1
|
Lebas A, Le Fèvre C, Waissi W, Chambrelant I, Brinkert D, Noël G. Prognostic Factors in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated with Radiotherapy: Systematic Review of the Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4486. [PMID: 37760456 PMCID: PMC10526842 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2023] [Revised: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities are rare tumors with various prognostic factors. Their management is debatable due to their inconsistent results within the literature and the lack of large prospective studies. The objective of this systematic review is to analyze the available scientific data on prognostic factors concerning the characteristics of the patients, the disease and the treatments performed, as well as their potential complications, on studies with a median follow-up of 5 years at minimum. A search of articles following the "PRISMA method" and using the PubMed search engine was conducted to select the most relevant studies. Twenty-five articles were selected, according to preestablished criteria. This review provides a better understanding of the prognosis and disease outcome of these tumors. Many factors were described comparing the frequency of occurrence according to the studies, which remain heterogeneous between them. Significant factors that could orient patients to radiotherapy were highlighted. These positive prognostic factors provide valuable insight to optimize radiotherapy treatments for patients treated for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arthur Lebas
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| | - Clara Le Fèvre
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| | - Waisse Waissi
- Radiotherapy Department, Léon Bérard Center, 28 Rue Laennec, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Isabelle Chambrelant
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| | - David Brinkert
- Orthopedic Surgery Department, University Hospital of Hautepierre, 1 Rue Molière, 67200 Strasbourg, France;
| | - Georges Noël
- Radiotherapy Department, ICANS, 17 Rue Albert Calmette, 67100 Strasbourg, France; (A.L.); (C.L.F.); (I.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Simões R, Augustin Y, Gulliford S, Dehbi HM, Hoskin P, Miles E, Harrington K, Miah AB. Toxicity, normal tissue and dose-volume planning parameters for radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities: A systematic review of the literature. Radiother Oncol 2023; 186:109739. [PMID: 37315584 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2023.109739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities (STSE) are left with high incidence of toxicities after Radiotherapy (RT). Understanding the normal tissue dose relationship with the development of long-term toxicities may enable better RT planning in order to reduce treatment toxicities for STSE. This systematic review of the literature aims at reporting the incidence of acute and late toxicities and identifying RT delineation guidance the normal tissues structures and dose-volume parameters for STSE. METHODS A literature search of PUBMED-MEDLINE for studies that reported data on RT toxicity outcomes, delineation guidelines and dose-volume parameters for STSE from 2000 to 2022. Data has been tabulated and reported. RESULTS Thirty of 586 papers were selected after exclusion criteria. External beam RT prescriptions ranged from 30 to 72 Gy. The majority of studies reported the use of Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) (27%). Neo-adjuvant RT was used in 40%. The highest long-term toxicities were subcutaneous and lymphoedema, reported when delivering 3DCRT. IMRT had a lower incidence of toxicities. Normal tissue outlining such as weight-bearing bones, skin and subcutaneous tissue, corridor and neurovascular bundle was recommended in 6 studies. Nine studies recommended the use of dose-volume constraints, but only one recommended evidence-based dose-volume constraints. CONCLUSION Although the literature is replete with toxicity reports, there is a lack of evidence-based guidance on normal tissue and dose-volume parameters and strategies to reduce the normal tissues irradiation when optimising RT plans for STSE are poor compared to other tumour sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Simões
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK; Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK; University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | | | - Sarah Gulliford
- University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; University College London, London, UK.
| | | | - Peter Hoskin
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK; University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Elizabeth Miles
- Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) group, Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
| | - Kevin Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| | - Aisha B Miah
- The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; The Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Praag VM, Fiocco M, Bleckman RF, van Houdt WJ, Haas RLM, Verhoef C, Grunhagen DJ, van Ginkel RJ, Bonenkamp JJ, van de Sande MAJ. The oncological outcomes of isolated limb perfusion and neo-adjuvant radiotherapy in soft tissue sarcoma patients - A nationwide multicenter study. Eur J Surg Oncol 2023; 49:339-344. [PMID: 36085118 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with locally extensive high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas (eSTS) are often presented in multidisciplinary teams to decide between ablative surgery (amputation) or limb-salvage surgery supplemented with either neo-adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) or induction isolated limb perfusion (ILP). In The Netherlands, ILP typically aims to reduce the size of tumors that would otherwise be considered irresectable, whereas neo-adjuvant RT aims mainly at improving local control and reducing morbidity of required marginal margins. This study presents a 15-year nationwide cohort to describe the oncological outcomes of both pre-operative treatment strategies. METHODS All consecutive patients with locally extensive primary high-grade eSTS surgically treated between 2000 and 2015 at five tertiary sarcoma centers that received neo-adjuvant ILP or RT were included. 169 patients met the inclusion criteria (89 ILP, 80 RT). Median follow-up was 7.3 years. RESULTS Limb salvage was achieved in 84% of cases in the ILP group (80% for patients with amputation indication) and 96% of cases in the RT group. 5-Year overall survival was 47% in the ILP group, 69% in the RT group. 5-Year local recurrence rate was 14% in the ILP group, 10% in the RT group. Distant metastasis rate was 55% in the ILP group, 36% in the RT group. CONCLUSION We find oncological outcomes and limb salvage rates in line with existing literature for both treatment modalities. Whether the tumor was locally advanced with an indication for induction therapy to prevent amputation or morbid surgery appeared to be the main determinant in choosing between neo-adjuvant ILP or RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V M van Praag
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands.
