1
|
Mohammadi A, Bartholmae W, Woisetschläger M. Comparison of multiphase data from CT perfusion vs clinical 4-phase CT scans with respect to image quality, lesion detection, and LI-RADS classification in HCC patients. Heliyon 2022; 8:e08757. [PMID: 35146150 PMCID: PMC8819526 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2021] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess the image quality and diagnostic performance of reconstructed arterial (A) and portal venous (PV) phases in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) scans compared to the corresponding phases in standard 4-phase CT and to assess the utility for LI-RADS classification using CTP and 4-phase 4CT. Methods A total of 26 scans with each method (CTP and 4-phase CT) from 19 hepatocellular carcinoma patients were analyzed and compared. Arterial and PV phases reconstructed by advanced modeled iterative reconstruction at strength 4 (ADMIRE 4) from raw CTP data were compared with image sets from arterial and PV phases of 4-phase CT (ADMIRE 3) in the same patient with respect to image quality. Results Quantitative image analysis showed that reconstructed CTP datasets were equivalent to 4-phase CT image sets. Qualitative image analysis revealed similar lesion detection rates with the 2 methods for patients with an abdominal diameter ≤36 cm and body weight <90 kg, but lower detection rates with CTP for patients with an abdominal diameter >37 cm. There was no difference in Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) classifications between the 2 methods. Conclusion Reconstructed CTP images can potentially replace 4-phase CT images in patients weighing <90 kg and with a body diameter <37 cm, as the 2 methods are comparable in terms of quantitative image quality and ability to detect and classify lesions based on LI-RADS criteria. Reconstructed A- and PV-CTP images have comparable image quality to 4-phase CT. Reconstructed A- and PV-CTP images can be used for LI-RADS classification of HCC. A-/PV-CTP has the potential to reliably detect lesions in patients weighing <90 kg with body diameter ≤36 cm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mohammadi
- Department of Radiology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden
| | - W Bartholmae
- Department of Radiology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - M Woisetschläger
- Department of Radiology, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping, Sweden
- Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Caruso D, Rosati E, Panvini N, Rengo M, Bellini D, Moltoni G, Bracci B, Lucertini E, Zerunian M, Polici M, De Santis D, Iannicelli E, Anibaldi P, Carbone I, Laghi A. Optimization of contrast medium volume for abdominal CT in oncologic patients: prospective comparison between fixed and lean body weight-adapted dosing protocols. Insights Imaging 2021; 12:40. [PMID: 33743100 PMCID: PMC7981367 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-021-00980-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient body size represents the main determinant of parenchymal enhancement and by adjusting the contrast media (CM) dose to patient weight may be a more appropriate approach to avoid a patient over dosage of CM. To compare the performance of fixed-dose and lean body weight (LBW)-adapted contrast media dosing protocols, in terms of image quality and parenchymal enhancement. Results One-hundred cancer patients undergoing multiphasic abdominal CT were prospectively enrolled in this multicentric study and randomly divided in two groups: patients in fixed-dose group (n = 50) received 120 mL of CM while in LBW group (n = 50) the amount of CM was computed according to the patient’s LBW. LBW protocol group received a significantly lower amount of CM (103.47 ± 17.65 mL vs. 120.00 ± 0.00 mL, p < 0.001). Arterial kidney signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and pancreatic CNR were significantly higher in LBW group (all p ≤ 0.004). LBW group provided significantly higher arterial liver, kidney, and pancreatic contrast enhancement index (CEI) and portal venous phase kidney CEI (all p ≤ 0.002). Significantly lower portal vein SNR and CNR were observed in LBW-Group (all p ≤ 0.020). Conclusions LBW-adapted CM administration for abdominal CT reduces the volume of injected CM and improves both image quality and parenchymal enhancement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damiano Caruso
