An Intervention to Improve Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing Among Adolescents in Primary Care

A retrospective review of the rate of sexually transmitted infections in adolescents after universal screening protocol implementation in an urban United States clinic

Objective

Despite expanded guidelines, adolescent gonorrhea and chlamydia (GC/CT) screening rates remain low due to multiple psychosocial barriers and biases. This intervention aimed to improve screening and diagnosis rates at adolescent well visits by establishing a streamlined universal screening protocol for all patients ages 13-18 years old.

Methods

A universal sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening approach was introduced at an urban clinic affiliated with an academic medical center near Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (PA) in September 2018 for all adolescent well-visits. GC/CT screening and diagnosis rates were compared two years prior to and two years after implementation, deemed the baseline and intervention groups, respectively.

Results

In total, 1,168 encounters were included for analysis. The patient cohort consisted of 47% females, with an average age of 15, and were predominantly publicly insured (79%). STI screening rates increased significantly from 16.7% (89/534) to 83.6% (530/634) of adolescents with implementation of the universal screening protocol. Furthermore, there was a 1.6-fold increase in total positive cases detected after implementation of ok universal screening.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates improved adolescent GC/CT capture rates by establishing a universal screening protocol and highlights a streamlined means of implementation in virtually any pediatric clinic. Limitations include sample size, as this is a single academic practice, as well as any issues with lab collection and results reporting.

Survey of Adolescents' and Emerging Adults' Preferences for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia Testing in Primary Care

ABSTRACT

Our study assessed adolescents' and emerging adults' (ages 14-24 years) preferences for opt-out gonorrhea and chlamydia screening compared with risk-based screening. Most participants (93%) preferred opt-out gonorrhea and chlamydia testing compared with risk-based testing (6%), and opt-out testing was associated with less sexually transmitted infection-related stigma ( P < 0.05).

Closing the Equity Gap: An Intervention to Improve Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing for Adolescents and Young Adults in Primary Care

BACKGROUND

Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea are the most reported sexually transmitted infections in the United States. Testing rates remain suboptimal and may be subject to implicit bias. We evaluated the effectiveness of an opt-out chlamydia and gonorrhea testing program for adolescents and young adults in improving testing rates and promoting equity.

METHODS

An opt-out testing program that standardized testing to once annually for 14 to 24-year-old patients was implemented across 28 federally qualified health centers spanning 4 specialties. A quasi-experimental design using interrupted time series analyses evaluated testing and infection rates between baseline, intervention, and pandemic-associated test shortage periods. Reduction in testing inequities based on sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, and language preference were also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 57 452 encounters during the baseline, 17 320 during the intervention, and 26 993 during the test supply shortage periods were included. Testing increased from 66.8% to 81.0% (14.2% absolute increase) between baseline and intervention periods. Pediatric clinics demonstrated the largest improvement compared to other settings (absolute increase 30.9%). We found significant reductions in testing inequities for language preference (P < .001), and un-insured and public insured individuals (P < .001). More cases of chlamydia and gonorrhea were detected in the intervention period (chlamydia-29.7; gonorrhea-7.4 per 1000 patients) than in the baseline period (chlamydia-20.7; gonorrhea-4.4 per 1000 patients; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

An opt-out approach increased testing, reduced inequities between some groups and detected more infections than a risk-based approach. Opt-out testing should be considered as an approach to increase detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea and promote equity.