1
|
Altshuler PJ, Pace DJ, Preston WA, Vincent SA, Shah AP, Glorioso JM, Maley WR, Frank AM, Ramirez CB, West S, Hasz R, Bodzin AS. Assessing Kidney Transplantation Using ECMO-Supported Donors Within a KDPI-Based Allocation System. Transplant Direct 2023; 9:e1521. [PMID: 37829245 PMCID: PMC10566806 DOI: 10.1097/txd.0000000000001521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Organ donors supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) have historically been considered high-risk and are judiciously utilized. This study examines transplant outcomes using renal allografts from donors supported on ECMO for nondonation purposes. Methods Retrospective review of the Gift of Life (Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Delaware) organ procurement organization database, cross-referenced to the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database, assessed kidney transplants using donors supported on venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) ECMO for nondonation purposes. Transplants using VA- and VV-ECMO donors were compared with Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI)-stratified non-ECMO donors. Regression modeling of the entire ECMO and non-ECMO populations assessed ECMO as predictive of graft survival. Additional regression of the ECMO population alone assessed for donor features associated with graft survival. Results Seventy-eight ECMO donors yielded 128 kidney transplants (VA: 80, VV: 48). Comparing outcomes using these donors to kidney transplants using organs from KDPI-stratified non-ECMO donors, VA- and VV-ECMO donor grafts conferred similar rates of delayed graft function and posttransplant renal function to KDPI-matched non-ECMO counterparts. VA-ECMO kidneys demonstrated superior graft survival compared with the lowest-quality (KDPI 86%-100%) non-ECMO kidneys and similar graft survival to KDPI <85% non-ECMO kidneys. VV-ECMO showed inferior graft survival to all but the lowest-quality (KDPI 86%-100%) non-ECMO kidneys. VV-ECMO, but not VA-ECMO, was associated with increased risk of graft loss on multivariable regression (hazard ratios-VA: 1.02, VV: 2.18). Higher KDPI, advanced age, increased body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes were identified as high-risk features of ECMO donors. Conclusions Kidney transplantation using appropriately selected ECMO donors can safely expand the donor pool. Ongoing studies are necessary to determine best practice patterns using kidneys from these donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Devon J. Pace
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Sage A. Vincent
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ashesh P. Shah
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jaime M. Glorioso
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Warren R. Maley
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Adam M. Frank
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Carlo B. Ramirez
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Sharon West
- Gift of Life Donor Program, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Adam S. Bodzin
- Department of Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Reid TD, Kratzke I, Dayal D, Raff L, Serrano P, Kumar A, Boddie O, Zendel A, Gallaher J, Carlson R, Boone J, Charles AG, Desai CS. The role of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in adult kidney transplant patients: A qualitative systematic review of literature. Artif Organs 2023; 47:24-37. [PMID: 35986612 DOI: 10.1111/aor.14376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A paucity of evidence exists regarding the risks and benefits of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in adult kidney transplantation. METHODS This was a systematic review conducted from Jan 1, 2000 to April 24, 2020 of adult kidney transplant recipients (pre- or post- transplant) and donors who underwent veno-arterial or veno-venous ECMO cannulation. Death and graft function were the primary outcomes, with complications as secondary outcomes. RESULTS Twenty-three articles were identified that fit inclusion criteria. 461 donors were placed on ECMO, with an overall recipient 12-month mortality rate of 1.3% and a complication rate of 61.5%, the majority of which was delayed graft function. Fourteen recipients were placed on ECMO intraoperatively or postoperatively, with infection as the most common indication for ECMO. The 90-day mortality rate for recipients on ECMO was 42.9%, with multisystem organ failure and infection as the ubiquitous causes of death. 35.7% of patients experienced rejection within 6 months of decannulation, yet all were successfully treated. CONCLUSIONS ECMO use in adult kidney transplantation is a useful adjunct. Recipient morbidity and mortality from donors placed on ECMO mirrors that of recipients from standard criteria donors. The morbidity and mortality of recipients placed on ECMO are also similar to other patient populations requiring ECMO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trista D Reid
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ian Kratzke
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Diana Dayal
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Lauren Raff
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Pablo Serrano
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Transplant Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Aman Kumar
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Transplant Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Olivia Boddie
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alex Zendel
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Transplant Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jared Gallaher
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Rebecca Carlson
- Health Sciences Library, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Joshua Boone
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anthony G Charles
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Chirag S Desai
- Department of Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Transplant Surgery, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|