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Elisa Rosati
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicola Panvini
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Marco Rengo
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Davide Bellini
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Giulia Moltoni
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Bracci
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Elena Lucertini
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Marta Zerunian
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Michela Polici
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Domenico De Santis
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Elsa Iannicelli
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Anibaldi
- Hospital Direction and Clinical Departments, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy
| | - Iacopo Carbone
- Diagnostic Imaging Unit, Department of Medico-Surgical Sciences and Biotechnologies, ICOT Hospital, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Via Franco Faggiana, 1668, 04100, Latina, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome - Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Via di Grottarossa, 1035-1039, 00189, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Woisetschläger M, Henriksson L, Bartholomae W, Gasslander T, Björnsson B, Sandström P. Iterative reconstruction algorithm improves the image quality without affecting quantitative measurements of computed tomography perfusion in the upper abdomen. Eur J Radiol Open 2020; 7:100243. [PMID: 32642503 PMCID: PMC7334814 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2020.100243] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Iterative image-reconstruction algorithm (ADMIRE) did not affect the quantitative measurements in CT perfusion. Iterative image-reconstruction algorithm (ADMIRE) did not affect the time attenuation curves in CT perfusion. Image noise was lower, but the SNR was higher, for iterative reconstructions in CT perfusion examinations with higher strength of noise reduction.
Objective To investigate differences between reconstruction algorithms in quantitative perfusion values and time-attenuation curves in computed tomography perfusion (CTP) examinations of the upper abdomen. Methods Twenty-six CTP examinations were reconstructed with filtered back projection and an iterative reconstruction algorithm, advanced modeled iterative reconstruction (ADMIRE), with different levels of noise-reduction strength. Using the maximum-slope model, quantitative measurements were obtained: blood flow (mL/min/100 mL), blood volume (mL/100 mL), time to peak (s), arterial liver perfusion (mL/100 mL/min), portal venous liver perfusion (mL/100 mL/min), hepatic perfusion index (%), temporal maximum intensity projection (Hounsfield units (HU)) and temporal average HU. Time-attenuation curves for seven sites (left liver lobe, right liver lobe, hepatocellular carcinoma, spleen, gastric wall, pancreas, portal vein) were obtained. Mixed-model analysis was used for statistical evaluation. Image noise and the signal:noise ratio (SNR) were compared between four reconstructions, and statistical analysis of these reconstructions was made with a related-samples Friedman’s two-way analysis of variance by ranks test. Results There were no significant differences for quantitative measurements between the four reconstructions for all tissues. There were no significant differences between the AUC values of the time-attenuation curves between the four reconstructions for all tissues, including three automatic measurements (portal vein, aorta, spleen). There was a significant difference in image noise and SNR between the four reconstructions. Conclusions ADMIRE did not affect the quantitative measurements or time-attenuation curves of tissues in the upper abdomen. The image noise was lower, and the SNR higher, for iterative reconstructions with higher noise-reduction strengths.
