasound surveillance in melanoma were included. R statistical software was used for data synthesis and analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were aggregated across studies using the meta-analytic method for diagnostic tests outlined by Rutter and Gatsonis. Adherence rates were calculated as the ratio of patients fully compliant to planned follow-up to those who were not. RESULTS A total of 36 studies including 18,273 patients were analysed, with a mean age of 56.6 years and a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.11. The median follow-up duration and frequency was 36 and 4 months, respectively. The pooled sensitivity of ultrasound examination was 0.879 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.878-0.879) and specificity was 0.969 (95% CI 0.968-0.970), representing a diagnostic odds ratio of 224.5 (95% CI 223.1-225.9). Ultrasound examination demonstrated a substantial improvement in absolute sensitivity over clinical examination alone, with a number needed to screen (NNS) of 2.95. The overall adherence rate was 77.0% (95% CI 76.0-78.1%), with significantly lower rates in the United States [US] (p < 0.001) and retrospective studies (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Ultrasound is a powerful diagnostic tool for locoregional melanoma metastasis. However, the real applicability to surveillance programmes is limited by low adherence rates, especially in the US. Further studies should seek to address this adherence gap.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Feng Liu
- Department of Dermatology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Johnny Wu
- Monash Health, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Darren Tan
- Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Lawrence Lin
- Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Wang
- Department of Radiology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Christopher Chew
- Department of Dermatology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
de Menezes JN, Arra DASM, Lôbo MM, Pinto CAL, Lima JPSN, Silva MJB, Duprat Neto JP, Bertolli E. Recurrence Patterns and Clinical Management after a Positive Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma Patients. Cancer Invest 2023; 41:830-836. [PMID: 37962565 DOI: 10.1080/07357907.2023.2283459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Introduction melanoma patients who become stage III after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB) may have several patterns of recurrence patients and methods retrospective analysis of melanoma patients who have undergone SNB in a single institution from 2000 to 2015. Results There were 111 recurrences (45.1%) among 246 (20.3%) SNB positive patients and median DRFS was 77.7 months. After initial treatment, further recurrences occurred in 68 (77.3%) patients, regardless the site of initial recurrence conclusions multimodal strategies are recommended to achieve better results when managing stage III melanoma patients after a positive SNB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dante A S M Arra
- Surgical Oncology Residence Program, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Matheus M Lôbo
- Skin Cancer Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | - João P Duprat Neto
- Skin Cancer Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Eduardo Bertolli
- Skin Cancer Department, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cheng TW, Hartsough E, Giubellino A. Sentinel lymph node assessment in melanoma: current state and future directions. Histopathology 2023; 83:669-684. [PMID: 37526026 DOI: 10.1111/his.15011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/02/2023]
Abstract
Assessment of sentinel lymph node status is an important step in the evaluation of patients with melanoma for both prognosis and therapeutic management. Pathologists have an important role in this evaluation. The methodologies have varied over time, from the evaluation of dimensions of metastatic burden to determination of the location of the tumour deposits within the lymph node to precise cell counting. However, no single method of sentinel lymph node tumour burden measurement can currently be used as a sole independent predictor of prognosis. The management approach to sentinel lymph node-positive patients has also evolved over time, with a more conservative approach recently recognised for selected cases. This review gives an overview of past and current status in the field with a glimpse into future directions based on prior experiences and clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany W Cheng
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Emily Hartsough
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alessio Giubellino
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Placzke J, Rosińska M, Sobczuk P, Ziętek M, Kempa-Kamińska N, Cybulska-Stopa B, Kamińska-Winciorek G, Bal W, Mackiewicz J, Galus Ł, Las-Jankowska M, Jankowski M, Dziura R, Drucis K, Borkowska A, Świtaj T, Rogala P, Kozak K, Klimczak A, Jagodzińska-Mucha P, Szumera-Ciećkiewicz A, Koseła-Paterczyk H, Rutkowski P. Modern Approach to Melanoma Adjuvant Treatment with Anti-PD1 Immune Check Point Inhibitors or BRAF/MEK Targeted Therapy: Multicenter Real-World Report. