Risk Factors for Treatment Discontinuation Caused by Adverse Events When Using Telaprevir, Peginterferon, and Ribavirin to Treat Chronic Hepatitis C: A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study

Direct-Acting Antivirals for Hepatitis C: Predictors of Early Discontinuation in the Real World

BACKGROUND

The treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has evolved over time, and direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have revolutionized HCV therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To (a) assess early treatment discontinuation and (b) identify predictors of early discontinuation in a cohort of patients receiving second-generation DAAs.

METHODS

We identified HCV patients newly prescribed simeprevir/sofosbuvir (SIM/SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir (OPrD), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL), elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) between 2014 and 2017. Early discontinuation was defined as duration of therapy less than 8 weeks. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to evaluate the association of drug regimens and potential predictive factors to early discontinuation.

RESULTS

We identified 26,098 DAA-treated patients: 67.8% with LDV/SOF, 9.9% with OPrD, 8.5% with SIM/SOF, 7.8% with SOF/VEL, 5.2% with EBR/GZR, and 0.8% with GLE/PIB. With approval of new therapies in 2016 and 2017, use of OPrD, LDV/SOF, and SIM/SOF declined substantially. At baseline, there was some heterogeneity of past HCV drug use and comorbidity across groups; patients on SIM/SOF had the highest frequency of previous interferon, cirrhosis, and decompensated cirrhosis. Most HCV patients received therapy for 8-12 weeks; fewer patients went through 16-week and 24-week therapy courses. Early discontinuation rates (95% CI) were 7.1% (6.0-8.2) for SIM/SOF, 3.2% (2.9-3.5) for LDV/SOF, 9.6% (8.5-10.7) for OPrD, 3.1% (2.3-3.8) for SOF/VEL, 4.2% (3.1-5.3) for EBR/GZR, and 2.5% (0.3-4.7) for GLE/PIB. In multivariable analyses, versus OPrD, patients starting other drug regimens were less likely to discontinue therapy early. Early discontinuation was more common in women, patients with baseline anemia, and Medicare and Medicaid patients.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data confirm low rates of early discontinuation in users of second-generation DAAs. Future research focusing on socio-economic and sex/gender issues may help further optimize care for patients with HCV.

DISCLOSURES

This study was funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. Klein has received grants for investigator-initiated trials from ViiV Healthcare, Janssen, Gilead, and Merck, as well as consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare, Merck, and AbbVie. Feld has received research support and/or scientific consulting fees from AbbVie, Contravir, Enanta, Gilead, Janssen, Merck, and Wako. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Results from this study were presented as a poster at the 34th International Conference of Phamacoepidemiology and Therapeutic Risk Management; August 22-26, 2018; Prague, Czech Republic.

Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Triple Therapy With Telaprevir and Boceprevir for Chronic Hepatitis C: A Decision Analysis From the Brazilian Public Health System Perspective

OBJECTIVES

Because of the lack of evidence regarding long-term effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of first-generation direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) treatment in Brazil, we performed a cost-utility analysis comparing standard dual therapy (peginterferon plus ribavirin [pegIFN/RBV]), boceprevir, and telaprevir for CHC patients.

METHODS

We developed a state-transition Markov model simulating the progression of CHC. Long-term outcomes included remaining life expectancy in life-years (LYs), quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Short-term outcomes included sustained virological response rates (SVR). Direct medical costs were obtained from Brazilian databases. A lifelong time horizon was considered and a 5% annual discount rate was applied for costs and clinical outcomes. A willingness-to-pay threshold of approximately $20 000 per QALY was used. We performed multiple sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

For short- and long-term scenarios, therapy with boceprevir was dominated by telaprevir, which was more effective than standard dual therapy (75.0% vs 40.4% SVR rate, 13.47 vs 12.59 LYs, and 9.74 vs 8.49 QALYs, respectively) and was also more expensive ($15 742 vs $5413). The corresponding ICERs were $29 854/SVR, $11 803/LY, and $8277/QALY. Based on our model, triple therapy with telaprevir was the most cost-effective treatment for the Brazilian health system. Despite a lack of data regarding the Brazilian population, we incorporated as many applicable parameters as possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Telaprevir is more effective and cost-effective than boceprevir. Our model may be applied for other settings with a few adjustments in the input parameters.