Collapse
Key Words
- 4D computed tomography
- ADMIRE, advanced modelled iterative reconstruction
- ALP, arterial liver perfusion
- AUC, area under the curve
- Abdomen
- BF, blood flow
- BMI, body mass index
- BV, blood volume
- CTP, computed tomography perfusion
- FBP, filtered back projection
- GFR, glomerular filtration rate
- HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma
- HPI, hepatic perfusion index
- Image reconstruction
- LI-RADS-5, liver imaging reporting and data system
- Liver
- PVP, portal venous liver perfusion
- Perfusion
- Radiation dosage
- SNR, signal to noise ratio
- TAC, time attenuation curve
- TACE, transarterial chemoembolization
- TTP, time to peak
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mischa Woisetschläger
- Department of Radiology in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Lilian Henriksson
- Department of Radiology in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Wolf Bartholomae
- Department of Radiology in Linköping, and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Center for Medical Image Science and Visualization (CMIV), Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Thomas Gasslander
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Surgery in Linköping, and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Badia S, Picchia S, Bellini D, Ferrari R, Caruso D, Paolantonio P, Carbone I, Laghi A, Rengo M. The Role of Contrast-Enhanced Imaging for Colorectal Cancer Management. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s11888-019-00443-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
|
5
|
van den Hoven AF, Braat MNGJA, Prince JF, van Doormaal PJ, van Leeuwen MS, Lam MGEH, van den Bosch MAAJ. Liver CT for vascular mapping during radioembolisation workup: comparison of an early and late arterial phase protocol. Eur Radiol 2016; 27:61-69. [PMID: 27108297 PMCID: PMC5127855 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4343-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2015] [Revised: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 03/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To compare right gastric (RGA) and segment 4 artery (A4) origin detection rates during radioembolisation workup between early and late arterial phase liver CT protocols. Methods 100 consecutive patients who underwent liver CT between May 2012–January 2015 with early or late arterial phase protocol (n = 50 each, 10- vs. 20-s post-threshold delay) were included. RGA/A4 origin detection rates, assessed by two raters, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the hepatic artery relative to the portal vein were compared between the protocols. Results The first–second rater scored the RGA origin as visible in 58–65 % (specific proportion of agreement 82 %, κ = 0.62); A4 origin in 96–89 % (94 %, κ = 0.54). Thirty-six percent of RGA origins not detectable by DSA were identified on CT. Origin detection rates were not significantly different for early/late arterial phases. Mean CNR was higher in the early arterial phase protocol (1.7 vs. 1.2, p < 0.001). Conclusion A 10-s delay arterial phase CT protocol does not significantly improve detection of small intra- and extrahepatic branches. RGA origin detection requires further optimization, whereas A4/MHA origin detection is adequate, with good inter-rater reproducibility. CT remains important for preprocedural planning, because it may reveal arterial anatomy not discernible on DSA. Key Points • An early arterial phase does not significantly improve RGA and A4/MHA origin detection. • RGA origin detection (58–65 %) on CT is still suboptimal. • 36 % of RGA origins undetectable on DSA can be identified on CT. • A4/MHA origin detection (89–96 %) on CT is excellent. • Inter-rater reproducibility is good for RGA and A4/MHA origin detection on CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andor F van den Hoven
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Manon N G J A Braat
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jip F Prince
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Pieter J van Doormaal
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maarten S van Leeuwen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marnix G E H Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice A A J van den Bosch
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhao L, Winklhofer S, Yang Z, Wang K, He W. Optimal Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Percentage in Dual-energy Monochromatic CT Portal Venography. Acad Radiol 2016; 23:337-43. [PMID: 26777591 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Revised: 11/09/2015] [Accepted: 11/09/2015] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES The aim of this article was to study the influence of different adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) percentages on the image quality of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) portal venography in portal hypertension patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS DECT scans of 40 patients with cirrhosis (mean age, 56 years) at the portal venous phase were retrospectively analyzed. Monochromatic images at 60 and 70 keV were reconstructed with four ASIR percentages: 0%, 30%, 50%, and 70%. Computed tomography (CT) numbers of the portal veins (PVs), liver parenchyma, and subcutaneous fat tissue in the abdomen were measured. The standard deviation from the region of interest of the liver parenchyma was interpreted as the objective image noise (IN). The contrast-noise ratio (CNR) between PV and liver parenchyma was calculated. The diagnostic acceptability (DA) and sharpness of PV margins were obtained using a 5-point score. The IN, CNR, DA, and sharpness of PV were compared among the eight groups with different keV + ASIR level combinations. RESULTS The IN, CNR, DA, and sharpness of PV of different keV + ASIR groups were all statistically different (P < 0.05). In the eight groups, the best and worst CNR were obtained in the 60 keV + 70% ASIR and 70 keV + 0% ASIR (filtered back-projection [FBP]) combination, respectively, whereas the largest and smallest objective IN were obtained in the 60 keV + 0% ASIR (FBP) and 70 keV + 70% combination. The highest DA and sharpness values of PV were obtained at 50% ASIR for 60 keV. CONCLUSIONS An optimal ASIR percentage (50%) combined with an appropriate monochromatic energy level (60 keV) provides the highest DA in portal venography imaging, whereas for the higher monochromatic energy (70 keV) images, 30% ASIR provides the highest image quality, with less IN than 60 keV with 50% ASIR.
