1
|
Gachabayov M, Lee H, Kajmolli A, Felsenreich DM, Bergamaschi R. Impact of robotic total mesorectal excision upon pathology metrics in overweight males with low rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 836 cases. Updates Surg 2024; 76:505-512. [PMID: 38147292 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-023-01733-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 12/27/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this pooled analysis was to evaluate the impact of robotic total mesorectal excision (TME) on pathology metrics in Male Overweight patients with Low rectal cancer (MOL). This was a multicenter retrospective pooled analysis of data. Two groups were defined: MOL (Male, Overweight, Low rectal cancer) and non-MOL. Overweight was defined as BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2. Low rectal cancer was defined as cancer within 6 cm from the anal verge. The primary endpoints of this study were histopathological metrics, namely circumferential resection margin (CRM) (mm), CRM involvement rate (%), and the quality of TME. Circumferential resection margin (CRM) was involved if < 1 mm. 836 (106 MOL and 730 non-MOL) patients that underwent robotic TME by six surgeons over 3 years were compared. No significant differences in demographics and perioperative variables were found, except for operating time, distal margin, and number of lymph nodes harvested. CRM involvement rate did not significantly differ (7.5% vs. 5.5%, p = 0.395). Mean CRM was statistically significantly narrower in MOL patients (6.6 vs. 7.7 mm, p = 0.04). Quality of TME did not differ. Distance of tumor from the anal verge was the only independent predictor of CRM involvement. Robotic TME may provide optimal pathology metrics in overweight males with low rectal cancer. Although CRM was a few millimeters narrower in MOL, the values were within the range of uninvolved margins making the difference statistically significant, but not clinically. Being MOL was not a risk factor for involvement of circumferential resection margin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahir Gachabayov
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Taylor Pavilion, Suite D-365, 100 Woods Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Hanjoo Lee
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrence, CA, USA
| | - Agon Kajmolli
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Taylor Pavilion, Suite D-365, 100 Woods Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA
| | - Daniel M Felsenreich
- Division of Visceral Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Roberto Bergamaschi
- Section of Colorectal Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Taylor Pavilion, Suite D-365, 100 Woods Road, Valhalla, NY, 10595, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chok AY, Tan IEH, Zhao Y, Chee MYM, Chen HLR, Ang KA, Au MKH, Tan EJKW. Clinical outcomes and cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients over 80 years. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:160. [PMID: 37278975 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04459-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The growth of Singapore's geriatric population, coupled with the rise in colorectal cancer (CRC), has increased the number of colorectal surgeries performed on elderly patients. This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus open elective colorectal resections in elderly CRC patients over 80 years. METHODS A retrospective cohort study using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) identified patients over 80 years undergoing elective colectomy and proctectomy between 2018 and 2021. Patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), 30-day postoperative complications, and mortality rates were analysed. Cost data in Singapore dollars were obtained from the finance database. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to determine cost drivers. The 5-year overall survival (OS) for the entire octogenarian CRC cohort with and without postoperative complications was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS Of the 192 octogenarian CRC patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery between 2018 and 2021, 114 underwent laparoscopic resection (59.4%), while 78 underwent open surgery (40.6%). The proportion of proctectomy cases was similar between laparoscopic and open groups (24.6% vs. 23.1%, P = 0.949). Baseline characteristics, including Charlson Comorbidity Index, albumin level, and tumour staging, were comparable between both groups. Median operative duration was 52.5 min longer in the laparoscopic group (232.5 vs. 180.0 min, P < 0.001). Both groups had no significant differences in postoperative complications and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. Median LOS was 6 days in the laparoscopic group compared to 9 days in the open group (P < 0.001). The mean total cost was 11.7% lower in the laparoscopic group (S$25,583.44 vs. S$28,970.85, P = 0.012). Proctectomy (P = 0.024), postoperative pneumonia (P < 0.001) and urinary tract infection (P < 0.001), and prolonged LOS > 6 days (P < 0.001) were factors contributing to increased costs in the entire cohort. The 5-year OS of octogenarians with minor or major postoperative complications was significantly lower than those without complications (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Laparoscopic resection is associated with significantly reduced overall hospitalization costs and decreased LOS compared to open resection among octogenarian CRC patients, with comparable postoperative outcomes and 30-day and 1-year mortality rates. The extended operative time and higher consumables costs from laparoscopic resection were mitigated by the decrease in other inpatient hospitalization costs, including ward accommodation, daily treatment fees, investigation costs, and rehabilitation expenditures. Comprehensive perioperative care and optimised surgical approach to mitigate the impact of postoperative complications can improve survival in elderly patients undergoing CRC resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Ivan En-Howe Tan
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Yun Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Madeline Yen Min Chee
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | | | - Kwok Ann Ang
- Finance, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, 169608, Singapore
| | - Marianne Kit Har Au
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