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4384. [PMID: 37686659 PMCID: PMC10486524 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The landscape of melanoma management changed as randomized trials have launched adjuvant treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS An analysis of data on 248 consecutive melanoma stage III and IV patients given adjuvant therapy in eight centers (February 2019 to January 2021) was conducted. RESULTS The analyzed cohort comprised 147 melanoma patients given anti-PD1 (33% nivolumab, 26% pembrolizumab), and 101 (41%) were given dabrafenib plus trametinib (DT). The 2-year overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and distant-metastases-free survival (DMFS) rates were 86.7%, 61.4%, and 70.2%, respectively. The disease stage affected only the RFS rate; for stage IV, it was 52.2% (95% CI: 33.4-81.5%) vs. 62.5% (95% CI: 52.3-74.8%) for IIIA-D, p = 0.0033. The type of lymph node surgery before adjuvant therapy did not influence the outcomes. Completion of lymph node dissection cessation after positive SLNB did not affect the results in terms of RFS or OS. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were associated with longer 24-month RFS, with a rate of 68.7% (55.5-84.9%) for TRAE vs. 56.6% (45.8-70%) without TRAE, p = 0.0031. For TRAE of grade ≥ 3, a significant decline in OS to 60.6% (26.9-100%; p = 0.004) was observed. CONCLUSIONS Melanoma adjuvant therapy with anti-PD1 or DT outside clinical trials appears to be effective and comparable with the results of registration studies. Our data support a de-escalating surgery approach in melanoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Placzke
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Rosińska
- Department of Computational Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Sobczuk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marcin Ziętek
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Wroclaw Medical University, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Natasza Kempa-Kamińska
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Wroclaw Comprehensive Cancer Center, 53-413 Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Bożena Cybulska-Stopa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 31-115 Kraków, Poland
| | - Grażyna Kamińska-Winciorek
- Skin Cancer and Melanoma Team, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Wiesław Bal
- Skin Cancer and Melanoma Team, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Jacek Mackiewicz
- Department of Medical and Experimental Oncology, University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland
| | - Łukasz Galus
- Department of Medical and Experimental Oncology, University of Medical Sciences, 61-701 Poznan, Poland
| | - Manuela Las-Jankowska
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University and Oncology Centre, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Michał Jankowski
- Department of Oncological Surgery, Ludwik Rydygier Collegium Medicum, Nicolaus Copernicus University and Oncology Centre, 85-094 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Robert Dziura
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Holy Cross Cancer Center, 25-734 Kielce, Poland
| | - Kamil Drucis
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Aneta Borkowska
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Tomasz Świtaj
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paweł Rogala
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Kozak
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Klimczak
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Paulina Jagodzińska-Mucha
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anna Szumera-Ciećkiewicz
- Department of Pathology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Hanna Koseła-Paterczyk
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| | - Piotr Rutkowski
- Department of Soft Tissue/Bone Sarcoma and Melanoma, Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, 02-781 Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Varey AHR, Thompson JF, Howle JR, Lo SN, Ch’ng S, Carlino MS. Has the advent of modern adjuvant systemic therapy for melanoma rendered sentinel node biopsy unnecessary? Eur J Cancer 2023; 186:166-171. [PMID: 37080117 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
The prognostic value of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is well established and SNB was therefore adopted as a requirement for pathological staging of melanomas>1 mm thick in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition. Consequently, a negative SNB status became an eligibility criterion for clinical trials of adjuvant systemic therapy in resected stage IIB/C melanoma. However, since the Keynote 716 trial demonstrated an improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients with Stage IIB/C melanoma, all of whom had SNB staging, some have argued that SNB is no longer required for patients with T3 and T4 primary melanomas. The rationale for omitting SNB is that these patients will be able to access adjuvant immunotherapy regardless of SNB status, avoiding the costs and potential complications of SNB. However, this argument overlooks the prognostic value of knowing a patient's nodal status and the therapeutic benefit of SNB in regional disease control. Based on extrapolation of data from multiple sources, we demonstrate that the risk of regional node-field relapse with SNB and immunotherapy for T3b and T4 melanomas is around 7-9% but is 20-27% without SNB. Similarly, the node-field recurrence rate with SNB alone is around 14% compared to around 40% with no SNB or immunotherapy. Consequently, in the absence of prospective data, we propose that the optimal management of the regional node-field for high-risk T3b and T4 primary melanomas is likely to be achieved by combining SNB and adjuvant immunotherapy for those patients who are suitable, rather than either treatment alone.