Collapse
|
7
|
Paolantonio P, Rengo M, Ferrari R, Laghi A. Multidetector CT in emergency radiology: acute and generalized non-traumatic abdominal pain. Br J Radiol 2016; 89:20150859. [PMID: 26689097 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Multidetector CT (MDCT) is an imaging technique that provides otherwise unobtainable information in the diagnostic work-up of patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. A correct working diagnosis depends essentially on understanding the individual patient's clinical data and laboratory findings. In haemodynamically stable patients with acute severe and generalized abdominal pain, MDCT is now the preferred imaging test and gives invaluable diagnostic information, also in unstable patients after stabilization. In this descriptive review, we focus our attention on acute, severe and generalized or undifferentiated non-traumatic abdominal pain. The main differential diagnoses are acute pancreatitis, gastrointestinal perforation, ruptured abdominal aneurysm and acute mesenteric ischaemia. We will provide radiologist readers with a technical guide to optimize MDCT imaging protocols and list the major CT signs essential to reach a correct diagnosis and guide the best treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marco Rengo
- 2 Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza-University Rome, Polo Pontino, ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Riccardo Ferrari
- 3 Department of Emergency Radiology, San Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Laghi
- 2 Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza-University Rome, Polo Pontino, ICOT Hospital, Latina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bendik E, Noël PB, Münzel D, Fingerle AA, Henninger M, Markus C, Vlassenbroek A, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M. Evaluation of a method for improving the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2013; 24:250-5. [PMID: 23996016 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-3006-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2013] [Revised: 07/27/2013] [Accepted: 08/13/2013] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve the detection of liver lesions in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) via an iodine contrast enhancement tool. METHODS Thirty-two patients with clinically proven HCCs underwent imaging with a three-phase protocol on a 256-slice MDCT. The contrast enhancement in the reconstructed slices was improved via a post-processing tool. Mean image noise was measured in four different regions: liver lesion, healthy liver, subcutaneous fat and bone. For each image set the image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were assessed. For subjective image assessment, four experienced radiologists evaluated the diagnostic quality. RESULTS While employing the post-processing algorithm, CNR between the liver lesion and healthy liver tissue improves significantly by a factor of 1.78 (CNRwithout vC = 2.30 ± 1.92/CNRwith vC = 4.11 ± 3.05) (P* = 0.01). All results could be achieved without a strengthening of artefacts; mean HU values of subcutaneous fat and bone did not significantly change. Subjective image analysis illustrated a significant improvement when employing post-processing for clinically relevant criteria such as diagnostic confidence. CONCLUSION With post-processing we see a significantly improved detection of arterial uptake in hepatic lesions compared with non-processed data. The improvement in CNR was confirmed by subjective image assessment for small lesions and for lesions with limited uptake. KEY POINTS • Enhancement with iodine-based contrast agents is an essential part of CT. • A new post-processing tool significantly improves the diagnostics of hepatocellular carcinoma. • It also improves detection of small lesions with limited iodine uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Bendik
- Department of Radiology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany,
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rengo M, Caruso D, De Cecco CN, Lucchesi P, Bellini D, Maceroni MM, Ferrari R, Paolantonio P, Iafrate F, Carbone I, Vecchietti F, Laghi A. High concentration (400mgI/mL) versus low concentration (320mgI/mL) iodinated contrast media in multi detector computed tomography of the liver: A randomized, single centre, non-inferiority study. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81:3096-101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2012] [Revised: 05/16/2012] [Accepted: 05/17/2012] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|