Issues in assessing products for the treatment of hemophilia - the intersection between efficacy, economics, and ethics

Trends in coagulation factor replacement therapy and medical costs in patients with haemophilia in Taiwan: A population-based, 15-year analysis

INTRODUCTION

Taiwan's National Health Insurance Program approved reimbursement of prophylactic coagulation factor replacement therapy (CFRT) for patients with haemophilia (PWH) in 2014.

AIM

To examine 15-year trends and the impact of reimbursement for prophylactic CFRT on its utilization and related medical costs for PWH.

METHODS

We analysed Taiwan's National Health Insurance Database from 2003 to 2017. We included patients with haemophilia A (PWHA) or B (PWHB) receiving coagulating factor. Female patients were excluded because of small sample size. We analysed annual consumption of CFRT units and medical costs. High proportion of days covered (PDC) with CFRT served as an indicator for prophylactic treatment since it reflects routine use of CFRT. We applied interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) to evaluate the impact of reimbursement for prophylactic CFRT on usage patterns and medical costs.

RESULTS

We included 896 male PWHA and 181 male PWHB, with 38.1% and 37.0% aged under 18 years, respectively. By ITSA, we found the trends in coagulation factor consumption and PDC significantly increased after reimbursement for prophylactic CFRT in both PWHA and PWHB (p values for trend change <0.05). The overall medical costs per patient increased with increasing consumption of coagulation factor; however, ITSA revealed non-CFRT cost decreased after reimbursement of prophylactic CFRT for both PWHA and PWHB (p values <.05).

CONCLUSION

Reimbursement for prophylactic CFRT facilitated growth in rates of prophylactic CFRT and increased related costs, but curbed rising non-CFRT costs. These findings provide strong grounds for future cost-effectiveness studies to leverage prophylactic CFRT for its therapeutic benefits.

Factors affecting the quality, safety and marketing approval of clotting factor concentrates for haemophilia

Selecting therapeutic products for the treatment of haemophilia follows the process of obtaining market approval of products submitted to the scrutiny of a regulatory agency. In well-resourced countries, key decisions on whether a product is sufficiently safe and of high quality are made by highly expert and well-resourced agencies, such as the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). In countries lacking such agencies, well-informed decisions can still be made through an appreciation of the key issues affecting the quality, safety and efficacy of haemophilia products. A number of well-established principles may then be applied in order to make a choice. In this review, reflecting principles outlined by the World Federation of Hemophilia, we outline the key features in determining the acceptability of therapeutic products for haemophilia in order to ensure an optimal choice in all the environments providing haemophilia care.

Prophylactic versus on-demand treatments for hemophilia: advantages and drawbacks

INTRODUCTION

Early long-term prophylaxis is the standard of care to prevent joint bleeding and chronic arthropathy in patients with severe hemophilia. Areas covered: Despite the obvious prophylaxis advantages upon the clinical outcomes, there are still several drawbacks to be addressed for the optimal patients' compliance. Frequency of treatment due to short half-life of conventional FVIII and FIX concentrates, difficult venous access, adherence to the prescribed therapy and costs may represent significant critical issues. The development of inhibitors also makes replacement therapy ineffective, preventing patients from receiving long-term prophylaxis. This paper will review these drawbacks and the tools to overcome these limitations, mainly thanks to the use of extended half-life products and the development of novel non-conventional therapeutic approaches. Expert commentary: The use of extended half-life products may help in reducing the burden of the frequent intravenous administration and in better tailoring an individualized prophylaxis. The development of novel therapeutic approaches, like the bi-specific antibody mimicking the coagulation function of FVIII or inhibition of anticoagulant proteins may facilitate prophylaxis treatment not only in patients with inhibitors, but also in severe hemophilia patients without inhibitors. Exciting opportunities are emerging for improving prophylaxis in hemophilia.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of hemophilia A and B

INTRODUCTION

Replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates is the most appropriate and effective way to treat bleedings of Hemophilia A&B to prevent chronic arthropathy. Unfortunately, the short half-life (HL) of FVIII/IX concentrates obliges the patients to receive frequent infusions, a big concern for children. The development of inhibitors in about 30-45% of hemophilia A and in 3-5% of hemophilia B patient is the major adverse event of replacement therapy.

AREAS COVERED

In the last few years, new rFIX have been developed with HL. New rFVIII concentrates are displaying small increase of PK characteristics. The new bio-engineering methods allowed the production of molecules fused with Fc fragment of IgG or Albumin or linked to PEG. A new approach to improve hemostasis is represented by Mab against TFPI and small RNA interfering with Antithrombin synthesis. Another innovative drug seems to be the new bi-specific antibody which mimics FVIII function in linking FXa and FX to tenase production.

EXPERT OPINION

The emerging drugs for hemophilia treatment seem to be very promising. The extended half-life will improve the adherence of patients to therapy. Accurate post-marketing surveillance studies will be necessary to check the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of these new molecules.