A Novel Treatment for Anterior Shoulder Instability: A Biomechanical Comparison Between a Patient-Specific Implant and the Latarjet Procedure

The Role of 3D Custom Implants in Upper Extremity Surgery

SUMMARY

As the technology of three-dimensional (3D) printing becomes more refined and accessible, multiple applications of its use are becoming more commonplace in upper extremity surgery. 3D-printed models have been beneficial in preoperative planning of complex cases of acute trauma or malunions, contributing to spatial understanding or even contouring of implants. Custom guides can also be created to assist intraoperatively with precise placement of osteotomies or arthroplasty implants. Finally, custom 3D implants have been described for cases of bone loss in the upper extremity. This can be for relatively small gaps after malunion correction or extensive defects, typically for trauma or tumor. Articular defects can also be addressed with this technology, although special considerations should be given to the implant design and longevity in these situations. Because of the relatively recent nature of 3D implants, long-term data are lacking. However, they show great promise in an expanding range of challenging clinical indications.

Comparison of Glenoid Dimensions Between 3D Computed Tomography and 3D Printing

INTRODUCTION

Glenoid dimensions can be measured in vivo with various imaging methods including two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging scans. Printing of three-dimensional (3D) models of the glenoid using imaging data is feasible and can be used to better understand skeletal trauma and complex skeletal deformations such as glenoid bone loss in patients with shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to compare measurements of glenoid dimensions on 3D CT scan reconstructed models and 3D printed models of the glenoid.

METHODS

CT scans from 62 young, male adults acquired for non-trauma-related causes were evaluated. Following volume rendering, a stereolithography model of each scapula was constructed and a 3D model was printed. Additionally, 3D CT models of each glenoid were reconstructed using dedicated software. Measurements of the maximum glenoid height and width were performed on both the 3D printed and the 3D reconstructed models. To assess intra- and interrater reliability, measurements of 15 glenoids were repeated by two observers after three weeks. The measurements of the 3D printed and 3D reconstructed models were compared.

RESULTS

Inter- and intra-rater reliability was excellent or perfect. Analysis of height and width values demonstrated a strong correlation of 0.91 and 0.89 respectively (p<0.001) for both the 3D printed models and the 3D reconstructed models. There was a strong correlation between the height and width, but no significant difference between the glenoid width and height in both models. There was no statistical significance between height and width when measurements on the two models were examined (p=0.12 and 0.23 respectively).

CONCLUSION

3D printed glenoid models can be used to evaluate the glenoid dimensions, width, and height, as they provide similar accuracy with 3D reconstructed models as provided from CT scan data.

Functional biomechanical comparison of Latarjet vs. distal tibial osteochondral allograft for anterior glenoid defect reconstruction

INTRODUCTION

Glenoid reconstruction is indicated for recurrent glenohumeral instability with significant glenoid bone deficiency. Coracoid autograft (Latarjet) and distal tibial osteochondral allograft (DTA) reconstructions have been used to successfully restore glenohumeral stability. Relative advantages and disadvantages associated with each reconstruction technique have been described. However, direct comparisons of functional glenohumeral biomechanics associated with Latarjet vs. DTA reconstruction are lacking. This study was designed to compare these 2 glenoid reconstruction techniques with respect to joint kinematics and cartilage pressure mapping using a robotic testing system.

METHODS

In accordance with institutional review board policies, human cadaveric shoulders (n = 8) were cyclically tested in the neutral position and 90° of external rotation with 60° and 90° of abduction under a 45-N joint-compression load to measure clinically relevant translations, loads, and torques. Joint contact pressure maps were obtained under a 120-N joint-compression load using pressure mapping sensors. After confirming that a 25% anterior glenoid defect resulted in glenohumeral dislocation, testing was performed to compare 3 conditions: native intact glenoid, 25% anterior glenoid defect with Latarjet reconstruction, and 25% anterior glenoid defect with DTA reconstruction. Analyses of variance and t tests were used to analyze data with statistical significance set at P < .05.

RESULTS

Significant differences in anterior translation, inferior drawer, anterior drawer, compression loads, horizontal abduction, negative elevation (adduction), and external rotation torques during cyclical testing in 90° of external rotation with 60° and/or 90° of abduction were noted when comparing the 2 different glenoid bone reconstruction techniques to native, intact shoulders. The only significant difference between Latarjet and DTA reconstructions for measured translations, loads, and torques was a significantly higher absolute maximum compressive load for Latarjet compared to DTA at 60° of abduction.

CONCLUSION

Latarjet coracoid osseous autograft and distal tibial osteochondral allograft reconstructions of large (25%) glenoid bone defects prevent failure (dislocation) and are associated with significant glenohumeral kinematic differences that largely confer less translation, load, and torque on the joint in abduction when compared to the native state. These findings suggest that these 2 surgical techniques exhibit similar glenohumeral kinematics such that each provides adequate functional stability following anterior glenoid bone reconstruction. Joint compression load and articular contact pressure distribution may favor distal tibial osteochondral allograft reconstruction for treatment of large (25%) anterior glenoid bone defects associated with shoulder instability.

Bankart Repair With Transferred Long Head of the Biceps Provides Better Biomechanical Effect Than Conjoined Tendon Transfer in Anterior Shoulder Instability With 20% Glenoid Defect

PURPOSE

To examine the biomechanical differences between labral repair with transferred conjoined tendon and transferred long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) for anterior shoulder instability with 20% bone loss.