Collapse
|
6
|
Rhodin KE, Fimbres DP, Burner DN, Hollander S, O’Connor MH, Beasley GM. Melanoma lymph node metastases - moving beyond quantity in clinical trial design and contemporary practice. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1021057. [PMID: 36411863 PMCID: PMC9675405 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1021057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The presence of lymph node metastases is a well-studied prognostic factor for cutaneous melanoma. Characterization of melanoma lymph node metastases and their association with survival in multiple, large observational studies has led to recognition of the following high-risk features: quantity of lymph node metastases (number of nodes), size of the nodal tumor deposit (in mm), and extracapsular extension. Despite increasing utilization of these features in the design of randomized clinical trials, in addition to their role in contemporary clinical decision-making, current staging systems lag behind, only accounting for the quantity of lymph nodes with metastases. Herein, we review the prognostic role of melanoma lymph node metastases and their high-risk features, current reporting standards, how such features have been utilized in practice-changing trials, and best practices for future clinical trial design and clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen E. Rhodin
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | | | | | - Shayna Hollander
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Margaret H. O’Connor
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Georgia M. Beasley
- Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Torphy RJ, Friedman C, Ho F, Leonard LD, Thieu D, Lewis KD, Medina TM, Robinson WA, Gonzalez RC, Stewart CL, Kounalakis N, McCarter MD, Gleisner A. Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Melanoma Without Immediate Completion Lymph Node Dissection. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:806-815. [PMID: 34537899 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10775-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For patients with stage III melanoma with occult lymph node metastasis, the use of adjuvant therapy is increasing, and completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is decreasing. We sought to evaluate the use of modern adjuvant therapy and outcomes for patients with stage III melanoma who did not undergo CLND. METHODS Patients with a positive SLNB from 2015 to 2020 who did not undergo CLND were evaluated retrospectively. Nodal recurrence, recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and melanoma-specific survival were evaluated. RESULTS Among 90 patients, 56 (62%) received adjuvant therapy and 34 (38%) underwent observation alone. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were younger (mean age: 53 vs. 65, p < 0.001) and had higher overall stage (Stage IIIb/c 75% vs. 54%, p = 0.041). Disease recurred in 12 of 34 patients (35%) in the observation group and 11 of 56 patients (20%) in the adjuvant therapy group. The most common first site of recurrence was distant recurrence alone (5/34 patients) in the observation group and nodal recurrence alone (8/90 patients) in the adjuvant therapy group. Despite more adverse nodal features in the adjuvant therapy group, 24-month nodal recurrence rate and RFS were not significantly different between the adjuvant and observation cohorts (nodal recurrence rate: 26% vs. 20%, p = 0.68; RFS: 75% vs. 61%, p = 0.39). Among patients with stage IIIb/c disease, adjuvant therapy was associated with a significantly improved 24-month DMFS (86% vs. 59%, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS In this early report, modern adjuvant therapy in patients who forego CLND is associated with longer DMFS among patients with stage IIIb/c disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Torphy
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Chloe Friedman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Felix Ho
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Laura D Leonard
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Daniel Thieu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Karl D Lewis
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Theresa M Medina
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - William A Robinson
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Rene C Gonzalez
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Camille L Stewart
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Nicole Kounalakis
- Melanoma Sarcoma Specialists of Georgia, Northside Cancer Institute, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Martin D McCarter
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ana Gleisner
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Farrow NE, Rhodin KE, Beasley GM. Nodal Recurrence as Primary Driver of Early Relapse in Patients with SLN-Positive Melanoma: What Does It Mean for Providers and Patients? Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:3452-3454. [PMID: 33710505 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09806-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|