The Prediction of Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-analysis of Serum Uric Acid

Association of serum uric acid with prognosis in patients with myocardial infarction: an update systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The prognostic significance of serum uric acid (SUA) in individuals who have experienced myocardial infarction (MI) remains a subject of academic debate. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine the occurrence of immediate and long-term adverse outcomes in individuals with elevated levels of uric acid (UA) following a diagnosis of MI.

METHOD

This study conducted a literature search from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane Library, Emcrae, and Scopus to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic impact of MI with a hyper SUA to assess short-term (30-day or in-hospital) and long-term mortality, the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and its adverse event rate in relation to SUA. The literature search was conducted up until April 2023. A random effects model and risk ratio (RR) were used as epidemiological indicators. For indicators with low disease rates, treatment intensity was reduced and RR was considered equivalent to odds ratio (OR). Hazard Ratio (HR), RR, and OR extracted from the data were simultaneously subjected to multivariable adjustment for confounding factors. In addition, P values for all original hypotheses were extracted and a meta-analysis was conducted. High SUA was defined as SUA levels equal to or greater than 420 μmol/L (7.0 mg/dL) for males and equal to or greater than 357 μmol/L (6.0 mg/dL) for females. The quality of the literature was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).

RESULTS

This comprehensive study included a total of 41 investigations, involving a large sample size of 225,600 individuals who had experienced MI. The findings from the meta-analysis reveal that patients diagnosed with hyperuricemia have significantly increased rates of short-term mortality (RR = 2.14, 95% CI = 1.86, 2.48) and short-term incidence of MACE (RR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.65-2.11). Furthermore, long-term adverse outcomes, including all-cause mortality (RR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.40-1.51) and incidence of MACE (RR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.35-1.52), were also found to be higher in this specific patient population.

CONCLUSION

Patients diagnosed with MI and elevated SUA levels exhibit a heightened incidence of MACE during their hospital stay. Furthermore, these individuals also experience elevated rates of in-hospital mortality and mortality within one year of hospitalization. However, it is important to note that further randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate and authenticate these findings.

From Classic to Modern Prognostic Biomarkers in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction

Despite all the important advances in its diagnosis and treatment, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is still one of the most prominent causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early identification of patients at high risk of poor outcomes through the measurement of various biomarker concentrations might contribute to more accurate risk stratification and help to guide more individualized therapeutic strategies, thus improving prognoses. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the role and applications of cardiac biomarkers in risk stratification and prognostic assessment for patients with myocardial infarction. Although there is no ideal biomarker that can provide prognostic information for risk assessment in patients with AMI, the results obtained in recent years are promising. Several novel biomarkers related to the pathophysiological processes found in patients with myocardial infarction, such as inflammation, neurohormonal activation, myocardial stress, myocardial necrosis, cardiac remodeling and vasoactive processes, have been identified; they may bring additional value for AMI prognosis when included in multi-biomarker strategies. Furthermore, the use of artificial intelligence algorithms for risk stratification and prognostic assessment in these patients may have an extremely important role in improving outcomes.

Elevated serum uric acid is associated with incident hypertension in the health according to various contemporary blood pressure guidelines

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Elevated serum uric acid (SUA) is associated with hypertension according to its traditional definition. We investigated the association between SUA and incident hypertension according to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and American Society of Cardiology (ACC) guidelines.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 10,537 healthy individuals ≥30 years old who underwent a routine annual health examination with office blood pressure recorded at our hospital in 2016; of the participants, 7349 repeated the exam in 2017. According to the ESC and ACC guidelines, hypertension was defined as office BP ≥ 140/90 mmHg or ≥130/80 mmHg. Hyperuricemia (HUA) was defined as SUA ≥7 mg/dL in men and ≥6 mg/dL in women. The hypertension incidence was 5.8% among 6378 individuals in the ESC cohort and 19% among 4330 individuals in the ACC cohort. Incident hypertension was significantly more common in the hyperuricemic group than in the normouricemic group (ESC: 8.6% vs. 4.7%, P < 0.001; ACC: 25.5% vs. 16.9%, P < 0.001). In the fully adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses, each increase in SUA was associated with an increase in incident hypertension risk (ESC: adjusted OR: 1.167, 95% CI: 1.061-1.284, P = 0.001; ACC: adjusted OR: 1.125, 95% CI: 1.044-1.213, P = 0.002). The association can be explained by a significant correlation of baseline SUA with the BP in the following year (r = 0.24, P < 0.001 for baseline SUA and SBP in the following year; r = 0.239, P < 0.001 for baseline SUA and DBP in the following year).

CONCLUSION

Elevated SUA was associated with incident hypertension in healthy individuals according to various contemporary BP guidelines (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03473951).

CLINICAL TRIALS

ClinicalTrials.gov with the identification number of NCT03473951.