| | - M Fiocco
- Mathematical Institute, Leiden University, Niels Bohrweg 1, 2333 CA, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Section Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - R F Bleckman
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - W J van Houdt
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R L M Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, and the LUMC, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - C Verhoef
- Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D J Grunhagen
- Erasmus MC-Cancer Institute, Department of Surgical Oncology, 's Gravendijkwal 230, 3015 CE, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R J van Ginkel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - J J Bonenkamp
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Surgical Oncology, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - M A J van de Sande
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sheoran A, Garg A, Yadav U, Kundu ZS, Sherawat R, Singla M, Nemani M, Wason D, Kulaar HS, Singha SB. Outcomes of Wide Resection of Soft-Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremity: A Retrospective Analysis. Cureus 2022; 14:e27329. [PMID: 36042997 PMCID: PMC9413370 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a rare heterogeneous group of tumors. Good functional results can be achieved with tumor excision in combination with suitable supplemental adjuvant therapies if needed. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of wide resection of STS of the extremities. Methodology In this retrospective study, a total of 139 patients diagnosed with STS of the extremities by radiological and/or histopathological study/biopsy were included. All patients irrespective of metastasis were included. Results The mean age of the patients in our study was 43.5 ± 18.89 years. Overall, the mean tumor size was found to be 11.81 ± 6.218 cm. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma was the most common histology encountered (41%). Synovial sarcoma was the second most common histology encountered (14.38%). Recurrence was observed in 14 (10.1%) patients. The overall survival was 64.7% in our study. Conclusions The surgical margin achieved during the surgery is the most detrimental factor in local tumor control, and the overall survival of the patient after resection mainly depends on the stage of the tumor.
Collapse
|
5
|
Salerno KE, Alektiar KM, Baldini EH, Bedi M, Bishop AJ, Bradfield L, Chung P, DeLaney TF, Folpe A, Kane JM, Li XA, Petersen I, Powell J, Stolten M, Thorpe S, Trent JC, Voermans M, Guadagnolo BA. Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2021; 11:339-351. [PMID: 34326023 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations addressing the indications for radiation therapy (RT), sequencing of local therapies, and appropriate dose and planning techniques for management of primary, operable, localized, soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults. METHODS The American Society for Radiation Oncology convened a task force to address 5 key questions focused on the use of RT for management of STS. These questions included indications for RT for STS of the extremity and superficial trunk; considerations for sequencing of RT with respect to surgery, dose of RT, appropriate treatment volumes and techniques; and the role of RT in management of retroperitoneal sarcoma. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Multidisciplinary evaluation and decision making are recommended for all cases of STS. RT is recommended for patients in whom there is increased risk of local recurrence of resected STS, particularly if close or microscopically positive margins are anticipated or have occurred. When RT is indicated, preoperative RT is strongly recommended over postoperative RT. Postoperative RT is conditionally recommended in specific clinical circumstances (eg, uncontrolled pain or bleeding) or when the risk of wound complications outweighs that of late toxicity from RT. Routine use of RT in addition to oncologic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma is conditionally not recommended. When RT is used for retroperitoneal sarcoma, preoperative RT is recommended, whereas postoperative RT is not recommended. CONCLUSIONS Based on currently published data, the American Society for Radiation Oncology task force has proposed evidence-based recommendations regarding the use of RT for STS in adults. Future studies will ascertain whether alterations in dosing and sequencing may optimize outcomes and quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kilian E Salerno
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.
| | - Kaled M Alektiar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York
| | - Elizabeth H Baldini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women's Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Manpreet Bedi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Andrew J Bishop
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT-MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Peter Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas F DeLaney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Andrew Folpe
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John M Kane
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - X Allen Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Ivy Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - John Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Michael Stolten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Steven Thorpe
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| | - Jonathan C Trent
- Division of Medical Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, The University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida
| | - Maria Voermans
- Froedtert & Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|