Critical review of multidisciplinary approaches for managing sinonasal tumors with orbital involvement

Choice of surgery in intestinal-type adenocarcinoma of the sinonasal tract: a long-term comparative study

PURPOSE

Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare sinonasal malignancy. Curative treatment requires multidisciplinary approach, with surgical options consist of the endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA) and external surgery (EXTS). Here, we provide the post-operative and survival results from a single-center long-term follow-up.

METHODS

We report long-term follow-up of 92 ITAC cases treated between 1998 and 2018, treated with EEA (n = 40) or EXTS (n = 52). Survival estimates, post-operative complications and duration of hospitalization were compared between surgical modalities.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar. A higher number of T4b tumors (16%), and subsequently more tumoral invasion (39%), was present in patients undergoing EXTS compared to EEA (3% and 18%, respectively). No difference in Barnes histology subtypes was noticed. Patients undergoing EEA had a shorter post-operative hospitalization stay versus EXTS (4 versus 7 days). Use of EEA was associated to improved disease-specific survival (DSS; 11.4 versus 4.4 years; HREEA = 0.53), especially for patients with T3-4a tumors (11.4 versus 3.0 years; HREEA = 0.41). Patients with T3-4 stage, tumoral invasion, positive surgical margins, mucinous or mixed histology, and prolonged post-operative hospital stay showed poor local relapse-free, disease-free, overall, and DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term follow-up in locally advanced ITAC demonstrates that resection by EEA is correlated with improved DSS compared to EXTS, especially for T3-4 tumors. No significant differences between both treatment modalities was observed regarding per- and post-operative complications, although hospitalization in patients undergoing EEA was shorter than for patients treated with EXTS. These results confirm that EEA should remain the preferred surgical procedure in operable cases of sinonasal ITAC.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for organ preservation in sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of induction chemotherapy (IC) in the treatment of locoregionally advanced sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC).

METHODS

130 patients who accepted IC between 2010 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. After IC, all the patients underwent chemoradiotherapy (CRT)/ radiotherapy (RT) or CRT/RT followed by surgery. We investigated the objective response to IC, the optimal treatment strategy, organ preservation, and long-term survival.

RESULTS

 Eighty-seven patients (66.9%) achieved a partial response after IC. 86% (27/43) of the patients who did not respond to the IC still presented a sensitive response to radiotherapy (χ2 = 9.26, p = 0.005). Patients who respond to IC could benefit from CRT/RT followed by surgery over other treatment modalities. The 3-year overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional-free survival (LRFS), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rates of 61.2%, 51.3%, 52.1%, 58.1% for the IC response group were significantly superior to those of 37.3% (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.34-1.01, p = 0.030), 33.5% (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30-0.82, p = 0.002), 35.9% (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.91, p = 0.009), 36.1% (HR = 0.60, 95% CI 0.35-1.03, p = 0.040) for the IC non-response group. Patients who responded to IC had a high rate of organ preservation compared with patients who did not respond to IC (90.8% vs. 74.4%, χ2 = 6.19, p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrated a response rate to IC in patients with advanced SNSCC; furthermore, the response to IC indicated better survival. Patients who responded to IC had a high rate of organ preservation.

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach to Intraconal Orbital Tumors: Outcomes and Lessons Learned

BACKGROUND

Lesions involving the intraconal space of the orbit are rare and challenging to manage. Operative techniques and outcomes for the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) to tumors in the medial intraconal space (MIS) remain poorly characterized.

OBJECTIVE

We present our experience with a wide range of isolated intraconal pathology managed via an EEA.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all cases (2014-2021) performed by a single skull base team in which the EEA was employed for the management of an intraconal orbital lesion.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (13 men, 7 women) with a mean age of 59 years (range, 40-89 years) were included. All lesions were isolated to the MIS, pathology addressed included: cavernous hemangioma (6), schwannoma (4), lymphoma (4), inflammatory pseudotumor (2), chronic invasive fungal sinusitis (2), and metastatic disease (2). Either a biopsy (10/20) or a complete resection (10/20) was performed. In all cases, the MIS was accessed via an endonasal corridor between the medial and inferior rectus muscles. Retraction and safe, intra-orbital dissection of the lesion was performed using a two-surgeon, multi-handed technique. Gross total resection of benign lesions was achieved in 90% (9/10) of cases; a pathologic diagnosis was achieved in 100% (10/10) of biopsy cases. No orbital reconstruction was required. Visual acuity returned to normal in 80% (8/10) of planned resection cases and postoperative diplopia resolved by 3 months in 90%. Mean follow-up was 15 months.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the EEA is safe and effective for accessing lesions in the MIS. This technique affords very favorable outcomes with minimal postoperative morbidity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 134:47-55, 2024.

