The importance of clinically and ethically fine-tuning decision-making about cesarean delivery

An ethical framework for counseling about mode of delivery for desired psychosocial benefit in pregnancies complicated by severe fetal anomalies

Background

A fetal diagnosis poses ethical challenges when a woman requests elective cesarean delivery for psychosocial reasons. We address the ethical challenges of counseling such patients.

Case presentation

A 36-year-old G4P2012 has chosen to continue a pregnancy despite a high likelihood of trisomy 18. At 36.5 weeks she was admitted for preeclampsia with severe features and requested to be delivered by primary cesarean section. Due to the poor prognosis associated with trisomy 18, the patient’s request for cesarean delivery was declined even when her baby changed to breech presentation with Category 2 fetal heart rate (FHT). The patient subsequently experienced a traumatic stillbirth and post-traumatic shock disorder (PTSD).

Conclusion

The obstetrician’s goal should be to transform the patient’s request into an informed decision. The obstetrician should explain that, while a cesarean could increase the likelihood of a live birth, it will not alter long-term neonatal outcomes and entails net biomedical risk for the current and future pregnancies. The obstetrician should ensure that the patient understands these clinical realities. The obstetrician should support the patient’s decision-making about whether to accept the risks of cesarean delivery for psychosocial benefit. The obstetrician should initiate counseling during prenatal visits to empower the patient with information to meaningfully exercise her autonomy. If the patient makes an informed decision for cesarean delivery, it becomes ethically permissible. Plans regarding intrapartum management and mode of delivery should be documented in case the patient is delivered by a physician who was not involved in prenatal counseling.

Time trends in births and cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities

BACKGROUND

Although it is likely that childbearing among women with disabilities is increasing, no empirical data have been published on changes over time in the numbers of women with disabilities giving birth. Further, while it is known that women with disabilities are at increased risk of cesarean delivery, temporal trends in cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities have not been examined.

OBJECTIVE

To assess time trends in births by any mode and in primary cesarean deliveries among women with physical, sensory, or intellectual/developmental disabilities.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked vital records and hospital discharge data from all deliveries in California, 2000-2010 (n = 4,605,061). We identified women with potential disabilities using ICD-9 codes. We used descriptive statistics and visualizations to examine time patterns. Logistic regression analyses assessed the association between disability and primary cesarean delivery, stratified by year.

RESULTS

Among all women giving birth, the proportion with a disability increased from 0.27% in 2000 to 0.80% in 2010. Women with disabilities had significantly elevated odds of primary cesarean delivery in each year, but the magnitude of the odds ratio decreased over time from 2.60 (95% CI = 2.25 = 2.99) in 2000 to 1.66 (95% CI = 1.51-1.81) in 2010.

CONCLUSION

Adequate clinician training is needed to address the perinatal care needs of the increasing numbers of women with disabilities giving birth. Continued efforts to understand cesarean delivery patterns and reasons for cesarean deliveries may help guide further reductions in proportions of cesarean deliveries among women with disabilities relative to women without disabilities.