Prostate cancer biology & genomics

Differential Expression of E2F Transcription Factors and Their Functional and Prognostic Roles in Human Prostate Cancer

Given the tumor heterogeneity, most of the current prognostic indicators cannot accurately evaluate the prognosis of patients with prostate cancer, and thus, the best opportunity to intervene in the progression of this disease is missed. E2F transcription factors (E2Fs) have been reported to be involved in the growth of various cancers. Accumulating studies indicate that prostate cancer (PCa) carcinogenesis is attributed to aberrant E2F expression or E2F alteration. However, the expression patterns and prognostic value of the eight E2Fs in prostate cancer have yet to be explored. In this study, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Kaplan–Meier Plotter, Metascape, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), CIBERSORT, and cBioPortal and bioinformatic analysis were used to investigate E2Fs in patients with PCa. Our results showed that the expression of E2F1–3, E2F5, and E2F6 was higher in prostate cancer tissues than in benign tissues. Furthermore, elevated E2F1–3 and E2F5 expression levels were associated with a higher Gleason score (GS), advanced tumor stage, and metastasis. Survival analysis suggested that high transcription levels of E2F1–3, E2F5, E2F6, and E2F8 were associated with a higher risk of biochemical recurrence. In addition, we developed a prognostic model combining E2F1, E2F6, Gleason score, and the clinical stage that may accurately predict a biochemical recurrence-free survival. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that the E2F family members and their neighboring genes were mainly enriched in cell cycle-related pathways. Somatic mutations in different subgroups were also investigated, and immune components were predicted. Further experiments are warranted to clarify the biological associations between Pca-related E2F family genes, which may influence prognosis via the cell cycle pathway.

A Mini-Review of Flavone Isomers Apigenin and Genistein in Prostate Cancer Treatment

The initial responses to standard chemotherapies among prostate cancer (PCa) patients are usually significant, while most of them will finally develop drug resistance, rendering them with limited therapies. To discover new regimens for the treatment of PCa including resistant PCa, natural products, the richest source of bioactive compounds, can serve as a library for screening and identifying promising candidates, and flavones such as apigenin and genistein have been used in lab and clinical trials for treating PCa over decades. In this mini-review, we take a look into the progress of apigenin and genistein, which are isomers, in treating PCa in the past decade. While possessing very similar structure, these two isomers can both target the same signaling pathways; they also are found to work differently in PCa cells. Given that more combinations are being developed and tested, genistein appears to be the more promising option to be approved. The anticancer efficacies of these two flavones can be confirmed by in-vitro and in-vivo studies, and their applications remain to be validated in clinical trials. Information gained in this work may provide important information for new drug development and the potential application of apigenin and genistein in treating PCa.

Magnetic Fields and Cancer: Epidemiology, Cellular Biology, and Theranostics

Humans are exposed to a complex mix of man-made electric and magnetic fields (MFs) at many different frequencies, at home and at work. Epidemiological studies indicate that there is a positive relationship between residential/domestic and occupational exposure to extremely low frequency electromagnetic fields and some types of cancer, although some other studies indicate no relationship. In this review, after an introduction on the MF definition and a description of natural/anthropogenic sources, the epidemiology of residential/domestic and occupational exposure to MFs and cancer is reviewed, with reference to leukemia, brain, and breast cancer. The in vivo and in vitro effects of MFs on cancer are reviewed considering both human and animal cells, with particular reference to the involvement of reactive oxygen species (ROS). MF application on cancer diagnostic and therapy (theranostic) are also reviewed by describing the use of different magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications for the detection of several cancers. Finally, the use of magnetic nanoparticles is described in terms of treatment of cancer by nanomedical applications for the precise delivery of anticancer drugs, nanosurgery by magnetomechanic methods, and selective killing of cancer cells by magnetic hyperthermia. The supplementary tables provide quantitative data and methodologies in epidemiological and cell biology studies. Although scientists do not generally agree that there is a cause-effect relationship between exposure to MF and cancer, MFs might not be the direct cause of cancer but may contribute to produce ROS and generate oxidative stress, which could trigger or enhance the expression of oncogenes.

Long Non-Coding RNA DARS-AS1 Contributes to Prostate Cancer Progression Through Regulating the MicroRNA-628-5p/MTDH Axis

Purpose

DARS antisense RNA 1 (DARS-AS1) is a long non-coding RNA that has been validated as a critical regulator in several human cancer types. Our study aimed to determine the expression profile of DARS-AS1 in prostate cancer (PCa) tissues and cell lines. Functional experiments were conducted to explore the detailed roles of DARS-AS1 in regulating PCa carcinogenesis. Furthermore, the detailed mechanisms by which DARS-AS1 regulates the oncogenicity of PCa cells were uncovered.

Methods

Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction was performed to analyze DARS-AS1 expression in PCa tissues and cell lines. Cell Counting Kit-8 assays, flow cytometry analyses, Transwell assays, and tumor xenograft experiments were conducted to determine the regulatory effects of DARS-AS1 knockdown on the malignant phenotype of PCa cells. Bioinformatics analysis was performed to identify putative microRNAs (miRNAs) targeting DARS-AS1, and the direct interaction between DARS-AS1 and miR-628-5p was verified using RNA immunoprecipitation and luciferase reporter assays.

Results

DARS-AS1 was highly expressed in PCa tissues and cell lines. In vitro functional experiments demonstrated that DARS-AS1 depletion suppressed PCa cell proliferation, promoted cell apoptosis, and restricted cell migration and invasion. In vivo studies revealed that the downregulation of DARS-AS1 inhibited PCa tumor growth in nude mice. Mechanistic investigation verified that DARS-AS1 functioned as an endogenous miR-628-5p sponge in PCa cells and consequently promoted the expression of metadherin (MTDH). Furthermore, the involvement of miR-628-5p/MTDH axis in DARS-AS1-mediated regulatory actions in PCa cells was verified using rescue experiments.

Conclusion

DARS-AS1 functioned as a competing endogenous RNA in PCa by adsorbing miR-628-5p and thereby increasing the expression of MTDH, resulting in enhanced PCa progression. The identification of a novel DARS-AS1/miR-628-5p/MTDH regulatory network in PCa cells may offer a new theoretical basis for the development of promising therapeutic targets.