Diagnostic performance of MRI for the assessment of extraocular muscle invasion in malignant sinonasal tumors

PURPOSE

Preoperative assessment of extraocular muscle invasion is essential for therapeutic strategies and prognostic evaluation. The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for evaluation of extraocular muscle (EM) invasion by malignant sinonasal tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutively, 76 patients of sinonasal malignant tumors with orbital invasion were included in the present study. Preoperative MRI imaging features were analyzed by two radiologists independently. The diagnostic performances of MR imaging features for detecting EM involvement were evaluated by comparing imaging findings to histopathology data.

RESULTS

A total of 31 extraocular muscles were involved by sinonasal malignant tumors in 22 patients, including 10 medial rectus muscles (32.2%), 10 inferior rectus muscles (32.2%), 9 superior oblique muscles (29.1%), and 2 external rectus muscles (6.5%). The EM involved by sinonasal malignant tumors usually showed relatively high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, indistinguishable from the tumor, nodular enlargement and abnormal enhancement (p = 0.001, < 0.001, < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Using a combination of EM abnormal enhancement and indistinguishable from the tumor in multivariate logistic regression analysis, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy for detecting orbital EM invasion by sinonasal tumors were 93.5, 85.2, 76.3, 96.3 and 88%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

MRI imaging features show high diagnostic performance for the diagnosis of extraocular muscle invasion by malignant sinonasal tumors.

Treatment of Skull Base Diseases: A Multidisciplinary Challenge

The skull base has always been regarded as a frontier by surgeons and radiation oncologists since it represents the interface between the intracranial and the extracranial compartment and hosts several critical anatomical structures with an extremely complex and close relationship [...].

Clinical considerations for open versus endoscopic approaches in skull base surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We aim to distill the current body of evidence to consider when selecting an endoscopic versus open approach to address cranial base disease. We evaluate the evolution of modern surgical techniques and their respective limitations.

RECENT FINDINGS

Greater understanding of the role of tumor biology in relation to patient outcomes has led to increasingly sophisticated treatment algorithms. This combined with further development of advanced instrumentation and technique has led to the adoption of new surgical corridors previously unapproachable via traditional surgery.

SUMMARY

Endoscopic and open craniofacial approaches both remain important surgical techniques in the management of cranial base tumors. The modern skull base surgeon may employ a combination of approaches to optimize tumor extirpation while preserving functional outcomes. Patient history, anatomic tumor extent, histology, and functional goals should be considered thoroughly when planning any surgical intervention.

The Selective Role of Open and Endoscopic Approaches for Sinonasal Malignant Tumours

Endoscopic endonasal surgery has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of selected cases of sinonasal cancers. However, in cases of locally advanced neoplasms, as well as recurrences, the most appropriate approach is still debated. The present review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge on the utility of open approaches to resect sinonasal malignant tumours. Published comparative studies and meta-analyses suggest comparable oncological results with lower morbidity for the endoscopic approaches, but selection biases cannot be excluded. After a critical analysis of the available literature, it can be concluded that endoscopic surgery for selected lesions allows for oncologically safe resections with decreased morbidity. However, when endoscopic endonasal surgery is contraindicated and definitive chemoradiotherapy is not appropriate, craniofacial and transfacial approaches remain the best therapeutic option.

Quality of life in sinonasal tumors: an up-to-date review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the impact of benign and malignant sinonasal tumors and their management on patients' Quality of Life (QOL) as measured by Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS).

RECENT FINDINGS

Although there is a growing consensus that endoscopic surgical management in carefully selected patients with sinonasal tumors is at least as (and probably more) effective than open resection, it is not clear to what extent this translates to better QOL outcomes. Earlier studies reported better outcomes in the emotional and physical function domains after endoscopic resection, and it seems that postsurgical morbidity is less in endoscopic compared to open approaches. QoL after endoscopic surgery for sinonasal and anterior skull base tumors seems to improve within several months of surgery in both benign and malignant tumor groups. However, patients with benign sinonasal tumors have a higher QOL pre and post operatively compared to those with malignancy mainly due to absence of (neo) - adjuvant radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy. Factors that seem to be associated with worse QoL include > 60 years, less than 6 months from surgery, prior and adjuvant chemo and radiotherapy, smoking history, advanced staging and malignancy.

