Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation

Exploring medical students' perceptions of individual and group-based clinical reasoning with virtual patients: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Virtual Patients are computer-based simulations used to teach and evaluate patient interviews, medical diagnoses, and treatment of medical conditions. It helps develop clinical reasoning skills, especially in undergraduate medical education. This study aimed to and investigate the medical students' perceptions of individual and group-based clinical reasoning and decision-making processes by using Virtual Patients.

METHODS

The study group comprised 24 third-year medical students. Body Interact® software was utilized as a VP tool. The students' readiness and the courses' learning goals were considered when choosing the scenarios. Semi-structured interview forms were employed for data collection. MAXQDA 2020 qualitative analysis software was used to analyze the data. The students' written answers were analyzed using content analysis.

RESULTS

The participants perceived individual applications as beneficial when making clinical decisions with Virtual Patients, but they suggested that group-based applications used with the same cases immediately following individual applications were a more appropriate decision-making method. The results indicated that students learn to make decisions through trial and error, based on software scoring priorities, or using clinical reasoning protocols.

CONCLUSION

In group-based reasoning, the discussion-conciliation technique is utilized. The students stated that the individual decision-making was advantageous because it provided students with the freedom to make choices and the opportunity for self-evaluation. On the other hand, they stated that the group based decision-making process activated their prior knowledge, assisted in understanding misconceptions, and promoted information retention. Medical educators need to determine the most appropriate method when using Virtual Patients, which can be structured as individual and/or group applications depending on the competency sought.

Improving Academic Performance in Medical Students Using Immersive Virtual Patient Simulation: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether immersive virtual patient simulation (IVPS) on the MedicActiv platform is influential in improving student academic performance in module validation tests.

DESIGN

In this prospective randomized controlled study a comparison was made between IVPS training combined with regular faculty courses versus courses alone. The primary endpoint was module validation grades. Secondary endpoints were satisfaction scores (overall interest, ergonomics, realism, immersion, and training efficiency).

SETTING

Angers School of Medicine, France.

PARTICIPANTS

2018 to 2019 class of fourth-year students, included on a voluntary basis. In the first semester 51 students were included, of whom 13 were excluded for lack of compliance (6 and 7 from the IVPS and control groups, respectively). In the second semester we included 57 students, of whom 10 were excluded for lack of compliance (2 and 8 from the IVPS and control groups, respectively).

RESULTS

Mean age was 21 years (±0.8). There were 85 female and 23 male students. In the first semester mean grades were 13.4 ± 1.6 versus 11/.9 ± 2.4 in the IVPS and control groups, respectively (p = 0.038). In the second semester mean grades were 15.3 ± 2.5 versus 11.9 ± 3.6 in the IVPS and control groups, respectively p < 0.001. The entire study population was pooled (n = 85): mean grades were 14.5 ± 2.4 versus 11.9 ± 3 in the IVPS group and the control group, respectively, p < 0.001. The satisfaction questionnaire response rate was 54% (46/85). Score percentages ≥4 regarding overall interest, ergonomics, realism, immersion and training efficiency were 89%, 85%, 100%, 93%, and 93% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Complementing conventional university education with simulation of virtual consultation cases on the MedicActiv platform improved student academic performance as compared with students studying regular courses. Students reported high levels of satisfaction with overall interest, ergonomics, realism, immersion and training efficiency on the MedicActiv platform.