- Finance, Singhealth Community Hospitals, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chok AY, Zhao Y, Tan IEH, Au MKH, Tan EJKW. Cost-effectiveness comparison of minimally invasive, robotic and open approaches in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 38:86. [PMID: 36988723 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04361-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study compares the cost-effectiveness of open, laparoscopic (LAP), laparoscopic-assisted (LAPA), hand-assisted laparoscopic (HAL), and robotic colorectal surgery using a network meta-analysis. METHODS Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the cost-effectiveness of comparing the five different approaches in colorectal surgery were included in a literature search until September 2022. Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted, and surface under cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) values, odds ratio (OR), and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were reported for total costs, surgical costs, operating time, length of stay (LOS), and postoperative outcomes. Cluster analysis was performed to examine the similarity and classification of surgical approaches into homogeneous clusters. The cophenetic correlation coefficient (cc) was evaluated to identify the most cost-effective clustering method. The primary outcomes assessed were: costs-morbidity, costs-mortality, and costs-efficacy, measuring total costs against postoperative complications, mortality rate, and LOS, respectively. RESULTS 22 RCTs with 4239 patients were included. Open surgery had the lowest total costs, surgical costs, and operating time but the longest LOS and most postoperative complications. LOS was significantly decreased in LAP compared to open surgery (OR 0.67, 95% CrI 0.46-0.96). Robotic surgery resulted in the highest total costs, surgical costs, and most extended operative duration but the shortest LOS and lowest mortality. LAPA and robotic surgery were superior in the costs-morbidity analysis. HAL was associated with the worst costs-mortality profile. LAP, LAPA, and HAL were better in terms of costs-efficacy. CONCLUSION Overall, LAP and LAPA are the most cost-effective approaches for colorectal surgery in terms of overall postoperative complications, mortality, and LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aik Yong Chok
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, 20 College Road, 169856, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yun Zhao
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, 20 College Road, 169856, Singapore, Singapore
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Ivan En-Howe Tan
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Marianne Kit Har Au
- Group Finance Analytics, Singapore Health Services, Singapore, 168582, Singapore
| | - Emile John Kwong Wei Tan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Academia, 20 College Road, 169856, Singapore, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Farey JE, Hooper T, Alland T, Naylor JM, Kelly TL, Lorimer M, Lewin AM, Rogers M, Law CK, Close J, Graves SE, de Steiger RS, Lewis PL, Adie S, Harris IA. Dual mobility versus conventional total hip arthroplasty in femoral neck fractures (DISTINCT): protocol for a registry-nested, open-label, cluster-randomised crossover trial. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e064478. [PMID: 36130765 PMCID: PMC9494585 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hip fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) are at high risk of prosthesis instability, and dislocation is the most common indication for revision surgery. This study aims to determine whether dual mobility THA implants reduce the risk of dislocation compared with conventional THA in patients with hip fracture suitable to be treated with THA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a cluster-randomised, crossover, open-label trial nested within the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR). The clusters will comprise hospitals that perform at least 12 THAs for hip fracture per annum. All adults age ≥50 years who meet the Australian and New Zealand Hip Fracture Registry guidelines for THA will be included. The intervention will be dual mobility THA and the comparator will be conventional THA. Each hospital will be allocated to two consecutive periods, one of dual mobility THA and the other of conventional THA in random order, aiming for an average of 16 patients eligible for the primary analysis per group (32 total per site), allowing different recruitment totals between sites. Data will be collected through the AOANJRR and linked with patient-level discharge data acquired through government agencies. The primary outcome is dislocation within 1 year. Secondary outcomes include revision surgery for dislocation and all-cause, complications and mortality at 1, 2 and 5 years. If dual mobility THA is found to be superior, a cost-effectiveness analysis will be conducted. The study will aim to recruit 1536 patients from at least 48 hospitals over 3 years. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval has been granted (Sydney Local Health District - Royal Prince Alfred Hospital Zone (approval X20-0162 and 2020/ETH00680) and site-specific approvals). Participant recruitment is via an opt-out consent process as both treatments are considered accepted, standard practice. The trial is endorsed by the Australia and New Zealand Musculoskeletal Clinical Trials Network. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ACTRN12621000069853.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John E Farey
- Institute for Musculoskeletal Health, King George V Building, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tamara Hooper
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Tania Alland
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Justine M Naylor
- DISTINCT Study Group, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Thu-Lan Kelly
- Clinical and Health Sciences Academic Unit, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michelle Lorimer
- South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Adriane M Lewin
- DISTINCT Study Group, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- South West Clinical Campuses, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret Rogers
- University of New South Wales - St George Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chi Kin Law
- Clinical Trials Centre, National Health and Medical Research Council, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Close
- Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
- Neuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Steven E Graves
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Richard S de Steiger
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Epworth Healthcare, University of Melbourne, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter L Lewis
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Sam Adie
- DISTINCT Study Group, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- University of New South Wales - St George Campus, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Ian A Harris
- Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- DISTINCT Study Group, Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Law CK, Stevenson ARL, Solomon M, Hague W, Wilson K, Simes JR, Morton RL. ASO Author Reflections: Is laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery More Costly than Traditional Open Resection for Rectal Cancer Treatment? Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:1935-1936. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11056-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|