Ligament augmentation reconstruction system artificial ligaments in patellar tendon reconstruction - a chronic patellar tendon rupture after multiple operations: A case report

Clinical Outcomes are Similar Between Graft Types Used in Chronic Patellar Tendon Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To compare clinical outcomes between graft types and techniques used to repair chronic patellar tendon injuries to help surgeons make evidence-based decisions.

Methods

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane libraries were searched through January 2021, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were surgical treatment of chronic patellar tendon injury (defined as >6 weeks old), article available in English, and human subjects, minimum 1-year follow-up, and level of evidence I-IV. Studies describing chronic patellar tendon ruptures in the setting of total knee arthroplasty were excluded. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tools for case reports and case series.

Results

A total of 642 studies were identified through the initial search with 9 studies meeting all inclusion criteria. All studies included were case series encompassing 96 patients with follow-up ranging from 21 months to 7.2 years. Reconstruction techniques included the use of semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendon(s), Achilles tendon, bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB), or direct repair. The most common graft choice was semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendon(s). Each reconstruction method yielded improvement in respect to range of motion (ROM), extensor lag, quadriceps strength, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Commonly reported complications were pain and numbness with only one reported instance of graft failure.

Conclusions

In this study, we found that all reconstructive methods described in the literature can produce satisfactory outcomes with improved function, strength, and minimal complications after chronic patellar tendon ruptures. Because of study heterogeneity and low levels of evidence, consensus cannot be reached on a single superior reconstruction method.

Level of Evidence

Level IV, systematic review of level IV studies.

Clinical Outcomes of Cannulated Screws versus Ring Pin versus K-Wire with Tension Band Fixation Techniques in the Treatment of Transverse Patellar Fractures: A Case-Control Study with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up

Purpose. K-wire with tension band (KTB) technique has long been the primary surgical method for transverse patella fractures; however, it also has shortcomings. This study is aimed at evaluating the three different techniques to see whether the cannulated screw tension band (CSTB) or ring pin tension band (RPTB) techniques could decrease complications and achieve better knee function compared with KTB. Methods. We conducted a retrospective comparison of the KTB, CSTB, and RPTB fixation techniques. We selected and reviewed 90 patients (30 patients in each fixation group) with follow-up at least 2 years. Duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, mean healing time, visual analog scale score, range of motion, Böstman score, Iowa knee score, modified Lysholm rating scale, and postoperative complications were compared. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify the independent risk factors for fracture healing time, postoperative complications, and knee function recovery. Results. After adjusting for confounding factors, multivariate regression analysis revealed that CSTB was 0.26 times (95% CI: 0.08-0.86, $p=0.027$ ) less likely to prolong fracture healing time, 0.20 times (95% CI: 0.06-0.64, $p=0.007$ ) lesser risk of postoperative complications, and more than four times (95% CI: 1.41-13.56, $p=0.011$ ) as likely to improve the knee function score compared with KTB. Besides, RPTB were also superior to KTB in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.64, $p=0.006$ ) and improved knee function score (OR: 3.96, 95% CI: 1.30-12.08, $p=0.016$ ); however, the CSTB group being more superior. In addition, AO/OTA C2 fractures (OR, odds ratio: 10.68, 95% CI: 1.30-87.70, $p=0.027$ ) and high-energy fracture (OR: 8.78, 95% CI: 1.57-49.17, $p=0.013$ ) were also associated with prolonged fracture healing time but not with postoperative complications and knee function. No significant differences in related indicators such as gender, age, BMI, AO/OTA classification, fracture side, injury mechanism, duration of operation, and intraoperative blood loss were detected among the three groups. Conclusion. This study demonstrated that the CSTB technique is superior to KTB and RPTB techniques in reducing the incidence of postoperative complications, and it also has advantages in accelerating fracture healing, achieving better VAS, ROM, and functional recovery. Further long-term large-sized prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the KTB in treating transverse patellar fractures.

Complication after the reconstruction of the old patellar tendon rupture

Introduction. Chronic patellar tendon rupture (PTR) occurs rarely; its frequency and prevalence are unknown. There are very little data on the late patellar tendon reconstruction in rheumatoid arthritis and its complications. Case report. We presented a surgical repair of a PTR with early postoperative rupture of the contralateral patellar tendon for a 21-year-old woman with a past medical history of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (treated with corticosteroids) who sustained initial injury 11 months prior to the presentation. The contralateral side was used for autograft harvesting. We used bone-tendon-bone (BTB) autograft and allografts followed by double-wire loop reinforcement and immediate postoperative mobilization. The patient was followed for 2 years, and the function of both knees was re-stored completely, with a full active range of motion. In this case, reconstruction of an 11-month-old chronic PTR (with complete resorption of the tendon and completely separated infrapatellar pads, complicated by the contralateral PTR) with BTB autograft and allografts and double wire loop reinforcement gave an excellent functional result. Two years after the surgical treatment, the extensor function of both knees was completely restored with a full range of movements. The patient reported satisfying outcomes and was able to return to all pre-injury activities without the assistance of orthopedic devices. Conclusion. This case report highlights the importance of the early diagnosis and describes operative techniques used in chronic PTR repair and treatments of the early postoperative complications such as rupture of the contralateral tendon.