Sugammadex associated profound bradycardia and sustained hypotension in patient with the slow recovery of neuromuscular blockade - A case report -

Cardiac arrest due to coronary vasospasm after sugammadex administration -a case report

BACKGROUND

Sugammadex is a widely used medication for the reversal of aminosteroid neuromuscular blockades. Although sugammadex is generally regarded to be safe, concerns about the risk of serious complications have emerged.

CASE

A 57-year-old man without a history of coronary disease was scheduled for general anesthesia to undergo cardiac radiofrequency catheter ablation due to symptomatic persistent atrial fibrillation and flutter. At the end of the procedure, he was given 400 mg of sugammadex. A little later, the electrocardiogram showed a sudden ST elevation on the inferior leads, followed by cardiac arrest. The urgent coronary angiography demonstrated total collapse of the right coronary artery. After two injections of intra-coronary nitroglycerin, the vasospasm of the right coronary artery was completely resolved. The patient recovered without sequelae and was discharged on postoperative day 5.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should pay close attention to the potential risk of coronary vasospasm, even cardiac arrest, after sugammadex administration.

Adverse events of sugammadex that occurred in a Korean population

Background

With increasing use, the incidence of adverse events associated with sugammadex, a neuromuscular blockade reverser, is increasing. This study aimed to identify and analyze cases of adverse events caused by sugammadex reported in Korean population.

Methods

Out of a total of 12 cases detected using various keywords in the Korean Journal of Anesthesia, Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (Seoul), KoreaMed, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library-CENTRAL from 2013 to December 2020, 10 cases directly associated with sugammadex were selected.

Results

Adverse events included five cases of anaphylaxis, one case of cardiac arrest, one case of profound bradycardia, one case of negative pressure pulmonary edema, and two cases of incomplete recovery. Three patients had American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status ≥ 3, two had emergency surgery, and two had a history of allergic reaction. Neuromuscular monitoring was applied in nine cases. The average dose of sugammadex was 2.87 mg/kg, and there were six cases in which one full vial was used, regardless of the state of neuromuscular recovery. Sugammadex was administered immediately after surgery in two cases, at train of four (TOF) 0 in four cases, at TOF 3 in one case, and after evaluation of the clinical signs only with no neuromuscular monitoring in one case.

Conclusions

Even with neuromuscular monitoring, an excessive dose of sugammadex was observed. Given that adverse events tend to occur within 10 min of administration, continuous monitoring is important even after administration.