METHODS

Twelve cadaveric shoulders were tested in sequent 5 conditions: intact, 20% glenoid defect, Bankart repair, Bankart repair with transferred conjoined tendon (dynamic conjoined tendon sling, DCS), and with transferred LHBT (dynamic LHBT sling, DLS) at 60° of glenohumeral abduction and 60° of external rotation. The physiological glenohumeral joint load was created by forces applied to the rotator cuff, conjoined tendon, and LHBT. The glenohumeral compression force and range of motion were recorded before anteroinferior force application. The anterior, inferior, and total translations were measured with 20, 30, 40, and 50 N of anteroinferior force, respectively.

RESULTS

Anteroinferior glenoid defect led to significant increase of humerus translation and decrease of glenohumeral compression force. DLS provided better resistance effect in both anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions than DCS under high loading condition (40 N, P =.03; 50 N, P <.01). Both DCS and DLS procedures could further restore glenohumeral compression force with Bankart repair (Bankart repair: 32.1 ± 4.0 N; DCS: 36.7 ± 3.2 N, P < .01; DLS: 35.8 ± 3.6 N, P =.03). No range of motion restrictions were observed relative to the normal shoulder.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the DLS and DCS techniques could reduce the anterior-inferior translation and partially restore the glenohumeral stability in anterior shoulder instability with 20% anteroinferior glenoid defect compared with Bankart repair. Under greater loading conditions, DLS provides better stability than DCS.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Shoulder stability can be restored by DLS and DCS with low load. With greater shoulder stability requirements, DLS might be a better option than DCS for anterior shoulder instability with 20% bone loss.

[3D printing in the field of shoulder surgery]

The 3D printing technology is a relatively new procedure with a high potential, especially in the field of shoulder surgery. The 3D printing procedures are increasingly being developed and also gaining new users. Principally, 3D printing procedures can be applied preoperatively in planning the surgical procedure, patient clarification and in teaching; however, the technology is increasing being used intraoperatively. In addition to intraoperative visualization of the models, 3D printing permits the use of individual and specific instruments and implants. This allows the precise transfer of the preoperative planning to the surgical procedure. Inaccuracies are mainly caused by soft tissues. The 3D printing can be beneficial in the fields of arthroplasty, shoulder instability as well as orthopedic trauma. The literature shows promising results in relation to duration of surgery, blood loss and clinical results of the procedure. On the other hand, it is still unclear which indications warrant the use of 3D printing. Other aspects that raise questions are the time of planning, the production time and the additional cost that the use of 3D printing entails. Nonetheless, 3D printing represents a meaningful enhancement of the portfolio of surgeons, which becomes highly beneficial and useful in complex situations. Furthermore, this procedure enables a certain amount of flexibility when reacting to certain circumstances.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Computed Tomography for Three-Dimensional Bone Imaging of Musculoskeletal Pathologies: A Review

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly utilized as a radiation‐free alternative to computed tomography (CT) for the diagnosis and treatment planning of musculoskeletal pathologies. MR imaging of hard tissues such as cortical bone remains challenging due to their low proton density and short transverse relaxation times, rendering bone tissues as nonspecific low signal structures on MR images obtained from most sequences. Developments in MR image acquisition and post‐processing have opened the path for enhanced MR‐based bone visualization aiming to provide a CT‐like contrast and, as such, ease clinical interpretation. The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of studies comparing MR and CT imaging for diagnostic and treatment planning purposes in orthopedic care, with a special focus on selective bone visualization, bone segmentation, and three‐dimensional (3D) modeling. This review discusses conventional gradient‐echo derived techniques as well as dedicated short echo time acquisition techniques and post‐processing techniques, including the generation of synthetic CT, in the context of 3D and specific bone visualization. Based on the reviewed literature, it may be concluded that the recent developments in MRI‐based bone visualization are promising. MRI alone provides valuable information on both bone and soft tissues for a broad range of applications including diagnostics, 3D modeling, and treatment planning in multiple anatomical regions, including the skull, spine, shoulder, pelvis, and long bones.

3D printing in shoulder surgery

Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a novel modality with the potential to make a huge impact in the surgical field. The aim of this paper is to provide an overview on the current use of 3D printing in shoulder surgery. We have reviewed the use of this new method in 3 fields of shoulder surgery: shoulder arthroplasty, recurrent shoulder instability and orthopedic shoulder traumatology. In shoulder arthroplasty, several authors have shown that the use of the 3D printer improves the positioning of the glenoid component, even if longer clinical follow-up is needed to determine whether the cost of this system rationalizes the potential improved functional outcomes and decreases glenoid revision rates. In the treatment of anterior shoulder instability, the literature agrees on the fact that the use of the 3D printing can: enhance the dept and size of bony lesions, allowing a patient tailored surgical planning and potentially reducing operative times; allow the production of personalized implants to restore substantial bone loss; restore glenohumeral morphology and instability. In orthopedic trauma, the use of 3D printing can be helpful to increase the understanding of fracture patterns, facilitating a more personalized planning, and can be used for resident training and education. We can conclude the current literature regarding the use of 3D printed models in orthopedic surgery agrees finding objective improvements to preoperative planning and to the surgical procedure itself, by shortening the intraoperative time and by the possibility to develop custom-made, patient-specific surgical instruments, and it suggests that there are tangible benefits for its implementation.