SUMMARY

There is not a universally accepted PROM for use in patients with sinonasal benign and malignant tumors: A variety of different PROMs have been used with different degrees of effectiveness. Most likely a combination of disease-specific (such as SNOT 22 and anterior skull base questionnaire) and generic (such as Short Form health survey questionnaire (SF-36) and Karnofsky Performance Status) health outcome measures provide the most insight into QOL of patients with sinonasal tumors. QOL of these patients appears to undergo a bimodal impact with patients experiencing an initial dip in QOL after surgical treatment followed by a slow improvement over time. However, while patients with benign tumors' return to their status quo ante QOL, this is not the case for patients with malignant tumors who stabilize at a lower than initially QOL. To a large extent this seems to be the effect of (neo) adjuvant chemo radiotherapy.

Mismatch Repair Deficiency and Somatic Mutations in Human Sinonasal Tumors

Simple Summary

Sinonasal carcinomas are rare tumors with an overall poor prognosis. Due to limitations in local therapeutic approaches, systemic neo-adjuvant or adjuvant therapies are becoming increasingly important in order to improve patient outcome. This study aimed to examine potentially therapeutic targetable molecular alterations in different sinonasal tumors, including deficiency in mismatch repair proteins and microsatellite instability as well as driver mutations. According to our results, immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and sequencing-based panel analysis should be integrated into the diagnostics of clinically aggressive inverted sinonasal papilloma (ISP) and sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) in order to enable the therapeutic possibility of a targeted therapy.

Abstract

Due to limitations in local therapy approaches for sinonasal tumors, improvement in systemic therapies plays a pivotal role for prolongation of the patient’s survival. The aim of this study was to examine potential biomarkers, including deficiency in mismatch repair proteins (dMMR)/microsatellite instability (MSI-H) in sinonasal cancers and their precancerous lesions. A comprehensive analysis of 10 sinonasal cancer cell lines by whole exome sequencing, screening 174 sinonasal tumors by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for mismatch repair deficiency and next generation sequencing (NGS) of 136 tumor samples revealed a dMMR/MSI-H sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) cell line based on a somatic missense mutation in MLH1 and an overall frequency of dMMR/MSI-H SNSCC of 3.2% (4/125). Targetable EGFR mutations were found in 89.3% (25/28) of inverted sinonasal papilloma (ISP) and in 60% (6/10) of ISP-associated carcinomas. While PIK3CA and EGFR mutations were not mutually exclusive, KRAS mutated tumors were an EGFR-wildtype. The effect of potential driver mutations in FGFR2, FGFR3, BRAF, HRAS, MAP2K1, PTEN, NOTCH1 and CARD11 need further investigation. Our results suggest that biomarker testing, including MMR-IHC and NGS panel analysis, should be integrated into the diagnostics of clinically aggressive ISPs and SNSCC to assess prognosis and facilitate therapeutic decisions.

Management of sinonasal cancers: Survey of UK practice and literature overview

INTRODUCTION

Sinonasal malignancy is a rare and heterogenous disease, with limited evidence to guide management. This report summarises the findings of a UK survey and expert workshop discussion which took place to inform design of a proposed UK trial to assess proton beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

METHOD

A multidisciplinary working group constructed an online survey to assess current approaches within the UK to surgical and non-surgical practice. Head and neck clinical oncologists, ear nose and throat (ENT) and oral-maxillofacial (OMF) surgeons were invited to participate in the 42-question survey in September 2020. The Royal College of Radiologists Consensus model was adopted in establishing categories to indicate strength of response. An expert panel conducted a virtual workshop in November 2020 to discuss areas of disagreement.

RESULTS

A survey was sent to 140 UK-based clinicians with 63 responses (45% response rate) from 30 centres, representing a broad geographical spread. Participants comprised 35 clinical oncologists (56%) and 29 surgeons (44%; 20 ENT and 9 OMF surgeons). There were variations in preferred sequence and combination of treatment modalities for locally advanced maxillary squamous cell carcinoma and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma. There was discordant surgical management of the orbit, dura, and neck. There was lack of consensus for radiotherapy in post-operative dose fractionation, target volume delineation, use of multiple dose levels and treatment planning approach to organs-at-risk.

CONCLUSION

There was wide variation across UK centres in the management of sinonasal carcinomas. There is need to standardise UK practice and develop an evidence base for treatment.